Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

東です。 > 最終的には、本家wikiページに掲載いただければと希望します。 はい。そうします。本家wikiページの日本語版を（誰かが）作って そこからリンクする形かな。 > ＊縁石 > 提案では、歩道と横断歩道の接続部にあるノードに対してbarrier=kerbとkerb=*を付けるとあります。 > wikiを見ると、barrier=kerbはウェイにつけることが想定され、 > 歩道と横断歩道の接続部にあるノードに対しては、barrier=kerbを付けずに、kerb=*だけを付けるのではないかと思います。 >

Re: [talk-au] Competing relations - similar areas.

I have not examined each way for their use in other relationships ... I expect some of them are. In general I would prefer to separate the 'natural' relationships (woods, lakes etc) from administrate ones simply because any changes to one probably should not change the other. And it would be

[talk-au] Extended Permission for South Australian Government Data

Recently I updated some information in OSM using data from South Australian Suburb Boundaries and Conservation Reserve Boundaries but I had inadvertently failed to note that the recent data was provided under a CC-BY-4.0 licence that was not covered by the explicit permission we had been granted

Re: [talk-au] Competing relations - similar areas.

I don't recall that particular edit but I recall some edits of administrative boundaries, including national parks and state forests where I was trying to disentangle landcover from the administrative boundaries, but I tried to leave the landcover or natural=wood areas as closely as I could to

[talk-au] Competing relations - similar areas.

Hi, I have noticed there are two relations with similar areas and both tagged landuse=forest. Relation5929494 created by down12under changeset 37053382 2/7/16 source given as 'aerial imagery', later edited by cleary and TheSwavu. Relation 5929493 created by down12under changeset 36918772

Re: [OSM-ja] MTKDLut 使っている方いらっしゃるでしょうか

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 08:04:01AM +0900, 下り専門 wrote: > 下り専門です。 > > MTKDLutは使っていないので話がずれてたらごめんなさい。 > > GPSBabel 自体が直接（というか仮想シリアルポート経由で）m241から読み込みできます。 > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Holux_M-241 > > -i に m241 を指定します。 > http://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-1.5.0/The_Formats.html > >

Re: [Talk-it] Semi OT - bus, pokemon e gtfs

cascafico wrote > Da poco mi sto interessando alle risorse per i navigatori multimodali ed > ai > relativi dati del trasporto collettivo in standard GTFS. Escludendo pochi > virtuosi (Lecce, Milano, Reggio Calabria,Bologna, Trento...), ho notato un > generico sentimento di "chiusura". Il rilascio

[Talk-it] R: Altezza edifici?

Ciao Cesare ... hai provato con Ferrara. Li trovi nel catalogo open data della Regione Emilia-Romagna: http://dati.emilia-romagna.it/dataset/stima-fabbisogno-energetico-edifici-ferrara - Messaggio originale - Da: "cesare gerbino" Inviato: ‎22/‎07/‎2016 13:27 A:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Grootschalige luchtfoto's

On zondag 24 juli 2016 23:39 Jakka wrote: > Op 24/07/2016 om 14:59 schreef Ruben Maes: > > Dag iedereen > > > > Iedereen weet ondertussen wel dat Agiv recente orthofotomozaïeken heeft die > > we mogen gebruiken om te mappen, en die een veel betere resolutie en > > alignering hebben dan Bing. > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Grootschalige luchtfoto's

Op 24/07/2016 om 14:59 schreef Ruben Maes: Dag iedereen Iedereen weet ondertussen wel dat Agiv recente orthofotomozaïeken heeft die we mogen gebruiken om te mappen, en die een veel betere resolutie en alignering hebben dan Bing. Hebben jullie ook al de grootschalige mozaïeken gezien? [1]

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What types of sources can be listed that are OK to use for OSM?

James, I think your list of "definitely OK" sources is a good one. The rest of your list does a good job of reflecting how complex geodata rights can be. In most cases, OSM elects to use a conservative interpretation of the situation in order to avoid any possible danger to the project. I will

Re: [Talk-it] Suddivisioni di Roma

Riepilogo 15 circoscrizioni (chiamate municipi): relazioni boundary (i membri sono confini) con amin_level 10 116 zone toponomastiche (rioni, quartieri, suburbi e zone): relazioni multypoligon (i membri sono percorsi) senza admin_level e con place=quarter

Re: [OSM-talk-be] newbie tag area and footway everywhere ...

On zondag 24 juli 2016 15:43 Ruben Maes wrote: > It looks a bit overkill, it will be a while before I go to that level of > detail, but I don't object if he wants to do that. > > Apart from that: > • ... • And changeset comments! For God's sake, calling everything "Update" isn't going to help

[Talk-it] Guado

Lungo i vari navigli nella zona tra Turbigo ed il Ponte di Oleggio (inserisco un riferimento geografico perche' non ho foto e chi li ha visti puo' farsi un'idea di cio' che voglio descrivere) ci sono dei punti che sono fatti per guadare. Dalle alzaie si staccano e scendono a livello del canale

[Talk-in] National Highway relations for measuring distance [was: National Highway relations are unacceptably huuuuge!]

Hi, As of now I have reverted and repaired the two state-wise relations to as it was (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40997091 ). Sorry for any confusion here. The southbound distances of the Telanganite sections of NH44 and

Re: [Talk-in] National Highway relations are unacceptably huuuuge!

Hi, Apologies if I have not seen to this earlier, but if measurements from OSM are crucial, then what about a route_master structure for the NHs and SHs (according to the guidance at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members)? It would allow each direction to have its own

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

Il giorno ven, 22/07/2016 alle 14.35 +0200, Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: > In attesa che arrivi l'ok all'import dalla ML imports (o che passi il > giusto tempo per pensare ad un silenzio-assenso), ho aggiunto un pò di > info sulla pagina wiki >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] newbie tag area and footway everywhere ...

On donderdag 21 juli 2016 11:26 Jakka wrote: > Hi, > > newbie tag area and footway everywhere ...even in backyards > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.03767764526553/3.2040104268684955 > > It is like http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway > > Is it the

[OSM-talk-be] Grootschalige luchtfoto's

Dag iedereen Iedereen weet ondertussen wel dat Agiv recente orthofotomozaïeken heeft die we mogen gebruiken om te mappen, en die een veel betere resolutie en alignering hebben dan Bing. Hebben jullie ook al de grootschalige mozaïeken gezien? [1] Tussen 2013 en 2015 werden er gemaakt in het

Re: [Talk-in] National Highway relations are unacceptably huuuuge!

It appears there was an oversight in one of changesets for the NH44 relations, where I should have checked that the members were still in the original NH44 relation. The error occurred when I was ordering the NH44 relation. > On 24 Jul 2016, at 11:27, I Chengappa

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

wiki個人ページにまとめていただきありがとうございます。 最終的には、本家wikiページに掲載いただければと希望します。 あと気がついたところを。 (wikiの議論ページは見る人が少ないのと、直接wikiを書き換える前に議論が必要だと思うので、引き続きtalk-jaに投げます) ＊縁石 提案では、歩道と横断歩道の接続部にあるノードに対してbarrier=kerbとkerb=*を付けるとあります。 wikiを見ると、barrier=kerbはウェイにつけることが想定され、

Re: [Talk-in] National Highway relations are unacceptably huuuuge!

Heinz_V has made relevant comments in a forum post at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17851=3. I've not been paying attention to most road / route relations, but I understand that there has been a coherent mapping of national highways in India, mostly due to him, which has now been

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

sent from a phone > Il giorno 24 lug 2016, alle ore 10:42, Stefano ha scritto: > > Più che altro uuid sarebbe una chiave quasi permanente rispetto all'id osm.. si, quasi permanente. E cosa ci comunica questa chiave? Un civico/indirizzo? Una posizione? Un ente, fonte di

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

Il giorno 24 luglio 2016 10:36, Simone Cortesi ha scritto: > > potrebbero, al momento dell'import, generare un hash che tengono in > memoria in Regione e tale hash contiene l'ID del nodo, e la versione > attuale. poi, ogni tanto controllano che l'hash generato fresco e >

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

Il 08/07/2016 12:41, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: Tempo fa veniva suggerito in ML di usare la tabella degli indirizzi della Pubblica Amministrazione [1], essendo questi capillarmente distribuiti sul territorio nazionale e soprattutto in IODL 2.0 [1]

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

On Jul 24, 2016 10:32, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 24 lug 2016, alle ore 08:08, Alessandro Palmas < alessandro.pal...@wikimedia.it> ha scritto: > > > > E proprio perchè vorrebbero sperimentare alcune modalità di gestione diretto

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

Il 23/07/2016 23:20, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi ha scritto: Sicuri che il source non vada sul changeset solo? Giusto. Ma mi era stato detto così, nella prima discussione sui civici di Ferrara. Se concordate, lascio perdere il source su tutti i nodi. Inoltre penso sia assolutamente da evitare il

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-24 8:08 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas : > Il 23/07/2016 20:56, marco bra ha scritto: >> >> IMHO, l'id non mantiene le aspettative e non produce nel tempo effetti >> benevoli per il db osm, lo vedrei utile solo se gestito direttamente su osm >> dall'autorità

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] plugin cadastre JOSM

Le 07/07/2016 à 17:16, HELFER Denis (SNCF RESEAU / SIEGE SNCF RESEAU / DT ALCA APPUI PERFORMANCE) a écrit : Bonjour la liste Depuis que le cadastre a modifié ses paramètres (voir http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Le-Calque-Cadastre-le-retour-td5860247.html) , le plugin cadastre JOSM, notamment

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

Il 23/07/2016 20:56, marco bra ha scritto: IMHO, l'id non mantiene le aspettative e non produce nel tempo effetti benevoli per il db osm, lo vedrei utile solo se gestito direttamente su osm dall'autorità che produce il dato, ma ho perplessità anche in quel caso; in un db nel quale chiunque