Hi everyone,
My name is Mihai, I’m a map analyst at Telenav.
As far as my French goes, in the last emails there have been some discussions
regarding some of our edits in Canada, especially with changeset #41680708,
ways 438953406 and 438953407. I can confirm that we’ve been doing edits using
ou
Simply said,
Looks like the original ways were linked to other ones by someone from Telenav
(according to reasonable image interpretation) but they should not according to
actual feature on the ground. The user is asking the changeset to be reverted,
especially since the Bing imagery identified
Daniel is correct, he says the roads dont join and he's been there
physically.
On Sep 20, 2016 5:52 AM, "Begin Daniel" wrote:
> Simply said,
>
> Looks like the original ways were linked to other ones by someone from
> Telenav (according to reasonable image interpretation) but they should not
> a
On 2016-09-20 03:46 AM, Mihai Iepure wrote:
>
> I can confirm that
> we’ve been doing edits using our ImproveOSM tool, using the
> /source=improve_osm_tn/ k/v pair.
It would be nice if they were actual improvements, rather than breaking
the map. Claiming Bing aerial imagery as a source in an area
Hi Mihai
I also commented about how the telenav contributors edited using improve_osm.
Using infos coming from navigation software tools client usage, we have to be
careful. It can be a service road in an industy courtyard, a forest road
accessible only to specialized equipment, etc. It is then i
Improve_osm derived modifications Quebec + Labrador
I see a lot of highway=service roads added on industrial company sites. They
seem in general ok.I also see residential highways added with the correct
spelling of the street name (source:name=geobase.ca ? )example Rue des Cèdres
(id=425557318)
Hi Mihai!
You have not acknowledged that you understand why we are not satisfied with the
edit done by biancah_telenav.
Would you please ask biancah to "disimprove_osm" and revert changeset
41680708. There are 3 major errors in that changeset.
I have some real (surveyed) improvements to add to
I would like to purpose OSM uses the same standard as this Wikipedia
Article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communities_in_Nunavut
I really believe that *name=** should be written in english (Community).
Inuktitut name if different from the name = *alt_name*
Inuktitut syllabics = *name:in
That's how French is handled in Ottawa so I agree.
Cheerio John
On 20 Sep 2016 4:00 pm, "John Marshall" wrote:
>
> I would like to purpose OSM uses the same standard as this Wikipedia
> Article.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communities_in_Nunavut
>
> I really believe that *name=**
Hi,
@dega - Let me talk with Bianca about that changeset and resolve the issue.
@Pierre - Thanks for checking those ways and for your suggestions. We'll review
them and come back with an answer once they're done.
Mihai
-Original Message-
From: dega [mailto:gade...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tues
10 matches
Mail list logo