Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

On 23 November 2015 at 13:27, Paul Norman wrote: > CC BY 3.0 doesn't allow you to do this, as it requires you to impose > conditions not present in the ODbL. When I publish my new work, I add all the required attributions and statements required by the CC-BY 3.0 license (in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] imagerie mapbox

pour ma partie L'outil uMap permet de créer facilement des cartes personnalisées. On place des points/lignes/polygones sur sa carte avec en fond de carte un rendu basé sur OSM peu de monde (en tout cas chez les nouveaux utilisateurs) sait que l'on peut rajouter un fond type "vue aérienne". et

Re: [Talk-in] Roads in India: How complete is OpenStreetMap ?

The data team at Mapbox is also looking at how we can improve the highway coverage. The public tracker is here: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/138 The first step might be to collect existing maps or stats for each state and compare them to OSM to identify where more work is needed. On

Re: [Talk-in] Roads in India: How complete is OpenStreetMap ?

Hi Arun, Can you point out what percent of NH and SH [by state] has mapped in India ? For NH length per state. http://morth.nic.in/showfile.asp?lid=1624 For SH length per state.

[OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result publicly. To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap Contributors under the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote: > To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results > contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap > Contributors under the Open Database License > http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright;.

Re: [Talk-br] duvida de tunnel=culvert

2015-11-23 1:58 GMT-02:00 Helio Cesar Tomio : > Mas depois disto aparece a mensagem "tunel em objeto suspeito" na > verificação do JOSM. > > Em cruzamentos destes tipos, é errado mapear como ponto? Sim. tunnel=* só pode ser utilizado em caminhos, não em pontos (nós). Por isso

Re: [Talk-in] Roads in India: How complete is OpenStreetMap ?

Most of Haryana, Gujarat and Rajasthan were mapped by HeinzV and Oberaffe I think.. Karnataka, Tamil nadu, Kerala and Maharashtra are decently mapped too... The rest needs a lot of work... On 23 Nov 2015 7:04 a.m., "Yogesh योगि" wrote: > Hi Naveen, > > Blog from

Re: [Talk-in] Roads in India: How complete is OpenStreetMap ?

Hi Naveen, Blog from Mikel shows that in India only 21% of roads are mapped. [ref: CIA factbook ] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/how-complete-is-openstreetmap/ https://gist.github.com/tcql/0d7ad9b32afbea76f615 Is there any further analysis by states or type of road ? The India:Roads OSM wiki

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

On 11/22/2015 6:19 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote: >To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results >contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap >Contributors under the Open Database License

[Talk-br] duvida de tunnel=culvert

Estava tentando corrigir erros tipo "Cruzamento hidrovia/estrada" que apareceram na verificação do JOSM. Coloquei no cruzamento da highway com o waterway, um nó com: tunnel=culvert layer=-1 Mas depois disto aparece a mensagem "tunel em objeto suspeito" na verificação do JOSM. Em cruzamentos

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [SOTMTG2015] SOTM en cours au Togo - dans le cadre de la mission de renforcement de capacités du Projet EOF

Merci pour vos retours Stéphane et Djakaridja ! Stephane, nous avons filmé toutes les présentations et les publieront dès que possible. Pour commencer nous publierons toutes les présentations pays du SOTM BF de Juillet 2015 sur Viméo, elles sont en lignes, nous allons les relayer sous peu. D'ici

Re: [Talk-cz] Nové pojetí dálniční sítě

Dne 22.11.2015 v 07:51 Pavel Machek napsal(a): > Ahoj! > >> navrh popisu cest - pokud je neco spatne napiste do konference >> >> >> >> Spravny popis road od 1.1.2016 >> >> a) Motorway Dálnice >> >> must_have:highway=motorway,ref=D1,oneway=true >> >> don't_have:motorroad=*

Re: [Talk-it] S.a.S. come scriverla?

Il 21/11/2015 19:07, girarsi_liste ha scritto: > Nel tag Operator=* ho il nome di una società con aggiunta Sas, ovvero > società in accomandita semplice. > > Sono in dubbio se inserire il nomesocietà con aggiunta Sas, oppure > estendere l'acronimo come dovrebbe essere per i santi dei nomi delle >

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Sent from my android device so quoting is crap! -Original Message- From: Colin Smale To: Daniel Kastl Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:57 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What3words On 2015-11-22 13:49, Daniel Kastl wrote: The

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Andy, you are right, if you accept that the 3 or 4 people who have participated in this discussion are representative of OSM at large. But the most active inhabitants of this list and others are limited to maybe 10 people, who frequently use authoritative-sounding language like "we are not

[Talk-GB] traffic calming

There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming features. I asked him to revert the undiscussed mechanical edit which he has done. He is not subscribed to talk-gb, he asked me to forward a link to his

Re: [talk-ph] Mapping all lanes of a toll plaza

Unless there is an "island" that separates them outside the toll booth building, I believe creating a separate way for that purpose makes it too cluttered. I second ":lanes" tagging scheme. In addition, we can place separate nodes for each toll booth instead as what was done in Cavitex and MCX.

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Hi Daniel, I didn't actually say there was any point in putting it in OSM, I just said "w3w exists, what could/should we do?" You argument about being able to derive the w3w from the geometry is valid, but requires the use of the proprietary API. But as you mention their resolution is 3m,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] imagerie mapbox

On 22/11/2015 06:45, Laurent Combe wrote: > effectivement vos cartes sont réussies > dans mon cas le but est de pouvoir ajouter à uMap une vue aérienne en > complément du rendu "carte" (avec les données OSM et le rendu osm-fr). > Mon but n'est pas d'utiliser d'autres fonds de carte de Mapbox,

Re: [Talk-cz] Nové pojetí dálniční sítě

To sice ano, ale mě se léty osvědčuje pravidlo, že žádná informace je lepší než špatná informace. Ono se totiž špatně rozlišuje, co je informace z importu a co už někdo ručně prošel. K Dne 22.11.2015 v 09:11 Marián Kyral napsal(a): Tak dálnice je dálnice ne? Předpokládá se 130. Pokud tam je

Re: [Talk-cz] možnost doplnění ref k rozcestníku

jo pujde to JizVelmiBrzy:), behem pristiho tydne zkusim naimplementovat nejake zakladni editacni rozhrani. 2015-11-19 14:41 GMT+01:00 Zdeněk Pražák : > Mám dotaz, > > zda bude možné doplnit číslo rozcestníku k nahraným fotografiím rozcestníků > >

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Colin, Beside the different opinions about proprietary and closed technology, what is the point to add these 3 words as a tag? I don't really understand the benefit, because the relation between location (coordinates) and their address system is

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 15:47, Dave F. wrote: > On 22/11/2015 14:32, Colin Smale wrote: > >> I just said "w3w exists, what could/should we do?" > > The consensus appears to be "Nothing" Agreed. --colin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 13:34, Colin Smale wrote: On 2015-11-22 13:18, Maarten Deen wrote: I also don't understand this:"It's a non-hierarchical system. The problem with latitude and longitude coordinates is that if you make a mistake when writing them down you will be completely lost. But with our

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 22 November 2015 at 11:07, Colin Smale wrote: > I guess there would be no objections to someone adding > addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? > Ok, so turning it around, what would be the benefit of this? Why bother? What purpose does it serve? The only purpose

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

As an infrequent poster to osm-talk I think I'm excluded from Colin's "3 or 4 people" and "most active participants" and am not in the Fetted Inner Core (at least I wasn't the last time I checked!) - however my views are similar to the ones previously, in this case, very sorry Colin! :-) In

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 22/11/2015 14:32, Colin Smale wrote: I just said "w3w exists, what could/should we do?" The consensus appears to be "Nothing" Dave F. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [SOTMTG2015] SOTM en cours au Togo - dans le cadre de la mission de renforcement de capacités du Projet EOF

Merci à tous pour ce volontariat et bon fin de formation au Togo. la communauté OSM-Bouaké (Côte d'Ivoire) vous êtes reconnaissant d'avoir séjourné du 28 septembre au 09 octobre 2015. Bien de choses à toutes les communautés réunies. et coucou a

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

I guess there would be no objections to someone adding addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? Surely the established addressing systems are also closed and proprietary, in the sense that some organisation with a sanctioned monopoly tells YOU what your address is - you

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Hi, On 11/22/2015 11:39 AM, Colin Smale wrote: > I have heard a few times recently about what3words, a new novel > coordinate/addressing system for the whole world. It's a blatant attempt at commercializing location. Under the (rather tasteless) guise of finally being able to bring Christmas

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 13:49, Daniel Kastl wrote: > The difference in their proprietary system (if you want to call > address systems in in countries closed and proprietary) is, that when > their API (and "algorithm") goes away, you won't find any address > anymore. It's totally unreliable to depend

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 22/11/2015 12:51, Colin Smale wrote: ...and once again, as seems to be the norm in OSM, any minority interest which is not supported by the oligarchy gets mercilessly shot down. ... except it's not _just_ the "oligarchy", is it? No-one on this list seems to have a good word for

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Hi Colin, Am 2015-11-22 um 11:39 schrieb Colin Smale: > I have heard a few times recently about what3words, a new novel > coordinate/addressing system for the whole world. > > Could/should we be doing anything to support/facilitate/implement this > system in OSM? No. It is a propietary system

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

I've read articles about it a few times, and for fun I sometimes post my w3w location on Facebook. But I don't know if it's achieved much traction. One maps site that I use from time to time, www.streetmap.co.uk, includes w3w addresses for searching and on its 'convert co-ordinates' screen,

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 22/11/15 11:13, Steve Doerr wrote: Maybe our search box could do the same, either directly or through integrating into Nominatim. I wouldn't suggest storing w3w addresses in the main OSM database though. As I said we have been asked to do this at least twice and we have refused on both

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

Hi, just for reference in May I saw a discussion on okfn-labs on "opening up" w3w by doing an open location code system (different from the Google one). https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-labs/2015-May/001623.html See also https://github.com/pudo/open3words/issues/1 Regards, Stefano

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:07:43 +0100 Colin Smale wrote: > I guess there would be no objections to someone adding > addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? Only in cases where such "adress" is displayed on the ground.

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

2015-11-22 13:16 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole : > > While developing a similar system to w3w might be an attractive proposal, > have you checked what the w3w patent covers given that the thoughts in the > referenced issue would seem to result in at least a very similar system? >

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:16:24 +0100 Colin Smale wrote: > > > On 2015-11-22 13:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:07:43 +0100 > > Colin Smale wrote: > > > >> I guess there would be no objections to someone adding > >>

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > > I guess there would be no objections to someone adding > addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? > > Surely the established addressing systems are also closed and > proprietary, in the sense that some organisation

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] imagerie mapbox

Salut, Dans mon cas, j'utilise l'IGN pour ça. J'ai une clé API pour umap.openstreetmap.fr et j'ajoute sur chaque carte un calque correspondant. C'est pas libre mais cet usage est autorisé et le quota est loin d'être atteint. Léo Le 22/11/2015 06:45, Laurent Combe a écrit : > effectivement vos

[OSM-talk] What3words

I have heard a few times recently about what3words, a new novel coordinate/addressing system for the whole world. Could/should we be doing anything to support/facilitate/implement this system in OSM?

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 22/11/15 11:07, Colin Smale wrote: I guess there would be no objections to someone adding addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? I don't see the point, and it's certainly not ground truthable. Integration with nominatim for example, which will need to use the w3w

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 13:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:07:43 +0100 > Colin Smale wrote: > >> I guess there would be no objections to someone adding >> addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? > > Only in cases where such "adress"

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] imagerie mapbox

peux-tu décrire la façon d'obtenir cette clé en cherchant j'ai trouvé ça http://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/depot/api/tutoriel/WMS_ARCGIS.pdf en en allant sur le site je ne vois pas comment obtenir une clé d'accès autre que temporaire et limité à des usages de développement Laurent Le 22 novembre

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 11/22/2015 2:39 AM, Colin Smale wrote: I have heard a few times recently about what3words, a new novel coordinate/addressing system for the whole world. Could/should we be doing anything to support/facilitate/implement this system in OSM? No. Other people might talk about the

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 12:07, Colin Smale wrote: I guess there would be no objections to someone adding addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? Reading about what it is, it is just a lookup between some random three words and a location. We don't map addr:latlon=51.34,3.45 in

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

While developing a similar system to w3w might be an attractive proposal, have you checked what the w3w patent covers given that the thoughts in the referenced issue would seem to result in at least a very similar system? Am 22.11.2015 um 13:00 schrieb Stefano: > Hi, > just for reference in May

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 13:18, Maarten Deen wrote: > On 2015-11-22 12:07, Colin Smale wrote: > >> I guess there would be no objections to someone adding >> addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ? > > Reading about what it is, it is just a lookup between some random three words

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On 2015-11-22 13:42, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:16:24 +0100 > Colin Smale wrote: > > On 2015-11-22 13:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:07:43 +0100 > Colin Smale wrote: > > I guess there would be

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

I see many merits in What3Words solution. I don't think it should be incorporated into OSM en-masse but a place adding its address:what3words=pull.donkey.cart should be fine in my view, just like them adding phone= and even the disappearing fax= Þann 22.11.2015 18:08, skrifaði Peter

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/15 19:06, Rob Nickerson wrote: >There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by >Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming >features. Thanks Chris, To summarise for those who don't want to get stuck in the tagging mailing list, Gerd

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/2015 19:37, Chris Hill wrote: Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then indicated that he would discuss the tags on tagging@ - indeed he suggested leaving his edit and discussing it on tagging@. I wanted also to make it clear that tagging@ is not the best place to discuss

[OSM-talk] [State Of The Map Togo] It was yesterday !

-Sorry for cross-posting- Hi all, After SOTMBF edition in Burkina Faso (July 2015), the 2nd african SOTM occured yesterday in Togo. You can find more about countries and projects presentations through these hashtags (and get pictures) : #map4tg : https://twitter.com/search?q=%23map4tg

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

>There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by >Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming >features. Thanks Chris, To summarise for those who don't want to get stuck in the tagging mailing list, Gerd spotted that traffic calming (speed bumps,

[OSM-talk-fr] Récupération cartes OSM pour utilisation dans un GPS

Bonjour, Comment peut-on récupérer les données OSM d'une zone pour les convertir en un fichier utilisable par un GPS ? Dans mon cas un format Rtmap pour un sportiva. J'avais bien trouvé Mobile Atlas Creator, mais il s'appuie sur mapquest, et mapquest avoue

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Voies récentes dans Fantoir, absentes d'OSM

Bonjour, Le 21/10/2015 14:59, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : De: "DH" quelle bonne idée pour occuper ses longues soirées d"hiver ! :) La version d'octobre 2015 du Fantoir a été intégrée par Christian côté BANO. Conséquence directe, la page des voies récentes

[Talk-TW] 社群組織理事會選舉開放登記

Hi 各位 Mapper， 第一屆台灣開放街圖社群大會理監事選舉即日起開放登記參選，表單如連結： https://goo.gl/hxEOBn 。根據選舉辦法，登記分為推舉和自行登記兩種，請填寫被推舉人的 OpenStreetMap id 和對 OpenStreetMap 的貢獻，這些資訊之後會在選舉公報上呈現。登記的過程中，我們也會釋出已經登記的名單。 先前打算先開放加入會員的管道再開放登記參選。將採用 KKTIX 作為會員加入的管道，目前已經向 KKTIX 送出免年費服務方案申請，等待結果中。所以我們決定在在生效前，先開放參選登記。請各位踴躍跳坑、推坑。 Happy Mapping

Re: [Talk-cz] Nové pojetí dálniční sítě

Ahoj! > >> a) Motorway Dálnice > >> > >> must_have:highway=motorway,ref=D1,oneway=true > >> > >> don't_have:motorroad=* > >> > >> conditional:int_ref=E 55 > >> > >> defaults: lines=4,maxspeed=130,source:maxspeed=CZ:motorway > > Spis "lanes", ne? > > > >

Re: [Talk-cz] Mapování tras KČT - stav

Dne Ne 22. listopadu 2015 11:05:53, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > On 11/19/2015 11:14 AM, Karel Volný wrote: > > teď jsme obcházeli nějaké hrady, před Bukovinou se nám ztratila > > značka, tak > > Coz je zrovna oblast kterou v taskmanu jeste nikdo neprosel. ... a zůstane nedokončená, neb informace

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: > On 22/11/2015 12:51, Colin Smale wrote: > ...and once again, as seems to be the norm in OSM, any minority interest > which is not supported by the oligarchy gets mercilessly shot down. > ... except it's not _just_

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22 November 2015 at 19:33, Chris Hill wrote: > > Gerd did the work you describe but went ahead with an almost nation-wide > mechanical edit without any prior discussion or description. That's why I > asked him to revert it. Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then >

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/15 20:17, Steve Doerr wrote: On 22/11/2015 19:37, Chris Hill wrote: Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then indicated that he would discuss the tags on tagging@ - indeed he suggested leaving his edit and discussing it on tagging@. I wanted also to make it clear that tagging@ is

[OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre contributeurs de Paris-IdF 26/11/2015

Bonjour à tous, Nous nous retrouvons jeudi 26 novembre 2015 à partir de 19h30 à la FPH 38 rue Saint Sabin, Paris 11. Le reste des informations est sur le forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewtopic.php?f=18=2381 ou sur l'agenda du libre http://www.agendadulibre.org/events/10318 Donat

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] imagerie mapbox

faut-il ou pas rajouter cette possibilité dans la page uMap du wiki ? Pour un simple affichage en fond, je ne pense pas qu'on soit encore dans les limites prévues ci-dessus. Il faut voir côté IGN... j'avoue ne pas tout comprendre à leurs conditions d'utilisation, mais pour certains

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/2015 20:55, Chris Hill wrote: On a mailing list or IRC channel that relates to the area the mechanical edit is proposed to be. So in a GB-wide edit, talk-GB and #osm-gb makes sense to me. But the amendments to the *tags* aren't GB specific. It needs to be discussed with as wide an