--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Only if the lanes are marked as separate ways, which they
normally
wouldn't be for a narrow road.
They should be, anything other than lanes=2 should be tagged properly, lanes=2
is implied as that is the usual case for most roads.
deleted
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
wynndale at lavabit.com writes:
The new Bad data proposal is a scheme to mark traced aerial photography or
maps as out of date or otherwise unreliable so that they can be obscured
in editors and users dont copy details into the OSM database reducing its
accuracy.
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Instead of calling it Bad data I would say it inaccurate or
outdated data. Map
data traced from Yahoo imagery is better than no data at
all. But some common
schema for tagging the quality of mapped features would be
Hi,
2009/8/26 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Anything tagged source=yahoo* or source=landsat should be treated worst
than source=survey and people should source the data properly otherwise
others will assume the data was traced if hi-res imagery is available.
are you sure? What about
On 26/08/2009, at 1:38 PM, John Smith wrote:
I agree, we need more tags to describe the railway crossing's
feature set, boom_gate=no, lights=no etc, however this is a special
case for stop signs because they will exist either side of the
junction and never applies to the railway line.
On 26/08/2009, at 1:10 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
I think the point here is that of being able to see easily what has
been
applied to the data. Nodes and ways are easy to see, but this extra
data
is probably not so obvious as you would not know that a node ON the
way
actually has extra
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Ondrej Novy wrote:
Anything tagged source=yahoo* or source=landsat should be treated worst
than source=survey and people should source the data properly otherwise
others will assume the data was traced if hi-res imagery is available.
are you sure? What about really old
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Ondrej Novy n...@ondrej.org wrote:
are you sure? What about really old survey and newest image
from yahoo? :) It doesn't implied that yahoo is older
then survey!
New sat imagery isn't exactly new, Yahoo recently added hi-res imagery for an
area near here, and the imagery
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
This brings up an interesting question, when you're
finding the
nearest junction to use for stop key on a node, what
counts as a
junction? It's going to be a node which belongs to the
current way and
at least one other way
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
could we simply extend source=survey with a year
and source=landsat similarly?
source=survey09
source=landsat_trace09
source=yahoo_trace08
I'd seperate the information out into 2 key pairs:
source=survey
survey_date=20090826
or
source
On 26/08/2009, at 7:31 PM, Liz wrote:
we've had a lot of trouble in Au because group X decided that
unmarked was
landsat and they would mark survey, and group Y decided that
unmarked was
survey and they would mark landsat
I take the approach that unmarked is landsat, yahoo, or something
Ondrej Novy wrote:
2009/8/26 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Anything tagged source=yahoo* or source=landsat should be treated
worst than source=survey and people should source the data properly
otherwise others will assume the data was traced if hi-res imagery
is
:
source=survey
survey_date=20090826
or
source=yahoo
imagery_date=20070101
or just source:date=*
some places i have been over so many times (like the road to canberra, the
roads to adelaide, and the road to work) that the actual date is meaningless,
but the last year i did the journey is
we
There was a change on the highway key wiki page, that interferes with the
concept presented here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Key%3Ahighwaydiff=317630oldid=317451
User Dieterdreist has changed the description so the highway tag is no longer
used for the objective physical
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
I also think we need a consensus that tag descriptions for tags that are
used more than 100.000 times shall not be changed without a proposal.
Regards
Lulu-Ann
it needs something stronger than a proposal
which is why earlier this month we discussed
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:23:22PM +0200, lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
User Dieterdreist has changed the description so the highway tag is
no longer used for the objective physical description but for a
subjective feeling of importance.
[...]
I ask you to support the reverting of the unapproved
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
some places i have been over so many times (like the road
to canberra, the
roads to adelaide, and the road to work) that the actual
date is meaningless,
It's not meaningless, and if it changes just update the survey date.
but
Hi,
lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
There was a change on the highway key wiki page, that interferes with
the concept presented here.
Have you read the following relevant thread on talk-de:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2009-August/052258.html
Since both you and dieterdreist are
Why tag survey date on every single object? Why not give survey date when
uploading a changeset, and then the 'history' window displayed by most OSM
editors could show it.
That way it won't get out of date if someone else comes along and makes a change
but omits to carefully update 'source' on
Hi!
Congracts everyone with amount of input OSM recieves this year.
Volunteers join us every day and changesets grow in detaility and
quality. However, there is one set back and those are two things -
mapnik render and NameFinder. While mapnik slowly gains additional
renders for POIs and stuff,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Ed Avis wrote:
Why tag survey date on every single object? Why not give survey date when
uploading a changeset, and then the 'history' window displayed by most OSM
editors could show it.
That way it won't get out of date if someone else comes along and makes a
change
Hi Frederik,
lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
There was a change on the highway key wiki page, that interferes with
the concept presented here.
Have you read the following relevant thread on talk-de:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2009-August/052258.html
Since both you and
On 26/08/2009 12:44, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Anyway, so far I have heard about two efforts of getting NameFinder
running again. First one is just performance improvement for old one
(done by David Earl)
I have been trying to rebuild the index, but the first two attempts
failed (well, the
2009/8/26 Jonas Krückel o...@jonas-krueckel.de:
Nestoria (Ed Freyfogle) also offered help for a new search/namefinder on
SOTM. And Geocommons made their geocoding service open source.
So maybe we should start a kind of working group who looks at all the offers
and possibilities and then get
On 26/08/2009 13:19, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
2009/8/26 Jonas Krückel o...@jonas-krueckel.de:
Nestoria (Ed Freyfogle) also offered help for a new search/namefinder on
SOTM. And Geocommons made their geocoding service open source.
So maybe we should start a kind of working group who looks at
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Why tag survey date on every single
object? Why not give survey date when
uploading a changeset, and then the 'history' window
displayed by most OSM
editors could show it.
So until editors update to include that info you could use the
Lulu-Ann wrote:
User Dieterdreist has changed the description so the highway tag is
no longer used for the objective physical description but for a subjective
feeling of importance. Millions of highway tags would need to be
reviewed if this change without proposal and approval would become
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
deleted
There seems to be some diary spam too...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lararefaeli/diary/7668
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Dieter and any other supporter of the concept is free to start a proposal
to change the most important tag of all. But please stay in the common
conventions for such an important change and give *all* users the chance to
vote, and do not make changes on the wiki because of an agreement of few
running again. First one is just performance improvement for old one
(done by David Earl) and second one is completely new effort (by
Twain).
The one I've been working on (suggestions for a name for the project
gratefully received off list BTW) is mostly functional. I was
expecting to open it
On 26/08/09 13:12, Jonas Krückel wrote:
Nestoria (Ed Freyfogle) also offered help for a new search/namefinder
on SOTM. And Geocommons made their geocoding service open source.
So maybe we should start a kind of working group who looks at all the
offers and possibilities and then get one
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:39:12PM +0200, Marc Schütz wrote:
But the point is that the users already have voted by the way they
actually use the highway tag. What dieterdreist did was just change
the wiki to match the reality, so that it is actually useful as a
documentation.
The wiki should
Hi,
lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
Dieter and any other supporter of the concept is free to start a
proposal to change the most important tag of all. But please stay in
the common conventions for such an important change and give *all*
users the chance to vote, and do not make changes on the wiki
Am 26.08.2009 um 14:49 schrieb Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu:
On 26/08/09 13:12, Jonas Krückel wrote:
Nestoria (Ed Freyfogle) also offered help for a new search/namefinder
on SOTM. And Geocommons made their geocoding service open source.
So maybe we should start a kind of working group who
Hi,
2009/8/26 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
Anyway, so far I have heard about two efforts of getting NameFinder
running again. First one is just performance improvement for old one
(done by David Earl) and second one is completely new effort (by
Twain).
I started working on a different
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests
where there is
Hi,
Jonas Krückel wrote:
Yep, sorry, I don't know why i missed that list, David already gave me
a hint know. I will subscribe asap.
I'm not on that list either (yet) so let me continue abusing talk:
There's also an OpenSearch Suggestion Service by Wolfram Schneider
wsc...@googlemail.com
Frederik wrote:
I think that a discussion on the mailing list reaches more people than a
proposal on the Wiki, so I don't see why the latter should be preferred
;-)
The wiki workflow includes the talk list several time, for the rfc and for the
start of voting, so the wiki process includes
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests
where there is
I use
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path/Examples
and have concluded to use
highway=path, wheelchair=no
The first tag classifies the way as being an unpaved and small path while the
second clarifies that you can't use it for anything on wheels.
Are you sure?
Roland Olbricht wrote:
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks
you may add a visibility tag, if it's rough terrain also sac_scale may
apply
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
On 26 Aug 2009, at 7:25 , Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again,
but, how
do people in general tag vague,
The wiki should not only match the reality, it should suggest proper
behaviour to (new) users. Text like
If a section of road in the US looks like a motorway then it can
be tagged as a motorway without researching its funding sources or
driving up and down the road looking for
Le mercredi 26 août 2009 à 09:56, John Smith a écrit :
Anything tagged source=yahoo* or source=landsat should be treated worst
than source=survey and people should source the data properly otherwise
others will assume the data was traced if hi-res imagery is available.
What does survey mean?
I just made this tool that I think can help for audio/photo mapping :
It parses a gpx trace, scans a folder for audio/photo (and why not
video) files, and creates waypoints accordingly.
I have been looking for such a tool, and thought I would do it myself,
since I couldnt find one.
I decided to
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
What does survey mean?
The page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source doesn't
list that
value.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Annotation
___
talk
2009/8/26 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
The wiki should not only match the reality, it should suggest proper
behaviour to (new) users. Text like
If a section of road in the US looks like a motorway then it can
be tagged as a motorway without researching its funding sources or
Renaud Martinet wrote:
I guess that the highway tag used to describe physical features
of different types of roads back when OSM was quite UK-centric.
Nope - UK highway tagging, which was of course the original, has always largely
been aligned to administrative classifications.
On 08/26/2009 10:19 AM, Roland Olbricht wrote:
I use
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path/Examples
and have concluded to use
highway=path, wheelchair=no
The first tag classifies the way as being an unpaved and small path...
It does nothing of the sort. unpaved would require
There seem to be three issues here:
1. Vandalism - perhaps we'd have a better discussion without the emotive
language.
2. Wiki vs mailing list: I use both - but the mailing list appears
automatically in my in-tray every day and gets read whenever I have time to
log on; the wiki seems to need me
Thanks Mike, wise council.
What I think we have here is a disagreement, a deep seated discussion
which has been taking place over the entire history of the project, and in many
forums.
IMO, the wiki should reflect the current collective thinking. If the collective
thinking is in disagreement,
2009/8/25 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
I just tried to apply the 'architects' convention' of steps 'always' being
from bottom to top. Then for unrelated reasons I reversed the way. Unlike
'oneway' this does not reverse the direction of the steps - i.e. the software
doesn't know about
Hello,
I have seen an advertisement on german website mobile.de I made a screenshot:
http://imgur.com/Rej1m
Is the map on background from OSM?
Ali
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Deal all,
voting is opened:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/geological=palaeontolog
ical_site
Best regards
Marcello B.
Proposal-RFC Start: 2009-08-12
2009/8/26 lulu-...@gmx.de:
Hi Lulu,
I'm happy that you finally put your edits to this list. Actually
before I was changing the page I was trying to involve as many
contributors as possible. I not only posted on talk but also on
talk-de and also on talk-it there was a note about this discussion.
2009/8/26 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
Whatever historically the Tag:Highway page has recommended should continue to
be the main recommendation,
for the time being. Discussion on changes can take place in the Talk page,
and in separate proposals.
Tag:Highway can give a general
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
In Italy (at least
in Rome) they are often engraved marble plates.
Standard signs in italy are supposed to be black on white with a thin
blue border, but there are still lots of old marble plates and even
names
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:22 PM, James Livingstondoc...@mac.com wrote:
On 26/08/2009, at 1:38 PM, John Smith wrote:
This brings up an interesting question, when you're finding the
nearest junction to use for stop key on a node, what counts as a
junction? It's going to be a node which belongs
2009/8/26 lulu-...@gmx.de:
I counted 4 pro votes on the talk list - I do not consider this to be
commen consensus.
As Dieterdreist wrote himself, he considers his changes as a proposal.
and there were no (0) Con-votes. There is (till now) no formal
procedure to change the definition of a
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
If we are to use the stop key, I think those
conditions will need to be explicitly spelt out, so that
you can process the data.
Which is tagging for routing
El Miércoles, 26 de Agosto de 2009, Alilo escribió:
Hello,
I have seen an advertisement on german website mobile.de I made a
screenshot:
http://imgur.com/Rej1m
Is the map on background from OSM?
Yep, it looks perfectly like a screenshot of the mapnik rendering at zoom
level 6.
I think
The one I've been working on (suggestions for a name for the project
gratefully received off list BTW) is mostly functional. I was
expecting to open it for testing on the geocoding list some time next
week when it has finished indexing the most recent planet import
however given the timing
2009/8/26 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El Miércoles, 26 de Agosto de 2009, Alilo escribió:
Hello,
I have seen an advertisement on german website mobile.de I made a
screenshot:
http://imgur.com/Rej1m
Is the map on background from OSM?
Yep, it looks perfectly like a
2009/8/26 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 26/08/2009, at 7:31 PM, Liz wrote:
we've had a lot of trouble in Au because group X decided that
unmarked was
landsat and they would mark survey, and group Y decided that
unmarked was
survey and they would mark landsat
I take the approach that
I thought we already discussed here on the talk mailing list a few weeks ago
that highway=* is usually based on road importance in most countries? I know
that that the change to the wiki was even announced here. So I'm quite
surprised by the delayed contrary reaction.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2009/8/26 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
Whatever historically the Tag:Highway page has recommended should continue
to be the main recommendation,
for the time being. Discussion on changes can take place in the Talk page,
and in
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You also seem to be saying that routing software should
work out
*for itself* which junction the stop sign applies to. I
disagree - the
mapper on the ground should be able to enter this
information in the
database.
Then we
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You also seem to be saying that routing software should
work out
*for itself* which junction the stop sign applies to. I
disagree - the
mapper on the
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two important differences:
1) The meaning of a particular way or node is separate from
the value
of is_in. On the other hand, the meaning of a requirement
to stop is
NOT separate from knowledge of the junction to which
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:06 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Besides why should you care about needing this explicit information, if it's
rendered you will see a sign, you will also see the nearest junction and your
mind can put 2 and 2 together. A computer can do the exact same
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You're asking why should we tag things explicitly? Because
we're
building a database. A huge, complex database that's used
by lots of
That's just a straw man argument, you keep building the same thing up again and
again but it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Besides, I asked you personally why you cared, why do you care, or how will
it benefit you personally how a stop sign is marked?
My apologies, I
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies, I misinterpreted your question why should
you care
about needing this explicit information. To answer your
question, I
do not care personally. It will not benefit me personally
whatsoever
how a stop sign is marked.
2009/8/26 Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com:
The council are also interested in correcting errors in their own data given
that today they are largely corrected via public complaints and subsequent
site surveys. If someone has some wizzy ideas on how to determine the
difference between the
Probably been looking at the quality of the OSM data...
http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/cartech/mapping-australia-one-road-at-a-time-20090825-extj.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Cosmic Charade wrote:
OSM however is stalling woefully on my humble 2GB Atom powered Ubuntu
netbook. Has anyone had any success with JOSM on such a platform?
yes, but I use debian and xfce as desktop.
however the screen is so small you need to learn about fullscreen, the
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
I've RTFA ;)
They aren't going to do all rural and remote towns like this, just cities. If
they do do all rural/remote towns it will cost a lot of money and take a lot of
time and effort and I don't see a commercial justification for it.
I
On 26/08/2009, at 7:44 PM, John Smith wrote:
One example given was do you search on google to rent a house,
generally no one does, they use a specialist search engine that is
built for rent listings.
That reminds me of something I was wishing for a couple of months ago,
trying to find a
In Switzerland they have a site called http://www.search.ch even though most
of it is only available in German or French, like the wikipedia or weather
integration.
The real-estate map is great but they have not been able to get all the local
companies to use their service.
Forgot to mention that if you hover over a public swimming pool it even gives
you the water temperature, something very important in Switzerland ;-)
On Wednesday 26 Aug 2009 13:14:43 Evan Sebire wrote:
In Switzerland they have a site called http://www.search.ch even though
most of it is
Liz wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Cosmic Charade wrote:
yes, but I use debian and xfce as desktop.
however the screen is so small you need to learn about fullscreen, the
keyboard shortcuts and see the optometrist as well
I use Ubuntu with xfce so a similar setup but it runs like a dog on
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Mike Smith mikesm...@dominoconsultant.org wrote:
Has anybody explored the possibility
of getting access to data from
the Australian government owned mapping company PSMA?
Link is here... http://www.psma.com.au/
I think most of us would be aware of PSMA, but I think any
Sorry to drag up this thread, but it's become relevant again.
--- On Wed, 20/5/09, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote:
There is some contention where the coastline ends, and
where the river begins.
From a practical stand point, coastlines are treated differently to other
similar ways in
Hallo,
Michael Buege wrote:
Folgende Anfrage ist bei mir eingegangen.
Kann dem Manne jemand helfen?
Geocoding gibts bei OpenRouteService und bei Cloudmade (also Adresse -
lat/lon), und den Rest kann er sich mit OpenLayers selber dazubasteln
(lassen) - eine plug play-Loesung fuer die
Hallo.
Am Mittwoch, 26. August 2009 schrieb Peter Körner:
Wir haben in unserem Ort eine Landsrtraße, welche kurvig mitten durch
den Ortskern führt (aka Alzeyer/Mainzer/Wormser Straße). Zusätzlich
gibt's eine Umgehungsstraße (aka Bahnstraße), jedoch nur als gut
ausgebaute Ortsstraße definiert
Am 25. August 2009 22:15 schrieb Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de:
Also:
man_made=pier
+ access=... (für Landverkehr, so ne Art pedestrian area)
+ mooring=... (Anlegestellen, abschnittsweise für Seeverkehr)
Dieser Vorschlag sorgt für Inkonsistenzen im vorhandenen Schema. Die
haben wir zwar auch
fastfood waere das letzte, womit ich so eine eisdiele in verbindung bringen
wuerde. warum nicht amenity=ice_cream?
Weil du fast-food mit Hamburgern Pommes in verbindung bringst? Was ist
mit dem China-Mitnehm-Imbiss - auch fast-food? Oder dem kleinen
Pizza-Hut hier, der auch nur
Falk Zscheile schrieb:
man_made=pier
+ access=... (für Landverkehr, so ne Art pedestrian area)
+ mooring=... (Anlegestellen, abschnittsweise für Seeverkehr)
Dieser Vorschlag sorgt für Inkonsistenzen im vorhandenen Schema. Die
haben wir zwar auch an anderen Stellen, aber man muss sie ja
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hallo,
Michael Buege wrote:
Folgende Anfrage ist bei mir eingegangen.
Kann dem Manne jemand helfen?
Geocoding gibts bei OpenRouteService und bei Cloudmade (also Adresse -
lat/lon), und den Rest kann er sich mit OpenLayers selber dazubasteln
(lassen) - eine plug
Hallo
In deinem Fall scheint es mir so als könnte man einfach die Klassifizierung
vertauschen. Interessant wäre dann noch, wie der normale Verkehrsfluss von
Süd-Ost (L 414) aussieht. Gibt es da nennenswerten Verkehr nach Richtung
Alzey? Jedenfalls sollte eine secondary auch nicht einfach
Moin Georg,
Moin,
Rainer Knaepper schrieb:
Moin Martin,
restaurant ist daher auch in unserem Vorschlag nicht vorgesehen,
wir sehen es als eine Untergruppe von café bzw. fast_food
fast_food finde ich recht grenzwertig. In welchen Landstrichen
bekommt man in Eiscafés was anderes als
Am 26. August 2009 09:34 schrieb Rainer Knaepper rain...@smial.prima.de:
Mit fast_food=keine_Sitzgelegenheit zur Unterscheidung habe ich dann
aber mal ein ernstes Problem. Soll ich alle die MacDoofs und BKs jetzt
als Restaurant taggen? Sorry, da klappen sich mir die Fußnägel hoch.
hehe... +1!
Hallo doppelte Wegesucher,
Andre Hinrichs schrieb vor einiger Zeit:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Steffen Wolf:
Was Euch noch fehlt, und da weiss ich auch keinen rechten Weg, ist die
Moeglichkeit, die Beseitigungen einzutragen, d.h. die GPX-Datei zu
kuerzen.
Ich denke, es
Am 25. August 2009 23:54 schrieb Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de:
Zwei kleine Ergänzungen:
- Statt aerialway ([Luft]seilbahnen) bitte aeroway
Natürlich, so war's auch gemeint. :-)
Gruß,
Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
Martin Simon wrote:
Gerade dort wäre es sinnvoll, mit einem eigenen Wert für Modellpisten
unterhalb des Schlüssels aeroway zu arbeiten - gerade wenn, wie du
schreibst, die Übergänge teils fließend sind. Der Unterschied wäre
dann Der Platz hat zwei Landebahnen vs. der Platz hat eine
Rainer Knaepper schrieb:
Soll ich alle die MacDoofs und BKs jetzt
als Restaurant taggen? Sorry, da klappen sich mir die Fußnägel hoch.
McDo hatte ja früher mit dem Slogan Das etwas andere Restaurant
geworben... ;-)
MfG
Michael.
___
Talk-de
Garry schrieb:
wie taggt man einen Modellflugplatz? Habe dazu nichts gefunden.
[...]
Es macht Sinn für die Startbahn ganz normal eine runway zu taggen, wie
bei jedem anderen Flugzeug auch.
Dies stellt sicher das sie auch in den bestehenden Anwendungen
dargestellt werden - auch in
Mirko Küster schrieb:
Bring dafür meinetwegen etwas spezielles für den Modellflug auf den Weg. Das
kann ja unter Aeroway bleiben. Oder besser noch unter Sport oder Freizeit.
Aber erstens ist das absolut irritierend wenn ich in der Karte
Minilandebahnen vorfinde die quasi breiter als lang
Am Mittwoch 26 August 2009 11:07:50 schrieb Michael Kugelmann:
für mich ist
klar, daß ein Modellflugplatz anders getaggt werden muß (!) als ein
normaler Flugplatz - trotz aller luftverkehrstechnischen und sonstigen
Vorschriften!
+1
___
Talk-de
1 - 100 di 310 matches
Mail list logo
