[Talk-transit] Bus stops not in naptan

2009-09-18 Per discussione Ed Loach
Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan? I verified 2 last night when out walking that I could see on the Mapnik layer only to find when I got back that they were two that I added in the dim and distant past (last December), so I'd verified my own additions.

Re: [Talk-transit] Bus stops not in naptan

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Childs
2009/9/18 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk: Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan? I verified 2 last night when out walking that I could see on the Mapnik layer only to find when I got back that they were two that I added in the dim and distant past (last

Re: [Talk-transit] Bus stops not in naptan

2009-09-18 Per discussione Thomas Wood
Just tag is per the normal OSM methods. physically_present=yes means nothing on a non-naptan stop, since its assumed to exist by merely being in the database. 2009/9/18 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk: Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan? I verified 2 last

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Shaun McDonald
On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:13, Frankie Roberto wrote: Then, make a node on each track to represent where the trains stop. There can be more than one of these if there are a few stopping points (eg platform 1a, 1b). Tag this railway=stop. All of these stopping points, plus the platforms,

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Childs
2009/9/18 Frankie Roberto fran...@frankieroberto.com: 2009/9/18 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org Its very difficult as London Bridge is based on about 6 layers with random escalators, lifts and ramps connecting it up. I'm thinking the building should only cover parts with a roof on and hence

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Thomas Wood
I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the front of the train stops. Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there was too poor also. 2009/9/18 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org: 2009/9/18 Frankie Roberto fran...@frankieroberto.com: 2009/9/18 Peter

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Thomas Wood
Maybe we should have door marks, ie Rather than say the train stops here say where the doors should be; I've seen these marked on the platform in some parts of the world and parts of the Tube have automatic doors fixed to the platform! The in-tube parts of the Jubilee line extension, I doubt

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Childs
2009/9/18 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk: Peter asked: Anyone got a Zoom Layer beyond level 19 so I can see what I'm doing and pace the station out.. JOSM. I think you can just keep zooming in. It also displays the length (and bearing) of the current way you're adding. Useful in some

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Miller
On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Thomas Wood wrote: I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the front of the train stops. Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there was too poor also. Sounds good. How about the following:- A railway=stop node

Re: [Talk-transit] London Bridge

2009-09-18 Per discussione Shaun McDonald
On 18 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Peter Miller wrote: We then have enough information for people to play trains! If the station has multiple levels then each element should have a layer tag and we will need to consider how one manages a single level (concourse) where one side has a level entrance to

Re: [talk-ph] please revert this user's edit (Re: Fwd: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal(assistance required in various countries))

2009-09-18 Per discussione ian lopez
Regarding cleaning up and/or removing some tainted data, it could be a tricky one. I did some cleanup in Ashton Fields in Calamba (and added landuse and a road stub for future reference); Ponte Verde near the STAR tollway interchange in Santo Tomas (where there used to be some edits from

Re: [talk-ph] please revert this user's edit (Re: Fwd: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal(assistance required in various countries))

2009-09-18 Per discussione maning sambale
BTW, we're lucky that we don't have to deal with people like RR8. Instead, all we need now is some understanding and consensus. Yep, the RR8 issue seems to be a deliberate vandalism. I don't think this is the same situation with deck and anthony's edits. Overeagerness maybe the word. --

Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Marloue Pidor
Yup, we did seminars/workshops because only few people knew OSM in Davao and some who are aware of it don't know how to edit the map. Maybe in Manila's case, you don't need seminars/workshops because you have many experienced contributor in your area. Maybe a pre-mapping party meeting will do to

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attribution of data for use on TV

2009-09-18 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 23:19 -0500, tele...@hushmail.com wrote: My question is what type of attribution is appropriate? I have no problem informing my end-users where I get the data. More than happy to do that. However, do I need to attribute while the application is used on-air? Screen

Re: [OSM-talk] Train station names: Place Station ou just Place ?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Ed Avis
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes: What is the actual convention about railway stations names ? do we have to write the word Station in the name itself or not ? Is it not implied by the tag railway=station or building=train_station ? Following the general rule that the name shouldn't

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Körner
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side?

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Steven Le Roux
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.comwrote: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side?

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Maarten Deen
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side?

[OSM-talk] proposed counter-vandalism / moderation list?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Miller
In the UK we have had a significant number of counter-productive edits recently, including both mistakes and vandalism. There have also been recent issues in Ireland and Iceland and probably in other places that we are not yet aware of. On talk-gb we have been discussing the merits of a

[OSM-talk] Intro video with Potlatch flash page

2009-09-18 Per discussione Sam Vekemans
Hi, Before i forget again... Is anyone working on getting an intro to OSM video(s) to play as an option when the user has to decide on if to use the 'edit live (and mess up :)' or edit with save (and timeout error :) ) Might be a good idea, so its like a mini mapping intro', then the user could

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Lester Caine
Peter Körner wrote: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side?

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Jonathan Bennett
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side? OSM also never tells you to turn 180 degrees across a motorway central reservation, then drive off the side of a

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Lester Caine
Jonathan Bennett wrote: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side? OSM also never tells you to turn 180 degrees across a motorway central reservation,

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peteris Krisjanis
2009/9/18 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk: Jonathan Bennett wrote: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side? OSM also never tells you to turn 180 degrees

[OSM-talk] Requirement for GPS Device at Kerala, India

2009-09-18 Per discussione Sajjad Anwar
Hello. We are planning a Mapping Party. The first one is a kind of micro. We are mapping the entire campus of National Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala, India. The second is mapping our city (Calicut, Kerala, India ; http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=11.2535lon=75.8357zoom=13) and

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Footnav - new 3D project aimed at countryside users

2009-09-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I'm glad to see that this project is moving on and especially that it's using Qt :) However, I get a compile error with revision 2: Me too. In SRTM.h there is: #include GL.h But in maths.h I see this instead: #ifdef __APPLE__ #include gl.h #else #include GL/gl.h #endif Quite

[OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Gary68
PLEASE X-POST TO TALK-GB, i am not registered there. tnx! hi, i just finished version 2 of UserActivity, a program that monitors actions in a certain area. there are new reports and drawn maps to be seen in/via the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UserActivity new: - map mode -

Re: [OSM-talk] Train station names: Place Station ou just Place ?

2009-09-18 Per discussione d f
I believe the usage of the building should be explicitly defined, so station should be used. Most people who disagree are discussing it from the point of view of using the map for the sole purpose of using a train. This is not the case. My home town station has the same name as at least two

Re: [OSM-talk] Train station names: Place Station ou just Place ?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Emilie Laffray
2009/9/18 d f fac63te...@yahoo.com I believe the usage of the building should be explicitly defined, so station should be used. Most people who disagree are discussing it from the point of view of using the map for the sole purpose of using a train. This is not the case. My home town

[OSM-talk] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 released

2009-09-18 Per discussione Doru Julian Bugariu
Hi, NaviPOWM 0.2.3 was released. You can find it at http://sourceforge.net/projects/navipowm Here what changed since 0.2.2 fixed bugs: - 2783863: OSM validation failure - 2789178: Do not exceed min / max lon / lat for osmosis split batch. - 2793291: snap to road - 2832238: displayed speed

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Data Liberation Front - beyond amazing

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
At the end of the day I'm still not sure what bulk downloading means apart from tagging every single road in a country and offering a kml file for it. As best as I can gather Ed seem to think anything less seems to be ok, or am I reading his responses wrong?

Re: [OSM-talk] Train station names: Place Station ou just Place ?

2009-09-18 Per discussione d f
Hi Emilie/Elena I see your point of view. Thanks Dave F. From: Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com To: d f fac63te...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, 18 September, 2009 14:51:54 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Train station names: Place Station ou just Place ? On

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Gary68
dear richard, yes, that's an idea. i added it to the wish list on the wiki page. now that the first real version is stable let's see what comes up. and i am sure there will be new features. although i stumbled upon the first doubts regarding the time slot analysis. One user thought that to be a

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione MP
I got http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/gary68/useractivity.pl and I notices some bugs: You are missing #!/usr/bin/perl at first line I fixed it and then I got: Undefined subroutine main::bzopen called at ./useractivity.pl line 1168. You have to use use Compress::Bzip2; also

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Gary68
hi martin, thanks for the feedback. 1.) this #! thing doesn't work for me... i added it to the script nevertheless. 2.) bzip2. you are right. i just didn't run it with a zipped file so i didn't notice. 3.) yeah, yeah. you know how it is. i expanded the usage string a bit. the wiki page told a

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Andrew Ayre
#! is called a shebang and allows you to run a script without having to specify which program runs it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix) Your wiki page shows that you specify perl on the command line, so the shebang isn't needed if the shell can find perl, but it's typical to add it

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Mikel Maron
Nice start! Agreed that filtering for users outside the social network of OSM is going to be incredibly useful. These are new users, who are (most unintentionally) causing issues, and folks who haven't earned trust in the community yet. Would it be possible to give a whitelist of trusted users

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione gary
Funny i used which first. Doesn t work -- Urspr. Mitt. -- Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc. Von: Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com Datum: 18.09.2009 21:52 #! is called a shebang and allows you to run a script without having to specify which program runs it.

Re: [OSM-talk] Evolution of a map

2009-09-18 Per discussione Valent Turkovic
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:00:29 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: And more generally (with the option to use Mapnik-style rendering): http://www.geofabrik.de/gallery/history/index.html How to get Croatia and two of best mapped cities (Zagreb and Osijek) in Croatia in selection box? Can you

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Anthony
That onramp isn't even connected: http://cloudmade.com/maps?lat=52.502802lng=13.277653zoom=18directions=52.502259876407635,13.276575207710266,52.49494458610386,13.267847299575806travel=carstyleId=1 And there's no restriction against this similar move:

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Anthony
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: Haha. Nice one. Maybe you can? There is no line in the middle of the road preventing crossing the road (see also the car turning a little south). I do assume there is a no left turn sign at the side of the road, but from

Re: [OSM-talk] Requirement for GPS Device at Kerala, India

2009-09-18 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Viernes, 18 de Septiembre de 2009, Sajjad Anwar escribió: We are mapping the entire campus of National Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala, India. [...] We would need GPS devices. Can anyone help? You should read: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GPStogo Best, --

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Richard Fairhurst
Lester Caine wrote:  Me thinks it is time for a hall of shame on the OSM site, with links like this and hopefully the correct solution on OSM? http://googlemapsfail.tumblr.com/ cheers Richard -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal (assistance required in various countries)

2009-09-18 Per discussione Rob
Thomas Wood wrote: Hi list, Attention was drawn to the OSM user RR8 last night on IRC. It appears that they have been producing /apparently/ deconstructive edits at a high frequency since late Saturday evening (server time). Edits primarily are the reclassification of highways to a different

Re: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal (assistance required in various countries)

2009-09-18 Per discussione Someoneelse
Rob wrote: Was just looking at the stats report and happened to notice this account is editing again after a 15 day quite period. Not checked the regions or validity at all yet but given the past history I though I would give a heads up. Thanks for that - it's been mentioned on Talk-GB

Re: [OSM-talk] UserActivity / Vandalism etc.

2009-09-18 Per discussione Gary68
hi, i have to think about new users first. how long to monitor, what will be showed etc. it also might imply some storage of local data - as well as a whitelist would. i am not sure about a whitelist. good can turn into evel at least. but of course that's the worst case. since the tool is called

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] [Fwd: Sprekers Software Freedom Day 2009/ OpenStreetMap Gebruikersdag Gendo, Amsterdam bekend]

2009-09-18 Per discussione bas
Rob, OK, jammer Quadcopter zou wel erg gaaf zijn! Kan je niet van gedachten/plannen veranderen ... ? :) Had ik je al verteld dat hier de opnames staan van de quadcoptervan de OpenStreetMap Gebruikersdag in mei: http://www.vimeo.com/6032738 Tot morgen hopelijk met ... :) -- Groeten Bas! Bas

Re: [talk-au] post code boundaries

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
I just figured out a quicker way to do postcode imports, especially in the larger postcode areas that you can't easily download the area in one go because it would exceed one of the download restrictions, although I'm not sure if this is possible in the stable version of JOSM or not. I load the

Re: [talk-au] post code boundaries

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
2009/9/18 Ian Wills swani...@gmail.com: Tell me about it! Having worked for the post office in my youth, I can tell you that Postcode boundaries are often idiosyncratic. The boundary represents an easy way for the postie to walk, not a rational suburb boundary. In my own case, when I moved

Re: [talk-au] post code boundaries

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
2009/9/18 Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com: Interesting, would that imply that the post code boundaries are unlikely to be running down the centre of the road ? i.e one side of the street in one postcode and the other in a different post code ? A lot of postcodes I've been fixing/adding

Re: [talk-au] post code boundaries

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
Also postcode 0862 had 3/4 or more of the boundary missing, 0862 takes up a good chunk of the NT... http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/254326 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] unexpected consequence of merging admin boundary and road

2009-09-18 Per discussione Liz
http://osm.org/go/uN5Scwuk- unexpected consequence of merging admin boundary and road the section of the Illawarra highway immediately west of the railway crossing at Robertson has been merged into the admin boundary which gives this result on Navit the road is not displayed, so I'm going to

[talk-au] Gatton, QLD

2009-09-18 Per discussione Lindley Bowers
I spent a bit of time driving around Gatton the other day. There are some roads there now and because it was night, I didn't catch many street names. This is the first town I've done from scratch so I don't know if I've done ok or done a royal mess. Anyway, I'm being bugged by the

Re: [talk-au] Gatton, QLD

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
2009/9/18 Lindley Bowers lindleybow...@gmail.com: I spent a bit of time driving around Gatton the other day. There are some roads there now and because it was night, I didn't catch many street names.  This is the first town I've done from scratch so I don't know if I've done ok or done a royal

Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-18 Per discussione John Smith
I received a reply about the cost to rent a plane, about 230GBP for one hour and the airport was close to the place they were photographying and it was mostly a PR stunt. Due to the sideways angle they are having difficulty rectifying images and that side of things is being worked on however

Re: [talk-au] Gatton, QLD

2009-09-18 Per discussione James Livingston
On 18/09/2009, at 10:03 PM, John Smith wrote: As for roundabouts, they're a bit of hassle and I'd love for JOSM to do it better but any way as things are I either draw a square and then add mid points between the 4 corners to turn it into a roundabout, or I draw a triangle and hit shift+o,

Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Matt White
John Smith wrote: I received a reply about the cost to rent a plane, about 230GBP for one hour and the airport was close to the place they were photographying and it was mostly a PR stunt. Due to the sideways angle they are having difficulty rectifying images and that side of things is being

Re: [Talk-de] Rollstuhlrouting-Portal online!

2009-09-18 Per discussione elchtreiber
Hallo, Glückwunsch zum Portal und zu deinem/eurem Auftritt bei Quarks Co. Auch von mir Glückwunsch. Das bringt uns auf jeden Fall im Bekanntheitsgrad weiter. Aber mal eine konkrete Frage: In Köln, wo ich mappe, gibt es einige öffentliche Behinderten-WCs, die (vermutlich) mit dem Eurokey

Re: [Talk-de] Leere und unverbundene Nodes identifizieren?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Jacques Nietsch
Am 18.09.2009, 06:39 Uhr, schrieb Joerg Fischer osm2...@jfis.de: Hallo Welt, irgendwas ging schief. :-/ Ich hab an einem Wald die Waldgrenze editiert. Was auch immer dabei in die Hose ging, jeder Punkt, den ich angelegt habe, ist nun zwei Mal da. Einmal so wie es sein soll, einmal an exakt

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione geo.osm
Doru Julian Bugariu schrieb: Hallo, die neue Version von NaviPOWM (0.2.3) ist freigegeben. Sie befindet sich an der ueblichen Stelle: super Ich wuensche Euch viel Vergnuegen mit der neuen Version. danke werd ich haben. Lädts du demnächst auch noch die 0.2.3 Karten hoch. Oder such ich

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
Hallo, geo.osm schrieb: Lädts du demnächst auch noch die 0.2.3 Karten hoch. Oder such ich nur an der falschen Stelle. Dann könnte ich es am WE gleich richtig testen ich habe mir auch erst gerade nie neue Version heruntergeladen. Die neuen Karten werde ich erzeugen. Sobal was fertig

Re: [Talk-de] [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Peter Körner
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb: Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the other side?

Re: [Talk-de] Leere und unverbundene Nodes identifizieren?

2009-09-18 Per discussione Joerg Fischer
Jacques Nietsch wrote: das ist ganz einfach mit JOSM und dem Validator Plugin zu lösen. Passend zum Land in dem mir der Unfall passierte: Mille grazie. ;-) Jörg -- Computers are like airconditioners: they stop working properly if you open Windows. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Adiac
Ist irgendwie beides falsch, oder? Ich kenne ich Gegend nicht, aber da wo google Sharp left to merge onto A115 sagt, darf man da wirklich links? Bei OSM sah es schon merkwürdig aus, ist aber schon repariert worden? I think both are wrong. It is realy allowed to turn left where google say Sharp

Re: [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione qbert biker
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:43:16 + Von: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org, openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org Betreff: [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin Why

[Talk-de] Worldfile vom 16.9.09

2009-09-18 Per discussione Carsten Schwede
Hallo, die neuen daten stehen wie immer zum Download bereit unter: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Computerteddy -- Viele Gruesse Computerteddy ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] OSM auf Deutsch

2009-09-18 Per discussione Markus
Hallo Tim, politischen Brisanz eines deutschsprachigen Renderings Es gibt in DE einen Ständigen Ausschuss für geographische Namen (StAGN). Aufgabe ist, deutsche Ortsbezeichnungen so zu beschreiben, dass sie in Kartenwerken weltweit verwendet werden können.

[Talk-de] UserActivity - Version 2

2009-09-18 Per discussione Gary68
hi, habe die version 2 fertiggestellt und auch neue berichte und BILDER ins web gestellt: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UserActivity es gibt nun: - einen karten modus - einen karten modus mit details - wege werden auch berücksichtigt - arbeitszeiten / timeslots werden dargestellt so,

Re: [Talk-de] OSM auf Deutsch

2009-09-18 Per discussione Marc Schütz
Dort werden internationale Empfehlungen erarbeitet und verabschiedet. Die wichtigsten: 1. grundsätzlich sollen Endonyme verwendet werden, also Ortsnamen sind so zu schreiben, wie sie in den dortigen Ländern geschrieben werden: München, Praha, Beijing 2. für die verschiedenen Schriften

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione geo.osm
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Hallo, geo.osm schrieb: Lädts du demnächst auch noch die 0.2.3 Karten hoch. Oder such ich nur an der falschen Stelle. Dann könnte ich es am WE gleich richtig testen ich habe mir auch erst gerade nie neue Version

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben - Germany neu

2009-09-18 Per discussione Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Sobal was fertig ist, melde ich mich! Also Deutschland ist nun fertig! Gruß, Stefan ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
Die Links hier http://forum.pocketnavigation.de/thread.php?postid=2337916#post2337916 funktionieren! Stefan geo.osm schrieb: Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Hallo, geo.osm schrieb: Lädts du demnächst auch noch die 0.2.3 Karten hoch. Oder such ich nur an der falschen Stelle.

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione geo.osm
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Die Links hier http://forum.pocketnavigation.de/thread.php?postid=2337916#post2337916 funktionieren! danke, in dem Thread bin ich auch aktiv. kenne sie also. Wollte dir nur sagen, dass der Link auf der Seite nicht ganz funzt. Völlig wertfrei ;-) --

[Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Frank Sautter
hallo zusammen, wir haben in deutschland und österreich einige hundert Schloßstraße, Schloß XY, Schloß-Apotheke und andere Schloß-dinge in unserer datenbank. nun gibt es ja die gesetzliche rechtschreibung (siehe seite 7): http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/14/003/1400356.pdf bzw:

Re: [Talk-de] OSM auf Deutsch

2009-09-18 Per discussione Markus
Hallo Marc, 1. grundsätzlich sollen Endonyme verwendet werden, also Ortsnamen sind so zu schreiben, wie sie in den dortigen Ländern geschrieben werden: München, Praha, Beijing 2. für die verschiedenen Schriften soll eine gegenseitige Umschrift erfolgen, damit die Endonyme auch für Dritte

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione Doru Julian Bugariu
geo.osm schrieb: danke werd ich haben. Lädts du demnächst auch noch die 0.2.3 Karten hoch. Oder such ich nur an der falschen Stelle. Dann könnte ich es am WE gleich richtig testen Man kann die alten Karten wieterverwenden. Gruesse, Julian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben - Germany neu

2009-09-18 Per discussione Doru Julian Bugariu
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Also Deutschland ist nun fertig! Mein Rechner knuspert sich gerade zu Tode mit Deutschland. Welches System benutzt Du? Hier: Kubuntu 9.04 auf einem AMD XP1800+ 1GB RAM. Gruesse, Julian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigennam e - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 18. September 2009 15:25 schrieb Frank Sautter openstreet...@sautter.com: wenn es hier zu einem tragbaren konsens kommt, würde ich das ggf. mittels eines bots erledigen, bei dem die ersetzungen manuell abgesegnet werden müssen. Bot erscheint mir nicht sinnvoll, ich würde zunächst alle Namen

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigen name - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Jens Frank
welchen regeln sollen wir hier folgen? bitte um eure meinung! Ich bin für Wir mappen, was da ist. Beispiele: * Schloßstraße http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5112465   - betrachten wir das als eigennamen?   - soll eine ersetzung in openstreetmap stattfinden?   - sollen wir die

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Markus
Hallo Frank, für mich war ein königlicher Regierungssitz und Wohnort schon immer ein Schloss. Alle Schweizer schreiben Schloss mit zwei s hinten. Die in Deutschland gelegene und vom Inhaber so bezeichnete Schoß-Apotheke versuche ich trotzdem mit diesem komischen Zeichen zu schreiben, für das

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigennam e - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 18. September 2009 15:49 schrieb Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de: PS: in DE:Openstreetmap bemühe ich mich, Strasse mit ß zu schreiben, weil das den Deutschen wichtig ist und auch fast überall noch so auf den Schildern steht. Gut, dass Du es erwähnst, Straße schreibt man nämlich in D nach wie

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben

2009-09-18 Per discussione Doru Julian Bugariu
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Die Links hier http://forum.pocketnavigation.de/thread.php?postid=2337916#post2337916 funktionieren! Stefan Wenn Du mir sagst, was ich hier: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/navipowm/index.php?title=NaviPOWM_Maps reinschreiben soll, dann

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione André Reichelt
Markus schrieb: Die in Deutschland gelegene und vom Inhaber so bezeichnete Schoß-Apotheke versuche ich trotzdem mit diesem komischen Zeichen zu schreiben, für das es auf der Schweizer-Tastatur gar keine Taste gibt. Das Komische Zeichen, dass gerne als scharfes S bezeichnet wird, ist

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Carsten Schwede
Hallo, ich schreibe mal hier unterm Ursprungspost, auch wenn es mehrere betrifft. Die Straßennamen sind Eigennamen, auch wenn die Schloßstraße zum Schloss führt. Solange dieser nicht offiziell geändert wird ist es eben so, dass es nicht der aktuellen deutschen Rechtschreibung entspricht.

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigen name - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 03:25:20PM +0200, Frank Sautter wrote: hallo zusammen, wir haben in deutschland und österreich einige hundert Schloßstraße, Schloß XY, Schloß-Apotheke und andere Schloß-dinge in unserer datenbank. wenn es hier zu einem tragbaren konsens kommt, würde ich das ggf.

Re: [Talk-de] OSM auf Deutsch

2009-09-18 Per discussione Dennis Egbers
Moin, Zitat von Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de: Hallo Marc, 1. grundsätzlich sollen Endonyme verwendet werden, also Ortsnamen sind so zu schreiben, wie sie in den dortigen Ländern geschrieben werden: München, Praha, Beijing 2. für die verschiedenen Schriften soll eine gegenseitige Umschrift

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Andreas Labres
Markus wrote: PS: in DE:Openstreetmap bemühe ich mich, Strasse mit ß zu schreiben, weil das den Deutschen wichtig ist und auch fast überall noch so auf den Schildern steht. Hint: Straße vs. Strass(-steine) schreibt man (in DE und AT) beides so. Servus, Andreas

Re: [Talk-de] Community-Treffen auf der INTERGEO naechste Woche

2009-09-18 Per discussione Tobias Wendorff
Gehling Marc schrieb: Leider belegt. So wie viele andere ... :-( Hin- und unterkommen sind mein Problem. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Tobias Wendorff
Carsten Schwede schrieb: Wenns genauer sein soll, dann kann ich ja mal meine Schwester fragen, die ist schon ne Weile Deutschlehrerin. Nur so aus Neugier: Darf ich fragen, welches Nachschlagewerk sie verwendet? Hintergrund: Viele Deutschlehrer verwenden den DUDEN, obwohl dieser in Fachkreisen

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigennam e - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 18. September 2009 18:58 schrieb Tobias Wendorff tobias.wendo...@uni-dortmund.de: Carsten Schwede schrieb: Wenns genauer sein soll, dann kann ich ja mal meine Schwester fragen, die ist schon ne Weile Deutschlehrerin. Nur so aus Neugier: Darf ich fragen, welches Nachschlagewerk sie

Re: [Talk-de] OSM auf Deutsch

2009-09-18 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 18. September 2009 15:58 schrieb Dennis Egbers dennis.egb...@tu-bs.de: bessere Alternative. Offiziell heißt (falls die sich inzwischen nicht doch anderweitig geeinigt haben) Sterzing Vipiteno oder Brixen Bressanone. Trotzdem benutzt in dem Fall doch fast niemand - weder vor Ort noch in

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Tobias Wendorff
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb: wir sind allerdings bei OSM sowieso nicht an die amtlichen Regeln gebunden, und m.E. ist darüberhinaus Sprache das, was die Leute sprechen, Schriftsprache das, was die Leute schreiben. Er ... darum schrieb ich: Nur aus Neugier und nicht Für OSM.

Re: [Talk-de] WMS-Server und geotif Orthofoto/Luftbilder

2009-09-18 Per discussione Martin
Hallo Christoph Vielleicht kann ich dir helfen, siehe meine Seite: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Memch Geotiff ist dabei kein Problem. Gruss Martin Christoph Matthei wrote: Hallo, ich bin seit ein paar Tagen dabei, ein georeferenziertes Luftbild über einen WMS-Server in JOSM

Re: [Talk-de] NaviPOWM 0.2.3 freigegeben - Germany neu

2009-09-18 Per discussione Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
Hallo Julian, Doru Julian Bugariu schrieb: Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb: Also Deutschland ist nun fertig! Mein Rechner knuspert sich gerade zu Tode mit Deutschland. Welches System benutzt Du? Hier: Kubuntu 9.04 auf einem AMD XP1800+ 1GB RAM. Die Kartenumsetzung

Re: [Talk-de] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Schorschi
lustich ... wie man unschwer bei google-maps ein Stück weiter südlich erkennt, hält sich jemand an die Zielführung von google-maps ;-) ob google den PKW zur Verdeutlichung extra zur richtigen Zeit dort positioniert hat? Kurz gesagt, es könnte sogar sein, das man dort wenden darf, aber es ist

Re: [Talk-de] [OSM-talk] Google Maps v.s. OSM routing in Berlin

2009-09-18 Per discussione Schorschi
Hum.. what do you want to tell us? :) Sorry if it's self-evident, but I don't see your point. Which of the both routes is wrong? or are they both valid? guck dir mal den Verlauf an ... das Drehen auf dem südlichen Teil des Messedamms ist nicht wirklich prickelnd und sicher nicht für

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Carsten Schwede
Hallo, Tobias Wendorff schrieb: Nur so aus Neugier: Darf ich fragen, welches Nachschlagewerk sie verwendet? Ich kann sie grade nicht fragen, aber sie geht sicherlich nach dem Duden. Hintergrund: Viele Deutschlehrer verwenden den DUDEN, obwohl dieser in Fachkreisen als nicht

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigen name - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Mirko Küster
Aber wieder zu OSM: Meine Meinung ist, Straßennamen sind Eigennamen, genauso wie der Name einer Apotheke oder sonstiges und sollten deshalb nicht korrigiert werden. Bei uns im Wald haben einige Waldwege eigene Namen, darunter auch Strassen. Das sind aber keine richtigen Straßen sondern einfach

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigen name - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:36:57PM +0200, Mirko Küster wrote: Ansich kein Problem, wenn nicht einige eifrige Bots rumrennen lassen würden um sowas automatisch zu verfrickeln.Und so hast du garkeine Wahl und darfst die vermeintlichen Rechtschreibfehler wiederum falsch taggen, weil es der

Re: [Talk-de] Schlossstraße vs. Schloßstraße - neue gesetzliche Rechtschreibung vs. alter Eigenname - wie sollen wir es bei OSM halten

2009-09-18 Per discussione Schorschi
Ja, ein Straßenname wird wohl ganz ausdrücklich vergeben ... ein schönes Beispiel (allerdings eines Wasserwegnamens): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuköllner_Schiffahrtskanal ja, mit zwei f ... Von daher: Schloss Neuschwanstein Schloßstraße Schloß-Apotheke, (solange die beiden

  1   2   3   >