On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
Garmin calls it high sensitivity but thats marketing Maybe better
than very old Garmin devices but much worse compared to a SiRF III
I have a new Hcx and compared multiple times.
Only 60, Oregon, Colorado use
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
Take a look at this boundary where a forest and national park meet:
http://osm.org/go/TwUljNo--
Notice that the boundaries don't line up. This is because the national
park is in slightly the wrong place. The
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a park barrier like this:
Like its made of metal, circular in shape, two
perpendicular diagonals separator, rotates and prevents any
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list.
Select /Yes
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list.
Select /Yes
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
(Please don't CC me when replying; I get the list, and I don't need two
copies (plus this defeats unsubscribing if someone later wants to leave
the conversation). Please use your mailer's reply-to-list feature or
check
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
(Please don't CC me when replying; I get the list, and I don't need two
copies (plus this defeats unsubscribing if someone later wants to leave
the conversation). Please use your mailer's reply-to-list feature or
check
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Peter Herison pheri...@web.de wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
Peter Herison wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
AFAIK, the biggest microSD card that you can put into an eTrex is a
2 GB card (the bigger microSD-HC cards won't work).
This is for firmware 2.80
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Peter Herison pheri...@web.de wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega schrieb:
AFAIK, the biggest microSD card that you can put into an eTrex is a 2 GB
card
(the bigger microSD-HC cards won't work).
This is for firmware 2.80. With 3.00 you can use SD-Cards up to 4GB.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Richard, I know that you don't have infinite resources to devote to
Potlatch. But if you can't fix usability problems, then maybe the
EDIT tab should go to a Webstart JOSM page? I'm not suggesting that
we ban potlatch;
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Lambertus wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Not to diminish your work on that front, but I find the tilelayout on
your site very strange. Of course it is a work of the splitter, but I
would opt for a manual
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Gary68 g...@gary68.de wrote:
hi,
i want to use the clipIncompleteEntities option for 0.6 data files.
osmosis version is 0.30
i get:
com.bretth.osmosis.core.OsmosisRuntimeException: Argument
clipIncompleteEntities for task 2-bounding-box was not recognised.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have raised a ticket for this but would appreciate any help so that I can
make some progress ...
I tackled API6 with JOSM for the first time today. My first attempt - a
small edit - worked like a dream and the update
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V.
marco.lech...@fossgis.de wrote:
hi karl,
./bin/osmosis --read-xml-0.6 file=path/planet-090421.osm.bz2
compressionMethod=bzip2 --bounding-polygon-0.6 file=path/aoi.pff
--write-xml-0.6 file=path/aoi_2009-04-21_v06.osm
gives
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
One data point: my Garmin eTrex unit has recently broken the 'zoom in'
button on
the side - it broke off underneath the rubber bumper and started rattling
around
inside, so now the map display can be zoomed out but not in. I
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David Ebling dave_ebl...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
During the downtime I figured I should really catch up with cleaning up my
huge backlog of GPX files and prepare them for upload. I have many many
hours of tracks on my HDD that I have not uploaded because many of
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Karl Newman wrote:
I want the same thing, and I looked into doing this with GPSBabel, too,
and
while it has the capability to filter points inside or outside a radius
(or
polygon, etc.), that function does
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote:
Joe Richards wrote:
I will be trekking in Nepal later this year, and would like to keep some
nice GPX trails and waypoints (both on the trekking trails and in the
towns/roads), since it looks relatively unmapped... I usually
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Joe Richards joefis...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well I'd like to collect lots of data, even if it involves me taking a pack
of those 2GB SD cards that I keep switching every day or two... Obviously
taking normal AA batteries is a plus, and I am thinking of getting one
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Igor Brejc igor.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Lambertus wrote:
Igor Brejc wrote:
I think 5 sec interval when walking is quite enough - realistically
that's less than 7 m of distance between two points. The problem with
Garmins (at least eTrex) is that they only
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
So you're saying that highway=cycleway is not intended for ways
which
are for bicycles? What an ... interesting interpretation!
I think mainly/exclusively may overstress the exclusively bit. I
think generally if a bicycle
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
Now the question is: should I remove the shared nodes (or detach them
in JOSM)
Yes. The roads are not topologically connected at the shared node, so nuke
it.
Karl
___
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:44 AM, LeedsTracker leedstrac...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/19 Tal tal@gmail.com:
Every time I change something in my local neighborhood, I have to wait
an unknown period of time before it appears in the Osmarender layer.
This is quite annoying.
Just a reminder
While GNIS might not be perfectly accurate in geoposition, it is the
authoritative set of geographic names for the US. It contains features
that are on no other map or spatial database.
Until now, anyway. ;-)
Karl
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Daniel A Carleton daniel.carleton at exaptic.com writes:
Are any of you aware of a conflation algorithm that snaps GPS tracks
to the street grid? This could be a useful way to verify existing
road networks and fill in any
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Karl Newman siliconfiend at gmail.com writes:
Are any of you aware of a conflation algorithm that snaps GPS tracks
to the street grid? This could be a useful way to verify existing
road networks and fill in any gaps.
To do
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Daniel A Carleton
daniel.carle...@exaptic.com wrote:
Hello All,
I'm trying to evaluate what street map dataset to go with for a web
application. I appreciate the features in the OSM data that would
otherwise go overlooked by big commercial products. e.g.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ed
I guessed it was a little t-i-c (:) but as it raised an issue I was
interested in, I took the opportunity to post!
You have returned the compliment!
As what might be described as a footpath worker (and getting
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book tb...@libero.it wrote:
I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus, but
that we are not yet sure how to tag the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Kim Hawtin kim.haw...@adelaide.edu.auwrote:
hi maning,
maning sambale wrote:
JOSM is an excellent data editing tool (hey I also love potlatch!).
Many of of its features I would love integrated in some FOSS GIS
editing toolbox.
That being said, are there
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
(f'up set to osmosis-dev)
Karl Newman wrote:
Anyway, the tee can choke things up with all the temporary files. It would
be nice to be able to share the stored node and ways files between tee
tasks, but I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.comwrote:
I've read that on some Garmin units you can press a given button for a
set period of time to have it dump a screenshot to its SD card. But I
haven't found out how to do this for my Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx.
Garmin has
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net wrote:
When I heard about the possibility of OSM on Garmin, I imagined
something like the Mapnik Slippy Map on my GPS screen. Now I have a
Legend HCx, it turns out that I get the Garmin vector rendering with OSM
data behind
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio
jldoming...@prodevelop.es wrote:
Hi list,
If someone is mapping the US national borders... forget it!
Within a few weeks, the US will look like this:
http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-AO116_RUSPRO_NS_20081228191715.gif
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah we're getting a little ahead of ourselves with the shields. The first
step is tagging the highways in a standard scheme which would give a
renderer sufficient data to draw shields. Then someone has to actually
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
Pieren
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Adam Killian vi...@bonius.com wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose and
San Francisco have equal admin_level rankings (county seat) and San Jose is
larger in both area and population.
As an aside
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.eswrote:
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
So
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's the sort of thing automated renderers have difficulty sorting out.
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
(I would hazard a guess
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
You're still missing the point about San Jose--it's larger in both area
and population (and probably in economic activity as well), and is located
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure it is. If a lot of people want to live in a place, in general that
should make it more notable. Besides, I was only suggesting using
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Beej Jorgensen b...@beej.us wrote:
Hey all,
This is sort of a general question with a specific example, namely,
Marin County.
Marin County (just north of the Golden Gate Bridge and San Francisco,
California) already exists in OSM. It's made of bad TIGER
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Scott Atwood scott.roy.atw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
I looked a bit at the osm.xml file for Mapnik. It currently orders them by
the place tag hierarchy (city, town, suburb, village, hamlet
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.eswrote:
Hi all,
It has come to my attention that Viking (that piece of software some of us
use
to see and manage our GPX tracks) has been banned from using Google Maps as
a
map background:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:38 AM, John07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Schütz schrieb:
Am Mittwoch 26 November 2008 17:56:15 schrieb Steffen Vogel:
As a user and mapper of OpenStreetMap, I often use OpenStreetBugs.
Unfortunatly this project is quity poor in features like:
- email
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Johann H. Addicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone is bound to say eTrex Legend HCx so let me be the first.
Don't do that.
I own one and can definitly say: The receiver is VERY crappy
in terms of accuracy. As i use this device (Vista HCx) for
geocaching,
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
This is one of the major problems with the OSM community. Someone proposes
or just starts using a particular tagging scheme which has some flaws. When
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the wiki redirects, barrier=gate is replacing highway=gate.
According to tagwatch, the latter is 10 times more popular than the
former.
Yes,
/Maxspeed
Exactly ! Great job.
My point is that:
- such tables should be grouped in a way that software applications
could easily parse the data into their configuration;
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because using borders to locate entities within
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:30 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
highway=pedestrian ; bicycle=yes/no = see [[Country specific default
values]]
Well, the wiki page didn't exist - it was just an idea/suggestion ...
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
2008/11/6 Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 schrieb Alex Mauer:
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
I am wondering what is the difference between footway and path?
sac_scale
on
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Milenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I've been trying to get a local ROMA server working and I've run into
an issue with getting osmosis working. I've patched osmosis as per the
instructions on the wiki
in.
-Jeremy
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Karl Newman
*Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:16 PM
*To:* Milenko
*Cc:* talk-us@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] Weird Osmosis/ROMA/pgsql issue
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Milenko
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Make sure the big three editors support ordering. Nobody will notice,
nobody has to change what he does. Also, try and get Osmosis and the
various mirror services (ROMA, XAPI) to support ordered relations.
I can
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Relations are unordered. You could load the relation and all the ways
referenced by it, then check to see if each way has another way that has
the same start and end nodes, through a process
If you try sidewalk:left=true, it might work. I know someone put some work
into automatically switching tags on way reversal, but I'm not sure if it
went into a plugin or the core.
Karl
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Dale Puch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick test of JOSM = nope
I tried
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there was a proposal on the Wiki about two years ago about a
possible extra tag emergency for hospitals, to signal whether they
have an AE (or ER, U.S.) facility. The proposal was voted through at
the time but
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Nick Hocking [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Well, #2 would be nice but it would be tricky to detect a collision with
an
existing way. Frankly, because the first TIGER import was done, the number
of completely new ways that would be added in a new import would be
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
Anyone
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
going
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
going
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just to reiterate my perspective, the Karlsruhe schema is fine for what
it
is, but it's not sufficient for all uses.
Perhaps not natively, but I
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Karl Newman wrote:
No, that would be tagging for actually being able to use the data. Without
the odd/even/both information, it's actually a loss of data.
Sounds quite strange to me. Any interpolation rule
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As for the efficiency in storage, I suggest you take the long-term view:
I am 100% sure that at some point in the future, OSM will have at least
one node for every house, more likely a building outline for every
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
Sent: 14 October 2008 4:59 PM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Yet another street number scheme
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Tristan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this catches on not only do we have a well-defined and easily-processed
value for speed to use in all manner of things, we also have a template
for defining other data types (bridge height? maxweight?) which might (or
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
graham wrote:
- Say I have a bus lane (or cycle lane) running along one side of a
two-way road (the most common situation where I am). Just attaching a
'left' tag to it makes it dependent on nobody ever reversing
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Doug Morrison-Cleary [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Nooo. I live in northern MN and all we have around here are lakes!
I really want them in yesterday grin. Please :-)
Ok I suppose I should have
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Lambert Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upload a couple of gpx tracks that I had cleaned up with Josm.
They
were refused with a message that seems to suggest thy are missing time
stamps
(possibly missing altitude).
Why does openstreetmap
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lambert Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:21:59 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Lambert Carsten wrote:
This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a
privacy issue here there are clearly those that do
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Kyle Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Dirk-Lüder Kreie wrote:
Ian Dees schrieb:
Hi list,
Just saw this pop up in my RSS reader:
http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2008/09/were-never-cont.html
Maybe we could throw the Mapnik tiles up on Amazon's content
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Cons: It's never, ever worked for me, across different computers and
networks... I have no idea why.
It does some DNS magic that seems to be unstable
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not perfectly positioned and I think the circumference is a tad short
but I made a reasonably good insert of the CERN LHC (and SPS) into the
database last night in time for the first full circle
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Norbert Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
The problem with this is that none of the editors support having
duplicate key values, even so the 0.5 API supports it. The 0.6 API will
not support duplicate key values.
I think the support
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
Just make two different nodes, each located closest to the amenity
concerned. There's nothing that makes it non-routable. It's just a
point--the routers will get you as close to the point on the road
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, robin paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
Scale wise we have about 250,000 tag records currently, and even if you
remove the duplicates there are about 40,000 or so. I don't think people
are going to want to download 40,000 tags even
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guilhem Bonnefille wrote:
I'm working on Viking[1], a GPS desktop application with OSM related
features.
In order to assist user when uploading its traces to OSM, I wish to
contact OSM, retrieve the previously used
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Simon Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I made some really good progress last week and got a map together for the
Crowsnest Pass. Unfortunately for the area I chose with a fair number of
contours the map redraw was quite slow. I have worked out how to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of Osmosis are you using, because I added that feature
(writing
of the bound element) a while ago, so it should work if your input file
has
a bound element.
Hi Karl,
I am use 'osmosis-latest'/version 0.29
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Morley wrote:
Sent: 24 August 2008 8:51 PM
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Left and Right?
Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Rory McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robin paulson wrote:
Rory McCann wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
What's current tagging best practice with things which are to the left
or the right of a way (e.g. bus
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be camping in Oregon in a week. OSM didn't seem to include any
campsites in that area so I downloaded positions from the USFS and a private
operator and imported them using ogr2ogr, gpsbabel and josm.
The USFS
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Richard Weait [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:07 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
I'm going to be camping in Oregon in a week. OSM didn't seem to
include any campsites in that
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Rory McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
What's current tagging best practice with things which are to the left
or the right of a way (e.g. bus stops)?
A nearly-approved proposal for a canal-side object has been objected to
by someone
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Earl wrote:
On 04/08/2008 11:14, vegard wrote:
For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and
you have to make many small ways, it
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds like you're looking for this:
http
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
How do we mark and tag Class II and Class III bike facilities? (I'm not
sure if Class I, II, and III is a California specific designation, or if
this is the standard terminology throughout the US)
Class I is the
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 13:30:24 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a page on the wiki devoted to this[1], someone
me
produces a map
for the UK[2]
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds like you're looking for this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag
This can not cross way boundaries. If someone splits that way
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The reason I don't like ideas like this is that the data you are adding to
the way (or as Frederik pointed out possibly also the intersections) is not
actually anything to do with the physical
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
To be clear, I don't have a problem with tagging the actual location of
the
house or building. I think it's unnecessary, but the problem I have
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Inge Wallin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the rather large thread Actually using OpenStreetMap and the
usability of
the current maps I got to understand a few things that I didn't grasp
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
I think the obvious thing is to quit splitting ways
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Charlie Echo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If things are clear, and if there is a consensus about using this Karlsruhe
schema, let's have a vote on it.
This will make things easier: we would then have a clean situation. This
would enable people to enter the data.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a situation (which I suspect is very common) where a street is
split into e.g. 3 ways, because the middle one is part of a bus route or
other relation.
If you label all three ways with name=Foo Street, you get
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
I think the obvious thing is to quit splitting ways just because
there's a bridge or the speed limit changed... IMHO, the only reason to
split ways is if the name changes or if the major type
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Joseph Scanlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Ian Dees wrote:
make sure that the data is better than the data that was already
imported from TIGER.
The data is quite good and gets updated weekly. So... I don't want to
treat this as a one
1 - 100 di 211 matches
Mail list logo
