Re: [talk-au] Suspicious amount of removed bicycle tags

> > Hi all > http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_reg/rsrr2017208/s250.html > ROAD SAFETY ROAD RULES 2017 - REG 250 > says "Footpath is defined in the dictionary" but it doesn't say which > dictionary. "The dictionary" is the dictionary in schedule 5 pf the Road Safety Road Rules --

Re: [talk-au] Tracks flagged as missing from government data

The Vicmap TR_ROAD table has a column "restrictions", in which a value '4' indicates that the road is private. In the latest version of the data, which was released only in the last couple of weeks, there are 158,466 roads with that restriction. On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 15:26, Andrew Harvey via

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Gebäude, Dachfläche oder Grundriss

l erfahrungsgemäß leider nicht viel bringen. Und Johann, dich kann ich nur noch einmal ersuchen, dich nicht über den Mailinglisten-Konsens hinwegzusetzen, sondern Kritik ernstzunehmen! Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Washington DC place node cleanup

- we usually say that local knowledge > tops everything, but then again for many of the languages there might > not even *be* a local Washington mapper in OSM ;) > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°2

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

difficult fords. (Nothing about what our friend Castor canadensis might have done to it!) Still, there's at least one group still organizing llama trekking in the Adirondacks: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3HVYZTbQVTw/XuOGlHM3nTI/XOM/g1KTWlBPMng_xCRnmcEdcubJhBBx0M0oACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/IMG_0453.j

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

Would 'horse=yes' (or maybe some other value if pack animals are OK but riding animals is forbidden) cover it? In which case, also consider making the way a bridleway and and having a route=horse as well as a route=hiking relation. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin __

Re: [Talk-us] Recent Trunk road edits

unk'. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Recent Trunk road edits

he 'I-93' designation continuous rather than interrupting it for one pass through the White Mountains. It wouldn't astonish me to learn of other exceptions. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] place=neighborhood on subdivisions?

permail/talk-us/2013-June/011131.html> and >> it seemed like other respondents were taking the same approach. >> [3] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/351 >> [4] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-January/019811.html >> [5] https://osm.org/go/ZTVSa4OB >> >> -- >> m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] While we're fixing things in iterations

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:04 AM Minh Nguyen wrote: > More recently, Kevin Kenny reimplemented the shield renderer using a > more robust approach [3] and has discussed route relation support with > the openstreetmap-carto developers. [4] > > OSMUS is interested in offering an Americ

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

fehlen sie komplett.) Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Cooper Country State Forest in Keweenaw County, MI [parcel ownership]

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:34 PM Doug Peterson < dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org> wrote: > That is made up of two properties. The southern, larger square is owned by > Thomas & Jane Griffith. The northern, smaller square is owned by the John & > Jane Griffith. The other square to the west of that,

Re: [Talk-us] Unintentional improvements in OSM data influencing / improving other databases

registries of deeds come at less total social cost. (Of course, most people who understand the system have a vested interest in preserving it, but our previous experiments with Torrens did not go well.) -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Cooper Country State Forest in Keweenaw County, MI

sonable timeframe at least. I'm constrained to mapping the country I have. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Trouble with getting Superior National Forest boundary to render on standard map

someone wants to map them with protect_class=14 or something, I wouldn't kick. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Trouble with getting Superior National Forest

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 9:03 AM Frederik Ramm wrote: > On 01.09.20 14:40, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > We don't map cadastre at least partly out of respect for personal > > privacy - something that is not at issue with government-owned land. > > I think I'm with Joseph here, we don

Re: [Talk-us] Trouble with getting Superior National Forest

., the zoo of New York State public-access areas, the Pennsylvania State Game Lands, and even our State Parks) off the map, for reasons that don't touch on verifiability, but throw verifiability into the pot in an effort to make a stronger case. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___

Re: [Talk-us] Trouble with getting Superior National Forest

ic access. In this particular case, as with many cases of government-owned land, the land use, the protection status, and the public access all follow the property lines. That is what is (implicitly) being mapped; mapping the property line is the way that it is achi

Re: [Talk-us] Trouble with getting Superior National Forest boundary to render on standard map

e lawyers care about the outermost boundary, except to give something that can yield a readable rendering on small-scale maps. I'm all for making the boundary follow the legal designation that has the greatest effect and is visibly signed. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin __

Re: [Talk-us] Opinions on Devil's Slide Bunker (San Mateo, CA)

ost never map a viewpoint. But where I live, there's a wide gulf between "map only viewpoints that have signs or benches" and "map every pimple of rock that might be pretty." Beyond the admittedly subjective, "is the view the reason that people come here?" I don't have much to

Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH

sense that it > isn't objectionable, not that it can't be refined. Sort of like > "building=yes" is not wrong but changing it to "building=barn" is > better. > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping the Future I-87?

ped with route=road, network=US:I:Future, with ref=26, ref=74, ref=785 and ref=840. I've been wanting to do 'Future I-86' in New York, but I'd have to drive it to see precisely where it's signed. (I can find out easily where the DOT says it is built, not so easily where they'v

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Johann Haag wrote: > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein […] > Wiener Verein Ah, daher weht also der Wind, das "gute alte" Wien-Bashing… Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@o

Re: [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

gt; > > > tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > think he picked the wrong year, > > > > > > > > > > > > That relation was first created in 2009. According to the > > > source > > > > > > tag, it used 2008 Tiger data, so the original mapper probably > > > > > > used > > > > > > the best available TIGER data at the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also all he got was a white line in his first try. > > > > > > > Way: 813726663 > > > > > > > > > > > > That way needs to be added to the relation, and the relation > > > must > > > > > > close. > > > > > > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH

ion to conform with law and/or > custom. We'll get there. > > SteveA > California > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

penstreetmap.at/> mit > openstreetmap.de <http://openstreetmap.de/> zusammenführt. Wieso soll Österreich von Deutschland aus verwaltet werden? Österreich ist ein unabhängiges Land und kein Teil von Deutschland! (Und die kurze Zeit, in der das anders war, wünscht sich hoffentlich keiner hi

Re: [Talk-at] Regionen mappen

als admin_level=5 zu mappen, da gebe ich dir schon recht. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Anyone familiar with Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP)?

g/way/429451427 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429681824 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429681823 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429451428 > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > ht

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

iting with reference to multiple (OSM and external) data sources. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 9:29 PM brad wrote: > Thanks for diving in. If it's a very minor unimproved road and not > clearly service, I usually tag it track. I would suggest adding some > indication of road quality. If it's an improved gravel road, I consider > surface=gravel sufficient.

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

the diary entry. (PS: I was shouting at the screen as I read that self-congratulatory article at https://gis.ny.gov/outreach/gist/fall01.htm) -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-ca] Proposal to tag Yonge Street in Toronto and York Region as Primary

downtown Brampton was made Primary. Thoughts? -Kevin On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 07:37, john whelan wrote: > What Jarek says makes sense to me. I suspect many of the map users don't > live where the use the map. > > Having said that could we come up with something that could be app

Re: [Talk-ca] Proposal to tag Yonge Street in Toronto and York Region as Primary

have heavy volume, and allow trucks. Thoughts? -Kevin On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 21:08, Andrew Deng wrote: > I thought the tagging would be similar to the US, where roads are tagged > based on its traffic volume and importance which is why I thought Yonge > should be Primary. I see now. &g

Re: [Talk-ca] Proposal to tag Yonge Street in Toronto and York Region as Primary

that and weren't really changed by consensus (thanks for the email, btw). My thoughts/opinion anyways... Cheers, -Kevin On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 14:09, Justin Tracey wrote: > In Canada, highway=primary is typically used for what I would call > "highway-like" roads.[0] IMHO, Y

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

no objections to >> geodata derived in part from data-sets published by the Vermont Center for >> Geographic Information in the Vermont Open Geodata Portal being incorporated >> into the OpenStreetMap project geodata database and released under a free >> and open license. >> >> Regards, >> >> John >> >> >> >> John E. Adams AICP >> >> Director | Vermont Center for Geographic Information >> >> State of Vermont >> 1 National Life Dr, Deane C. Davis Bldg, 6th Floor | Montpelier, VT >> 05620-0501 >> 802-522-0172 >> vcgi.vermont.gov > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

access restriction is not verifiable by survey, it's good to add a > access:source=* or note=* so mappers like me won't assume the tag is outdated > or erroneous. > > And Kevin, relevant for hikers like you & me is the question of service roads > that lead to private

Re: [Talk-us] Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes (was: Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?)

the carrier.) and hence, the public/private distinction for service ways falls in my mental model under, 'don't worry about it.' -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?

he information that TIGER didn't ordinarily provide, I can leave for others (possibly including future-Kevin). ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-ca] NRCan lakes

on provincial data, which is based on municipal data) are both much more up to date and actively maintained if you want some assistance when using imagery. I believe both are automatically available in JOSM when editing in Canada. --- Kevin F On Wed., Jul. 8, 2020, 5:24 p.m. Hannes Röst, wrote

Re: [Talk-ca] can I submit road data?

to fly every spring. It might not be the freshest available, but I've found the accuracy to be more accurate than other commercial imagery available. --- Kevin F On Tue., Jul. 7, 2020, 1:02 p.m. Jason Carlson, wrote: > While waiting for a response I think if I import roads that already ex

Re: [Talk-at] Anpassung der Plattentektonik

±1m ist ein relativ kleiner Fehler. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] National Forest boundaries

sts looking at public lands with an eye toward visiting them, rather than prospectors looking for opportunities or statisticians looking to tabulate how much of the land is under government ownership. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-at] shop=second_hand vs. shop=charity

uch Fanartikel der MA 48 zu kaufen gibt.) Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling county roads (Idaho)

have attributes like surface, maxspeed, lanes, Having the relation provides the data model with a way to group all the way segments; roads get split all the time when people decide to map small bridges, or when speed limits or lane counts changed, and so on. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Ke

Re: [Talk-us] National Forest boundaries

he map reflects a complex reality in the field. That complexity doesn't make mapping them useless, or mean that we should refer map users to the state agencies. I can look at OSM and the maps derived from it, and see where a hike might trespass, and where I'm safely on public-access lan

Re: [Talk-at] Irreführendes Nominatim-Ergebnis

r laggt, obwohl ich natürlich verstehe, daß Rendering-Ressourcen endlich sind). Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-ca] WikiProject Canada Post - franchise assessment

sense so it may be okay. I think this is also a little different since Canada Post doesn't make money selling the location of their offices like they do postal codes so chances are they wouldn't target this as an issue. --- Kevin On Tue., Jun. 16, 2020, 10:18 a.m. john whelan, wrote: >

Re: [Talk-us] USGS Topo layer for JOSM?

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:45 AM Dave Swarthout wrote: > Once I restarted JOSM, the old USGS Topo layer disappeared and after a > longish search through the Imagery Preferences, finally located the new > layer. I'd have never figured out what went wrong had Todd not posted this > question. The

Re: [Talk-us] USGS Topo layer for JOSM?

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:49 AM Brandon Cobb wrote: > > It still exists in JOSM, it just looks like the imagery was renamed to > “USA/Mexico/Canada/Scandinavia Topo Maps”. AHA! There it is! Up at the top under 'Worldwide", rather than listed under "US", which is why I didn't spot the

Re: [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level and COGs, MPOs, SPDs, Home Rule

ng metes and bounds only by reference. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] How to map snowmobile trails in US?

> Any thoughts? > > _______ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-at] caresteouvert-Karte

19:00-Einigung betroffen sind). Anderes Beispiel: die bevorstehende "schrittweise Lockerung". Auch durch die Abholmöglichkeit bei Restaurants gab es schon einige Wiedereröffnungen.) Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@o

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging sidewalks as separate ways and issues with bicycle routing

ride on sidewalks. It's quite a patchwork/mess and best to avoid sidewalks in almost all cases - adding them to the map in the first place or using them in routing when not required... --- Kevin/Kevo On Fri., Apr. 3, 2020, 11:37 a.m. Justin Tracey, wrote: > I was assuming cyclists can fig

Re: [talk-au] Gravel pits?

The term you're looking for is "gravel stack". A gravel pit is indeed a quarry -- but that's something else. Kevin. On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 12:31, Michael James wrote: > As someone who drives a lot of country highways they are both temporary > and permanent. > > > >

Re: [Talk-at] Fehler bei Altenmarkt im Pongau

g (nicht einfach highway=track für den Renderer, was außerhalb der Rodelsaison dann Unsinn ist), den man da setzen kann und der auch gerendert wird? Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] When is your doctor a clinic?

Places where they consolidate radiology, lab, endoscopy, outpatient surgery, orthopaedics, ...? -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] When is your doctor a clinic?

that the practices can consolidate their billing and insurance negotiations. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-at] Stop area groups

ch nicht von allen. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Stop area groups

gt;> Falls es sich dabei um den User Diego Sanguinetti handelt, der scheint >> für diese MAPS.me subway Gruppe zu mappen. Die haben ja leider auch eine >> eigene Vorstellung wie die Daten aussehen sollen... >> > > Ja, es handelt sich in beiden Fällen um diesen User und Kevin

Re: [Talk-at] Stop area groups

PS: Kevin Kofler wrote: > Die neuesten Änderungen dieser Art in Wien stammen von Daniel Sanguinetti, Sorry, Diego Sanguinetti, nicht Daniel. > einem Peruaner, der (laut History) weltweit editiert. Z.B.: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78848893 > > Aber er ist nicht d

Re: [Talk-at] Stop area groups

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78848893 Aber er ist nicht der einzige, der dieses Splitting in Wien betrieben hat. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[Talk-at] Stop area groups

d", resp. "Volkstheater" vs. "Ring, Volkstheater"). The artificial suffixes are often not even consistent (e.g. "(U-Bahn 1)" vs. "U1"), or they contain English descriptions such as "Railway Station" or "(north bus)". I would like to reunite those "stop_area"s (1 name = 1 stop_area, no artificial suffixes). What do you think? Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Jefferson Notch Road and latest "GPS made me do it" in the news

an 3, 2020 at 2:11 PM Mark Wagner wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:47:35 -0500 > Bill Ricker wrote: > > > Kevin asks, > > > is Jefferson Notch Road actually closed to wheeled vehicles in > > > winter or > > just not maintained? > > > > Per copyrig

Re: [Talk-us] Jefferson Notch Road and latest "GPS made me do it" in the news

>> >> What is the right way to tag a road which is 3 season dramatic automobile >> mountain short-cut and one-season snowmobile trail? >> >> >> -- >> Bill Ricker >> bill.n1...@gmail.com >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux >> __

Re: [Talk-us] Wilderness areas separate from forest?

wilderness area within a National Forest satisfies all of these conditions. Moreover, the same section of the guidelines specifically warns that a data model must guard against overcounting when using such 'nested' areas for statistical analysis. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin __

Re: [Talk-at] Userdaten Löschen

assiert auch, wenn man Daten in die OSM hochlädt), aber du darfst nicht einfach so tun, als wärst du der Urheber, und ohne eine entsprechende Vollmacht eigenmächtig die Lizenz ändern. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetm

Re: [Talk-us] Alt_names on counties

rint and on multilingual signage. It was definitely 'Lac du Saint-Sacrement' to the French before the English seized the land around it in 1760. Francophone locals would recognize any of the names. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Wilderness areas separate from forest?

atskill Park - but have not yet done so. In conclusion, I agree with you that the wilderness area is indeed part of the National Forest (or in my case, State Forest Preserve) that contains it. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing

Re: [Talk-at] Windy Map

angeschaut habe. Und auf dem e-Book-Reader ging die Webseite des "Marktführers" überhaupt nicht. Trotzdem ist es natürlich sehr ärgerlich, daß die Windy Map die Attribution nicht so hinbekommt, daß man sie in jedem Kontext lesen kann. Kevin Kofler

Re: [Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

be trespassing, whether I need to bring my New York City watershed access card, and so on. And nobody's been offended enough by the way it's been done that thye've reverted or brought the wrath of the DWG down upon me. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk

Re: [Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 16:39 Mike Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:28 PM Bradley White > wrote: > >> Yes I understand that, that is what the landuse tag is for. Private >> land should tagged as private. Public land should be tagged as public. >> The 'access' tag is probably preferable

Re: [Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

Once again, I think that New York state lands offer a parallel. The administrative borders of the Adirondack and Catskill parks are mapped (boundary=national_park protect_class=2). This has been discussed elsewhere; for these two specific regions, national_park appears to be a better fit than a

Re: [Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

in-holding, I would exclude it from the National Forest (or whatever) polygon and maybe map the landcover (forest, etc) if you are so inclined. Kevin On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 3:12 PM Bradley White wrote: > No, this is incorrect. USFS administrative boundaries and USFS managed >

Re: [Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:10 PM Mike Thompson wrote: > > Not all of the land within US National Forests is owned by the US Government, > there are private "inholdings" [1]. > > The boundaries between government land and private land are often marked by > signs, e.g.[2] The above photo is

Re: [Talk-us] Opinions on micro parks

priate tag so you can't map it," or "that sort of thing is only visual clutter so you can have it in the database only if it doesn't render." And before anyone accuses me again: I've never played Pokémon Go, and I'm not trying to create parks to manipulate the game. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Maine leaf-off imagery?

laz files. I'm curious what your process is for incorporating the lidar into osm. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:40 PM Kevin Broderick wrote: > Thanks for the responses. > > Unfortunately, the State of Maine LIDAR project doesn't yet have data > available where I'm trying to map; i

Re: [Talk-us] Maine leaf-off imagery?

, it looks like fall flights, so it's a little better than midsummer at least. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:57 AM Kevin wrote: > Maine has some nice ortho imagery available through their arcgis > services.. > https://gis.maine.gov/arcgis/rest/services/imageryBaseMapsEarthCover > >

Re: [Talk-us] Maine leaf-off imagery?

service for the US can be found here. https://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/rest/services On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:20 PM Kevin Broderick wrote: > Anyone have an ODbL-compatible source of leaf-off imagery for Maine, by > any chance? I'm particularly interested in the area around Bethel, as I'm &g

Re: [Talk-at] Änderung von Bezirks- und Gemeindenamen in Tirol und Vorarlberg

unmöglich um ein Versehen handeln. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[Talk-us] Maine leaf-off imagery?

of questions unanswered. Leaf-off imagery would be incredibly helpful, the more so if it were actually recent. (Yes, I've been surveying where feasible, but I'm not about to start going up driveways to get building dimensions.) Many thanks. -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com

Re: [Talk-ca] Postcodes in Canada

of government data. -Kevin (Kevo) On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 20:39, James wrote: > funny you should mention geocoder.ca > > The owner of that website was sued by Canada Post because he was crowd > sourcing postal codes. Just recently (2 ish years ago?) they dropped the > lawsuit because they

Re: [Talk-us] Opinions on micro parks

All of these cases are somewhat deceptive and deserve more research. In cases 1, 3, and 4 - these areas are slivers or discontinuous areas from actual parks. Case 2 may also be a discontinuous area, but it's not as obvious as the other areas. My suggestion would be to zoom out a little bit and

Re: [Talk-us] Opinions on micro parks

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:04 PM Bill Ricker wrote: > In many other matters we say we map the signage. > That is not a bad place to start here. > So a rule of it needs at least a name and/or a physical sign would be > internally consistent and predictably OSMish. > An exception to allow for

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

or there are many missing speed limits in Markham. People on this list may be able to help out and map remotely with the imagery you're providing or go collect information when they have free time. --- Kevin F On Mon., Sep. 30, 2019, 10:03 p.m. Eric Geiler, wrote: > Team Canada, (unsure

Re: [Talk-at] zahlreiche motorway_link auf motorway geändert

ers durch die DWG (aber das muß die DWG entscheiden, wir können sie nur auf den Fall aufmerksam machen). Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Historic 66 as highway=trunk in OK

t; Many (if not most) of Montanas "Secondary State Highways" are gravel. > > Wolfgang > ( lyx @ OSM ) > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com

Re: [Talk-us] Historic 66 as highway=trunk in OK

o there's a lot of gravel Up North as well. Used to be that most of the AlCan Highway was gravel. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Historic 66 as highway=trunk in OK

may be eager, but I'm surely not fresh. I haven't lived in the Southwest for many years and no longer have current local knowledge. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-at] Import von BEV Adress- Stichtagsdaten Österreich

t-Scripts so anpassen kann und auch tatsächlich anpaßt, daß bestehende Daten nicht dupliziert oder ungeprüft ersetzt werden, kann es klappen. Dir vertraue ich allerdings leider gar nicht mehr! Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@opens

Re: [Talk-at] highway=trunk in Österreich

ar zu machen. Eine kompliziertere Definition von highway=trunk (die noch dazu internationalen Konventionen widerspräche) ergäbe auch für mich absolut keinen Sinn. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstre

Re: [Talk-at] Moderation bei persoenlichen Vorwuerfen

Mail nicht mehr zurückgenommen werden kann). Einen hundertprozentigen Schutz vor unerwünschten Beiträgen gibt es leider nicht. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Österreichs Hausnummern in OpenStreetMap unvollständig

lgende Nutzungsbedingungen: > "Standardentgelte und Nutzungsbedingungen 2014 für Daten des > Adressregisters" (Erlass des BEV vom 23. Oktober 2014, GZ 4374/2014-152) Das Adressregister ist KEINE Open-Data-Quelle. Daten daraus in OSM zu übernehmen

Re: [Talk-at] Relationschaos nach Landesstraßenanpassung (Kreisverkehr Erstellung)

hon seit ein paar Jahren nicht mehr. In Wien hingegen ist die Qualität erstklassig.) Und nur in der OSM habe ich die ÖPNV-Daten zusammen mit den ganzen anderen Daten (POIs, Fußwege usw.) an einer Stelle. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing

Re: [Talk-at] Relationschaos nach Landesstraßenanpassung (Kreisverkehr Erstellung)

beitest. Hellsehen können die natürlich alle nicht. ;-) Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

would one need to build these? > > Thanks, Jason > > > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-at] CS Kommentar durch Problemuser

sten benutzt. Zudem unterstellt er verbrecherische Absichten. Kevin Kofler ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Historisches Gebäude mit gewerblicher Nutzung?

n. Zudem hat er einige wenige Features, die, zumindest als ich es zuletzt überprüft hatte, nicht einmal der JOSM konnte. Aber mit dem Funktionsumfang von JOSM kann er nicht mithalten.) Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editor_usage_stats Liebe Grüße, Kevin __

[Talk-us] Tagging of State Parks in the US

Summary: I propose that the unifying feature of the typical State Park is its protection status, and propose that one tag combination that ought to appear on its boundary is `boundary=protected_area protect_class=21`. I solicit community feedback before trying to stitch this idea into the Wiki or

Re: [Talk-at] Organisiertes Mappen un Österreich

portierst du dann massenhaft Daten vom BEV? Kevin Kofler (der auch NICHT für das BEV arbeitet!) ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >