Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

2010-04-26 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Might be cool to set up a Saturday mapping party and social combined somewhere easy to reach and needing some mapping between London and Birmingham. We could thrash out the bones of a UK chapter and see who's interested in working on it over a beer or two. Anyone want to look and suggest a

Re: [Talk-GB] Workington Bridges

2010-04-21 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
We had a discussion about this point during the Kidderminster mapping party on Saturday. Our decision (relating to the Black Country in our case) was that we would use OS OpenData StreetView, especially in partly mapped areas, but we would record some info on the wiki for each area covered so

[Talk-GB] Reminder: Three Counties Mapping party (Haslemere, Surrey) this Saturday

2010-04-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Just a reminder that the Three Counties mapping party is taking place this Saturday 17th April at Haslemere, Surrey meeting 9.30am in the Costa Coffee on Haslemere High Street. Background: Surrey, West Sussex and Hampshire is increasingly well mapped in OpenStreetMap with good

[OSM-talk] SOTM: Mapping party idea, and language question

2010-04-10 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
As was the case last year to some degree, the venue of SOTM has decided my holiday plans for me this year and I'm thinking of staying on for about a week to see more of Catalonia. I'm quite keen to see the mountain scenery of the Pyrenees and to do some walking, and looking at the cycle map,

[Talk-GB] VectorMap District: Completely crazy idea, maybe, but...

2010-04-04 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Despite being disappointed at the lack of public right of way/field boundary info in the OS releases, I have to admit that VectorMap District does *look* very nice, kind of like Landranger minus contours and footpaths. So I'm wondering, would it be possible to create maps which combine the

Re: [OSM-talk] Announcing closedstreetmap.org

2010-04-01 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Google, Waze and OSMF have partnered on a common initiative to explore crowd-sourced mapping solutions. Yes, this is real. See: www.closedstreetmap.org for the full press release. Contact me if you want to be involved It's (well) after 12:00 here and in most of the world! ;-)

Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey

2010-04-01 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Does that mean there's nothing at all for countryside users in the OS data being released? Or does Meridian have it? Sorry to follow up my own post - it would appear not. A real shame about the lack of countryside data in this free OS dataset. The Meridian data doesn't really contain anything

Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey

2010-04-01 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hi Andy, I'm not sure the OS has reliable footpath data for the countryside anyway. Last time I chatted with the OS about this they were interested in whether OSM could work with them to update rural ROW footpaths because they don't survey them anymore. Really? - that's interesting. Do you

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView: StreetView for footpaths and trails

2010-03-25 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Just a quick follow up: apologies for the downtime overnight, when changing around the locations of files on the server to prepare for committing to SVN, I messed up one or two paths. Anyway it should work again now. Nick ___ talk mailing list

[OSM-talk] OpenTrailView: StreetView for footpaths and trails

2010-03-24 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hi, (*posted to talk in case of interest, but all follow ups will be on the Photos list*) Having been, I have to admit, just a little impressed with the current state of Google Street View in the UK (i.e. it's now complete), my interest in developing StreetView for footpaths has been

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView: StreetView for footpaths and trails

2010-03-24 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Nice, Will the source code be available in one of the svn repositories? Yes, I've just added it (and the whole of Freemap) to the OSM SVN repository at sites/www.free-map.org.uk/otv/ It is intended to gather panoramas by the way. Thanks for the suggestions. Nick

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView: StreetView for footpaths and trails

2010-03-24 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
This is certainly a nice project and a challenge to do, but it would take out the fun of actually walking /trailing if you are not surprised anymore by the lovely view around that corner. Though seeing the view for real is a bit different than seeing it on the internet! ;-) Also there are other

[Talk-GB] Three Counties (Surrey, W Sussex, Hants) Mapping Party Sat April 17th - date confirmed

2010-03-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
To follow on from my earlier email, I'd like to now confirm the date of the Three Counties mini mapping party (Haslemere, Surrey) as Saturday April 17th. Aim will be to complete a number of the villages and small towns in the Haslemere area. Details on the wiki at

[Talk-GB] Three Counties (Surrey/W Sussex/Hants) mini-mapping party Saturday April 17th

2010-03-19 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Would like to propose a mini mapping party for Sat April 17th to cover the Surrey/W Sussex/Hampshire borderlands. This area is generally well mapped but there are a number of missing streets in several of the villages / small towns in the area - e.g. Hindhead, Midhurst, Witley,

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I wouldn?t take PRoW refs from any source unless I was completely confident that it?s compatible with OSM?s license Sorry, meant to raise this point in my last reply. Would any source also include footpath signs with the number on? This is common practice on the Isle of Wight, and I myself

Re: [OSM-talk] Freemap - OpenStreetMap for walkers (hikers) - feature ideas?

2010-03-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Walking isn't just about long-distance stuff. Being able to say: x is my starting point and I have [10|30|60mins|...] and I am [slow as a snail|average|running from mad mappers], please take me on a circular route that avoids busy roads, goes through nice parks, maybe goes to places people

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for walkers / hikers - getting it going!

2010-03-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
(PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure how many of my trails will work with other stylesheets) path isn't Spawn of Satan! ;-) What is Spawn of Satan, here in the UK at least, is foot=yes. ;-) This is completely ambiguous, either use designated for a designated

[OSM-talk] OSM for walkers / hikers - getting it going!

2010-03-11 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that we can make a good go of exchanging ideas and developing

[OSM-talk] Freemap - OpenStreetMap for walkers (hikers) - feature ideas?

2010-03-10 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, After a year or so of server memory issues causing problems with Freemap (www.free-map.org.uk; currently maps are temporarily unavailable as I'm testing one or two things; will be available from later this evening) I'm aiming to re-vamp the site this year to use tiles generated

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping Oxted, Reminder: Maidstone 27th March

2010-03-08 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Anyone want to arrange something an April? hint hint ;-) Yes, I can still do but due to likely work pressure it will now have to be April 10/11 or 17/18 - I'm probably going to have to work until about 1pm-2pm on the weekend of 24/25 and May 1/2/3. I'll see how Haslemere's doing and if it

Re: [Talk-GB] Kent County Council Highways Gazetteer

2010-03-04 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
No idea whether c-class road references are nationally unique. It seems both plausible and implausible at the same time. The C-numbers seem to low (1000) for them to be national. You'd probably end up with 6-figure C roads if they were nationally numbered... Also Kent isn't in region 3 for

Re: [OSM-talk] Thoughts on OSM design, and looking forward and back

2010-02-26 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
When I originally signed up I found the whole thing a tad daunting and overwhelming originally, nothing was very clear about what it was I was supposed to be doing, beyond fixing simple mistakes, or how to use GPS traces to enter data that wasn't available from imagery. I'd just like to make a

[OSM-talk] Still interest in an Android POI collector?

2010-02-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Firstly thanks for the replies regarding a tile generator using the Mapnik OSM plugin - looks like there's a little bit of interest so I might start work on it. The other thing I have in mind to do is a POI collector for Android devices. I seem to remember there being an interest in this

[OSM-talk] Creating custom OSM sites using the Mapnik OSM plugin?

2010-02-22 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Not sure if talk's the best place for this, rather than dev, but I would guess so as it doesn't relate to OSM development itself. Anyway, some time ago I developed the OSM plugin for Mapnik, but due to other things haven't worked on it for a while. However I always thought that it would be

Re: [OSM-talk] Creating custom OSM sites using the Mapnik OSM plugin?

2010-02-22 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Do people think this is a good idea? It's one of several possibilities that I'd like to work on, though I'd probably only do so if there's sufficient interest and/or I can't resolve the memory issues on my own site in other ways. Sorry to follow up my own post - but I forgot to say, this would

Re: [Talk-GB] Two dozen mapping parties

2010-02-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
The residential areas and suburbs of *any* town aren't places you'd normally go unless you had to, but we do to map them. Mapping Berry Hill or Ladybrook wouldn't be any different to mapping a suburb in any other town in the UK. To be fair it can be quite pleasant mapping the nicer residential

Re: [Talk-GB] Two dozen mapping parties

2010-02-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hi Andy, Had a couple in mind, firstly a mini-party for Haslemere (surrey) which is partly complete but not totally. I could also do Andover from the priority list as it's quite local to me. Thirdly I'd like to do a larger-scale countryside event in the summer down here in the south somewhere,

Re: [Talk-GB] Bracknell Forest - vandalism?

2010-01-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Not sure whether this is vandalism or just a bit of 'fun' (I suspect the latter). I would go through and just remove all the names but I don't have sufficient local knowledge to determine which are genuine (I know The Devil's Highway is right, and I'm pretty sure that Poo Alley is wrong, but

[OSM-talk] osm2pgsql error in Oxford/Cotswolds .osm data 19/12/09

2009-12-22 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, I'm having problems loading in a slab of OSM data for the Oxford/Cotswolds area for the UK extract for 19/12/09 downloaded from geofabrik.de. osm2pgsql stops with the error Error allocating ways (no other info is produced) The relevant file is

Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM 2010 Girona, Spain!!

2009-12-20 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Perhaps that's southern Spain in the Sunny Florida sense, all of it being a tad southern. Now I'm getting more confused about your abilities in geography All of those locations are North North compared to where? ;-) Nick ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] ClosedCycleMap (was: Re: Cross-renderer tag support, now with OSMdoc!)

2009-12-20 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Technical skills and inclination are not enough. You also need considerable server side muscle to create a dedicated map. You don't *necessarily* need this if you're prepared to only update your map once a week (which, it should be said, is still much, much more frequently than the OS and

Re: [OSM-talk] ClosedCycleMap (was: Re: Cross-renderer tag support, now with OSMdoc!)

2009-12-20 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
The standards for acceptance by the casual user have grown enourmously. A year ago, the main maps were re-rendered once a week and that was cool. Now they are updated daily/minutely and somehow people expect that from _every_ map. Weekly updates are now considered lame. And less than full

Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM 2010 Girona, Spain!!

2009-12-20 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
All of Spain is further north than Tennessee, the US state where I live. Tennessee is on about the same latitude as Algeria. That's another example of the anticlockwise axis tilt of perceptions of places versus where they actually are. I've noticed that several places in the world are tilted

Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM 2010 Girona, Spain!!

2009-12-20 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
OK, so if we tilt Spain enough then Girona is in southern Spain. Cool... I don't think anyone will sniff at the 30C average max for Girona in July though (source: Wikipedia) :-) Nick ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] openmaps.eu

2009-12-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hmm, no one thought of registering Open Maps as a trademark as well as OpenStreetMap? What makes you think that if OpenStreetMap is a term deemed to general to work as a trademark, Open Maps would somehow work? In any case, we are supposed to be open. Trying to trademark names merely

Re: [OSM-talk] New OpenStreetMap iPhone Editor - Mapzen POI Collector

2009-12-07 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
A call to get only points is certainly something we could add and it would certainly save quite a bit of work on the server over the normal map call and hence hopefully speed things up. What would be really good, I think, to avoid conflicts is to add some API code which refuses to add a POI if

Re: [OSM-talk] Divided roads proposal

2009-12-03 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
It's both, a rendering issue when the names are duplicated and a mapping issue about representing the turn restrictions. Note that It's a very old definition in OSM to say that we duplicate the ways when there is a physical division between the two ways (it's physically impossible to cross the

Re: [OSM-talk] Path vs footway vs cycleway vs...

2009-11-30 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I'm doing a lot of mapping of pedestrian and bike paths around my area, and am having trouble deciding when to use path, when footway, and when cycleway. I'm particularly troubled by the way Potlatch describes path as unofficial path - making it sound like an unpaved line of footprints carved

Re: [OSM-talk] positioning of barrier = stile

2009-11-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Should be this: or should I put in a node e and tag that with barrier = stile: c | | a---e-b | | d or, better c . . . a..e.b . d because the path has to actually join the road. b is the node

Re: [Talk-GB] Surrey meet-up?

2009-11-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Does anyone from Surrey (and Hants, Sussex or Berks) fancy a social in Guildford during the first week in December? I'm thinking of Wednesday 2nd or Thursday 3rd. Yes, definitely. Nick ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-GB] Reminder: Fareham mapping party tomorrow 10.00am

2009-10-31 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, A reminder that the Fareham mapping party takes place tomorrow meeting Fareham station 10am. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Fareham_Mapping_Party for more details. The weather's maybe a bit iffy in the morning, but hopefully will clear by 12.00 giving a few

Re: [Talk-GB] Proper Rights of Way coverage

2009-10-26 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello Andy, Couple of comments on that. Quite a lot of PROW within the urban sprawl. These being ways that have had to be adjusted and realigned when housing development extended, but at least were maintained as a route. True, though perhaps these aren't so important to show as most people

[Talk-GB] Proper Rights of Way coverage map

2009-10-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Following on from the unintentional rights-of-way coverage map generated by zooming out from the OSM/First Edition mashup that I mentioned the other day, I've now done a script to generate a real one. It's available at http://www.free-map.org.uk/freemap/stats/statsmap.php

Re: [Talk-GB] Proper Rights of Way coverage map

2009-10-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello Andy, Couple of comments on that. Quite a lot of PROW within the urban sprawl. These being ways that have had to be adjusted and realigned when housing development extended, but at least were maintained as a route. True, though perhaps these aren't so important to show as most people

Re: [Talk-GB] Proper Rights of Way coverage map

2009-10-23 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
It's a bit more sophisticated than that; see the URL for what I consider a right of way. Note that I tried a version with highway=footway,foot=yes added in, and got the same sort of pattern. Nick In fact, it's possible to add highway=footway, foot=yes to the definition of a right of way by

[Talk-GB] Fareham Mapping Party Nov 1st now on wiki

2009-10-22 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Brief details of the Fareham mapping event are now available on the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Fareham_Mapping_Party Fareham is one of the few south Hampshire towns with a relatively small number of street names, so come along and finish the job! There

[Talk-GB] UK rights of way coverage map

2009-10-21 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
An unintended consequence of the First Edition/OSM mashup (see earlier post) is that I have an image of rights of way coverage of the UK in OSM. See http://www.free-map.org.uk/images/tiles2/firsted/5/15/10.png Clearly shows we need more countryside mappers in the east, southwest and Wales!

[OSM-talk] Freemap blog now up again, including Footnav updates

2009-10-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, After a long period of being down, largely due to being too busy with other things, the Freemap blog, which focuses on UK countryside mapping and my own development projects in this area, is now up again at: http://www.free-map.org.uk/wordpress/ If you're following the Footnav

[Talk-GB] Fareham mini-mapping party Sun Nov 1st

2009-10-13 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, After a long hiatus in mapping parties in the south of England, I'd like to announce one on Sunday November 1st in Fareham, Hants, near Portsmouth. This is being partly run as an OSM taster session with the local branch of the British Computer Society, though experienced OSMers

[OSM-talk] Freemap Mobile (mobile map application): version 3 now available

2009-10-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, TBH I thought I had announced this in June but a quick search of the mailing lists suggest I didn't, must have been too distracted with organising my holiday. Anyway, an updated version (3) of Freemap Mobile, a Java ME based mobile mapping application orientated towards

Re: [OSM-talk] Freemap Mobile (mobile map application): version 3 now available

2009-10-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
TBH I thought I had announced this in June but a quick search of the mailing lists suggest I didn't, must have been too distracted with organising my holiday. Anyway, an updated version (3) of Freemap Mobile, a Java ME based mobile mapping application orientated towards countryside users is

Re: [Talk-GB] Freemap Mobile (mobile map application): version 3 now available

2009-10-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
TBH I thought I had announced this in June but a quick search of the mailing lists suggest I didn't, must have been too distracted with organising my holiday. Anyway, an updated version (3) of Freemap Mobile, a Java ME based mobile mapping application orientated towards countryside users is

[OSM-talk] footnav: 3D visualisation tool for OSM data: updates

2009-10-05 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
A few updates to footnav, the 3D OSM visualisation tool aimed at countryside (and eventually mobile, in the field) use. The main development is that it will now read in OSM data and overlay it on the SRTM data, using bilinear interpolation. This mostly works, but there are issues to do with

Re: [OSM-talk] Mobile countryside surveying tool

2009-10-02 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
The downside of J2ME (at least in the UK, where it rains a lot) is that the phones that it runs on tend not to be waterproof. There are various cases available, but they're not cheap. Maybe a complementary approach would be to have something that could work with GPX file from a handheld GPS

Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?

2009-10-01 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
And as I said before I am 99.9% certain that this is not breach of copyright in the UK either. As I said before this is identical to the case where someone plans a route using an atlas then uploads their traces to OSM, using their own observations to tag the roads, not the atlas.

[OSM-talk] Mobile countryside surveying tool

2009-09-30 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, With all the talk of countryside surveying issues recently (placement of hedges etc) I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to develop some sort of mobile countryside surveying tool where people could note down, in the field, the placement of hedges relative to paths and the

Re: [OSM-talk] Mobile countryside surveying tool

2009-09-30 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Why JavaME exactly? It's kind of getting long in the tooth compared to JVMs running on modern smart phones Not to mention smart phones usually have a soft or hard keyboard, rather than twiddling about with 12 keys to type things out To try and support as many as possible - Qt is another

Re: [OSM-talk] Mobile countryside surveying tool

2009-09-30 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
This sounds interesting, but could you describe a bit more what you had in mind? I would particularly be interested to know how it would differ to the already existing mobile tools and if it is not possible to add this functionality to them, given that you can do a fair amount with them

Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?

2009-09-29 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Lawds, I wish the English could speak English. Who decided it would be a good idea to fork off American into a whole 'nother language? Well if it's any consolation I seem to have learnt the American meaning of public domain before any English meaning ;-) Nick

Re: [OSM-talk] Terms of use for OSM tiles and API?

2009-09-29 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Problem is that you create expectations that are difficult to fulfil by hobbyists with the haphazard setup that we have. If you want a reliable tile server, you need a proper computing centre with fallback hardware and all that, and admins paid for being woken up at 3am if something goes

Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?

2009-09-28 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Incidentally, as well as the possible OS contamination, the Council will itself have database and content copyright in the data, so explicit permission would be needed from them to incorporate and release it under our CCBySA license. In obtaining that permission you could ask them to assert

Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?

2009-09-28 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Bear in mind that public domain meaning free of copyright is a US term. The traditional UK meaning is quite different. In the UK, if you say the map is now in the public domain, that means that the map is now available to the public - i.e. it's not solely an internal publication. It does not

Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries

2009-09-25 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the 3D navigation stuff I'm working on. I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles btw. Nick We do, I know, because I'm one of them ;-) but sometimes that's not quite enough. I had a path that

Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?

2009-09-25 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
You bring up a point that I think needs expanding on for clarification. I decide where I'm going to go for a walk by looking at a combination of my OS and OSM maps. I look for /indications /of rights of way on my OS map. Initially this is the only evidence I have. If I see it's not indicated in

Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries

2009-09-24 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hi Mike, OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is anyone working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping? Mike Harris I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the 3D navigation stuff I'm working on. I think most people who

Re: [OSM-talk] USB Serial converters - any recommendations?

2009-09-22 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
[snip mostly PL2303 recommendations] Thanks for the replies on this. My converter is a PL2303 based one, the kernel module detects it when it's plugged in, but... I can't get data out of it using gpsbabel, it reports Timeout - no data read or similar. Maybe I just got a cheap-and-nasty

[OSM-talk] USB Serial converters - any recommendations?

2009-09-21 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, I have a MacBook Pro dual-booting Mac OS X 10.5 and Linux (Ubuntu 9.04, kernel 2.6.28). Can use it for most things I need to do but the one thing lacking is a serial port. I got hold of a USB Serial converter and drivers but it didn't work well, sometimes it read data,

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Footnav - new 3D project aimed at countryside users

2009-09-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I'm glad to see that this project is moving on and especially that it's using Qt :) However, I get a compile error with revision 2: Me too. In SRTM.h there is: #include GL.h But in maths.h I see this instead: #ifdef __APPLE__ #include gl.h #else #include GL/gl.h #endif Quite

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123's latest

2009-09-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
We seem unable to contact Liam123 via normal channels. This means we have to think of other ways of contacting members who continually put mistakes into the dataset. Is it not possible to put a flag on his account, so when he logs in he is told what he has been doing and asked to explain himself?

[OSM-talk] Footnav - new 3D project aimed at countryside users

2009-09-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, A quick update on the Footnav project, which I've hinted at once or twice on here. Footnav aims to be a 3D mobile navigation application for countryside users e.g. hikers, off road cyclists, showing OSM data (paths, 3D models of stiles, gates etc, and hills using SRTM data).

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?

2009-09-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
How do you then tag roads that are smaller than unclassified, are narrower or have lesser importance? If they're a residential street, residential. If they're a service road (drive, road into industrial estate), service. All other minor roads would be unclassified. These could be country lanes

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Footnav - new 3D project aimed at countryside users

2009-09-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello Matt, Hello everyone, A quick update on the Footnav project, which I've hinted at once or twice on here. Footnav aims to be a 3D mobile navigation application for countryside users e.g. hikers, off road cyclists, showing OSM data (paths, 3D models of stiles, gates etc, and hills

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?

2009-09-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hi, My understanding is that rural roads (country lanes as they are called in the UK) should be highway=unclassified. However if there is a small housing estate or residential road in a village, it should be highway=residential. Cue long debate on this ;-) Nick Valent Turkovic

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?

2009-09-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
To be clear, how would you map this street that goes from Podravlje: http://bit.ly/DesFh That looks like an unclassified to me. These sorts of things are common in the UK: dead-end rural roads which have footpaths or bridleways coming off the end. Nick

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?

2009-09-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
My understanding was that Unclassified roads went somewhere and did not have a road number but were not up to Tertiary Standard (What ever that means) where as Residential Streets did not go anywhere and only had houses on them. bit like a living_street but where cars have priority really. Peter.

[OSM-talk] Tagging vague, ill-defined, or unfriendly paths

2009-08-26 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths? The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests where there is

Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC End: signFinder

2009-08-19 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
here, whatever the local council decides to put up often reflective silverish background, black letters may be black on yellow may be white on blue may be green on white Where's here? The UK seems to be rather variable, black on white is most common but I've seen white on green, white on black,

Re: [Talk-GB] English chapter

2009-08-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
My main comment was that the proposal didn't 'sit' well with the government regional structures. I do have to make the comment though that the government regional structures are rather arbitrary and do not reflect real cultural regions. Where I am in Southampton, I'm supposedly in the same

Re: [Talk-GB] English chapter

2009-08-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
What is the point of local chapters in England? We don't have language conversion issues, currency issues or time zone issues. Cheers, Chris One need would be to organise and coordinate local mapping. For instance, in my area (the Solent area or central southern England for want of a better

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way

2009-08-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Also, the definitive map/statement is not even definitive! The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 set a cut off date of 2026 for all rights of way to be recorded on definitive statements or be lost, Going off the OSM subject, but: would presence on an NPE map as a black dashed line but

[Talk-GB] Fw: English chapter

2009-08-18 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk 18/08/2009 17:08 To Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk cc talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject Re: [Talk-GB] English chapter Nick Whitelegg wrote: What is the point of local chapters in England? We don't have language conversion issues

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Whiteleggnick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: In the UK I would tag such a path as foot=designated;bicycle=permissive; and pragmatically highway=footway for the moment, using the generally-accepted definition of footway as urban surfaced path (though would prefer highway=path; surface=paved)

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
... but, rightly or wrongly, I do not think I am alone in using highway=footway for all paths intended primarily for pedestrians whether urban or rural, designated or not, designation=anything - the only real exception I make is (mostly) in rural areas where the path is clearly informal and of

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way

2009-08-17 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Following on from this, am I correct in assuming that the only definitive source of mapping information about public rights of way is the OS? It seems ludicrous that *public* rights of way are effectively copyrighted in this manner. I suppose it's analagous to the issue with council boundaries.

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-16 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
So a public footpath which the council has converted into a cycleway (part of a future cycle network if the council ever commit funds to complete their decade old plan) which is segregated in some sections and unsegregated in others is possibly a footway with bicycle=permissive? I think I?ve

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-14 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb: highway=footway (not suitable) bicycle=dedicated (signed) A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me. why not? In Germany: sign footway + additional sign: Fahrräder frei That's yes, not designated. Silly question, maybe: but, what does yes actually

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-14 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
I would prefer that designated does not infer exclusively designated, so that it's possible to have bicycle=designated as well as foot=designated on a shared pathway (signed with a picture of a person and a picture of a bicycle). Agree here. UK bridleways for instance should have foot=designated;

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way

2009-08-14 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
So hopefully you can see where I'm going with this. I want to represent ways with a legitimate ?foot=yes? tag. In the absence of signposts, in practice the guide for UK walkers is the OS map, but if I walk a route which I believe follows the OS map for the purposes of a GPS trace, is this not

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way

2009-08-14 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
And just a quick reminder that the NPE edition map is available as on overlay in both JOSM and Potlatch editors David Caution is needed here though. I have an NPE map of the local area which I sometimes use to locate possible rights of way in an area with which I am unfamiliar. In about 80%

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
This is a rather lenient definition that is unsuitable to depict the German use case. That is exactly the reason for the confusion we are having. If something is tagged as a cycleway and I am planning to walk on foot, I need to know whether it is an unsigned way assumed to be suitable for

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
In my opinion, suitability is a whole new topic that should'nt be represented by *mode_of_transport*=yes/no, as it's highly subjective. yes/no should solely describe the legal status. Agreed. One can use the surface tag to do this together with SAC_scale etc (with which I'm not 100% familiar but

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
[waymarked paths in Schwarzwald, Germany] If you use designated for the waymarked ways without legal impact, then you need yet another tag (e.g. official) for the real cycleways with roadsigns and legal impact. Thanks! In that case I'll just use permissive. Are there any Germany-specific tags

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-12 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
The highway=footway is IMHO an alias for the more complex highway=path foot=yes surface=paved etc. construction. I think aliases are perfectly legitimate constructs when dealing with very common situations, and furthermore, much easier for newbies to remember and deal with. Perhaps, but I

Re: [OSM-talk] A process for rethinking map features

2009-08-11 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello Tom, So for example Nick Whitelegg and Martin Simon might lead a group to work out how best to tag paths of all kinds. If their proposal was accepted at SOTM 2010, somebody would create a map highlighting all the ways that probably need to be corrected and a massive effort to bring things

Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

2009-08-11 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com Sent by: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org 10/08/2009 23:2 To Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com cc talk talk@openstreetmap.org Subject Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Martin Simongrenzde...@gmail.com wrote:

[OSM-talk] SOTM Friday Night latest arrangements

2009-07-09 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, Is the plan for tomorrow (Friday) still to meet here? http://www.stateofthemap.org/2009/07/06/pre-conference-drinks-nieuwmarkt/ Will be unable to read the list from approx 07:30 BST tomorrow. Can get the internet on my phone but obviously in NL it's going to be rather

[OSM-talk] SOTM: Amsterdam Friday Evening

2009-07-06 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello everyone, I'm arriving (all being well!) in Amsterdam Friday evening at either 17:03 or 18:03, depending on train connections from London. Are there any plans for any people / groups to look round the city on Friday evening? My hotel is fairly central I think so should be ready by 18:00

Re: [Talk-GB] UK-specific tagging for rural feature names?

2009-06-19 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Hello Mike, Just catching up on my talk-GB email and was looking at Nick's nice new free-map. Ilkley Moor is on, so it is clearly Ideologically Sound. :-) Thanks Nick. The Yorkshire moors look very empty though. There is a whole wealth of detail that can be added from NPE and local

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging hazardous routes

2009-06-15 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several existing rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it appears that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking pedestrians to walk across four lanes of heavy traffic moving at 70-80 mph. I'd like to include these

Re: [Talk-GB] Freemap (OSM for walkers) - increased coverage

2009-06-09 Per discussione Nick Whitelegg
Quick update on Freemap - a countryside orientated OSM renderer covering England and Wales Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent 09/06/2009 13:42 To talk-gb@openstreetmap.org cc Subject Freemap (OSM for walkers) - increased coverage Hello everyone, Quick update on Freemap - a countryside

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >