Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
On 01/05/2015 23:05, Jérôme Amagat wrote: Il y a 5 fichier texte [Supports, Stations, Antennes, Emetteurs, Bandes] On peut passer d'un fichier a l'autre avec differents id. Voilà ce que fournit donc l'anfr. Bien sur, RIEN N'OBLIGE DE TOUT INTÉGRÉ DANS OSM. Mon opinion est que l'intérêt d'OSM réside dans Supports et Antennes et que le reste a plutôt vocation à rester externe. C'est le consensus ou y-a-t-il d'autres opinions ici ? Bon - j'ai vu quelques mentions de bandes de fréquences dans le débat... Pour les supports, je pense qu'il faut utiliser les tag déjà en circulation les différents man_made (mast , tower, communications_tower) et ne rien mettre pour immeuble,batiment... qui sont déjà présent en surfacique. plus height= et owner=. jusque là on n'est pas sur des choses nouvelles Ca me paraît bien - le fichier des Supports est une source supplémentaire pour qualifier les objets identifiés dans l'imagerie orbitale par le cartographe distant, donc un gain pour OSM avant-même toute considération spécifique aux télécommunications. (peut être reparler de mast , tower, communications_tower, moi je comprends pas les différences) Tu n'es pas seul... First question: Is it a mast or a tower ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower#First_question:_Is_it_a_mast_or_a_tower.3F http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower : man_made=communications_tower has stairs and a lift inside, whereas as man_made=tower, tower:type=communication has to be climbed on the outside http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast montre un exemple où man_made=mast et man_made=tower sont tous les deux valides - la limite est floue. Pour le reste, déjà il peut bien il y avoir 30 antennes sur un pylône, dans osm les antennes et le pylône c'est un node donc il faut mettre les tags sur ce node. il faut choisir le niveau de detail que l'on veut et que l'on peut mettre dans osm et le niveau de complexité. Pour illustrer, pour ceux qui n'ont pas l'habitude d'en voir... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/a/a5/Frazier_Peak_microwave_relay_tower.jpg Aucun pylone ne résistera au poids d'autant d'étiquettes Openstreetmap... [..] Le tag antenna = yes peut permettre aussi d'indiquer le type d'antenne : antenna = multi lorsque'il y a différentes antennes antenna = panneau ou antenne parabolique ... quand il n'y a qu'une antenne Une solution envisageable serait de distinguer le cas de l'antenne isolée de celui de l'antenne sur pylône multifonctions: - Dans le cas de l'antenne isolée, on étiquette l'antenne dans toute sa splendeur - Dans le cas du méga-pylône, on énumère les fonctions du pylône sans détailler chaque antenne Bon... J'avoue qu'il ne s'agit que d'un contournement du problème et non d'une solution - mais ça permet de commencer et on pourra toujours se pencher ultérieurement sur le cas des méga-pylône... D'ici là peut-être qu'une idée géniale sera apparue pour les traiter. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
It is also an easy fallacy to think that if the marketing people of some chain decide to spell their name differently, we could or should simply replace all names to what they should be - no we don't, we only change the name when the store changes its lettering. Another issue. If a store changes name a mechanical edit does not make sense because usually new signs get put up gradually. For instance Domino's Pizza changed its name to Domino's and is running TV ads promoting this, but there are still old signs that say Domino's Pizza. The same thing applies if a chain store goes out of business because usually not all stores close at the same time and there may still be some stores open. I am concerned with stores that are wrong. McDonalds and Tim Horton's are wrong as far as I know. The same is true with an amenity=restaurant called Subway, since it should be amenity=fast_food and any Subway that is not the well known chain would almost certainly be sued by the well known chain and forced to changed its name. On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 5/1/2015 11:07 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that*really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. The proposed edit doesn't seem to match the previous mass Search/Replace edit. It should also be possible to confirm each location against the McDonalds store locator or a store list from McDonalds. It is also an easy fallacy to think that if the marketing people of some chain decide to spell their name differently, we could or should simply replace all names to what they should be - no we don't, we only change the name when the store changes its lettering. I as a local mapper would never notice such a change in 100 years of going back to audit POIs. A remote mapper change would correct this properly if checked against corporate data, complete with proper tagging for old_name - this would assist searches for the new name. The argument is strongly *for* informed, remote changes, assuming that the data in OSM is to be of some use to data consumers. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
L'idée de Verdy est pas al en la matière mais non normalisé encore, donc ta solution parait pas mal.Pour te répondre le consensus est clairement sur operator, usage (avec GPS, GLONASS, GSM, LTE... etc), l'apparence de l'antenne shape/type (à choisir). Sinon pour ton mégapylone, je ne connais pas les données sur ce point mais combien d'opérateurs et quel type d'usage? Le Samedi 2 mai 2015 0h14, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org a écrit : On 01/05/2015 23:05, Jérôme Amagat wrote: Il y a 5 fichier texte [Supports, Stations, Antennes, Emetteurs, Bandes] On peut passer d'un fichier a l'autre avec differents id. Voilà ce que fournit donc l'anfr. Bien sur, RIEN N'OBLIGE DE TOUT INTÉGRÉ DANS OSM. Mon opinion est que l'intérêt d'OSM réside dans Supports et Antennes et que le reste a plutôt vocation à rester externe. C'est le consensus ou y-a-t-il d'autres opinions ici ? Bon - j'ai vu quelques mentions de bandes de fréquences dans le débat... Pour les supports, je pense qu'il faut utiliser les tag déjà en circulation les différents man_made (mast , tower, communications_tower) et ne rien mettre pour immeuble,batiment... qui sont déjà présent en surfacique. plus height= et owner=. jusque là on n'est pas sur des choses nouvelles Ca me paraît bien - le fichier des Supports est une source supplémentaire pour qualifier les objets identifiés dans l'imagerie orbitale par le cartographe distant, donc un gain pour OSM avant-même toute considération spécifique aux télécommunications. (peut être reparler de mast , tower, communications_tower, moi je comprends pas les différences) Tu n'es pas seul... First question: Is it a mast or a tower ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower#First_question:_Is_it_a_mast_or_a_tower.3F http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower : man_made=communications_tower has stairs and a lift inside, whereas as man_made=tower, tower:type=communication has to be climbed on the outside http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast montre un exemple où man_made=mast et man_made=tower sont tous les deux valides - la limite est floue. Pour le reste, déjà il peut bien il y avoir 30 antennes sur un pylône, dans osm les antennes et le pylône c'est un node donc il faut mettre les tags sur ce node. il faut choisir le niveau de detail que l'on veut et que l'on peut mettre dans osm et le niveau de complexité. Pour illustrer, pour ceux qui n'ont pas l'habitude d'en voir... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/a/a5/Frazier_Peak_microwave_relay_tower.jpg Aucun pylone ne résistera au poids d'autant d'étiquettes Openstreetmap... [..] Le tag antenna = yes peut permettre aussi d'indiquer le type d'antenne : antenna = multi lorsque'il y a différentes antennes antenna = panneau ou antenne parabolique ... quand il n'y a qu'une antenne Une solution envisageable serait de distinguer le cas de l'antenne isolée de celui de l'antenne sur pylône multifonctions: - Dans le cas de l'antenne isolée, on étiquette l'antenne dans toute sa splendeur - Dans le cas du méga-pylône, on énumère les fonctions du pylône sans détailler chaque antenne Bon... J'avoue qu'il ne s'agit que d'un contournement du problème et non d'une solution - mais ça permet de commencer et on pourra toujours se pencher ultérieurement sur le cas des méga-pylône... D'ici là peut-être qu'une idée géniale sera apparue pour les traiter. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com wrote http://map.meurisse.org/ Merci. Ça utilise le rendu OSM (perso: beurk) plutôt que MapQuest et c'est externe au site OSM, mais en attend mieux, je prends. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700p5842809.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[talk-au] camp sites
Hi Folks, as some of you are possibly not subscribed to the tagging mailing list, thought I'd point out a proposal under way. Its about a rough classification of camp sites in an ordered way. With the intention of making them a bit easier to render or search for. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Camp_Site Note we use camp site as being the larger area that we, in Oz, would call a camp ground. And what we would call camp site, where one tent or caravan would be set up, is a pitch. They are UK terms, that's OSM policy. But camping is Australia so please consider voting folks. The discussion has driven home to me just how lucky we are in this country in this respect at least ! David ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
Le 2 mai 2015 00:09, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Verdy: un jour faudra que tu lances une encyclopédie :) A l'heure où les encyclopédies arrêtent les unes après les autres... Wikipédia est là pour durer (même s'il ne peut répondre à tout et si on le critique beaucoup c'est devenu le point d'entrée universel pour trouver autre chose via les références externes... car oui on ne doit pas s'en contenter et passer le contenu en revue en cherchant les références et en s'en servant). Il ne restera plus que les ouvrages spécialisés et guides pour les nuls (d'ailleurs de moins en moins vendus sous forme imprimée mais juste en ligne sous forme d'eBook ou de service de questions à la demande). Sinon il restera juste les ouvrages universitaires pour la recherche et les publications privées industrielles (quand elles sont accessibles... sinon il faut attendre la publication d'un brevet), même même eux maintenant copient (ou plagient) Wikipédia sans forcément le citer. Le plagiat ça n'a jamais été mon truc, j'ai un regard critique sur tout et forcément ce que je dis ou écrit est forcément orienté, et tant pis si d'autres ne sont pas d'accord, au moins je ne suis pas là pour copier les autres et je les incite à user de leurs propre esprit critique et leur originalité pour me contredire. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [talk-au] camp sites
Hi, My only observation would be that in Australia toilets and no water seems a very common combination at camp grounds. You know the kind of campground I'm talking about, with either drop toilets or unpotable water. It would probably be worthwhile making a call on the classification that applies to these kinds of camp grounds. Ian. On 2 May 2015 at 10:25, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote: Hi Folks, as some of you are possibly not subscribed to the tagging mailing list, thought I'd point out a proposal under way. Its about a rough classification of camp sites in an ordered way. With the intention of making them a bit easier to render or search for. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Camp_Site Note we use camp site as being the larger area that we, in Oz, would call a camp ground. And what we would call camp site, where one tent or caravan would be set up, is a pitch. They are UK terms, that's OSM policy. But camping is Australia so please consider voting folks. The discussion has driven home to me just how lucky we are in this country in this respect at least ! David ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
BBC source NGA, Nepalese government ?? http://nepal.nga.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/74deb0f5eb6f4f7099f8f24cc176d5f9_3 IDP Camps Nepal April 29th 2015 - IDP_Camps (2111) - Production : 04/28/2015 to 04/29/2015 - Metadata IDP Camps Nepal April 29th 2015 - Licensing No license specified - Source http://ngamaps.geointapps.org/arcgis/rest/services/NEPAL/Latest_NGA_Damage_Assessments/MapServer/3 and , maybe related : Nepal, OSM License, and the NGA http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MapMakinMeyers/diary/34878 Imre 2015-05-01 23:53 GMT+02:00 Robert Banick rban...@gmail.com: This: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32551499 Map at bottom — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: same problem with me. Pierre -- *De :* Simon Poole si...@poole.ch *À :* talk@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Vendredi 1 mai 2015 17h44 *Objet :* Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Robert, the link doesn't seem to work (not just for me) Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
I can confirm that McDonald's in Quebec, Canada have an apostrophe from a Mapillary image of one in Gatineau, QC: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/CYy8HTA4MeQouhZ6929gJw. Reason being that an apostrophe is English but it is allowed in Quebec (at least nowadays) under French language laws. I am aware that McDonald's in non-Latin scripts is different but I assume that McDonald's has an apostrophe everywhere else. (Is there a country where McDonalds is actually correct?) If someone manages to get properly licensed data on store locations from a large company, it might be useful to look at the data integration functionality at http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/. Simply importing data is a bad idea because there already are lots of existing POIs in OSM (there are 14039 objects with name=McDonald's in OSM and Wikipedia says there are about 35000 McDonald's restaurants in the world, so OSM has slightly less than 50% of them), and because imported data is often poor quality. On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:52 PM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote: On 1 May 2015 at 18:30, Imre Samu pella.s...@gmail.com wrote: .. McDonald's problem... Please don't forget the true McDonald's problem! It is a content encoding hell. and very hard to detect by any ordinary field mappers. #1. name=McDonald’s( count=126 ) U+2019 ’ e2 80 99 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%E2%80%99s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97c #2. name=McDonald´s( count=40 ) U+00B4 ´ c2 b4 ACUTE ACCENT http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%C2%B4s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97e #3. name=McDonald's ( count=14039) U+0027 ' 27 APOSTROPHE http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald's Regards, Imre Any hope of tracing the sources of #1 and #2 ? Such as Apple users ? and which editor was used? -- Mike. @millomweb - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via the area's premier website - currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets TCs ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Harry could you assure that they interview KLL ? I agree with Simon. This would be the more beneficial for OSM. regard Pierre De : Simon Poole si...@poole.ch À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 18h14 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Correct link worked now. I'm not aware that anybody in the LWG has a BBC contact, but Harry Wood from the CWG (and HOT) should have one. It is one of the cases were more benefit is likely to be had by getting the BBC to do a piece on OpenStreetMap, KLL and the volunteers that are supporting the aid efforts by remote mapping. Getting attribution in an article that will be somewhere in the archives tomorrow doesn't really help anybody, and will potentially just end in disagreement because the provience of the data is likely difficult to actually trace, better strategy to have BBC owe us one. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Agreed with all the above. No sense coming across very small in a disaster, but it is an opportunity to tell our story. Whether the BBC bites or not is really out of our control. — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: Harry could you assure that they interview KLL ? I agree with Simon. This would be the more beneficial for OSM. regard Pierre De : Simon Poole si...@poole.ch À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 18h14 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Correct link worked now. I'm not aware that anybody in the LWG has a BBC contact, but Harry Wood from the CWG (and HOT) should have one. It is one of the cases were more benefit is likely to be had by getting the BBC to do a piece on OpenStreetMap, KLL and the volunteers that are supporting the aid efforts by remote mapping. Getting attribution in an article that will be somewhere in the archives tomorrow doesn't really help anybody, and will potentially just end in disagreement because the provience of the data is likely difficult to actually trace, better strategy to have BBC owe us one. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Andrew, That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that *really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. I am aware of this problem, though usually trademark laws would make it illegal to operate such a store. Various weird exceptions might exist, such as a McDonalds that existed before the well-known McDonald's fast food restaurant existed, or something called McDonalds that is not a fast food restaurant. There is a bus stop in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada called McDonalds in front of a McDonald's fast food restaurant which I am told is correct because the bus stop name was accidentally misspelled by the city and never corrected. Usually this is only a problem for a chain that only operates in certain countries, and there are unrelated stores in other countries. I would strongly recommend putting a note on any POI that has the name of a common fast restaurant like McDonald's, Subway, KFC, etc. that isn't actually what you think it is. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
@Jérome: Merci de l'avoir expliqué. Je suis opposé au tag communication:*= cependant, en effet je trouve que ces tags surchargeraient trop en cas de données multiples et ne serons jamais assez exhaustif, on risquerait de se retrouver avec des key user defined...). Pour le type d'antenne, je propose déjà antenna:shape (antenna:type éventuellement, j'étais partagé en écrivant). Mais on reste sur le même set d'info a taguer.@Lacombe, comme précisé plus haut, les commentaires sont souhaités entre crochet, j'ai donc rajouté pour les tiens mais du coup j'y réponds ici. Ah et si possible sur le pad les commentaires sont plus intéressants s'ils constituent un texte à compléter et pas une remarque qui nécessite débat, plus approprié à la ML (ou au canal de communication si subitement on s'y connecte en masse), je supprimerai du texte les superflus mais il sera possible d'en retrouver la trace dans l'interface. - radio=repeater|relay ou autre: Non il s'agit d'élément immatériel, difficile à vérifier en pratique et peu utile en carto, mais si quelqu'un d'autre les souhaite, je suis à l'écoute de vos raisonnements. Je propose antenna=yes seul sur un node en cas d'absence de support ponctuel (comme sur un immeuble) - tower:type=communication_tower conduisait jusqu'alors implicitement à l'existence d'une antenne, ce que je défend c'est un tag unifié pour les antennes. Mais donc non pas de confusions... - Le fichier ANFR ne permettrait pas le placement: Relis ce qu'à écrit Jérôme.- Une antenne radar/ une antenne onde courte... etc sont des antennes colossales qui se remarque facilement en milieu urbain et qui constituent toujours un repère, de même à la campagne.- La base de données opencellid/mozstumbler est approximative, mais elle peut etre utile dans des pays qui ne possède pas un équivalent de l'anfr ou dont la base serait non libre. Cela donne une position approximative d'une antenne télécom. d'où la précision déjà présente sur la localisation.J'ai laissé un commentaire parce que je ne comprends pas ce que tu veux y dire. (J'ai intégré certains commentaires au texte aussi)@Verdy: un jour faudra que tu lances une encyclopédie :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 23h06, Jérôme Amagat jerome.ama...@gmail.com a écrit : Le 1 mai 2015 21:42, François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com a écrit : Je ne comprends toujours pas le lien entre ce qui est dans le fichier ANFR et un possible inventaire des antennes dans OSM. Le fichier ANFR décris au mieux une station d'émission pouvant comprendre plusieurs antennes. Le support de l'ANFR n'est pas l'antenne. La plupart des supports sont occupés par une multitude d'antennes. Du coup, si on pouvait avoir quelques explications supplémentaires sur le raisonnement, elles sont les bienvenues. Tu n'as pas du regarder entièrement ce qu'a libérer l’anfr. Il y a 5 fichier texte qui liste chaque'un quelque chose de différent : les Supports (pylône, mat, immeuble ...) accueillant des antennes avec position, hauteur, propriétaire, ça c'est sur ça doit être intégrer dans osm. ensuite les Stations (il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par support) avec l’opérateur (orange,sncf,tdf...) et des dates (implantation,mise en service et modification). Puis les Antennes (il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par station) avec son type (panneau, antenne parabolique...) et des info sur cette antenne (dimension, azimute...). Puis les émetteurs (il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par antenne) avec le système (GSM 900, FM,). Et enfin les Bandes (il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par émetteur) avec le début et la fin d'une bande de fréquence.On peut passer d'un fichier a l'autre avec differents id. Voilà ce que fournit donc l'anfr. Bien sur, RIEN N'OBLIGE DE TOUT INTÉGRÉ DANS OSM. Pour les supports, je pense qu'il faut utiliser les tag déjà en circulation les différents man_made (mast , tower, communications_tower) et ne rien mettre pour immeuble,batiment... qui sont déjà présent en surfacique. plus height= et owner=. jusque là on n'est pas sur des choses nouvelles (peut être reparler de mast , tower, communications_tower, moi je comprends pas les différences).Pour le reste, déjà il peut bien il y avoir 30 antennes sur un pylône, dans osm les antennes et le pylône c'est un node donc il faut mettre les tags sur ce node.il faut choisir le niveau de detail que l'on veut et que l'on peut mettre dans osm et le niveau de complexité.operator=reseau =FM. FH; UMTS 900; LTE 260... ou faire comme proposer là : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmastcommunication:mobile_phone=yes; LTE 260;...communication:radio=yescommunication:television=yescommunication:microwave=yes Le tag antenna = yes peut permettre aussi d'indiquer le type d'antenne :antenna = multi lorsque'il y a différentes antennes antenna = panneau ou antenne parabolique ... quand il n'y a qu'une antenne ___ Talk-fr mailing list
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Correct link worked now. I'm not aware that anybody in the LWG has a BBC contact, but Harry Wood from the CWG (and HOT) should have one. It is one of the cases were more benefit is likely to be had by getting the BBC to do a piece on OpenStreetMap, KLL and the volunteers that are supporting the aid efforts by remote mapping. Getting attribution in an article that will be somewhere in the archives tomorrow doesn't really help anybody, and will potentially just end in disagreement because the provience of the data is likely difficult to actually trace, better strategy to have BBC owe us one. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-at] Wie gelöschte Wege ansehen?
On 03/03/2014 08:33 AM, Christian Aigner wrote: Ein Kollege hat mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, daß er Weg 47710270 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47710270) gelöscht hat und mich gefragt, ob das eh ok für mich ist. Wie kann ich mir ansehen, wie die Karte vor dem Löschen ausgesehen hat? Ich hab ja sonst keine Chance, festzustellen, ob mir die Löschung gefällt. :-) Hallo, der Post ist zwar schon etwas her, aber da es noch nicht alle kennen (die Frage kam bei den Grazer Linuxtagen und am BarCamp auf), möchte ich euch Achavi¹ nicht vorenthalten: [1] http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=20883818 Ich füg die Changeset-id händisch zur URL dazu, aber man kann auch das bookmarklet² verwenden. [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Achavi Besonders praktisch zu verwenden von diesem RSS-Feed eines Gebiets³ aus, da sind dann bei jedem Changesets Links zu achavi dabei (Auf Get RSS-Link klicken, und Rechteck aufziehen): [3] http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/ LG, Christian lg, Michael -- Michael Maier, Student of Telematics @ Graz University of Technology OpenStreetMap Graz http://osm.org/go/0Iz@paV http://wiki.osm.org/Graz http://wiki.osm.org/Graz/Stammtisch signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
[Talk-at] OpenStreetMap Infostand auf den Linuxwochen Wien von 7. bis 9. Mai 2015 (fwd)
Hi! Wir haben jetzt die finale Information für die heurigen Linuxwochen bekommen. Leider haben sich noch nicht viele Leute zur Anwesenheit am Stand eingetragen. Wäre toll, wenn sich noch ein paar finden würden. Ist immer nett sich auch untereinander besser kennen zu lernen. - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wien/Linuxwochen2015 Ich möchte hiermit vor allem jüngere Mitglieder (sowohl jung als in Alter, als auch in noch nicht lange registriert) dazu motivieren sich zu beteiligen. Vor den Gesprächen am Stand muss man keine Angst haben, meistens sind diese eher oberflächlich und niemand erwartet, dass man sich mit allen Aspekten der OSM gut auskennt. Außerdem könnt ihr ein paar von den älteren Hasen kennen lernen. Andreas: Du hast Materialien bereits besorgt, oder? Gibt es noch Dinge die ich mitnehmen kann? Ich freue mich wieder auf interessante Gespräche am Stand! gruesse, Stephan - Forwarded message from Linuxwochen Programm progr...@linuxwochen.at - Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 21:13:02 +0200 From: Linuxwochen Programm progr...@linuxwochen.at To: Stephan Bösch-Plepelits sk...@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at Subject: OpenStreetMap Infostand auf den Linuxwochen Wien von 7. bis 9. Mai 2015 Hallo Stephan, wir freuen uns sehr den OpenStreetMap-Infostand auf den Linuxwochen Wien 2015 vom 7. bis 9. Mai in der FH Technikum Wien begrüßen zu dürfen. Im Ausstellungsbereich gibt es für unsere Aussteller: - Tische und Sesseln nach Bedarf - Bodensteckdosen (Verteiler bitte mitnehmen) - Internet via Wlan - eine Glaswand dahinter für Poster* bis zu A0 Größe - die Möglichkeit Dinge, die nicht transportabel sind, zu versperren. Die Anlieferung kann am Donnerstag 7. Mai ab 8:30 beginnen, der Aufbau ab 9:00, der Einlass für Besucher ist 10:00 und die Keynote beginnt ab 10:30. Der tägliche Abbau empfiehlt sich kurz nach Beginn des letzten Vortrages. Der Abbau am Samstag 9. Mai beginnt ab 16:00. Bitte die Linuxwochen in Euren Communities noch bewerben: - alle Infos: http://www.linuxwochen.at - das Programm: https://cfp.linuxwochen.at/de/LWW15/public/schedule - Linuxwochen Twitter: @linuxwochen Hashtag ist #lww15 * falls ihr noch einen Poster braucht, können wir euch helfen einen auszudrucken, also bitte diesen per PDF, oder PNG sobald als möglich schicken. Bevorzugt nicht vollflächig. Wir schauen was möglich ist. mit lieben Grüßen Christian Jeitler -- progr...@linuxwochen.at +43-699-81729005 Verein Linuxwochen Museumsplatz 1/49 1070 Wien ZVR: 320875837 - End forwarded message - -- Seid unbequem, seid Sand, nicht Öl im Getriebe der Welt! - Günther Eich ,-. | Stephan Bösch-Plepelits,| | Technische Universität Wien -Studien Informatik Raumplanung | | Projects: | | openstreetbrowser.org couchsurfing.org tubasis.at bl.mud.at | | Contact:| | Mail: sk...@xover.mud.at Blog: plepe.at | | Twitter: twitter.com/plepe Jabber: sk...@jabber.at | `-' ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [talk-au] camp sites
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 14:36 +1000, Ian Sergeant wrote: Hi, My only observation would be that in Australia toilets and no water seems a very common combination at camp grounds. You know the kind of campground I'm talking about, with either drop toilets or unpotable water. Thanks Ian. The 'standard' level has water, not necessarily potable or drinking water. So much of your use case is covered. Some effort was put in to minimise the number of steps. Too many and the idea would be unwieldy. So that call had to be made. I reckon at least 95% of camps with a toilet also had water, probably better. So we are playing the odds ! Please consider voting ! david ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat zmolu?
Zdar, natural=cliff snad nemusí být nutně obnažená skála. Aspoň podle wiki: A cliff is a vertical or almost vertical natural drop in terrain topography as it occurs for example in form of coastal cliffs or escarpments. The face of the cliff usually consists of bare solid rock but can occasionally also consist of clay, compacted sand, ice or other solid materials. Takže by to mohlo jít použít... Honza -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Miroslav Suchý miros...@suchy.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 1. 5. 2015 15:59:18 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat zmolu? Mám dotaz, jak se má mapovat zmola? Pro ne-moraváky - rokle vymletá vodou. natural=cliff mi nepřijde správný, ten by měl být jenom tam kde je obnažená skála. barrier=ditch je zase jenom pro man-made prvky Takže jak mapovat rokli - v mém konkrétním případě minimálně 5 metrů hlubokou, se sklonem přes 70 stupňů (geometricky). Což se sice dá překonat, ale rozhodně to je významná překážka. Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
If we want to unify a kind of chain store, I think we should leave the name tag, and focus on other tags. Some examples are ref:vatin=* for the vat id of the store, brand:wikidata=* for the wikidata id of the brand owner, website=* for the central website, or we can find a new better tag that should be the same with all certain chain stores. Names should be left to the local mapper. Janko pet, 1. svi 2015. 17:39 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com je napisao: On 1 May 2015 at 16:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Andrew, On 05/01/2015 12:04 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: I am trying to figure out a way of cleaning up incorrect chain store data in OSM. For example there are 1422 instances of McDonalds in OSM (should be McDonald's) and 203 instances of Tim Horton's (should be Tim Hortons). That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that *really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. I don't think that is something that really advances the quality in OSM, and I would encourage you to grab a notepad and venture outside to do some mapping. That way you wouldn't be scripting world-wide cleanup operations but who knows, you might actually add real value to OSM. Leave the mis-spelled McDonalds to those who map in the area. Maybe it encourages them. I'd go for the mechanical edit. Actually, I'd go for a central single point of maintenance for store names - so we change them all with one change. Doing manual edits, how long does it take OSM to reflect the name change globally ? It's my guess that this would be less accurate than changing them all in one move. The change should of course be name -- old_name and then a new name applied. I'm also in favour of being ahead of the game - gives a better impression that the map's well up to date. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-br] Áreas de perigo
Acompanhando esta discussão, eu me lembrei que nos mapas impressos do Guida 4Rodas em algumas rodovias há alertas sobre perigo de assaltos durante a noite. Ainda que eu concorde com a subjetividade da questão, o exemplo mostra que não é inteiramente fora de propósito inserir este tipo de informação num mapa. O outro ponto bem mais objetivo que me chama atenção na pergunta é o seguinte: se existe um *lugar* conhecido pelo nome de Cracolândia, porque não inserir esta informação no mapa? algo assim: place=locality name=Cracolândia Tirando o nome infame, que diferença isto tem para qualquer outra denominação popular de lugar? É um lugar e tem nome, porque não mapeá-lo? Não será o primeiro e nem o último topónimo com conotação triste. Obs.: O Google Maps não achou Cracolândia. abraço e bom feriado a todos Gerald 2015-04-30 11:24 GMT-03:00 belnu...@pop.com.br: Sei que o termo Área de perigo seria algo muito subjetivo , mas o OSM não poderia criar uma tag para que possamos alertar as pessoas sobre regiões perigosas pra trânsito seja com veículo ou a pé , como por exemplo a Cracolândia ( que existe há muito tempo e parece que não vai acabar ) na cidade de SP ? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Áreas de perigo
Já teve, vindo das contribuições de usuário que as vezes eles põem no mapa, mas já foi removido. http://m.oglobo.globo.com/sociedade/tecnologia/google-maps-identifica-regiao-de-sao-paulo-como-cracolandia-14391239 Em sex, 1 de mai de 2015 11:13, Gerald Weber gwebe...@gmail.com escreveu: Acompanhando esta discussão, eu me lembrei que nos mapas impressos do Guida 4Rodas em algumas rodovias há alertas sobre perigo de assaltos durante a noite. Ainda que eu concorde com a subjetividade da questão, o exemplo mostra que não é inteiramente fora de propósito inserir este tipo de informação num mapa. O outro ponto bem mais objetivo que me chama atenção na pergunta é o seguinte: se existe um *lugar* conhecido pelo nome de Cracolândia, porque não inserir esta informação no mapa? algo assim: place=locality name=Cracolândia Tirando o nome infame, que diferença isto tem para qualquer outra denominação popular de lugar? É um lugar e tem nome, porque não mapeá-lo? Não será o primeiro e nem o último topónimo com conotação triste. Obs.: O Google Maps não achou Cracolândia. abraço e bom feriado a todos Gerald 2015-04-30 11:24 GMT-03:00 belnu...@pop.com.br: Sei que o termo Área de perigo seria algo muito subjetivo , mas o OSM não poderia criar uma tag para que possamos alertar as pessoas sobre regiões perigosas pra trânsito seja com veículo ou a pé , como por exemplo a Cracolândia ( que existe há muito tempo e parece que não vai acabar ) na cidade de SP ? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On 1 May 2015 at 16:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Andrew, On 05/01/2015 12:04 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: I am trying to figure out a way of cleaning up incorrect chain store data in OSM. For example there are 1422 instances of McDonalds in OSM (should be McDonald's) and 203 instances of Tim Horton's (should be Tim Hortons). That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that *really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. I don't think that is something that really advances the quality in OSM, and I would encourage you to grab a notepad and venture outside to do some mapping. That way you wouldn't be scripting world-wide cleanup operations but who knows, you might actually add real value to OSM. Leave the mis-spelled McDonalds to those who map in the area. Maybe it encourages them. I'd go for the mechanical edit. Actually, I'd go for a central single point of maintenance for store names - so we change them all with one change. Doing manual edits, how long does it take OSM to reflect the name change globally ? It's my guess that this would be less accurate than changing them all in one move. The change should of course be name -- old_name and then a new name applied. I'm also in favour of being ahead of the game - gives a better impression that the map's well up to date. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-cz] Jak mapovat zmolu?
Mám dotaz, jak se má mapovat zmola? Pro ne-moraváky - rokle vymletá vodou. natural=cliff mi nepřijde správný, ten by měl být jenom tam kde je obnažená skála. barrier=ditch je zase jenom pro man-made prvky Takže jak mapovat rokli - v mém konkrétním případě minimálně 5 metrů hlubokou, se sklonem přes 70 stupňů (geometricky). Což se sice dá překonat, ale rozhodně to je významná překážka. Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
Andrew, On 05/01/2015 12:04 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: I am trying to figure out a way of cleaning up incorrect chain store data in OSM. For example there are 1422 instances of McDonalds in OSM (should be McDonald's) and 203 instances of Tim Horton's (should be Tim Hortons). That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that *really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. It is also an easy fallacy to think that if the marketing people of some chain decide to spell their name differently, we could or should simply replace all names to what they should be - no we don't, we only change the name when the store changes its lettering. We're not a parrot for the marketing department, we observe what's on the ground. OSM editing is usually holistic - you work on many aspects of the map in an area. If the map has many edits by different people in an area then I can reasonably assume that it has a certain minimum quality because these people are on the ground fixing things. If you remote-mass-fix McDonald's, or worse, if you remote-mass-fix all chain stores on an ongoing basis, you create a false impression of activity in an area when in fact all you do is scribble the latest business decision of some corporate marketing department all over OSM. I don't think that is something that really advances the quality in OSM, and I would encourage you to grab a notepad and venture outside to do some mapping. That way you wouldn't be scripting world-wide cleanup operations but who knows, you might actually add real value to OSM. Leave the mis-spelled McDonalds to those who map in the area. Maybe it encourages them. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Gerade mit iOS getestet, bei mir wird TomToM bzw. Apple maps verwendet, zumindest laut Legal Info unten links in der Karte. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 16:22, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo Jens Ja das Stimmt was du Schreibst, aber wenn man die App Installiert und dann die Karte aufruft wird OSM benutzt. Und danke für die Aufklärung wegen dmca. Ich denk Sie haben einfach die Screenshots nicht Aktuell. Hallo, Wie man am letzten Screenshot der Android App sieht, verwenden sie dort GoogleMaps (der Lizenshinweis ist im linken unteren Eck). Es ist anzunehmen, dass sie auch bei der iOS Version das verwenden, was das Betriebssystem anbietet. Da die POI Daten wie du sagst anscheinend nicht aus OSM sind, und die Attributierung der Karte auch der Homepage passt, sehe ich hier keinen Handlungsbedarf. Die http://dmca.openstreetmap.org ist uebrigens fuer andere Kartenanbieter, um sich bei OSM zu beschweren, falls sie meinen dass unsererseits ein Lizenzverstoss vorliegt. lg, Jens On 05/01/2015 02:18 PM, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
[Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Hallo Jens Ja das Stimmt was du Schreibst, aber wenn man die App Installiert und dann die Karte aufruft wird OSM benutzt. Und danke für die Aufklärung wegen dmca. Ich denk Sie haben einfach die Screenshots nicht Aktuell. Hallo, Wie man am letzten Screenshot der Android App sieht, verwenden sie dort GoogleMaps (der Lizenshinweis ist im linken unteren Eck). Es ist anzunehmen, dass sie auch bei der iOS Version das verwenden, was das Betriebssystem anbietet. Da die POI Daten wie du sagst anscheinend nicht aus OSM sind, und die Attributierung der Karte auch der Homepage passt, sehe ich hier keinen Handlungsbedarf. Die http://dmca.openstreetmap.org ist uebrigens fuer andere Kartenanbieter, um sich bei OSM zu beschweren, falls sie meinen dass unsererseits ein Lizenzverstoss vorliegt. lg, Jens On 05/01/2015 02:18 PM, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On 5/1/2015 11:07 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain non-fastfood places that*really* were called McDonalds just as you mention. The proposed edit doesn't seem to match the previous mass Search/Replace edit. It should also be possible to confirm each location against the McDonalds store locator or a store list from McDonalds. It is also an easy fallacy to think that if the marketing people of some chain decide to spell their name differently, we could or should simply replace all names to what they should be - no we don't, we only change the name when the store changes its lettering. I as a local mapper would never notice such a change in 100 years of going back to audit POIs. A remote mapper change would correct this properly if checked against corporate data, complete with proper tagging for old_name - this would assist searches for the new name. The argument is strongly *for* informed, remote changes, assuming that the data in OSM is to be of some use to data consumers. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Hallo, Hab die App jetzt auf Android installiert, da koennte schon was dran sein, hier ein aktueller Screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dg69to1hi2zuv99/buschenschank.png?dl=0 Zum Vergleich: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/46.75608/15.61403 lg On 05/01/2015 04:30 PM, Gabriel Pfuner wrote: Gerade mit iOS getestet, bei mir wird TomToM bzw. Apple maps verwendet, zumindest laut Legal Info unten links in der Karte. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 16:22, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo Jens Ja das Stimmt was du Schreibst, aber wenn man die App Installiert und dann die Karte aufruft wird OSM benutzt. Und danke für die Aufklärung wegen dmca. Ich denk Sie haben einfach die Screenshots nicht Aktuell. Hallo, Wie man am letzten Screenshot der Android App sieht, verwenden sie dort GoogleMaps (der Lizenshinweis ist im linken unteren Eck). Es ist anzunehmen, dass sie auch bei der iOS Version das verwenden, was das Betriebssystem anbietet. Da die POI Daten wie du sagst anscheinend nicht aus OSM sind, und die Attributierung der Karte auch der Homepage passt, sehe ich hier keinen Handlungsbedarf. Die http://dmca.openstreetmap.org ist uebrigens fuer andere Kartenanbieter, um sich bei OSM zu beschweren, falls sie meinen dass unsererseits ein Lizenzverstoss vorliegt. lg, Jens On 05/01/2015 02:18 PM, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Die KVP stehen noch nicht komplett fest. Die Erstellung der Queries traue ich mir aber schon zu. Erfahrung darin ist bereits vorhanden. Wie ich deiner Antwort entnehme, würdest du das also eher über Overpass umsetzen, als über ein Planet File oder anderen Tools (falls vorhanden)? Am 01.05.2015 um 08:17 schrieb Jo: Wenn du uns sagst welche key-value Paare, werden wir dir ein Overpass Query besorgen. Alles kann grupiert werden in 1 Query. Jo 2015-05-01 8:05 GMT+02:00 Danilo Bretschneider bretschnei...@geospatialinformation.org mailto:bretschnei...@geospatialinformation.org: Moin, ich möchte für die Stadt / Region Bonn bestimmte Key-Value-Paare extrahieren und weiter verarbeiten. Das ganze soll automatisiert über ein Shell-Skript unter Linux laufen. Nun stehe ich vor der Fragestellung: Woher die Daten? Prinzipiell würde ich die Daten über die Overpass API abfragen, als XML abspeichern und entsprechend weiter verarbeiten. Overpass müsste ich jedoch mehrfach anfragen. Zu Beachten wäre hier die Beschränkung von 1 Request pro Sekunde und IP. Außerdem stellt sich mir die Frage, inwieweit man Overpass zum Download verwenden kann - wie viele KVP ich extrahieren möchte steht noch nicht fest (und somit auch nicht der Traffic / Auslastung). Alternativ könnte ich das Planet File bzw. Extrakte von der Geofabrik mit Osmosis verabreiten. Hier besteht das Problem, dass die kleinste Region der Regierungsbezirk Köln ist. Hier müsste man zusätzlich noch eine BBox anwenden, welche jedoch viereckig. Somit wären in der Auswertung auch Objekte enthalten, welche nicht in Bonn liegen. * Gibt es sonst noch Möglichkeiten, um an die OSM Daten zu kommen? * Gibt es hierfür weitere Tools, die für mein Workflow geeignet sind? * Wie kann man anhand des Planet Files die Region Bonn extrahieren? Viele Grüße Danilo ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de - -- 50°45'19.9N 7°05'11.9E Briefkasten gesucht? www.briefkastenkarte.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVQxxSAAoJEHHS7Nnj7BruUxQH/2uG7EZiqogddUGlLSXKxQSP XjCR69VL2oeeTGWfHgxxCAyR9axWm8nAyz0NM4hdenI+oPS6UYNqYSeGJ1jE+Vlu CYHoqwykFm/FrxxUOTZ5giumqtOH8dspgkh+8djLctNJW9XFj161a0EnBmnfmsjs Ug4gRBL6xJmkYpelorLAVxN1mZ1tJ1jUtOZYvDr31br6yGN2YEznyXG0XMIouJ9r UEx5g7glp+f2hROlA6nLrKsWdA4427f8WH62HkqCI3fOgg8FI9dwmMPN/vxA3ySW 41lFLvIwk86bu6Dkvgyc7hjJ6o5JiRIR3t8wli1bRvGqHBmpzlzeI1jkZEQWkyQ= =NFAr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
Am 01.05.2015 um 02:29 schrieb Nicholas G Lawrence: Exactly why this is necessary is a mystery to me. If business wants to make use of OSM data, they can download the planet file just like anyone else. If business wants to contribute data, or donate equipment or sponsor events, those things are also possible. It should be pointed out that during 2012 and 2014 and continuing with at least the LWG till today, dozens of companies and organisations (outside of the geo-industry) with questions have had no problems contacting the OSMF and getting an answer back, typically within less than 24 hours. The OSMF even has a published and working postal mail address (contrary to certain other organisations). Maybe we should run a workshop on how to use google and an e-mail program for the moaners in the geo-industry. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, ich möchte für die Stadt / Region Bonn bestimmte Key-Value-Paare extrahieren und weiter verarbeiten. Das ganze soll automatisiert über ein Shell-Skript unter Linux laufen. Nun stehe ich vor der Fragestellung: Woher die Daten? Prinzipiell würde ich die Daten über die Overpass API abfragen, als XML abspeichern und entsprechend weiter verarbeiten. Overpass müsste ich jedoch mehrfach anfragen. Zu Beachten wäre hier die Beschränkung von 1 Request pro Sekunde und IP. Außerdem stellt sich mir die Frage, inwieweit man Overpass zum Download verwenden kann - wie viele KVP ich extrahieren möchte steht noch nicht fest (und somit auch nicht der Traffic / Auslastung). Alternativ könnte ich das Planet File bzw. Extrakte von der Geofabrik mit Osmosis verabreiten. Hier besteht das Problem, dass die kleinste Region der Regierungsbezirk Köln ist. Hier müsste man zusätzlich noch eine BBox anwenden, welche jedoch viereckig. Somit wären in der Auswertung auch Objekte enthalten, welche nicht in Bonn liegen. * Gibt es sonst noch Möglichkeiten, um an die OSM Daten zu kommen? * Gibt es hierfür weitere Tools, die für mein Workflow geeignet sind? * Wie kann man anhand des Planet Files die Region Bonn extrahieren? Viele Grüße Danilo - -- 50°45'19.9N 7°05'11.9E Briefkasten gesucht? www.briefkastenkarte.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVQxeYAAoJEHHS7Nnj7BruIcsH/2+QBbH91pcGXk2gpCIVrndz lSxoCBCbIsUtxx9kQJY5IxQlTL0hybOmWFwgF3zm3QMCSsdYY6HWTjqZDSRVtHD1 let4YsjCTRh+aOVafpkEmxGHoKfsLLXWRyW6RRg+E8fouCfI3ntxzDfeqoXZUYnJ I6tiNhPKIcH+xeVIEAEy+xB6Fcywd5pn3DAE5uBowMIZja75jFf7hU0tqYpnV6DT LfsaRpTONVS4NMRcnOdf+wHQKOc+mFxq3ELF5yh/sz5yOfrkMaLsje4caGc8O1oN I5GlwzGa6tKFyw7EkoqsmyHznHanjH43RCwBqiMzHpfoxvQAHvIzjwUT3QAR7AU= =XzrA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
Wenn du uns sagst welche key-value Paare, werden wir dir ein Overpass Query besorgen. Alles kann grupiert werden in 1 Query. Jo 2015-05-01 8:05 GMT+02:00 Danilo Bretschneider bretschnei...@geospatialinformation.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, ich möchte für die Stadt / Region Bonn bestimmte Key-Value-Paare extrahieren und weiter verarbeiten. Das ganze soll automatisiert über ein Shell-Skript unter Linux laufen. Nun stehe ich vor der Fragestellung: Woher die Daten? Prinzipiell würde ich die Daten über die Overpass API abfragen, als XML abspeichern und entsprechend weiter verarbeiten. Overpass müsste ich jedoch mehrfach anfragen. Zu Beachten wäre hier die Beschränkung von 1 Request pro Sekunde und IP. Außerdem stellt sich mir die Frage, inwieweit man Overpass zum Download verwenden kann - wie viele KVP ich extrahieren möchte steht noch nicht fest (und somit auch nicht der Traffic / Auslastung). Alternativ könnte ich das Planet File bzw. Extrakte von der Geofabrik mit Osmosis verabreiten. Hier besteht das Problem, dass die kleinste Region der Regierungsbezirk Köln ist. Hier müsste man zusätzlich noch eine BBox anwenden, welche jedoch viereckig. Somit wären in der Auswertung auch Objekte enthalten, welche nicht in Bonn liegen. * Gibt es sonst noch Möglichkeiten, um an die OSM Daten zu kommen? * Gibt es hierfür weitere Tools, die für mein Workflow geeignet sind? * Wie kann man anhand des Planet Files die Region Bonn extrahieren? Viele Grüße Danilo - -- 50°45'19.9N 7°05'11.9E Briefkasten gesucht? www.briefkastenkarte.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVQxeYAAoJEHHS7Nnj7BruIcsH/2+QBbH91pcGXk2gpCIVrndz lSxoCBCbIsUtxx9kQJY5IxQlTL0hybOmWFwgF3zm3QMCSsdYY6HWTjqZDSRVtHD1 let4YsjCTRh+aOVafpkEmxGHoKfsLLXWRyW6RRg+E8fouCfI3ntxzDfeqoXZUYnJ I6tiNhPKIcH+xeVIEAEy+xB6Fcywd5pn3DAE5uBowMIZja75jFf7hU0tqYpnV6DT LfsaRpTONVS4NMRcnOdf+wHQKOc+mFxq3ELF5yh/sz5yOfrkMaLsje4caGc8O1oN I5GlwzGa6tKFyw7EkoqsmyHznHanjH43RCwBqiMzHpfoxvQAHvIzjwUT3QAR7AU= =XzrA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] open expo 2015
oggi apre l'expo, ma probabilmente, a meno di non aver fatto dei miracoli (o delle immani c***ate dal punto di vista progettuale/costruttivo/realizzativo pur di finire in tempo), alcuni degli edifici non sono pronti per l'apertura...questo stando ad un mio amico che lavora li e che due giorni fa mi ha detto che avevano cominciato a levare alcuni ingombri (la così detta bonifica) solo per far sembrare l'expo meno un cantiere, non perchè effettivamente il lavoro su molti degli edifici fosse finito. qualcuno conferma e nel caso sa dire dove i lavori proseguono e quindi dove eventuali tag associati al cantiere non potranno essere rimossi? io ho modo di accedere per il 20, ma fino ad allora non sono in grado di aggiornare la situazione - Ciao, Aury -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/open-expo-2015-tp5817169p5842668.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
I wonder how a marketing department would react if their (potential) customers complained they couldn't find the store. On 2015-05-01 08:47, Simon Poole wrote: Am 01.05.2015 um 02:29 schrieb Nicholas G Lawrence: Exactly why this is necessary is a mystery to me. If business wants to make use of OSM data, they can download the planet file just like anyone else. If business wants to contribute data, or donate equipment or sponsor events, those things are also possible. It should be pointed out that during 2012 and 2014 and continuing with at least the LWG till today, dozens of companies and organisations (outside of the geo-industry) with questions have had no problems contacting the OSMF and getting an answer back, typically within less than 24 hours. The OSMF even has a published and working postal mail address (contrary to certain other organisations). Maybe we should run a workshop on how to use google and an e-mail program for the moaners in the geo-industry. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk [1] Links: -- [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] tag per allevamento trote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 01/05/2015 02:52, Alberto Nogaro ha scritto: From: makakk...@vodafone.it [mailto:makakk...@vodafone.it] Sent: giovedì 30 aprile 2015 22:00 To: Talk-it@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-it] tag per allevamento trote Ciao a tutti, nella mia zona ci sono molti allevamenti di trote,ma non sono ancora riuscito a trovare indicazioni utili su come taggarli.Mi potete aiutare? Grazie Dovrebbe essere questo: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Daquaculture Per le trote: landuse=aquaculture + aquaculture=fish Ciao, Alberto Stando alla pagina tedesca, acquaculture dovrebbe essere l'allevamento nel lago o mare. La pagina propone anche fishfarm, che mi sembra più idoneo per la cultura su terraferma. - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVQymTAAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt0U4H/2pAq62D3oFyfYB/3w6KV0sl HKqFfsSumtsn5UlQPKzO2O5gL/Jdz+EDJnpn/EHcaaWic1jM17FR3iw1a+ejkL07 JR3SIN/E7El1UW3DCtGte8XeP9OYUUgTmda5up26NGFyztgG2extnmjxT+S3St1U 69NtrADcYtUIaNIJzPNYq1tR4dW1TOxMU+UWb/AuMNTFQxoVzjcOkqfeMNJuF1UZ DoSwzYfTAsLQbQ/bphjTOTlJgVCos5UKi4k2kcVmfTbLIQzecDp/AoUujBd2idT7 rvSswq0R0SdyiS854Wanl0joQSNgbZksKPvz3MkeTT8f826yCKFMf64FuTWYQI0= =bKGJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. I think this depends on the chain and how much they care about this. I believe there was a previous import of Lowe's locations, and this data was *woefully* inaccurate. At least in Oklahoma, these often ended up well into the close but no cigar territory, often being blocks away and in nonsensical spots kinda-sorta close, but not close enough to get accurate routing. On the other hand, there was a pretty nicely detailed import of Love's truck stops a while back that included a fair amount of detail, for which the only issue I take with it is that it mistagged most as caravan sites instead of service plazas. The import style I've used ignores the store's geometry or position after the first import. In other words, we can trust the store's store finder to have reasonably accurate information about opening hours and which store locations are currently open for business. Any the additional imports copy over opening_hours type stuff, but leave the OSM geometry alone. If the chain lists a location as 'closed', that generates note to a local mapper. -- Armchair mapping of chain stores faces another problem: while some chains have iconic buildings, on occasion they sell out. Thus a mom pop restaurant in a iHop shell, or an old style Taco Bell that's now a pizza joint. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-cz] Satelitní snímky bingu zmizely?
Ahoj, právě dělám nějaké úpravy ve FM a v JOSM jsem si zapnul satelitní snímky Bingu. A najednou koukám na rozplizlé fleky :-( Nevíte někdo, proč se ztratily detailní snímky, podle kterých jsem mapoval? Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Siehe Anhang, so sieht das Beispielbild von Jens auf iOS aus. Lt legal Info unten links in der Karte Apple Maps und TomTom .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 17:55, Jens Steinhauser wrote: Hallo, Hab die App jetzt auf Android installiert, da koennte schon was dran sein, hier ein aktueller Screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dg69to1hi2zuv99/buschenschank.png?dl=0 Zum Vergleich: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/46.75608/15.61403 lg On 05/01/2015 04:30 PM, Gabriel Pfuner wrote: Gerade mit iOS getestet, bei mir wird TomToM bzw. Apple maps verwendet, zumindest laut Legal Info unten links in der Karte. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 16:22, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo Jens Ja das Stimmt was du Schreibst, aber wenn man die App Installiert und dann die Karte aufruft wird OSM benutzt. Und danke für die Aufklärung wegen dmca. Ich denk Sie haben einfach die Screenshots nicht Aktuell. Hallo, Wie man am letzten Screenshot der Android App sieht, verwenden sie dort GoogleMaps (der Lizenshinweis ist im linken unteren Eck). Es ist anzunehmen, dass sie auch bei der iOS Version das verwenden, was das Betriebssystem anbietet. Da die POI Daten wie du sagst anscheinend nicht aus OSM sind, und die Attributierung der Karte auch der Homepage passt, sehe ich hier keinen Handlungsbedarf. Die http://dmca.openstreetmap.org ist uebrigens fuer andere Kartenanbieter, um sich bei OSM zu beschweren, falls sie meinen dass unsererseits ein Lizenzverstoss vorliegt. lg, Jens On 05/01/2015 02:18 PM, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-GB] elsan_points
On 30/04/15 22:49, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: tag - disposal_point Values pump_out:grey (No sewage) pump_out:black(Contains Sewage) pump_out:bilge(May contain oil) pump_out:restricted (note advise restrictions) dump:black(may have restrictions?) chemical:contained(cartridge style disposal) chemical:clean_down('wet' disposal with clean down facility) chemical:gel_only (may be other restrictions depending on country?) Access clients_only (marina or campsite or leisure facility clients) public_free (council provided facility?) public_fee:rates (see debate in Oz about lack of public facilities even if they paid for access) LOCATION should show if it's private access to boats or other vehicles Payment methods or private access also expand the data. Ok, so if understand, in that proposal a UK canal waterway=elsan_point might be re-tagged like: /disposal_point=yes/ /chemical:contained=yes chemical:clean_down=yes / /chemical:gel_only=no / /chemical:restrictions=uses a septic field, and only biodegradable tank chemicals are allowed.// / /access=/public_fee:rates /boat=yes/ /motor-home=no/ NO ... amenity=marina disposal_point=chemical:clean_down access=clients_only I see no reason for boat or motor-home ... that is determined by the presence or absence of camping grounds on the marina. If the marina is a day boat facility it may well have caravan and RV pitches for those who want to stay overnight and having to add duplicate tags is pointless? It is the ACCESS tags which determine who can access the facilities, And if there is no publicly accessible route to the facility anyway ... Perhaps next to a: /water_point=yes/ /access=public_free/ Access to that may well be different to the disposal facilities! Emergency access to drinking water should be universal. The tags boat=yes and motorhome=no are not universally processed by rendering. Thus most of the time the feature will show up undifferentiated. I see no value to those tags at all ... OpenSeaMap has chosen to use it's own tags in part to avoid motorhome features showing up on Mariner's map. If they don't want to show publicly accessible facilities simply because they are not 'boat users only' then that is up to them. It just seems wrong especially when one starts looking at the sort of combine leisure facilities that are being developed in many countries. There are some interesting comments on the sanidumps sites about access to 'government/council' provided facilities being restricted where they should be universally accessible be that from land or water. If your map only shows half of the facilities you can ACTUALLY use then I think I would be using a different map? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
.. McDonald's problem... Please don't forget the true McDonald's problem! It is a content encoding hell. and very hard to detect by any ordinary field mappers. #1. name=McDonald’s( count=126 ) U+2019 ’ e2 80 99 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%E2%80%99s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97c #2. name=McDonald´s( count=40 ) U+00B4 ´ c2 b4 ACUTE ACCENT http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%C2%B4s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97e #3. name=McDonald's ( count=14039) U+0027 ' 27 APOSTROPHE http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald's Regards, Imre ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Friday 01 May 2015, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: I have created pages on the OSM wiki called http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chain_Store_Cleanup and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chain_Store_Directory. Ideally I would like to create wiki pages for every large chain of stores in the world that is similar to Map Features, with recommended ways of tagging chain stores. A lot of new OSM users get this wrong and create incorrect data, and there wasn't anything on the wiki telling users that McDonalds or Tim Horton's is incorrect. [...] Actually when you want to tag what chain a certain store belongs to the proper tag is brand=* - not for all chains the stores have a uniform name and even if this is the case the name also often varies with the language internationally. As Frederik said, the name tag should be what's on the sign on the store and that should not be changed to something else just because it happens to be identical to a common misspelling of a certain brand name. Both maintining a list of tagged brands and making mechanical edits in case of brand name changes or widespread typos make sense for brand tags IMO but not for name. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project)
Hi The group has been out to bewdley and did a test run of finding curbs. I was not able to join in cos of health problems felling worn out with weather n hayfever. I should really have a go on my own here around my town in redditch. got a stack of photos and a spreadsheet of gps points where there good curbs and so reasonable ones that either steep and hard work to push a manual wheelchair up and others with a reasonable size drop down to the path/road etc etc I need to get some clarification on all the different issues with curbs and come up with some form of coding and label system. first beta version of the map attached (not sure its openstreetmap) i want to know to make a seperate layer of points on top of openstreetmap? does this need to done on custom webpage and having a host etc? I not done any internet programming yet would like the challange but also very time limited too get some sort of beat/demo copy of at least a paper copy of the map of bewdley. Maybe we have a go around bromsgrove on thursday? Is taking photos with embedded gps position enough? I have a friend that can offer me some free website space? ( i am involved in another project called Disability Action Redditch and need to redo there website and i am hoping to put this Curb/Kurb project on there for now - so that should be up soon or at least a frontpage saying that DAR website going live in june/july 2015) mark croft redditch On 15 April 2015 at 19:42, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: A quick reminder that we're due to meet on Thurs 7 May (Election Night!). Thise of us who were at the April meeting decided from our list on Bromsgrove ( mainly to support mark a new mapper). Pub is the Golden Cross ( A Wetherspoons ) which might be a challenge as it wasn't on the map when we decided Regards Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
2015-05-01 13:36 GMT+02:00 Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com: I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. Agree. Has anyone actually asked the retail chains? That's a good question Rob. 'Seeing the light' possibly means maintaining your own platform/apps as a business. I did ask McDonald's back in 2012, I got the following reply: We put focus on optimizing this McDonald's app and want to keep the management of the associated database as efficiently as possible. Keeping databases for others makes that ambition tricky. With the McDonald's app we also communicate information about McDonald's products, actions, nutrition values, different locations and opening times of the restaurants and the McDrives. Also, restaurant renovations and therefore temporary adjusted opening hours are regularly incorporated into an update. For the above reasons, we will not consent to the inclusion of McDonald's restaurants in Openstreetmap. Of course I was disappointed, because I still believe OSM can be the best platform. On the other hand, McDonald's has a point. Breaking the answer down: 1) It's not efficient trying to maintain more than one database 2) that single database serves more purposes than just geocoding 3) Other databases do not have the same quality. So, how does that compare to one of the better POI databases, Google Maps? Having a quick look at GM shows that McDonald's despite copyright allows GM to copy opening hours into the GM database. But maybe they have an arrangement to copy (changing) opening hours on the fly in order to prevent dissatified customers standing in front of a closed door. Since McDonald's does have an incentive to maintain their own database (customer focus), quality of McDonald's data in OSM will always be lower. For me it means that I do map the McDonald's POI's based on ground thruth along with the url to the McDonald's website, but not the opening hours. Reaason for that is that I often see them from the road, but don't visit them daily to have a look at the opening hours. I'm looking forward to other experiences, I sure hope that I'm not the only mapper who has had contact with McDonald's Cheers, Johan I haven't because I don't want to suggest that we will do anything with the data until I know we have the right tools in place to match entries in their database and in OSM. I'm sure it's an easy task but I don't know how to do that. I'd also like to see community support in place so that we can merge in some of their attributes (phone number, opening hours, etc). This could be a bigger challenge! Regards, Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
Je ne comprends toujours pas le lien entre ce qui est dans le fichier ANFR et un possible inventaire des antennes dans OSM. Le fichier ANFR décris au mieux une station d'émission pouvant comprendre plusieurs antennes. Le support de l'ANFR n'est pas l'antenne. La plupart des supports sont occupés par une multitude d'antennes. Du coup, si on pouvait avoir quelques explications supplémentaires sur le raisonnement, elles sont les bienvenues. J'ai ajouté quelques commentaires dans le pad. Bonne soirée. *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux Le 1 mai 2015 13:55, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Désolé de l'erreur de fenêtre Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 11h06, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Le 1 mai 2015 10:20, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Verdi: Hum je pense que tu pousses un peu loin le format initial de Jérome me paraissait bien Jérome avait plutôt été séduit par ma première proposition, cependant je parlais du problème plus général des infos structurées pour lesquelles on n'a pas de schéma clair permettant de les représenter de façon compacte mais lisible et parsable avec un système unique et non ambigu, et sans forcément multiplier le nombre de tags quand ce n'est pas toujours nécessaire (car des infos optionelles qui complètent un tag de base). Dans un proemier tmeps j'avais évoqué JSON (aussi XML mais trop verbeux), alors qu'on a moyen de faire un format JSON light reprenant les conventions habituelles d'OSM où tout est codé avec des valeurs atomiques de type chaine, et où on a des séparateurs point-virgule et pipe mais pas très lisibles quand on les combine et pas non plus suffisant au delaà des listes simples ! ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote: That's a good question Rob. 'Seeing the light' possibly means maintaining your own platform/apps as a business. I did ask McDonald's back in 2012, I got the following reply: We put focus on optimizing this McDonald's app and want to keep the management of the associated database as efficiently as possible. Keeping databases for others makes that ambition tricky. With the McDonald's app we also communicate information about McDonald's products, actions, nutrition values, different locations and opening times of the restaurants and the McDrives. Also, restaurant renovations and therefore temporary adjusted opening hours are regularly incorporated into an update. For the above reasons, we will not consent to the inclusion of McDonald's restaurants in Openstreetmap. They also want the eyeballs on their website, not ours. I think they understood the request well. Perhaps the right approach is to ask for limited access to specific fields. The position of the restaurant showing up a a benefit to McD stockholders. The opening hours might be seen as competition for eyeballs. Beyond that it's unclear if querying for existence is a violation of any sort. In other words if I ping https://ajax.bigchainstore.com?storeid=2323format=json and it comes up empty, I learned something. But did I also violate their terms of service? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On 1 May 2015 at 20:26, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-01 13:36 GMT+02:00 Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com: I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. Agree. Has anyone actually asked the retail chains? That's a good question Rob. 'Seeing the light' possibly means maintaining your own platform/apps as a business. I did ask McDonald's back in 2012, I got the following reply: We put focus on optimizing this McDonald's app and want to keep the management of the associated database as efficiently as possible. Keeping databases for others makes that ambition tricky. With the McDonald's app we also communicate information about McDonald's products, actions, nutrition values, different locations and opening times of the restaurants and the McDrives. Also, restaurant renovations and therefore temporary adjusted opening hours are regularly incorporated into an update. For the above reasons, we will not consent to the inclusion of McDonald's restaurants in Openstreetmap. Of course I was disappointed, because I still believe OSM can be the best platform. On the other hand, McDonald's has a point. Breaking the answer down: 1) It's not efficient trying to maintain more than one database 2) that single database serves more purposes than just geocoding 3) Other databases do not have the same quality. Glad to hear that you have had a go at contacting one of these big chains. Their response is disappointing but I think we need to be looking at some potential solutions and better explaining the benefits of being on OpenStreetMap to them. Tackling the benefits of being in OSM first. I would point out that because OpenStreetMap provides a rich database of geographic features there are many apps that use OpenStreetMap's data. For example Maps.Me uses OSM in it's SatNav style app for iOS and Android. Their app also displays clickable points of interest including fast food outlets. Right now OpenStreetMap includes some McDonald's stores (as contributed by our community) but may be missing some. If McDonald's was to provide locations of all stores then we could update our map data and as such all apps that use our data would pick up these additional stores when they next update. As for tackling some of their concerns then first the opening hours concern. We could offer to link to their website for each store via opening_hours:url=http://bigchainstore.com?storeid=12345 . As for keeping the database up to date this is where we would benefit from more conflation tools. For example it would be great if we had a tool that compares BigChainStores data dump month 1 against BigChainStores data dump month 2 (should be easier as most entries will be the same). We would also want a tool that compares BigChainStores data dump against what's already in OSM. Currently there is no user firendly tool to do this (you end up back in traditional GIS solutions which tend to go over my head). I think we can get there but we'd need someone to help in regards to the comparison tools. Best, Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-si] nov maper razsaja po Sloveniji
Izgleda da se je nek novinec (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tanch) odločil da bo naredil par neumnosti. V zadnjih nekaj dneh je naredil več sprememb v Sloveniji. Tista na Pohorju je bila totalna neumnost, zato sem jo odstranil. Preprosto je narisal pot, ki jo je prehodil, in vse skupaj označil kot en sam dolg footway, čeprav je vse že bilo mapirano Predlagam da kdo pogleda še ostale spremembe, vsak področje, ki ga pozna. Dokler so sveže jih je mogoče enostavno odstraniti. Pozdrav, Blaž ___ Talk-si mailing list Talk-si@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
Re: [Talk-cz] Satelitní snímky bingu zmizely?
Tak to jsi mně moc nepotěšil :-( Že by měli některé podklady pouze s časově omezenou licencí? Možná by jim někdo mohl vysvětlit, že Ostrava je třetí největší město v ČR a detailnější snímky Ostravy a jejího okolí by tedy nebyly na škodu ;-) Marián Dne 1.5.2015 v 19:54 Martin Ždila napsal(a): Aj na Slovensku mame skusenost s tym, ze kvalita snimkov od Bingu postupne degraduje. Skus pouzit snimky od MapBox-u. 2015-05-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz mailto:mky...@email.cz: Ahoj, právě dělám nějaké úpravy ve FM a v JOSM jsem si zapnul satelitní snímky Bingu. A najednou koukám na rozplizlé fleky :-( Nevíte někdo, proč se ztratily detailní snímky, podle kterých jsem mapoval? Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Ing. Martin Ždila http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin* OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ http://www.freemap.sk ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat zmolu?
On 05/01/2015 07:57 PM, Martin Ždila wrote: Ahoj natural=gully http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dgully Jo to bude ono. Diky Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
Je ne pense pas qu'il demande le calcul d'une distance de trajet mais une simple mesure de distance sur la carte visualisée. Hors c'est possible de le faire facilement juste en connaissant les numéros de tuiles et le niveau de zoom, avec un petit scriptlet côté client : un clic sur l'icone du scriptlet, on clique un point de la carte, et le scriptlet affiche la distance jusqu'au point survolé pr la souris; un autre clic ferme le scriptlet, pour cela le scriptlet n'a qu'à récupérer les coordonnées X/Y et le niveau de zoom, avec ça ça devient facilement des coordonnées WGS84 puis on a les formules classiques de calcul de distance entre deux points Aucune modification n'est nécessaire sur le serveur, le scriptelt pourrait fonctionner sur tout site utilisant des tuiles en projection Mercator et avec le découpage en quadtiles : les URL des bitmaps carrées (et leur position à l'écran pour faire correspondre les positions de souris) suffisent. Ça demande juste un peu de javascript. Le 1 mai 2015 14:28, sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com a écrit : Sur internet il y a ça : http://map.meurisse.org/ Tu peux créer des points, des trajets sans utiliser forcément les nœuds osm et les exporter sous différents formats. Et sinon il avait été question il y a pas longtemps sur la liste d'un autre site qui permettait de calculer les trajets depuis un point A jusqu'à un point B. Il devait bien donner la distance... Je ne retrouve plus la discussion. Sébastien On 01/05/2015 13:54, dHuy Pierre wrote: erreur de fenetre! désolé Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h44, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing listTalk-fr@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-cz] Satelitní snímky bingu zmizely?
inak sa to spominalo aj v osm weekly 247: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/3353 2015-05-01 21:25 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz: Tak to jsi mně moc nepotěšil :-( Že by měli některé podklady pouze s časově omezenou licencí? Možná by jim někdo mohl vysvětlit, že Ostrava je třetí největší město v ČR a detailnější snímky Ostravy a jejího okolí by tedy nebyly na škodu ;-) Marián Dne 1.5.2015 v 19:54 Martin Ždila napsal(a): Aj na Slovensku mame skusenost s tym, ze kvalita snimkov od Bingu postupne degraduje. Skus pouzit snimky od MapBox-u. 2015-05-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz: Ahoj, právě dělám nějaké úpravy ve FM a v JOSM jsem si zapnul satelitní snímky Bingu. A najednou koukám na rozplizlé fleky :-( Nevíte někdo, proč se ztratily detailní snímky, podle kterých jsem mapoval? Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Ing. Martin Ždila http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin* OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ ___ Talk-cz mailing listTalk-cz@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Hallo, das in der Android-App ist der Kartenstil “Mapbox Streets” - also OSM. Das in der iOS-App ist die Apple-eigene Karte. Thomas On May 1, 2015, at 6:42 PM, e...@gmx.net wrote: Siehe Anhang, so sieht das Beispielbild von Jens auf iOS aus. Lt legal Info unten links in der Karte Apple Maps und TomTom .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 17:55, Jens Steinhauser wrote: Hallo, Hab die App jetzt auf Android installiert, da koennte schon was dran sein, hier ein aktueller Screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dg69to1hi2zuv99/buschenschank.png?dl=0 Zum Vergleich: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/46.75608/15.61403 lg On 05/01/2015 04:30 PM, Gabriel Pfuner wrote: Gerade mit iOS getestet, bei mir wird TomToM bzw. Apple maps verwendet, zumindest laut Legal Info unten links in der Karte. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- On 01/05/15 at 16:22, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo Jens Ja das Stimmt was du Schreibst, aber wenn man die App Installiert und dann die Karte aufruft wird OSM benutzt. Und danke für die Aufklärung wegen dmca. Ich denk Sie haben einfach die Screenshots nicht Aktuell. Hallo, Wie man am letzten Screenshot der Android App sieht, verwenden sie dort GoogleMaps (der Lizenshinweis ist im linken unteren Eck). Es ist anzunehmen, dass sie auch bei der iOS Version das verwenden, was das Betriebssystem anbietet. Da die POI Daten wie du sagst anscheinend nicht aus OSM sind, und die Attributierung der Karte auch der Homepage passt, sehe ich hier keinen Handlungsbedarf. Die http://dmca.openstreetmap.org ist uebrigens fuer andere Kartenanbieter, um sich bei OSM zu beschweren, falls sie meinen dass unsererseits ein Lizenzverstoss vorliegt. lg, Jens On 05/01/2015 02:18 PM, Johannes Silly wrote: Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at Attachment 1.jpg___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Imre Samu pella.s...@gmail.com wrote: .. McDonald's problem... Please don't forget the true McDonald's problem! It is a content encoding hell. and very hard to detect by any ordinary field mappers. #1. name=McDonald’s( count=126 ) U+2019 ’ e2 80 99 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%E2%80%99s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97c #2. name=McDonald´s( count=40 ) U+00B4 ´ c2 b4 ACUTE ACCENT http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%C2%B4s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97e #3. name=McDonald's ( count=14039) U+0027 ' 27 APOSTROPHE http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald's I'd go with Option 3, for two reasons. It's actually an apostrophe, so it's grammatically correct (hey, I try), and it's the most common. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Holistic Map Editing (Was: Chain Store Cleanup)
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: OSM editing is usually holistic - you work on many aspects of the map in an area. If the map has many edits by different people in an area then I can reasonably assume that it has a certain minimum quality because these people are on the ground fixing things. holistic editing is not the only sort. The community is more diverse than that. You'll find mappers seeking out one feature (e.g. dog walk parks). Mappers doing wiki or tag gardening (like the original poster). Mappers working to consolidate tagging, and mappers working to split apart tagging and make it explicit. And those focused on data imports. -- Quality on the ground is probably better measured by views, both among mobile apps like OsmAnd, and the tile servers. Who cares enough about the map in certain areas to look at it? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat zmolu?
Ahoj natural=gully 2015-05-01 15:58 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý miros...@suchy.cz: Mám dotaz, jak se má mapovat zmola? Pro ne-moraváky - rokle vymletá vodou. natural=cliff mi nepřijde správný, ten by měl být jenom tam kde je obnažená skála. barrier=ditch je zase jenom pro man-made prvky Takže jak mapovat rokli - v mém konkrétním případě minimálně 5 metrů hlubokou, se sklonem přes 70 stupňů (geometricky). Což se sice dá překonat, ale rozhodně to je významná překážka. Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Ing. Martin Ždila http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin* OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Intégration des données de PSS dans OSM
Merci pour vos réponses, notamment Philippe pour ton mail très instructif. Et donc s'il faut résumer cette licence BY-NC-ND empêche toute extraction de donnée vers OSM, c'est vraiment dommage. Je vais quand même essayer de leur demander si une autorisation spéciale pour OSM serait envisageable, sait on jamais... Le 28 avril 2015 07:37, Jean-Christophe Becquet j...@apitux.com a écrit : Le 27/04/2015 13:17, Vincent Frison a écrit : De ce que j'ai compris ce qui les gêne dans la licence OSM c'est que les données peuvent être réutilisées dans des projets commerciaux. Apparemment il vont bientôt rendre disponible leurs données sous la licence BY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/fr/). Bonjour, Peut-être utiliser l'argumentaire Libérez vos créations pour essayer de les faire changer d'avis ? http://www.apitux.org/index.php?2008/05/03/232-liberez-vos-creations Des explications sur les licences Creative Commons et des infos pour aller plus loin sur : http://www.apitux.org/index.php?2005/09/11/11-les-licences-creative-commons Bonne continuation Librement JCB -- Des formats ouverts pour des données libres http://www.apitux.org/index.php?2006/07/09/107-des-formats-ouverts-pour-des-donnees-libres ==APITUX : le choix du logiciel libre== APITUX - Jean-Christophe Becquet BP 32 - 04001 Digne-les-Bains Cedex 06 25 86 07 92 - j...@apitux.com - http://www.apitux.com/ SIRET : 452 887 441 00031 - APE : 6202A === ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk] Open community (was: Chain Store Cleanup)
Fred wrote: I don't think that is something that really advances the quality in OSM, and I would encourage you to grab a notepad and venture outside to do some mapping. That way you wouldn't be scripting world-wide cleanup operations but who knows, you might actually add real value to OSM. Hi Andrew, My local community would love to have move people involved in OpenStreetMap - with or without notepad. We are mostly a bunch of on the ground mappers so we lack is someone with the skills to write scripts that help us identify problems in OSM data and help us to make use of new exciting third party datasets (e.g. by building tools to help us merge/conflate this data). Unfortunately OSM is not good at attracting software developers but we could really do with lots more devs :-) Best, Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Satelitní snímky bingu zmizely?
Aj na Slovensku mame skusenost s tym, ze kvalita snimkov od Bingu postupne degraduje. Skus pouzit snimky od MapBox-u. 2015-05-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz: Ahoj, právě dělám nějaké úpravy ve FM a v JOSM jsem si zapnul satelitní snímky Bingu. A najednou koukám na rozplizlé fleky :-( Nevíte někdo, proč se ztratily detailní snímky, podle kterých jsem mapoval? Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Ing. Martin Ždila http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin* OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
Am 01.05.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Colin Smale: I wonder how a marketing department would react if their (potential) customers complained they couldn't find the store. Gary knows very very very well who and how to contact if he actually had a question. Just as the handful of others in the geo-industry moaning, it is simply a meme for you don't conform to our industry norm for a number of things and we think you should. It is a very particularly silly meme, because as pointed out, at least in modern times, I have yet to find anybody having issues or questions THAT REALLY WANTED AN ANSWER and was not purposely fumbling to make a statement, not finding out about the OSMF (or for local stuff one of the local organisations) and getting a response. Could it be easier? Sure, but google doesn't really care about our tendency to hide information behind multiple links (for example it takes two clicks from the main map page to find that the OSMF is the licensor of the data instead of one) so while not super convenient it is not HARD to find out. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
I'm fairly sure that it has been discussed before (for a while pre-redesign we had such a link at least on the German version which we really should still have for legal reasons). I suspects the designers issue is using screen real estate for stuff that is not that often used. It is simply the small matter of producing the code and a test instance of the rails port with the corresponding changes. Simon Am 01.05.2015 um 09:54 schrieb Colin Smale: How about a new page on www.openstreetmap.org behind a new item Contact in the top row menu (which has Help and About)? I am thinking of a page which forwards users according to their scenario: If you would like to contribute to the map as an individual, click here If you would like to partner with OSM to improve the map, click here If you would like to re-use OSM data or have questions about licensing, click here etc etc The current Help page is all about mapping, and the About page does contain a link to OSMF but without any information about what the OSMF is or does in the ecosystem. On 2015-05-01 09:45, Simon Poole wrote: Am 01.05.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Colin Smale: I wonder how a marketing department would react if their (potential) customers complained they couldn't find the store. Gary knows very very very well who and how to contact if he actually had a question. Just as the handful of others in the geo-industry moaning, it is simply a meme for you don't conform to our industry norm for a number of things and we think you should. It is a very particularly silly meme, because as pointed out, at least in modern times, I have yet to find anybody having issues or questions THAT REALLY WANTED AN ANSWER and was not purposely fumbling to make a statement, not finding out about the OSMF (or for local stuff one of the local organisations) and getting a response. Could it be easier? Sure, but google doesn't really care about our tendency to hide information behind multiple links (for example it takes two clicks from the main map page to find that the OSMF is the licensor of the data instead of one) so while not super convenient it is not HARD to find out. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danke für die Info. Da ich eh osmconvert in meinem Skript verwenden wollte, bietet sich die Funktion mit dem Polygonformat perfekt an. Der Tipp mit Osmosis hat auch geholfen, denn dort wird beschrieben, wie man überhaupt zu diesem Polygonformat kommt - auch wenn es einen Link von osmconvert gibt ;) Ich werde das Skript auf GitHub stellen. Vielleicht kann jemand sowas auch noch einmal gebrauchen. Vielen Dank Danilo Am 01.05.2015 um 11:49 schrieb Toggenburger Lukas: Hallo Hm, Osmosis kann doch nicht nur eine BBox anwenden sondern auch Polygone zum Filtern verwenden [1]. Das müsste doch die letzte Frage beantworten. Ebenfalls gibt es osmconvert, welches auch zum Ausschneiden geeignet ist und dasselbe Polygonformat verwendet. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Osmconvert Grüsse Lukas ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de - -- 50°45'19.9N 7°05'11.9E Briefkasten gesucht? www.briefkastenkarte.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVQ09BAAoJEHHS7Nnj7Bru38YH/ibPWihRcX0oTqAn3NMv+Lj2 6oGhEmeVXnE6w7+pVbR76VLHLHy9bzG3wCI4KP8Vdkpvlj5/XTSQqBI+fq2K2MqT xFqHZfBsUHBo4esbCP60NCpB2FgejmvPmtyPRyc/T6aus6Nu7wpviwxt95c8p544 CJTdbKiD+uZXlGFBl4Dm+SOexlTLe1nRFD7kao8RY5q+BSdNXDqLTkKdvRf/W4hl sUy6sROqM7tUQZaz2CnsdpwG43kI+sjEzCpQbpEkzXHOAere6soLexBdHbkC5R+T QPYjHTCBDgOKb+sOeTrpPbfHM9FtiDiNyQ6e6JPkj6PhjHTAlqgvQbeGnxNOvis= =eTVz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
How about a new page on www.openstreetmap.org behind a new item Contact in the top row menu (which has Help and About)? I am thinking of a page which forwards users according to their scenario: If you would like to contribute to the map as an individual, click here If you would like to partner with OSM to improve the map, click here If you would like to re-use OSM data or have questions about licensing, click here etc etc The current Help page is all about mapping, and the About page does contain a link to OSMF but without any information about what the OSMF is or does in the ecosystem. On 2015-05-01 09:45, Simon Poole wrote: Am 01.05.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Colin Smale: I wonder how a marketing department would react if their (potential) customers complained they couldn't find the store. Gary knows very very very well who and how to contact if he actually had a question. Just as the handful of others in the geo-industry moaning, it is simply a meme for you don't conform to our industry norm for a number of things and we think you should. It is a very particularly silly meme, because as pointed out, at least in modern times, I have yet to find anybody having issues or questions THAT REALLY WANTED AN ANSWER and was not purposely fumbling to make a statement, not finding out about the OSMF (or for local stuff one of the local organisations) and getting a response. Could it be easier? Sure, but google doesn't really care about our tendency to hide information behind multiple links (for example it takes two clicks from the main map page to find that the OSMF is the licensor of the data instead of one) so while not super convenient it is not HARD to find out. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk [1] Links: -- [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
Le 1 mai 2015 10:20, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Verdi: Hum je pense que tu pousses un peu loin le format initial de Jérome me paraissait bien Jérome avait plutôt été séduit par ma première proposition, cependant je parlais du problème plus général des infos structurées pour lesquelles on n'a pas de schéma clair permettant de les représenter de façon compacte mais lisible et parsable avec un système unique et non ambigu, et sans forcément multiplier le nombre de tags quand ce n'est pas toujours nécessaire (car des infos optionelles qui complètent un tag de base). Dans un proemier tmeps j'avais évoqué JSON (aussi XML mais trop verbeux), alors qu'on a moyen de faire un format JSON light reprenant les conventions habituelles d'OSM où tout est codé avec des valeurs atomiques de type chaine, et où on a des séparateurs point-virgule et pipe mais pas très lisibles quand on les combine et pas non plus suffisant au delaà des listes simples ! ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
On 01/05/15 09:25, Simon Poole wrote: I'm fairly sure that it has been discussed before (for a while pre-redesign we had such a link at least on the German version which we really should still have for legal reasons). I suspects the designers issue is using screen real estate for stuff that is not that often used. It is simply the small matter of producing the code and a test instance of the rails port with the corresponding changes. I don't think a new link is necessary - how about just beefing up the current extremely minimal Help page with some nice text and including a section with contact details for various use cases? Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
Servus, Am 01.05.2015 um 08:05 schrieb Danilo Bretschneider: Alternativ könnte ich das Planet File bzw. Extrakte von der Geofabrik mit Osmosis verabreiten. Hier besteht das Problem, dass die kleinste Region der Regierungsbezirk Köln ist. Hier müsste man zusätzlich noch eine BBox anwenden, welche jedoch viereckig. Somit wären in der Auswertung auch Objekte enthalten, welche nicht in Bonn liegen. * Gibt es sonst noch Möglichkeiten, um an die OSM Daten zu kommen? * Gibt es hierfür weitere Tools, die für mein Workflow geeignet sind? * Wie kann man anhand des Planet Files die Region Bonn extrahieren? Hm, Osmosis kann doch nicht nur eine BBox anwenden sondern auch Polygone zum Filtern verwenden [1]. Das müsste doch die letzte Frage beantworten. Ob das jetzt besser oder schlechter als Overpass ist kann ich Dir aber nicht sagen. Grüße, Michael [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Osmosis/Polygon_Filter_File_Format ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
I feel OSM has many flaws and one of them is that it's failing to address the flaws adequately. I think the fault lies with the OSM marketing department - what do you mean, we haven't got one ? Another fer instance: ex-mappers should be a swear-word around here. On 1 May 2015 at 10:12, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: Am 01.05.2015 um 10:48 schrieb Christoph Hormann: ... rant Of course big head at company A usually knows how to quickly get in contact with big head at company B, what really bugs them with OSM is that they are supposed to use the same channels as John Doe. /rant Well less that, because obviously given that we are talking about a small group of people, they will actually typically know each other in any case, the real irritation is that everybody gets the same usage terms and you can't haggle a special deal. I don't want to make the impression that from an OSMF business operations perspective everything is perfect, far from it. But the issues tend(ed) to be more internal cultural kind of things than customer facing. Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] En Inde, des enfants veulent transformer les bidonvilles par la cartographie
Lien intéressant, merci. Information conservée dans le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_education#Projets_.C3.A9ducatifs_.22g.C3.A9ographiques.22_n.27utilisant_pas_.28encore.29_OSM Brice Le 30/04/2015 19:31, Shohreh a écrit : Tous les enfants aiment dessiner. Mais en Inde, de jeunes résidents des bidonvilles utilisent leurs talents d’artistes pour provoquer des changements urbains. Dans le cadre d’une campagne civique centrée sur des clubs d’enfants, des groupes de jeunes créent des « cartes sociales » détaillées de leurs quartiers marginalisés avec l’objectif de partager leurs inquiétudes sur l’espace public. http://visionscarto.net/inde-cartographie-enfants -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/En-Inde-des-enfants-veulent-transformer-les-bidonvilles-par-la-cartographie-tp5842600.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-cz] konference Geoinformatics - oznameni
Vazeni kolegove z OSM komunity, rad bych, aby nekdo z vas vystoupil v sekci klicovych recniku konference za OSM. Mel byste o to nekdo z vas zajem. Predem doufam, ze ano :-) Mej te se a mapovani zdar ;-) Martin Dne 28. dubna 2015 10:50 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com napsal(a): Vážení přátelé, dovolujeme si vás pozvat na konferenci Geoinformatics, která proběhne 11. a 12. června 2015 na půdě Fakulty stavební Českého vysokého učení technického v Praze. Stěžejním tématem konference jsou letos Otevřená data. Dopoledne ve čtvrtek 11. června proběhnou workshopy (o jaké workshopy půjde můžete rozhodnout i vy v anketě v přihlašovacím formuláři). Odpoledne proběhne první část konference, ve které budou předneseny obecné příspěvky na témata spojená s otevřenými daty, otevřeným software, GISem a geoinformačními vědami. V pátek 12. června bude probíhat klíčová část konference, ve které budou předneseny příspěvky spojené se stěžejním tématem Otevřená data. Mezi nimi vystoupí i klíčoví řečníci, kterými jsou Mgr. Jiří Čtyroký z Institutu plánování a rozvoje hlavního města Prahy (IPR), Ing. Jiří Poláček CSc. z Českého úřadu katastrálního a zeměměřického, Ing. Petr Dvořáček ze Zeměměřického úřadu zástupce (bude doplněno později) z Českého statistického úřadu. Konference i workshop jsou bez účastnického poplatku. Ve čtvrtek večer proběhne přátelské posezení v některé z blízkých restaurací. Více o konferenci najdete na internetových stránkách http://geoinformatics.fsv.cvut.cz/konference/. Online přihláška: http://geoinformatics.fsv.cvut.cz/konference/prihlaska/ Stále sháníme další řečníky, kteří by rádi promluvili o svých projektech ať už na poli otevřených dat, nebo dalších témat, které jsou probírány na naší konferenci. Zájemci ať se obrátí na email martin.la...@fsv.cvut.cz a michal@fsv.cvut.cz. Dále bychom vás rádi pozvali na spřátelenou akci Prague Hacks pořádanou Fondem Otakara Motejla, více informací na adrese http://www.praguehacks.cz/. Za organizační tým konference Martin Landa a Michal Med. -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
When it comes to McDonald's, at least in the USA and Canada, they (when they are stand-alone stores) are extremely easy to verify via Bing Imagery since they almost always use the same design for the buildings. It also helps when the sun was just right when the imagery was taken that the McDonald's logo casts a shadow on the ground from their tall sign (if they have one). So, you might be able to get away with just checking the imagery for the misspelled ones in the USA/Canada without having to rely on doing anything mechanical. And for the ones you can't verify, you could just add a note for them to be field checked if the building design doesn't match any of the normal designs, or is inside a gas station/WalMart and can't be verified for sure since those locations can/do change often sometimes to another brand. -James ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
Am 01.05.2015 um 10:48 schrieb Christoph Hormann: ... rant Of course big head at company A usually knows how to quickly get in contact with big head at company B, what really bugs them with OSM is that they are supposed to use the same channels as John Doe. /rant Well less that, because obviously given that we are talking about a small group of people, they will actually typically know each other in any case, the real irritation is that everybody gets the same usage terms and you can't haggle a special deal. I don't want to make the impression that from an OSMF business operations perspective everything is perfect, far from it. But the issues tend(ed) to be more internal cultural kind of things than customer facing. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
Just a quick comment that GeoHipster is just a (fun) blog with some tongue-in-cheek atmosphere. There are eg interviews on it and guest posts with very different opinions. Gary's post is his own views. I am not affiliated with GeoHipster, just wanted to clear this up. Cheers, Hannes Anybody ever get the feeling that there may be some astroturf in play? I can't help but to see a parallel in this discussion between GeoHipster's position relative to OpenStreetMap today and groups linked to Microsoft relative to Linux two decades ago. pgpXcZ9P0Y4m4.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] OSM Daten extrahieren
Hallo Hm, Osmosis kann doch nicht nur eine BBox anwenden sondern auch Polygone zum Filtern verwenden [1]. Das müsste doch die letzte Frage beantworten. Ebenfalls gibt es osmconvert, welches auch zum Ausschneiden geeignet ist und dasselbe Polygonformat verwendet. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Osmconvert Grüsse Lukas ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: It should be pointed out that during 2012 and 2014 and continuing with at least the LWG till today, dozens of companies and organisations (outside of the geo-industry) with questions have had no problems contacting the OSMF and getting an answer back, typically within less than 24 hours. The OSMF even has a published and working postal mail address (contrary to certain other organisations). Maybe we should run a workshop on how to use google and an e-mail program for the moaners in the geo-industry. Anybody ever get the feeling that there may be some astroturf in play? I can't help but to see a parallel in this discussion between GeoHipster's position relative to OpenStreetMap today and groups linked to Microsoft relative to Linux two decades ago. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
@Verdi: Hum je pense que tu pousses un peu loin le format initial de Jérome me paraissait bien@Lioter, on dispose déjà d'une liste je te la mets ci dessous: le problème c'est que je voudrais éviter le jargons techniques pour des mots compréhensibles et je ne connais pas la moitié de ses antennes. J'ai fait une liste avec le nombre d'apparition dans le fichier: 211822 : Panneau (16) 83318 : Antenne parabolique (17) 12407 : Réseaux d'antennes panneaux (19) 10711 : Yagi (21) 8129 : Cierge/Perche (18) 4257 : Dipôle/Doublet (32) 4044 : Panneau Ran-Sharing (75) 3038 : Réseau vertical (26) 2712 : Tube (76) 2387 : Groundplane (12) 1513 : Logarithmique/Log périodique (14) 1392 : Active (directionnelle ou omnidirectionnelle) (2) 1126 : Dipôle large bande (5) 1082 : Antenne indoor pour téléphonie mobile (59) 777 : Trombone (33) 567 : Dièdre (50) 516 : Plan passif ou miroir (44) 472 : Fouet (9) 335 : Antenne à fentes (24) 199 : Cornet (46) 188 : Cylindre (49) 133 : Cable rayonnant (antenne coaxiale) (60) 114 : Discone (52) 112 : Helicoidal (56) 107 : Antenne Grille (45) 100 : Globe (51) 99 : Cigare (3) 95 : Multi Doublets/Multi dipoles (64) 94 : Colinéaire (35) 77 : Panneau bi-bandes (47) 66 : Antenne Gonio (31) 62 : Antenne radar (54) 59 : Sans type (0) 53 : Panneau bi-mode (74) 51 : Filaire (8) 41 : Antenne trisectorielle (58) 32 : Aérien issu de reprise des données électroniques (9) 21 : Réseau circulaire 49 antennes (25) 15 : Antenne à faisceau (65) 14 : Pylone Rayonnant (72) 12 : Antenne directive (7) 10 : Réseau linéaire 13 antennes (22) 10 : Antenne Plane (39) 9 : Obus (55) 9 : Antenne à jupe (66) 6 : Antenne HF (38) 4 : Antenne Parapluie (30) 4 : Antenne Marguerite (29) 3 : Panneau tri-bandes (48) 3 : Fuseau (10) 3 : Antenne biconique (67) 3 : Accordable (1) 2 : Système antennaire (20) 2 : Corolle (4) 2 : Antenne équidirective dans un plan (61) 1 : HLO (13) 1 : Antenne à rayonnement zenithal (63) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 1h40, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Note: je n'ai rien précisé concernant la façon de créer un échappement pour les crochets, accolades, guillemets, apostrophes, et les pipe, virgules ou point-virgules : il faudrait juste réserve le backslash ou d'un caractère conventionel non réservé :- \\ pour le backslash \ lui même - \| pour le pipe |- \= pour le signe égal =- \[ et \] pour les crochets [ et ] - \{ et \} pour les accolades { et }- \s (semicolon) pour le point-virgule ; et non pas \; afin de ne pas entrer en conflit avec les point-virgules séparateurs par défaut des listes non ordonnées d'OSM) Et pour le cas où des chaines déjà entre guillemets ou entre 'apostrophes' sont utilisées:- \q (quote) pour les guillemets doubles ASCII - \a (apos) pour les guillemets doubles ASCII ' Rien de prévu pour les échappements Unicode (ceux qui y tiennent pourront ajouter \xNN ou \u ou \UNN), le but étant de coder directement les caractères du texte si possible et d'utiliser sinon les échappements plus compacts à deux caractères... Avec ça on a tout pour imiter JSON, mais en plus compact et sans distinguer les types numériques et chaines (il n'y a qu'un seul type d'atome : les chaînes). Les schémas qui voudraient distinguer les types d'atomes devraient coder ça dans les atomes-chaines par une convention comme type:valeur (un peut comme le fait PHP pour sérialiser ses données), par exemple i:10 pour indiquer l'entier 10 (nombre de bits non limité), n:10 pour le nombre flottant 10 (précision non limitée), s:10 pour indiquer la chaîne 10, n: pour indiquer une valeur nil, d:date pour une date dans un format compatible ISO8601 (avec séparateurs de champs de date optionnels pour que ce soit encore plus compact)... Le 1 mai 2015 01:17, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Le 1 mai 2015 00:35, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Verdy: Heureux de te voir enfin, j'étais presqu'étoné de ne pas te lire. Cette propal de nomenclature est vraiment bonne. Note: je n'ai pas voulu taper gags mais tags (mais sur le coup le smartphone que j'ai utilisé temporairement, le temps d'une indisponibilité du système sur PC, n'en a fait qu'à sa tête malgré plusieurs corrections successives de ce mot, il a encore été remplacé contre ma volonté lors de l'envoi...) Personnellement je n'ai jamais aimé le fait de mêler deux types de séparateurs dans les tags lanes, c'est très peu lisible et trompeur. Et j'aurais préféré un codage de type JSON (mais encore un peu plus compact), sans aucun point-virgule (sauf si la structure principale est celle d'une liste non ordonnée: aucun point-virgule dans les éléments) Bref si on veut tout mettre dans un seul tag, permettre alors l'usage des accolades, et dans ce cas dans les accolades permettre d'utilier guillements et apostrophes ASCII pour
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
On Friday 01 May 2015, Simon Poole wrote: Gary knows very very very well who and how to contact if he actually had a question. Just as the handful of others in the geo-industry moaning, it is simply a meme for you don't conform to our industry norm for a number of things and we think you should. The funny thing is that bigger companies - specifically including the 'moaning ones from the geo-industry' - are usually quite hard to get in contact with outside their regular streamlined business processes like web shops and sign up forms, for example via contact forms and published email addresses. rant Of course big head at company A usually knows how to quickly get in contact with big head at company B, what really bugs them with OSM is that they are supposed to use the same channels as John Doe. /rant -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
I was actually going to suggest something along such lines given that both the Help and About pages are not particularly well used. But didn't want to get in to the bike shedding trap, so if I get around to it I'll submit a couple of PRs. Simon Am 01.05.2015 um 10:52 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 01/05/15 09:25, Simon Poole wrote: I'm fairly sure that it has been discussed before (for a while pre-redesign we had such a link at least on the German version which we really should still have for legal reasons). I suspects the designers issue is using screen real estate for stuff that is not that often used. It is simply the small matter of producing the code and a test instance of the rails port with the corresponding changes. I don't think a new link is necessary - how about just beefing up the current extremely minimal Help page with some nice text and including a section with contact details for various use cases? Tom signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. I think this depends on the chain and how much they care about this. I believe there was a previous import of Lowe's locations, and this data was *woefully* inaccurate. At least in Oklahoma, these often ended up well into the close but no cigar territory, often being blocks away and in nonsensical spots kinda-sorta close, but not close enough to get accurate routing. On the other hand, there was a pretty nicely detailed import of Love's truck stops a while back that included a fair amount of detail, for which the only issue I take with it is that it mistagged most as caravan sites instead of service plazas. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
Le 1 mai 2015 21:42, François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com a écrit : Je ne comprends toujours pas le lien entre ce qui est dans le fichier ANFR et un possible inventaire des antennes dans OSM. Le fichier ANFR décris au mieux une station d'émission pouvant comprendre plusieurs antennes. Le support de l'ANFR n'est pas l'antenne. La plupart des supports sont occupés par une multitude d'antennes. Du coup, si on pouvait avoir quelques explications supplémentaires sur le raisonnement, elles sont les bienvenues. Tu n'as pas du regarder entièrement ce qu'a libérer l’anfr. Il y a 5 fichier texte qui liste chaque'un quelque chose de différent : les *Supports *(pylône, mat, immeuble ...) accueillant des antennes avec position, hauteur, propriétaire, ça c'est sur ça doit être intégrer dans osm. ensuite les *Stations *(il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par support) avec l’opérateur (orange,sncf,tdf...) et des dates (implantation,mise en service et modification). Puis les *Antennes* (il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par station) avec son type (panneau, antenne parabolique...) et des info sur cette antenne (dimension, azimute...). Puis les *émetteurs *(il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par antenne) avec le système (GSM 900, FM,). Et enfin les *Bandes *(il peut il y en avoir plusieurs par émetteur) avec le début et la fin d'une bande de fréquence. On peut passer d'un fichier a l'autre avec differents id. Voilà ce que fournit donc l'anfr. Bien sur, RIEN N'OBLIGE DE TOUT INTÉGRÉ DANS OSM. Pour les supports, je pense qu'il faut utiliser les tag déjà en circulation les différents man_made (mast , tower, communications_tower) et ne rien mettre pour immeuble,batiment... qui sont déjà présent en surfacique. plus height= et owner=. jusque là on n'est pas sur des choses nouvelles (peut être reparler de mast , tower, communications_tower, moi je comprends pas les différences). Pour le reste, déjà il peut bien il y avoir 30 antennes sur un pylône, dans osm les antennes et le pylône c'est un node donc il faut mettre les tags sur ce node. il faut choisir le niveau de detail que l'on veut et que l'on peut mettre dans osm et le niveau de complexité. operator= reseau =FM. FH; UMTS 900; LTE 260... ou faire comme proposer là : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast communication:mobile_phone=yes; LTE 260;... communication:radio=yes communication:television=yes communication:microwave=yes Le tag antenna = yes peut permettre aussi d'indiquer le type d'antenne : antenna = multi lorsque'il y a différentes antennes antenna = panneau ou antenne parabolique ... quand il n'y a qu'une antenne ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
Du coup le lien que j'ai donné devrait répondre à sa question. Après peut être que le fait que ça soit en dehors de OSM soit bloquant pour Shohreh. Si c'est bloquant il faudra se lancer dans le script dont tu parles, Philippe. Sébastien On 01/05/2015 21:42, Philippe Verdy wrote: Je ne pense pas qu'il demande le calcul d'une distance de trajet mais une simple mesure de distance sur la carte visualisée. Hors c'est possible de le faire facilement juste en connaissant les numéros de tuiles et le niveau de zoom, avec un petit scriptlet côté client : un clic sur l'icone du scriptlet, on clique un point de la carte, et le scriptlet affiche la distance jusqu'au point survolé pr la souris; un autre clic ferme le scriptlet, pour cela le scriptlet n'a qu'à récupérer les coordonnées X/Y et le niveau de zoom, avec ça ça devient facilement des coordonnées WGS84 puis on a les formules classiques de calcul de distance entre deux points Aucune modification n'est nécessaire sur le serveur, le scriptelt pourrait fonctionner sur tout site utilisant des tuiles en projection Mercator et avec le découpage en quadtiles : les URL des bitmaps carrées (et leur position à l'écran pour faire correspondre les positions de souris) suffisent. Ça demande juste un peu de javascript. Le 1 mai 2015 14:28, sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com mailto:sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com mailto:sebastien.bugzi...@gmail.com a écrit : Sur internet il y a ça : http://map.meurisse.org/ Tu peux créer des points, des trajets sans utiliser forcément les nœuds osm et les exporter sous différents formats. Et sinon il avait été question il y a pas longtemps sur la liste d'un autre site qui permettait de calculer les trajets depuis un point A jusqu'à un point B. Il devait bien donner la distance... Je ne retrouve plus la discussion. Sébastien On 01/05/2015 13:54, dHuy Pierre wrote: erreur de fenetre! désolé Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h44, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr mailto:dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr mailto:codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org http://www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Hi All, I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682 Based on what I’m reading in the relevant coordination channels it appears that HOT / Kathmandu Living Labs are one of the main sources for IDP damage. This is confirmed by the obvious square shape of the southern camps shown. The shape appears to align with bounds of HOT task #1008. http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1008 Likely this is an honest mistake from a BBC reporter who sourced the derived data from the Nepali government. Nonetheless it’s a violation and should be fixed. Is there anyone with BBC contacts who could try to have this sorted? I’ve written them through the generic Contact button but personal contacts are always quicker. Best, Robert — Sent from Mailbox___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
Approaching bigchains.com and asking them stupid questions is only going to downgrade the quality of OSM in their eyes. Consequently, it'd be better for OSM not to contact them - unless you can offer them '*something*'. Google (maps) is a business - so has a significant advantage. As for variable data like opening hours, phone number etc. (even postal address is no use to them) their building needs to appear on the map with a one-click link to the outlet's website that shows phone number and opening hours. Feel free to go back to McD when you can offer them a flashing 'neon' building on the map and when the building is 'dim' replace it with their logo M. You just need to figure out what you'd charge them for this advertising. If you don't charge them they'll think it's a pointless gimmick and show no interest. On 1 May 2015 at 21:44, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 May 2015 at 20:26, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-01 13:36 GMT+02:00 Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com: I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. Agree. Has anyone actually asked the retail chains? That's a good question Rob. 'Seeing the light' possibly means maintaining your own platform/apps as a business. I did ask McDonald's back in 2012, I got the following reply: We put focus on optimizing this McDonald's app and want to keep the management of the associated database as efficiently as possible. Keeping databases for others makes that ambition tricky. With the McDonald's app we also communicate information about McDonald's products, actions, nutrition values, different locations and opening times of the restaurants and the McDrives. Also, restaurant renovations and therefore temporary adjusted opening hours are regularly incorporated into an update. For the above reasons, we will not consent to the inclusion of McDonald's restaurants in Openstreetmap. Of course I was disappointed, because I still believe OSM can be the best platform. On the other hand, McDonald's has a point. Breaking the answer down: 1) It's not efficient trying to maintain more than one database 2) that single database serves more purposes than just geocoding 3) Other databases do not have the same quality. Glad to hear that you have had a go at contacting one of these big chains. Their response is disappointing but I think we need to be looking at some potential solutions and better explaining the benefits of being on OpenStreetMap to them. Tackling the benefits of being in OSM first. I would point out that because OpenStreetMap provides a rich database of geographic features there are many apps that use OpenStreetMap's data. For example Maps.Me uses OSM in it's SatNav style app for iOS and Android. Their app also displays clickable points of interest including fast food outlets. Right now OpenStreetMap includes some McDonald's stores (as contributed by our community) but may be missing some. If McDonald's was to provide locations of all stores then we could update our map data and as such all apps that use our data would pick up these additional stores when they next update. As for tackling some of their concerns then first the opening hours concern. We could offer to link to their website for each store via opening_hours:url=http://bigchainstore.com?storeid=12345 . As for keeping the database up to date this is where we would benefit from more conflation tools. For example it would be great if we had a tool that compares BigChainStores data dump month 1 against BigChainStores data dump month 2 (should be easier as most entries will be the same). We would also want a tool that compares BigChainStores data dump against what's already in OSM. Currently there is no user firendly tool to do this (you end up back in traditional GIS solutions which tend to go over my head). I think we can get there but we'd need someone to help in regards to the comparison tools. Best, Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
They will have to pay an interview for this :) Pierre De : Robert Banick rban...@gmail.com À : OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org; hot h...@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 17h18 Objet : [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Hi All, I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682 Based on what I’m reading in the relevant coordination channels it appears that HOT / Kathmandu Living Labs are one of the main sources for IDP damage. This is confirmed by the obvious square shape of the southern camps shown. The shape appears to align with bounds of HOT task #1008. http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1008 Likely this is an honest mistake from a BBC reporter who sourced the derived data from the Nepali government. Nonetheless it’s a violation and should be fixed. Is there anyone with BBC contacts who could try to have this sorted? I’ve written them through the generic Contact button but personal contacts are always quicker. Best,Robert — Sent from Mailbox ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Is that news article link still valid ? On 1 May 2015 at 22:18, Robert Banick rban...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682 Based on what I’m reading in the relevant coordination channels it appears that HOT / Kathmandu Living Labs are one of the main sources for IDP damage. This is confirmed by the obvious square shape of the southern camps shown. The shape appears to align with bounds of HOT task #1008. http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1008 Likely this is an honest mistake from a BBC reporter who sourced the derived data from the Nepali government. Nonetheless it’s a violation and should be fixed. Is there anyone with BBC contacts who could try to have this sorted? I’ve written them through the generic Contact button but personal contacts are always quicker. Best, Robert — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Robert, the link doesn't seem to work (not just for me) Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
On 01/05/2015 22:18, Robert Banick wrote: Hi All, I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682 Looks like that story's moved. I just see Contact BBC News online - help, feedback and complaints. Can you link to the current URL? Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
same problem with me. Pierre De : Simon Poole si...@poole.ch À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 17h44 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Robert, the link doesn't seem to work (not just for me) Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
On 1 May 2015 at 18:30, Imre Samu pella.s...@gmail.com wrote: .. McDonald's problem... Please don't forget the true McDonald's problem! It is a content encoding hell. and very hard to detect by any ordinary field mappers. #1. name=McDonald’s( count=126 ) U+2019 ’ e2 80 99 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%E2%80%99s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97c #2. name=McDonald´s( count=40 ) U+00B4 ´ c2 b4 ACUTE ACCENT http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald%C2%B4s http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/97e #3. name=McDonald's ( count=14039) U+0027 ' 27 APOSTROPHE http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=McDonald's Regards, Imre Any hope of tracing the sources of #1 and #2 ? Such as Apple users ? and which editor was used? -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
Hi all, Sorry my internet cut out midway through writing the email and I got turned around finding the link. Im on my phone now and it's a bit clumsy to get the link, but Ii's the front page article on Nepal on the BBC World website. Robert — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:46 PM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote: On 01/05/2015 22:18, Robert Banick wrote: Hi All, I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682 Looks like that story's moved. I just see Contact BBC News online - help, feedback and complaints. Can you link to the current URL? Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
This: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32551499 Map at bottom — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: same problem with me. Pierre De : Simon Poole si...@poole.ch À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 17h44 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? Robert, the link doesn't seem to work (not just for me) Simon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
On 1 May 2015 at 22:53, Robert Banick rban...@gmail.com wrote: This: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32551499 Map at bottom Not sure it's a BBC issue if they've had the image in good faith. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
Sur internet il y a ça : http://map.meurisse.org/ Tu peux créer des points, des trajets sans utiliser forcément les nœuds osm et les exporter sous différents formats. Et sinon il avait été question il y a pas longtemps sur la liste d'un autre site qui permettait de calculer les trajets depuis un point A jusqu'à un point B. Il devait bien donner la distance... Je ne retrouve plus la discussion. Sébastien On 01/05/2015 13:54, dHuy Pierre wrote: erreur de fenetre! désolé Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h44, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] Josm 8279 e aggiunta valori
Ho segnalato il bug e a quanto pare già ne erano al corrente, sembra sia un vecchio bug riattivato da non si sa bene cosa... speriamo lo risolvano, su Kubuntu ho provato ad impostare delle dimensioni fisse per quella finestra ma niente, torna sempre alle dimensioni che non permettono la visione dei campi Key e value... :( -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Josm-8279-e-aggiunta-valori-tp5842534p5842712.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Normalisation du tag antenne
Désolé de l'erreur de fenêtre Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 11h06, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Le 1 mai 2015 10:20, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Verdi: Hum je pense que tu pousses un peu loin le format initial de Jérome me paraissait bien Jérome avait plutôt été séduit par ma première proposition, cependant je parlais du problème plus général des infos structurées pour lesquelles on n'a pas de schéma clair permettant de les représenter de façon compacte mais lisible et parsable avec un système unique et non ambigu, et sans forcément multiplier le nombre de tags quand ce n'est pas toujours nécessaire (car des infos optionelles qui complètent un tag de base). Dans un proemier tmeps j'avais évoqué JSON (aussi XML mais trop verbeux), alors qu'on a moyen de faire un format JSON light reprenant les conventions habituelles d'OSM où tout est codé avec des valeurs atomiques de type chaine, et où on a des séparateurs point-virgule et pipe mais pas très lisibles quand on les combine et pas non plus suffisant au delaà des listes simples ! ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
erreur de fenetre! désolé Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h44, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup
I think eventually chains will see the light, and publish their locations in an open format compatible manner. At that point a quick cross check with OSM would clear up most of the issues. Agree. Has anyone actually asked the retail chains? I haven't because I don't want to suggest that we will do anything with the data until I know we have the right tools in place to match entries in their database and in OSM. I'm sure it's an easy task but I don't know how to do that. I'd also like to see community support in place so that we can merge in some of their attributes (phone number, opening hours, etc). This could be a bigger challenge! Regards, Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajouter une règle dans le site OSM?
oups Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h44, dHuy Pierre dh...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Je t'invite à écrire une propal là desus en attendant je propose la combinaison pie/point virgule. Vu qu'il s'agitde listes associées simple c'est nickel, mais ta propal est extremement intéressant surtout que les bases tournent très bien avec de l'orienté document. Tu auras mon vote :) Le Vendredi 1 mai 2015 13h41, Shohreh codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Un truc qui me manque sur le site OSM (www.openstreetmap.org), c'est une règle pour mesurer la distance entre deux points. Faute de mieux, je crée à chaque fois une carte dans Umap pour ça. Quelqu'un sait-il s'il y a un moyen de rajouter ça sur le site OSM? Merci. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ajouter-une-regle-dans-le-site-OSM-tp5842700.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[Talk-at] buschenschank Attributierung
Hallo liebe Kollegen Heute hab ich in der Kleinen Zeitung über eine neue App zum finden von Buschenschänken und deren Öffnungszeiten gelesen und gleich Ausprobieren müssen. Mein Meinung allgemein von der App ist in erster Sinne nicht schlecht, aber noch erweiterbar. Daten der Buschenschänke sind anscheinend eigens erfasst, da ich sie in OSM nicht sehe (Wird vielleicht auch nur gegen Bezahlung in App übernommen, dann geht OSM leider nicht) Könnte man übernehmen bzw. eine Partnerschaft vereinbaren? Auf der Webseite (1) ist die Attributierung korrekt. Die Attributierung der OSM Karte in der App (2), (3) fehlt! (Android, Apple??) Da die App noch in Entwicklung ist denke ich dass es nur Übersehen wurde. Nun bitte ich euch: das zu Beobachten bzw. den App Entwickler wenn nötig eine Nachricht zukommen zu lassen, da ich Persönlich die genaue Rechtslage nicht genau kenne (bzw.nachvollziehen kann, Lizenzen sind für mich ne kopfzerbrechende Dinger) Auf http://dmca.openstreetmap.org/ melden? (englisch ist für mich wie Slowenisch, nicht versteh) Mit herzlichen grüßen Johannes (1) http://buschenschankguide.at/ (Freizeitclub Süd) (2) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.klemencic.buschenschankhl=de (3) https://itunes.apple.com/at/app/buschenschank/id796965905 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk] GeoHipster comment on OSM
Perhaps TeleNav or Bing's lawyers are brave enough to say ODbL is not a problem, or they guess that those entities could absorb the lawsuit. They are the only lawyers who take this stance, and they haven't tested it - neither company provides permanent OSM-derived geocoding. Everywhere else, cautious lawyers and lawyers are the same thing. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: I love Gary - I think it’s great that OSM is getting to the point that people will write 100 page critiques of it. We must be doing something right. :-) I actually tried on the single point of contact issue, I think it’d be a great idea for OSM to have a 1-800 (or similar) number. Even manned by volunteers. But at the time, companies are evil and all that so it didn’t go anywhere. ODbL critique is the usual thing; people want to take OSM and merge it with other people’s datasets without giving back, perhaps for good reasons. That’s not an ambiguity, it’s the whole point. There are edge cases and complexities like geocoding, but as far as I can see some lawyers can work with it, cautious lawyers tend to make it a big issue. It’s a shame some organizations are trapped by cautious advice like that - I’ve worked in organizations with more positive advice around OSM and it means you can go a lot further. Best Steve On Apr 30, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Nicholas G Lawrence nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote: http://geohipster.com/2015/04/27/gary-gale-dear-osm-its-time-to-get-your-finger-out/ Anyone read this blog piece by Gary Gale? Is it worth commenting on? *“**To my mind there’s two barriers to greater and more widespread adoption, both of which can be overcome if there’s sufficient will to overcome them within the OSM community as a whole. These barriers are, in no particular order … licensing, and OSM not being seen as (more) conducive to working with business.”* 1) Gary criticises OSM for not having a single point of contact for business to liaise with. Exactly why this is necessary is a mystery to me. If business wants to make use of OSM data, they can download the planet file just like anyone else. If business wants to contribute data, or donate equipment or sponsor events, those things are also possible. 2) Gary criticises the ODbL for ambiguities in the share-alike clause. Maybe this needs clarification, but personally I think the share-alike clause is a good thing. Fundamentally though, Gary seems to be under the impression that OSM has a driving need to “compete” with other providers of geospatial data, and that if OSM hasn’t “won the race” then it is failing somehow. Which I think reveals a vast ignorance of the motivations of the majority of OSM volunteers. Anyway, I wondered if anyone else had seen the post. Cheers, Nick *** WARNING: This email (including any attachments) may contain legally privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print or copy this email without appropriate authority. If this email was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake, please telephone or email me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of this email and delete it and any copies of it from your computer system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this email is not waived or destroyed by that mistake. It is your responsibility to ensure that this email does not contain and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with your computer system). Opinions contained in this email do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Department of Transport and Main Roads, or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure. *** ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk