On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com
by this weekend.
-Ian
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
is gone.
It would only take a couple of minutes for Maree/Coober Pedy, and the
problem as far as street names go would vanish.
Ian.
That then removes the tempation
On 27 October 2010 12:42, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
referenced is for Coober Pedy. As far as I can tell the guy
sub tags as we commonly do for many other
osm features
Ian has suggested the established is_in= tag for this purpose, and Alex
Mauer has suggested a relation that contains all the routes for a (state
or lower) network.
Personally, of those two, I think I prefer is_in=.
For Michigan
well for
communication. Information in the notes, or even in notes:FOR_SWANILLI. It
also lets others editing in the area know what is going on.
Ian.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Since there's more agreement around the US:ST:County approach, are there
objections to just documenting that in the wiki?
I disagree that there is agreement about this approach. As I've mentioned a
couple times, we need to
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 10/24/10 11:12 PM, Mike N. wrote:
Mike, are you specifically interested in Arkansas? The state level
data might be better than TIGER and the state is very interested in
getting it into OSM.
I was researching
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Craig Hinners cr...@hinnerspace.comwrote:
On 10/15/2010 09:44 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
Sans prefices, the highway=motorway where US Highway 10, Wisconsin
Highway
66, and Interstate Highway 39 run together would have ref=10;66;39.
Not
very useful for
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Prefix information should not go in OSM. If a renderer wants to display a
prefix somehow, then they can go look it up based on other information
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 10/23/2010 05:00 PM, Mike N. wrote:
should be using reply to mailing
list and not reply to all. The former has been around in modern
mailers not politically motivated to do the wrong things for about 10
years
I agree with Richard but I don't want to feed the trolls by responding
(which is the policy of several other mailing list readers I know).
On Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21,
doubt that placing it on the ABS boundary is a step forward - it
misses many details of the bay. The Port Hacking has been adjusted in many
points, by survey, interpolation and yahoo, and is mostly more accurate in
my view than the ABS data.
Ian
to mark an
asphalt national park track as wheelchair accessible, as not many of them
maintained to a point of being independently accessible. Where is the path
you are considering tagging?
Ian.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:00 PM, Anthony wrote:
What project would you recommend? I'm looking for a project that
creates and provides free geographic data such as street maps to
anyone who wants them. Not one that makes maps in
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote:
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com writes:
For example, Kansas highway 18:
type = route
route = road
network = US:KS
ref = 18
(optional?) symbol=* tag
Also an optional wikipedia link.
There does seem to be
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Tom Hughes, OSM contributor and infrastructure guru has written an
interesting summary of why some part of OSM can look strange.
http://compton.nu/2010/10/city-labels-in-openstreetmap/
Sounds like a good project for a bot to
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
- Support for route relations
Why should this be US-specific? Canada certainly has the same sort of
route system as the US, and many European
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 10/15/2010 05:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ian Dees
ian.dees-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote:
So far, it seems to be something like
type=route
route=road
network=US:NY - state abbreviation
ref=87 - number only
symbol=*
or for county roads,
network=US:NY:Albany - full county name
As I pointed out
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
i have created a page for a US Tagging working group here:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
...discussions on the mailing list tend to wander all over the place and
lead to no conclusions or decisions being made. If we meet in a phone
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
== Inconsistent State Prefixes ==
I wish there was a better (simpler) way to consistently tag the state and
county shields but I do not have one. I think it needs to be done though.
Compared to the rest of the world, I
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I made that one up (CO for County). Yes, CTH probably makes more sense
but
isn't that pretty specific? Do all states use that verbiage
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we should be storing any prefix as part of the network=* or
ref=* tags (thus my suggestion for
network=us_route/state_route
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 10/15/10 6:06 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I made that one up (CO for County
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why I briefly mentioned the is_in=* tag earlier. County road 1 in
Albany County would have network=county_road,is_in:county=Albany while
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm importing the USFS data for the Ocala National Forest boundary
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you should imply that there is a natural=forest boundary
logically separate from the National Forest's boundary. Assuming you're
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2011/Bid/Denver-Ian
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
One of the topics discussed tonight during the US Chapter board meeting was
the possibility of making a bid for the international State of the Map
conference in 2011. We
9, 2010 at 22:34, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm digging this idea... is there anyone that would be interested in
starting a bid document or page on the wiki for Boulder or Denver? Not that
we have to officially submit it but it would be helpful to at least get
these ideas down on paper
Just in case the mailing lists don't overlap enough to catch everyone:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Deborah Shaddon dshad...@comcast.net
Date: Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Subject: [CrisisMappers] Re: [CrisisCommons] URGENT BAY AREA NEED -
volunteer mappers tomorrow
To:
be great if people could make both events.
Leslie
--
*From:* Peter Batty pe...@ebatty.com
*To:* Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com
*Cc:* talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
*Sent:* Wed, September 8, 2010 8:41:59 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-us
I'm digging this idea... is there anyone that would be interested in
starting a bid document or page on the wiki for Boulder or Denver? Not that
we have to officially submit it but it would be helpful to at least get
these ideas down on paper somewhere.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Hurricane
Brian Prangle wrote on 27/08/2010 08:02:
Have we got to the stage of mapping these that it
would be worth the effort in replicating a rendering similar to
OpenCycleMap?. The wiki page on long distance paths seems to have
a pretty comprehensive listing and you can
SomeoneElse wrote on 27/08/2010 10:58:
On 27/08/2010 08:50, Ian Spencer wrote:
I don't think there is anyone rendering it explicitly at the
moment, however, it would be trivial for someone to take
SomeoneElse wrote on 27/08/2010 11:35:
On 27/08/2010 11:22, Ian Spencer wrote:
There is a relationship type route with network tag uk_ldp, and
in Potlatch it already renders the long distance paths in a
different way, so
Craig Wallace wrote on 25/08/2010 22:28:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:41 +0100, "Ian Spencer" ianmspen...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think "already by definition cycle-legal" is the very point I
am querying. The trouble with the Bicycle
I came across a problem with Velomap, which I find is a good
autorouting version of OSM for my purposes for cycling and still
works fine for walking too.
Velomap has made an assessment of the various tags to guess how best
to route for bicycles on roads, tracks and
Brad Rogers wrote on 25/08/2010 11:30:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:57:23 +0100
Ian Spencer ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ian,
suggested, there are no sources quoted on the ways typically, and a
very high number of ways simply do not join although keepright
Jim Avery wrote on 25/08/2010 12:36:
Personally I think that explicitly tagging roads which
are already by
definition cycle-legal as bicycle=yes would be too onerous and not
entirely helpful. There are quite a few roads which are legal but
lethal for cyclists. I think
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.eduwrote:
Anyway If the 2010 has block-face-level address ranges, it would be good
to upload the streets as block edges rather than long ways spanning several
blocks, to make it easier to work with the address ranges. (so the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
On a smaller scale, I don't know. Pretty much all the TIGER data I've
ever seen is surpassed in quality by local county/state data. So if
you're going to import county by county, why bother with TIGER?
Not all states /
Richard Fairhurst wrote on 23/08/2010 12:00:
Phillip Barnett wrote:
Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the
potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be
dropping this rather quickly?
I
, at 23:57, Ian Spencer wrote:
I was checking why a
bike route from near Derby to Alton Towers was really
badly out and discovered that whoever has been mapping an
area around Derbyshire has been cunningly disguising
Dave F. wrote on 21/08/2010 13:29:
On 21/08/2010 07:42, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
Sorry not to list.
- Forwarded Message
From:
Jerry Clough - OSM
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Ian,
Ian Dees wrote:
I got the impression after SotM US that there was a huge interest in doing
imports correctly. For me, correctly means the following:
0. Discuss with community (don't import if no community
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
A toolset like this would let a community grow around the import
process - letting OSM get the good data that's out there whilst making
sure there's a community there to maintain it.
Good ideas. Also, If one of the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Lord-Castillo, Brett
blord-casti...@stlouisco.com wrote:
Once I get our data uploaded into ESRI Community Basemaps (which is a
simpler process, has technical support, and will accept and integrate our
authoritative data even without an editor community), I'm
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Lord-Castillo, Brett
blord-casti...@stlouisco.com wrote:
Just thought I would add that both the Google and ESRI programs allow for
community edits, which we can get back out into our systems.
Community BaseMaps even makes the data directly available to end
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Joe Woycke woy...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] if osm chooses to exclude the local govt and refuse their data they
will lose out on a rich data source that is better than the tiger data that
osm currently uses as its base data.
Again, no one is suggesting that we
I got the impression after SotM US that there was a huge interest in doing
imports correctly. For me, correctly means the following:
1. Get permission
2. Convert to OSM format
3. Compare to existing data
4. Upload to the data
I think a tool could be made that automated most of these steps (or at
After a half mile walk to CVS and an unsuccessful attempt at writing a
driver for the $10 USB camera I bought, I just installed Ustream on my
phone.
Here's the link:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/state-of-the-map-us-live
No guarantees on uptime :-).
, but they serve two different purposes/missions.
SEJ
Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans. -Empedocles
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:12, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if our friends at the USGS know about this data. If they do,
there must be a good reason why
I think I remember Eric (ebwolf: owner of said changeset) mentioning
something about a bulk upload a few weeks ago. I bet he'll respond to your
OSM message if he doesn't see this thread.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at
I'm have a private tilecache for NAIP and am working on a public one right
now.
I'll publicize it when I get it working.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Eric Wolf ebw...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this seems like a silly question, coming from me and all, but where
are you getting your NAIP
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
It sure would be nice if these individual image sets were available through
a common interface, instead of having to find/add all the separate links.
1) Check out
-=--=---===---=--=-=--=---==---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf 720-334-7734
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like it was actually Ian who posted this WMS URL a couple weeks ago:
http://isse.cr.usgs.gov/ArcGIS/services
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Jaak Laineste jaak.laine...@gmail.com
wrote:
Map is a hand-written 2D picture of the world. It is definitely more a
kind of art than a digital photo in flickr, there is more subjectivity
and
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote:
Hi,
There is a big difference between pointing out the current form of the
contributor terms means that we will loose 80% of the data in Australia.
Do you really want to proceed? and jumping into every thread and
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, SteveC wrote:
Maybe a line saying mailing list posts should follow the topic of the
list
Fine
Talk= talk
and when you get plenty you are upset?
Talk is not how I would describe what's happening on the
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:04:00PM -0600, SteveC wrote:
Someone mentioned that in addition there should be some topic
guidelines per mailing list too […]
I think this should be a general code of conduct, and each
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the cases you are probably familiar with involve simple lists of
telephone numbers and subscribers. The moment you add even the slightest
originality to a collection of facts then it become eligible for copyright.
Can you
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:14 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2010, at 11:09 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 7 August 2010 03:04, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sounds like you've never been to court. Who's right or wrong is a
secondary consideration here, the first order of
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 August 2010 03:14, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If they have several orders of magnitude more money then probably the
cost/benefit tradeoff would suggest throwing out the data is the better
option.
Even
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I'm wondering about: how useful is a small piece of a future
larger import? For example, there's the National Hydrography Dataset,
import of which is apparently being coordinated on the wiki. I've
imported
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the NHD import is a good example of a well-intentioned importer
(me) gone wrong. I had initially planned to import the whole darn thing
On Sat, Jan 8, 2000 at 3:20 PM, Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com wrote:
The difference with NHD is that we are leaving conversion to osm format for
the local mapper / importer. Since OSM US has server space, maybe that's
good use of it to host converted data ready for import.
I like this...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2010-08-05 11:52, Ian Dees wrote:
...
It isn't any different. I had made the (bad) decision at the time to
import over any existing data because in the several hundred places I
2010/8/4 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On 04/08/2010 19:01, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Let's create a fund to pay for license related legal action ;))
After all it is so sad having a license and not be able
2010/8/4 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Ian Dees wrote:
Wait, how did the thread about NOT nitpicking over licensing issues turn
into a donate so we can hire lawyers to nitpick thread?
Probably because some people instead of doing something with our data (like
big
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:53 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm slightly confused by all this talk about needing contractual
agreements with all the end users and the OSM-F, or needing to
identify Nearmap users to OSM-F.
OSM already has data in the database from other
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
It's somewhat
frustrating to find this being immediately classified in the same box
as anonymous editing and/or vandalism.
I wanted to make it clear that I'm ecstatic to finally see a simple map
editor coming out. I look
Is just me or does musical chairs not work with the Chrome Browser. I
cannot select the boxes. I can interestingly select the circles?
Ian
.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
On 3 August 2010 18:13, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Can somebody revert this edit ASAP?
Which reminds me... we at NearMap are preparing to begin rollout of OSM
editing on our site; simple operations like adding
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
I think I remember something like that; however, the edits that we're
submitting all come from one user (that represents NearMap) since we
don't (and can't) require users of our site to all be registered with
OSM. So we
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.org
wrote:
I'm almost done with this script. It's not a full bot, but instead
modifies
an osm file which I will read back into JOSM and upload the
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Emilie Laffray
emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote:
While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people
working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means
that every one doing an app needs to do some significant work to
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
How is the OpenStreetMap community to distinguish these edits from
vandalism, and you from a vandal?
Considering I didn't make any of the changes you are accusing me of I
fail to see the problem.
You did...
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people
working
in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Brian Quinion
openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote:
Discussing this for a day on the Tagging list is not enough for you to
make
this change.
How much time should it take? I didn't really set a dead line but was
trying to get comments on the idea...
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
I'll be working a lot on the viewing interface next, so this may not always
be functional. However I'm aiming to keep the upload side of things up and
running throughout.
I just noticed that Google's Map API
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:43 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 28 July 2010 13:15, Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu wrote:
Bu to be the first: Where's the Openstreetmap attribution?
Since all data was collected by one mapper, their consent would be
enough to allow
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:51 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On 28 July 2010 15:28, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:43 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 July 2010 13:15, Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu wrote:
Bu
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.org
wrote:
Roadway classification in the United States is subjective
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem is that the
European community has decided
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:
Roadway classification in the United States is subjective, there is no
getting around that fact. No amount of discussion is going to fix that.
Guidelines which only focus on each road separably without considering
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems to me that Steve's post is not just a harmless rant, but
contains an implication, whether purposeful or not, that some mappers,
namely
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjO1S0AYMs4
Does anyone have the lyrics and/or video from what was presented on the
screen behind him?
___
talk mailing list
Tom Evans wrote on 14/07/2010 09:19:
As another suggestion: Is there a special tag we can add to force it
to highlight on the noname check without actually destroying the name
tag?
Tom
Perhaps what is required is a new hierarchy, like:
query
so you might then have query:tag_name
Not
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Alan,
Alan Mintz wrote:
I just tried to look at tagwatch for North-america and got a 404, possibly
because there is no north-america directory at
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/ either. What's up?
We haven't
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:39 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
To who may concern in the OSM community (*please excuse any double
postings*).
The OSM community is encouraged to consider offering a proposal in response
to the RFP proposed at
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone has tried a helmet camera like the GoPro Helmet
Hero HD or ContourHD for mapping? The former even has a mode where it
takes a 5MP photo every two seconds. Plus you could probably narrate
to
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote:
I agree. Actually I was thinking on how to integrate P2 with a new design
for our Chilean website. The idea of integrating Potlatch with our own
website graphics/color scheme, instead
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM, John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.comwrote:
It sure would be nice if users couldn't submit bad data. Incorrect data
(wrong street name) takes a human to spot, but bad topology (doesn't conform
to the rules and a computer can verify conformance) shouldn't be
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Alan Millar a...@bolis.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
There's a dummy script at
http://repo.or.cz/w/ump2osm.git/blob/HEAD:/osm-merge to do that (would
need to be modified for 2 layers).
Here is my updated version of osm-merge.sh
If there's a
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 07/09/2010 03:50 AM, David Ellams wrote:
The company, a subsidiary of AOL, plans to announce Friday
morning that it is launching a site in the U.K. based on a
project called OpenStreetMap, which is dedicated to
Jonathan Bennett wrote on 05/07/2010 23:58:
On 05/07/2010 23:28, Guy Collins wrote:
Another search: high street, barnstaple and yes the result includes
various options but always ...Devon County, Kelland Cross
You'll find the answer here:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I made a demonstration of how the yournavigation.org website can be
embedded inside osm.org. Check it out:
901 - 1000 di 1423 matches
Mail list logo
