On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:35 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us
wrote:
>
> 29 wrz 2020, 02:02 od b...@mapwise.com:
>
> An example unhelpful comment:
>
> "YES GEORGIA IS BADLY-TAGGED TRUNK FREE! Control is provided by
> floridaeditor; i.e., if anybody tries to change one back I will review
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:02 PM Brian May wrote:
>
> I'm Florida based, have seen Floridaeditor's changes and noticed an eagerness
> to change a lot of road classifications. I didn't pay a lot of attention
> until now. Of course, trunk can be a tricky one, but if you got one lone guy
> on a
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:15 PM Evin Fairchild wrote:
>
> We've always tagged non interstate freeways as motorways. They are often
> designed to interstate standards and there is literally no distinction
> between them and interstate freeways except that there's no interstate shield.
>
> As for
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:02 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:42 AM Jack Burke wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, September 28, 2020, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Georgia 400 is a grade-separated, divided, high-speed freeway from its
>> southern en
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:21 PM Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> On 9/28/20 11:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Given NE2 was also in Flordia, I wouldn't rule out it's the same person.
>
> I was considering the same possibility. Given he's been indefinitely
> banned from editing, if we find out it is him
On Monday, September 28, 2020, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:07 AM Matthew Woehlke
> wrote:
>
>> On 28/09/2020 11.42, Jack Burke wrote:
>> > I'm willing to bet that most OSM editors who drive on either of those
>> two
>> > wi
On Monday, September 28, 2020, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 8:35 PM Jack Burke wrote:
>
>> Recently, someone has taken it on himself to downgrade most (all?)
>> highway=trunk roads in the eastern U.S. to just primary. The odd
>> thing is that the very w
ld recommend involving DWG. If they
> just want to argue then but won't join Slack, then I'd invite them to to this
> mailing list discuss why they feel a particular road should be changed from
> trunk to primary.
>
> Best,
> Clifford
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:35 PM
Hi all,
Recently, someone has taken it on himself to downgrade most (all?)
highway=trunk roads in the eastern U.S. to just primary. The odd
thing is that the very wiki page he cites as his reason fully supports
keeping them as trunk. Many of them I'm personally familiar with, and
even absent
Hi Clay.
I would use the layer=* tag to reflect the various elevations of the tracks in
question, and probably offset them slightly from each other to make future
editing easier.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology.
On May 4, 2020 2:15:07 PM EDT, Clay Smalley wrote:
>Hi
I've been using amenity=college for those. They fit the meaning of "further
education" to me, and I didn't see the need for yet another category.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology.
On February 17, 2020 10:20:56 PM EST, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>How are people tagging
Does anyone know someone who lives in the "disputed" area? If so, then one
definitive information point is what local government elections he/she can vote
in.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On January 26, 2019 8:50:39 PM EST, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>Do the latest
As Paul said, it depends on the type of road. In Georgia, the signage
has been the brown keystone one for roads that mere mortal cars can
drive on:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/HD_cjbQunrGWEQCViX-Now
And the vertical ones with FS on them for people with more advanced vehicles:
Oh I am so happy that Frederik brought this up. I've been thinking
about this topic for a while, but just haven't said anything. I love
the ensuing discussion, too.
So, first, the wiki page on now to tag the refs
Because they are labeled "United States Postal Service" with big stickers,
that's how I've been tagging them.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On August 28, 2018 4:02:40 PM EDT, Jmapb wrote:
>On 8/28/2018 3:31 PM, Leif Rasmussen wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> A couple of
I am opposed to this suggestion, because there are two countries called "United
States" in North America: the United States of America, and the United States
of Mexico.
Yes, when people say "United States" they typically mean America and not
Mexico, but the USA is just as often referred to as
Asking for thoughts & opinions...
While some counties just attach a number to a pole (e.g., many counties in
Georgia), there are some that put up signs saying "CR 123" (Jasper County,
Mississippi) for unnamed county roads. However, Clarke County, Mississippi
signs (with shiny new
I kinda object to any type of mechanical removal of this tag, mainly
because I do still use it. I've modified JOSM's settings to show the
yellow highlight, and I periodically go on a TIGER editing spree,
especially in the county I live in. It has been very valuable in finding
and fixing misnamed
2018 at 10:00 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> Right, we're only counting striped lanes.
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped.
>>
>> -jack
&g
But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On May 8, 2018 3:24:08 PM EDT, Paul Johnson wrote:
>The tag you're looking for is width, not lanes.
>
>On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:29 Tod Fitch wrote:
I would forward the account link and your explanation to d...@openstreetmap.org
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On April 28, 2018 10:39:23 PM EDT, Ian Nicholson wrote:
>What's the process for reporting a spam account? I'm fairly certain
>that
Keep in mind that OSM apparently uses "compacted" to refer to macadamized
roads, which is a specific process for building roads.
Maybe they wiki should be updated to say that roads with loose pieces of gravel
scattered around but a hardened underlying surface is compacted, not gravel?
-jack
I've been tagging roads like that as compacted, once I learned more about the
surfacing tech.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On April 18, 2018 6:19:07 PM EDT, Toby Murray wrote:
>I recently bought a gravel bicycle to ride on the many gravel
I've been leaving all the TIGER tags and just changing reviewed from no to
yes
The main reason I've been leaving them is I don't know who might want to make
use of that information.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On February 13, 2018 5:13:16 AM EST, Mark Wagner
nor...@mac.com> wrote:
>On 1/8/2018 10:53 AM, Jack Burke wrote:
>> I'll leave it to others to decide what, if anything, we should do
>> about this.
>>
>>
>http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/leonia-streets-off-navigational-apps/
>
>If they actua
I'll leave it to others to decide what, if anything, we should do about this.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/leonia-streets-off-navigational-apps/
--jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology___
Talk-us mailing list
de I interpreted from the conversation is that the latter
is the way to go now.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 24, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/09/2017 09:46, J
Howdy folks,
I'm looking for advice on how to tag properly a complex lane condition.
I 85 northeast of Atlanta (both NB and SB) has an express lane[1][2] that
extends for many miles (sample section located here:
https://osm.org/go/ZSAYLN0I0-?m= ). The lane is not barrier separated from
the
I would call this map vandalism and delete.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On September 3, 2017 6:51:27 PM EDT, Bradley White
wrote:
>Something a little bit different:
>
>The Republic of Molossia is a self-declared "micro-nation" located
According to one Georgia lawyer's website[1] as well as the Indiana
driver's handbook[2], it is illegal to cross a solid white line between
lanes. Having said that, I would map Case 1 as shown in A, because I don't
think any police officer is going to bother writing a ticket if someone
does so
*begins reading*
*minutes later, eyes begin watering*
*starts reading from the beginning*
*gives up*
TL;DR
So...what exactly are you asking?
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
What is the preferred ref tag shorthand for forest service roads? I found
one wiki page[1] that specifies NFR is to be used, which I don't think I've
ever heard before. I can't find any supporting documentation, including
discussions, mailing list threads, votes, etc. That info appears to have
Thanks for the feedback, Steve! That's kinda what I was thinking, but
wanted another opinion.
--jack
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:56 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea <
stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
> I tagged barrier=toll_booth on numerous "exit lanes" at the parking
> facility at San Diego
The new SunTrust Park baseball stadium is about to open, with the first
game just before Easter. In addition to on-grounds parking lots (the easy
ones), many businesses and offices around the area have a parking agreement
with the county and team to provide parking for games. However, most of
Are the various "toll" related tags appropriate for park entrances where
you have to stop and pay a fee? For example, most state parks in Georgia
have a "parking fee" that you have to pay to an attendant when you enter
the park, so it seems appropriate to tag the collection point as
No one has called for my head yet, so I guess everything is ok :-)
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On March 15, 2017 2:31:16 AM EDT, OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
>My apologies to you, Jack, for putting your name in my Subject line. A
>simple
I just came across this OSM user diary which links to yet another article
on how to manipulate OSM for Pokemon:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/-karlos-/diary/40684
The bothersome part is the replies to the diary entry where people bring up
the new edits they've made for the game. Since I'm
Maybe I'm the last to know this, but Samsung"s Find My Mobile service lets you
switch between HERE and OSM maps. (And yes, they do correctly note "(c)
OpenStreetMap contributors".)
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology___
Talk-us
I, for one, loved the points you made about sovereignty.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On January 30, 2017 11:23:25 PM EST, OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
>Apologies, Ian. I did mention that my VERY brief digression into state
>sovereignty
Can a local OSM editor in Austria help verify that we have this tagged
correctly? :-D
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/ski/news/driver-get-stuck-on-a-ski-slope-after-his-sat-nav-gets-him-lost/
I'm not much use. I don't speak German and can't tell a fahrvergnugen from a
weinerschnitzel on a
Hey, Michigan folks, keep an eye out for some speed limit changes
http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2017/01/75-mph_speed_limits_officially.html
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
They're using the same map they used in Ingress, a game they launched when
still part of Google. That one is known to have come from Google. It makes
sense that any map databases they had when the break happened would still be
owned by the company; they just wouldn't have maps that included
> Elliott
>
> [1] = https://www.mapbox.com/blog/la-turn-lanes-map/
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:01 PM Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Something about some HOV access tags I've seen have been bothering me.
>>
>> Some of the interstates through
Something about some HOV access tags I've seen have been bothering me.
Some of the interstates through Atlanta have designated HOV-only lanes. In
looking at the attributes on them, someone has added
hov:lanes=designated|yes|yes|yes|yes {etc.} to them.
However, after reviewing the wiki for the
I think that was a discussion on one of the mailing lists. And, where you order
was also what I understand the (very fine) distinction to be.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On September 29, 2016 2:00:04 PM EDT, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>Harald Kliems
Tagging maxspeed is purely for a router. So are turn restrictions.
As for turn:lanes meant for complex intersectionsthe examples in the
wiki show very simple uses. I can't see anything in it, or the discussion
page, indicating that it is only for complex intersections. Certainly
there is a
Would love to compare notes on that, but it'll have to be later next week.
If you want to look at what I do for exits, feel free to examine pretty
much all of them on I 75 south of Atlanta, as well as through downtown.
--jack
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Paul Johnson
> This exit has no turn lane. There is no staging lane prior to the exit
where tags could be placed, one should not be created just so that there is
a place to put tags.
> This freeway should not be split. You said yourself that the exit is not
part of the freeway itself, so tags should not be
ne, UNLESS markings indicate otherwise).
> These rules, too, vary by jurisdiction, so if the map is going to be
> general for global use it should express them.
>
> --
> Jesse B. Crawford
>
> https://jbcrawford.us
> je...@jbcrawford.us
> GPG 0x4085BDC1
>
> On 08/25/2016 11
Freeway exit tagging
I am totally confused.
What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes
approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane
without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not
signed with an arrow, such as this one?
at 1:38 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I take it that at least you and I are in agreement that the wiki is
>> deficient for branching exits like this one:
>> http
at the last minute.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So I take it that at least you and I are in agreement that the wiki is
> > deficient for br
rows, not for describing where you can legally go from that lane. That's
> what the turn restriction relation is for.
>
> Putting "through" on a lane means that there is a straight arrow painted
> on it. Putting "none" on a lane means that there is no marking.
>
>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Even if the road isn't signed that way? The use of "through" when there
>> is no explicit marking to that effect seems to be contraindicated by the
>> wiki.
>>
>
&
it signage. But if
that's how we want to use "through" then shouldn't we update the wiki to be
more clear?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
on on the lane, which is of
>course impossible. These "scripted" edits are therefore a correct
>interpretation of the original tagging. The problem here is that the
>original tagging was incorrect.
>
>> On Aug 24, 2016, at 7:24 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I never thought of that. When they get around to rerouting Windy Hill over
the Interstate, I might have to try that.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote:
> On 8/24/2016 9:14 PM, Jack Burke wrote:
>
>> Since I'm on e-mail tonight, I thought I'd brin
Since I'm on e-mail tonight, I thought I'd bring folks up-to-date on some
ongoing road construction north and south of Atlanta that is rendering some
pretty important imagery out-of-date. So before you go about trying to
"fix" something that doesn't match the spy photos, please check around to
be
ases where it might be used and would defer to
> the local mapper who used it. (The ones in my area are much more likely to
> be “through;slight_right”.)
>
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, it's https://github.com/mapbox/
h a blank globally? If so, this should be shut down immediately.
>> "none" and blank are both valid values and while I wouldn't mind
>> seeing it be consistent, any such edit would need to be discussed
>> before it is done.
>>
>> Toby
>>
>> On W
An active OSM group (leaving names, etc. out while they check out what I
reported) is running a script or plug-in or challenge called "to-fix" that
is apparently supposed to help fix incorrect turn:lanes values (and maybe
other things, I haven't investigated deeply enough).
The problem is, it's
The errors in OSM must be worse than we thought if Martijn can't tell which
state he's in!
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On August 8, 2016 1:19:32 PM EDT, "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:15 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>
Is anyone else starting to see map spam popping up in their areas?
Over the past few months, I've seen 3 OSM entries that I'm calling map spam
for lack of a better term. I know that doesn't seem like a lot, but it
could be a new trend.
Specifically, what I'm finding is a well-formed node for a
Interesting. I've been tagging most large pharmacies as shop=convenience and
amenity=pharmacy since I tend to think of them as convenience stores as much as
pharmacies.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On July 5, 2016 1:08:26 PM EDT, Peter Dobratz
I don't see anything immediately wrong with the only segments your Overpass
query turns up in Georgia (Savannah).
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On June 13, 2016 8:17:59 PM EDT, Toby Murray wrote:
>I just discovered some misguided edits and the
I concur. You could also put Harvey as an alt_name tag.
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On May 23, 2016 1:03:15 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk
>Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary
For Paisley Place, maybe:
abandoned:highway = residential
access = no
name = Paisley Place
note = Your description of what the GIS people say.
Since it needs to exist for addresses, it needs to be there.
For the reservoir:
landuse = reservoir
intermittent = yes
--
Typos courtesy of
Many of them may be valid, and could be nothing more than a farmer's private
grass landing strip for his cropduster. The FAA does have a regulation
requiring anyone establishing or closing an airfield (a private farm strip
qualifies) to notify the government, but they don't really police it.
Is it just me, or does social_path sound like the way to a "social disease"?
-jack
On March 25, 2016 6:36:56 PM EDT, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag"
>of
>social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to
I didn't even know they existed. What is their purpose? What is needed to
maintain them?
On March 24, 2016 9:51:56 AM EDT, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I haven’t paid any attention to these in a pretty long while. If they
>are still useful I can try and find some time to
"Open to the public" is not the same thing as free from copyright
restrictions
-jack
On February 11, 2016 1:46:53 PM EST, Clifford Snow
wrote:
>Sixty percent of Washington State counties have open data portals with
>GIS
>data. Washington State laws (Open Records
You can copyright a publication of facts, too. I could publish a book called
Ugly Red Things and copyright it. But nothing would stop you from publishing
your own book, Red Things That I Find Ugly.
On January 23, 2016 1:48:51 PM EST, Russ Nelson wrote:
>Kevin Kenny writes:
I would like to mention that the desired option is probably "avoid freeways"
(U.S. English; motorways in the U.K.) since there are too many highways in
existence to avoid. Google names the setting incorrectly.
-jack
On January 21, 2016 10:51:10 AM EST, Daniel Patterson
Out of curiosity, are there any plans to bring mph back to the OSRM web
interface? MPH used to be an option until the last major revision of the
website
--jack "don't judge until you've walked 1.6 km in my shoes"
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
Hello!
New message, please read <http://theabegweit.com/piece.php?6>
Jack Burke
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hello!
New message, please read <http://documation.greatapes.com/felt.php?xvg>
Jack Burke
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hello!
New message, please read <http://tanstore.com.tr/seems.php?8>
Jack Burke
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
;People
>who try to use the shoulder as a driving lane receive traffic
>citations.
>
>--
>John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
>"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate
>cannot
>drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther K
My 2 mills worth (after inflation):
The Florida Turnpike is a toll road (highway=motorway in OSM) with a
standard 70 mph speed limit that drops to 25 mph a few dozen yards before
the toll plazas (even for SunPass users). Having driven on it for years, I
would never consider any section of it to
Wait, question:
Are these shoulder lanes under discussion *only* for bicycles, or for motor
vehicles as well?
--jack
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Elliott Plack
wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I have not seen the Shoulder or Lanes tags in wide use yet. I use the
> cycleway
I use commercial.
To me, retail implies that you can take home a product (even if it's food in
your stomach). Commercial means you are buying a service.
-jack
On October 1, 2015 1:35:14 AM EDT, Clifford Snow
wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Hans De Kryger
Clearly, your sample contained nuts.
On September 30, 2015 2:40:37 PM EDT, Paul Johnson wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>
>> Our OSM team cooked up something new. A missing roads plugin for
>JOSM. I
>> think it's pretty
You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the
city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a
consolidated city-County, so it should exist.
-jack
On September 29, 2015 5:10:25 PM EDT, Ray Kiddy wrote:
>
>I
I'll put money on it being the same vandal.
1) The account was created today
2) The account profile has the following on it: "Homicide: Life On The Street
Baltimore 1990"
-jack
On September 14, 2015 1:26:47 PM EDT, Andy Townsend wrote:
>Can any Baltimore locals veryify or
Paul,
He's not saying that jakeroot isn't the most recent editor. He's saying that
the specific changes you're referring to are in changesets earlier than
jakeroot's, and that *those* changesets appear to be yours.
Not at a computer, so can't look myself.
-jack
On September 4, 2015
Just offering my unsolicited opinion
From the map, I would guess that this node is located near an old settlement,
where the train station used to be, that has since been absorbed into the
larger city nearby.
From other searching, it appears that the name is being applied to a nearby
So, just for fun, I'm going through the area you pointed out and fixing some of
the roads. I'm making some of those Unclassified instead of Tertiary because
they go from nowhere to nowhere, but feel free to change them.
I plan on making a road trip in a few weeks, and depending on timing and
Usually I change it to =yes instead of just deleting it. The main reason is I
frequently use ITOworld maps to review the county I live in to find unreviewed
roads, and I like the color pattern better that way.
-jack
On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Is it correct to tag a non-building object with building=yes if it is
functionally used as one?
As examples, I'm thinking about restaurants that use an old train car as a
dining room, or this unusual example of a riverboat as a welcome center
http://osm.org/go/Tv8f5t42q?layers=Nway=349671718
Hi folks,
I was wondering if it is appropriate to tag truck stops with
tourism=caravan_site. I've noticed a lot of them tagged this way, presumably
because many of the truck stop chains allow overnight parking of RVs, some have
dump stations, etc.
The wiki on caravan_site seems to imply a
What happened to the OSM US Google group? I can't find it any more.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto-spell technology. ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
In many cases, the sucket:tesla_supercharger is different
So Tesla is calling their supercharger sockets suckets?
How appropriate.
-jack
On April 13, 2015 4:24:03 PM EDT, Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org
wrote:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 05:33:02 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
You may
I would politely disagree that TIGER is an authoritative source for two reasons:
1) The extensive TIGER cleanup that is still being done years after the last
import, and
2) While helpful at compiling data, the federal government is not authoritative
for any boundaries within a state (and once
Won't be able to make it. 2pm is the middle of my afternoon at work.
-jack
On March 8, 2015 10:42:00 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hey all,
It's time for Mappy Hour tomorrow! I changed the time slot to 11am
Pacific
/ 2pm Eastern, let's try that a few weeks and see if it works
PS. The event link doesn't work for me.
On March 8, 2015 10:42:00 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hey all,
It's time for Mappy Hour tomorrow! I changed the time slot to 11am
Pacific
/ 2pm Eastern, let's try that a few weeks and see if it works for more
people. Let me know.
I don't see where you're getting the interstate references shouldn't go in
the destination tag bit...can you quote the sentence/paragraph on that? I
agree that it seems wrong, for the same reason you listed.
The ref= tag is used for the highway number on the actual highway itself.
E.g., I-95
I'll be out on a limb and say that the reason is because they know not all
locations for a particular business are mapped in OSM and so they don't want to
rely on OSM for the actual locations.
Which begs the question of why Where 2 Get It doesn't edit OSM themselves to
add the locations
access=use_at_your_own_risk
access=two_paths_diverged_in_a_yellow_wood
access=choose_wisely
access=plugh
access=xyzzy
?
-jack
On December 22, 2014 10:06:15 AM EST, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
On 12/22/14 3:27 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I've frequently wanted to map the
In Georgia, (almost?) all state roads are signed with the state outline and the
highway number, but no GA or Georgia text with it. Occasionally you might
see State Road or State Route printed on the sign in addition to the state
outline. In some very rural areas, I think there might still be a
Howdy,
I have a question about how much effort should be put into adding directional
suffixes to road names.
Many counties around Atlanta have adopted directional suffixes for roads, both
in incorporated areas as well as outside city limits. Usually all areas in the
county use the same
1 - 100 di 105 matches
Mail list logo