Are you planning to run this on a regular schedule (e.g. every month) ?
m.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:18 AM Leif Rasmussen <354...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> The opinions expressed on the USPS/United States Postal Service tagging have
> been very mixed, with seemingly equivalent
The Belgian community lives now mostly on Riot, we do have an IRC
bridge and different channels to discuss dev or landuse related stuff.
The main drawback is the lack of threads (ever tried to follow 2
discussions taking place at the same time, let alone read was said
during the day ?). The not
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Rihards wrote:
> On 2018.01.31. 03:16, Albert Pundt wrote:
>> Yeah, that wasn't right of me... I've been using the other sources for a
>> bit now and it's really not as bad as I thought it was, plus there's
>> more of the old imagery still
If you fill in "Coolidge Corner, Brookline, MA" on the nominatim
website, and run that query:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=Coolidge+Corner%2C+Brookline%2C+MA_geojson=1=
Then click details, you end on the page
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=498867
There
Do you know this
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/fiets/index.html?map=cycleways
map ? It shows a lot of cycleway tags, including surfaces, cycleway
routes and common mapping mistakes. There is nothing about shoulders,
but I'm pretty sure that you ask to include them (on the Dutch
> Another point is that if you have the outline for something that GNIS shows
> as a node, please conflate! I've done that with a lot of buildings and parks
> locally - just copy-and-paste the GNIS tags from the node to the polygon and
> then delete the node.
The utilsplugin2 [1] for JOSM and
The hot task manager http://tasks.hotosm.org/ already lists 4 tasks :
3499, 3501, 3502 and 3504
regards
m.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Jordan Brod wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was curious if anybody was planning to do a response similar to what was
> done in the Houston
In the old thread someone wrote (paraphrasing): I map from
photographs, so I'm not biased.
Since I map in the same way, I have a couple of thoughts. A photo is a
personal interpretation of the real world. The photographer framed the
scene, leaving out or including items. This can be conscious or
While I agree that changing peoples mapping habits is possible by
posting about certain mapping subjects, or developing apps, I do not
see why it is wrong to question whether a typical mapper only maps
what interests him/her or whether they also map other stuff.
I map a lot of items in which I
One of the discussion points on her diary entry was female hygiene
products found in women's toilets. How is a man going to map that,
without access to women's toilets ?
The real question for me is are men more likely going to map shop=car
than shop=clothes;clothes=underwear/fashion/ ... (sorry
I wonder whether it is interesting to know the difference between
concrete, asphalt and pervious concrete. All three have different
characteristics whether it be comfort for the cyclist or being
dangerous under icy conditions or durability under heavy loaded
trucks. What do you think ? Is it worth
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Eric Ladner wrote:
> Just to play Devil's advocate: B is probably more TECHNICALLY correct since
> a solid white line indicates "lane change discouraged, but not illegal" and
> you'd probably want the routing software to indicate where the
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:37 PM, wrote:
> The turn lanes plugin seems to support this nicely:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8wmp5h2cn931pic/Screenshot%202017-06-19%2014.33.40.jpg?dl=0
> — even though the center lane is rarely marked with left turn arrows, as
> suggested by the
a proposal, relations will not be used.
regards
m.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> As I asked you before, show me a real world case where you hav
that proposal, move it forward, make sure the tools get updated etc.
m.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul J
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> How does it not? A node doesn't infer a way that it's attached to, though a
> node may infer what nodes it crosses through. This is why relations became
> a thing, to model things that can't be inferred from the other
Oh , I thought position 2 was where the physical barrier ended. Must
have misinterpreted the image
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Harald Kliems <kli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:09 AM Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I
I thought the "standard" was to put the exit and entrance nodes at the
place where there is no physical barrier. Continuous white lines
should be mapped with change:lanes and should have no impact on the
position of the node. So definitely position "2".
IMHO This is illustrated by the picture on
JOSM has functionality to copy relations from one way to another. Of
course, you will still have to delete the relations that hold for the
other direction.
There is also a plugin that helps you check public transport
relations, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/PT_Assistant
Steve was so kind to accept my request for an interview.
You can read it at the new website of the Belgian Community:
http://www.osm.be/2017/01/19/en-motm-Steve-All.html
Enjoy.
m
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
> There's also garmin.openstreetmap.nl where you can define your own custom
> bounding box for generating Garmin routable map files. Perhaps that helps.
Lately several people reported errors with this service.
You
there is also https://opentopomap.org, is this similar to what you need ?
regards
m
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Lars Ahlzen wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 10:58 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>>
>> On 5/20/16 9:24 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> I was just on TopOSM [1] which appears
They tagged them as "social_path", according to their blog entry [1]
regards
m
[1]
https://hi.stamen.com/patrolling-trails-in-openstreetmap-a1c4762efb70#.2qq0g0v79
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I find this article a bit worrying:
>
>
Jochen Topf has an experimental site where you can pick the language
for the tags, see http://mlm.jochentopf.com/
regards
m
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> Yeah, the tiles on osm.org just straight up render the name=* tag
> which is supposed to
I just noticed a similar question on the tagging mailing list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-October/027115.html
It would be nice to combine efforts, not ?
regards
m
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM, maning sambale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are
After 11 editions of "Mapper of the Month" in Belgium and number 12 coming,
we see that almost all people started mapping because they are coming for
from Open Source/Data communities or because the other map solutions are
lacking for their needs.
They need a map for hiking, cycling, etc. and the
Keypadmapper can send the recorded data via email.
OSMTracker can upload the GPX-trace directly to OSM
I use Bluetooth to get the data from OSMTracker or OsmAn to my laptop.
regards
m
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:53 AM, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
> Marc Gemis writes:
I've tried OsmAnd, OSMTracker and KeypadMapper 3.
The latter two do not show a map.
The first one does.
Still prefer a dedicated GPS-device, in my case a Garmin 10 + photo camera.
Reasons:
* I can take more pictures and faster with the camera. All the smartphone
apps requires to many clicks and
They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as highway=service,
service=driveway, and typically access=private.
I don't care for the appearance of the map, it's more important to connect
houses that are further away from the main road via the proper driveway to
allow navigation to the
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> It has occurred to me that there will probably need to be a "boundary
> watcher" tool, which can let an interested group know about it when a
> boundary gets broken in some way. And I have started playing with the
> python
, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
wrote:
The razed sections of the abandoned railway need not confuse anybody.
Will you allow razed buildings and razed streets as well in OSM ( just
curious
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
The razed sections of the abandoned railway need not confuse anybody.
Will you allow razed buildings and razed streets as well in OSM ( just
curious) ?
What about previous swamps, forest, etc. that are now turned into
Do you think anybody will do the effort to correct some of the data, when
it will be overwritten again with each update ? That's why people ask not
to overwrite the data automatically.
regards
m
p.s. it's annoying that this is cross-posted on 2 mailing lists, I'm only
subscribed to one of
So you mean that there is at least a pole to indicate the stop, something
as on this picture [1] ?
regards
m
[1] http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2015/2015-03-08-Kester/i-LFFfVns
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Martin
Somehow my mail program corrupted your query, the greater-than sign was
gone.
It's easier to share Overpass Queries with the share button, so just follow
this link: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/76j . Position over an area you would
like to investigate and press Run.
If needed you could include an
Or Overpass + Level0 :-)
regards
m.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Minh Nguyen wrote:
I think we should consider a mechanical edit to update these tags
While you're thinking about GNIS mechanical edits, could I suggest one for
In the UK someone is trying to do the same. He's following the mechanical
edit procedure. Here is his proposal page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Math1985/UK_Shop_Names
regards
m
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us
wrote:
On ,
Is the abandoned prefix [1] something for you ?
or abandoned=village [2] (in German)
both tags are rendered on [3]
regards
m
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:abandoned%3Dvillage
[3]
Is this really vandalism or a user that wanted to add her/his company to
the map (o.a. for advertising purposes) and accidentally selected the
street instead of the building ?
regards
m
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd like to report
:55 AM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 08:42 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
Is this really vandalism or a user that wanted to add her/his company
to the map (o.a. for advertising purposes) and accidentally selected
the street instead of the building ?
I fixed
Since when has the DWG jurisdiction on user pages ?
IMHO the DWG can only interfere when the data of OSM was affected.
I'm not saying that I like that persons' user page, but where is it written
that you cannot advertise on that page?
regards
m
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Greg Morgan
In Europe (at least Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, UK) people started
to add both source:maxspeed=country code:classification and explicit
maxspeed tags. Then there is no need for an external DB to lookup the
speeds. Although it means that when the speed changes, all roads have to be
retagged.
42 matches
Mail list logo