On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this is not the place for that argument. That argument's
place is the legal-talk mailing list.
Which makes me wonder why you posted the poll here then?
It was your idea - as you said, only asking the legal-talk mailing
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Un ordenador no es un televisor ni un
Hi,
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks
Lulu-Ann
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks Lulu-Ann
I like the idea.
The english term for clothing requirements is a Dress Code. I'm not
sure how this can best fit in - dress_code_min=formal,
dress_code_max=naked ?
-J
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a separate database and combine it with
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:09 AM, OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Erik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only way you
will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:21 AM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) Would you like OSM to always be inferior to TeleAtlas and Navteq
and probably die (PD license)
b) Would you like OSM to be the best map on the planet (viral license))
c) This requires more than 90 seconds thought, please let
On Monday 03 November 2008 01:09:41 pm SteveC wrote:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course at this point your eye is mysteriously drawn to the elephant
in the room, which is what deserves copyright protection?.
Adding a
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and ways that are
How for example?
Way # 12564789654321
History
* Edited by
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
understand them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.8815lon=10.8767zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
Østensjøvannet seems ok, but Nøklevannet is missing on the Mapnik
rendering. Is that the problem?
2008/11/3 Gustav Foseid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations#Proposed_uses_of_Relations
has a large number of proposed uses of relations, but there never seems to
be any forward movement on these.
However flawed the voting
Phooee, all these lists to choose from. Probably most sensible on
legal-talk, I think (so followups to there).
Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and
a fun way for checking the dataset would surely be to have OSM maps in
3d simulations or games, such as
http://torcs.sourceforge.net/ or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trigger-rally/ (picked at random,
other targets are welcome)
Imagine roadsigns showing restrictions, place street names,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki.
Having a quick look on the european statistics about relations in
tagwatch ([1]), the most popular relation is type=boundary (10297),
most of them for
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Bernt M. Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Østensjøvannet seems ok, but Nøklevannet is missing on the Mapnik
rendering. Is that the problem?
Sorry, my mistake. Yes, the problem is Nøklevannet.
- Gustav
___
talk
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest concentrating on documenting the ones that are in use,
such as multipolygons, cycle route relations. Even better is to
concentrate on the ones that are in the db and widely consumed
by e.g. a renderer),
Is
Large-scale I-plucked-this-out-of-my-ass creative mapping bearing no
relation to the facts on the ground, like someone has just done in
Cheadle, Staffordshire, UK: yeah, that probably deserves copyright
protection. And taking outside and shooting.
cheers
Richard
On a complete tangent to this
On 3 Nov 2008, at 00:12, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a complete tangent to this conversation... I was curious about the area
Richard mentioned, so looked it up:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.98283lon=-1.99189zoom=15layers=B000FTF
And was amazed that someone has
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM license. Building a community is much more important than any license,
and this is
On Mon, November 3, 2008 14:49, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki. Having a quick look on the european statistics
about relations in tagwatch ([1]), the most popular
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Sven Rautenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you cannot complete this task until Mapnik gets some software fixes.
I'd suggest tagging your lake correctly and try to get Mapnik fixed,
instead of trying to find a workaround tagging that works in Mapnik and
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On a complete tangent to this conversation... I was curious about the
area
Richard mentioned, so looked it up:
On 3 Nov 2008, at 15:08, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
On Mon, November 3, 2008 14:49, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still
considered
as a proposal in the wiki. Having a quick look on the european
statistics
On 3 Nov 2008, at 02:09, Joseph Gentle wrote:
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some
On 11/3/08, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on what you're wearing - clothes make the man!
clothes = emperors_new
---
Perhaps we can view clothing as we can view other restrictions
dress_code:yes
dress_code:no workwear after 7pm
beach:yes
clothes:permissive
church
2008/11/3 OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a
Hi,
Andreas Fritsche wrote:
So, could someone please help me: Is contributing a good or
a bad thing? *confused*
Depends on what you're wearing - clothes make the man!
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM
80n wrote:
Since street names are one of the harder bits of information to collect,
what this user has done here looks like a very worthwhile contribution to
the project.
Perhaps we should even be encouraging users without GPS units to create this
kind of topological map. It looks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp Klaus Krause
Sent: 03 November 2008 09:55
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there
are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne
thinks we should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give
him a cigar and shoot him :-)
elvin
Hello,
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as footways, as
far
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, elvin ibbotson escribió:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there
are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne
thinks we should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give
him a cigar and shoot him
- Original Message -
From: Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed Relations
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gentle
Sent: 03 November 2008 10:10
To: Iván Sánchez Ortega
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A super quick poll
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
Exactly. I mean
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, elvin ibbotson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there are
more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne thinks we
should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give him a cigar and
Wednesday - patch by Bernhard H integrated and submitted yesterday.
Locality has been in mapnik style for a while and should render fine.
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
Manager of e-Learning Academic Development
Centre for Learning and Quality Enhancement
Middlesex
The page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations#Proposed_uses_of_Relations
has a large number of proposed uses of relations, but there never seems to
be any forward movement on these.
However flawed the voting system for proposed tags is, at least there is a
recognised procedure,
hello Iván
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM license. Building a community is much more
Tom Hughes wrote:
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google
out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to
render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it
would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some argument here than Steve's
inflammatory remarks
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:37:06 +0100
From: Jochen Topf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the license note ffs guys, legal-talk-general i believe,
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
It's an entire mailing list set up so this un-resolvable (to a large
extent) discussion can be kept away from
Is it minimum clothing? To me, min_clothing=kippah implies that the
very minimum for me to wear would be a kippah, and not wearing socks,
underwear, vest etc.
similarly with min_clothing=scarf - no indication of the general
clothing rules.
and echoing earlier replies:
Could we extend this to
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't we constantly reiterating the fact that tagging is
democratic?
I think democratic is the wrong word. You can do what you like.
There's no tyranny of the masses, for a start - minorities and
majorities are both on equal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
80n wrote:
Since street names are one of the harder bits of information to collect,
what this user has done here looks like a very worthwhile contribution to
the project.
Perhaps we should even be encouraging users
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Stefan Baebler escribió:
a fun way for checking the dataset would surely be to have OSM maps in
3d simulations or games, such as
http://torcs.sourceforge.net/ or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trigger-rally/ (picked at random,
other targets are welcome)
Gustav Foseid schrieb:
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
understand them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.8815lon=10.8767zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, elvin ibbotson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I
suspect there are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while
Etienne thinks we should give him
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:15:26 +
80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot more people without GPS units than there are with, and if
they can get pleasure from recording street names like this, then the GPS
mappers job is made much easier.
Isn't this exactly the sort of thing that the
Proposal
An Air traffic obstacle is a tall structure (a node, or linear feature) which
can endanger air traffic. Air traffic
obstacles have to be marked in most cases with red and white colored markings
and with aircraft warning lights at night.
On larger structures blinking lights are
See also:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Kosmos_AirNav_Rules#Obstructions_for_low-flying_charts
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-November/031052.html
(Tagging tall buildings)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:18:21PM +0100, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio wrote:
I agree with Etienne. Assuming that zone was blank, I think that user has
done a great job.
The day will come when we will get rid of all these gps talibans
Well. There's nothing wrong with mapping rough
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Sven Rautenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the inner way marks something other than nothing? Simply tag
it as such. This works great, too. Example: Lake with wood island.
What if this inner way has holes by itself? Example: Wood with lake
inside, which
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
With two seperate relations I presume, one for the wood, one for the
lake. Offhand I think osm2pgsql should get this right in slim mode
(non-slim has its own problems). Do you have an example?
It is reported as
Thanks for the link (I didn't see it when I searched for existing info in the
wiki - I searched for obstacle and
obstruction ... neither one turned up this page). I think, our tagging schema
would fit fairly well in the obstacles
part of this definition (which is not very detailed in the
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Relations are unordered. You could load the relation and all the ways
referenced by it, then check to see if each way has another way that has
the same start and end nodes, through a process of stitching.
1. Shaun is right BUT
2. I want relations to become ordered
Hi,
Pieren wrote:
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki.
[...]
This is an example of approved relation which does not require a
vote because it's already widely used.
There are no approved relations; there are those that are
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Relations are unordered. You could load the relation and all the ways
referenced by it, then check to see if each way has another way that has
the same start and end nodes, through a process
On Monday 03 November 2008 03:27:46 pm प्रवीण नळे wrote:
Also not sure how it would affect route planning systems - but I guess
not much of concern as it would be done mostly on high end processors
unlike rendering which needs to be done on small form factor (hence
low end processor) devices.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Subhodip Biswas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its easy to understand and tag ,
But this would break rendering - I use roadmap on my mobile with osm
as data source. It renders only important roads at low zoom levels
which is good as I don't have to look through
On Monday 03 November 2008 06:22:11 pm Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
linking them accordingly. Possibly the best way to classify would be to
take the central government rating for purposes of DA. This will give an
accurate representation of the status of towns and the status of roads
linking them.
mi trovo in ragionevole difficoltà ad usare josm.
ho visto che c'è una lista per newbie ma da josm non vinen visualizzata.
fatico a selezionare e taggare i percorsi (la selezione soprattutto) e
purtroppo ho staccato le finestre sulla destra che mi piacerebbe riagganciare
ai bordi della finestra
Ok grazie
ciao Matteo
Ciao Matteo, la pagina di help di JOSM in italiano è la seguente:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/IT:JOSM
dovresti ragionevolmente trovare risposta alla maggior parte dei dubbi.
Devo anche risponderti alla mail che ho visto mi hai inviato, purtroppo in
questi
Il domenica 2 novembre 2008 16:56:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
[...]
guardando alcuni post
di Ottobre , dovrebbero essere disegnate come landuse=residential e
dando il nome; anche perchè, se guardiamo la renderizzazione finale,
si avrà sullo stesso piano indicate sia le frazioni
2008/11/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mi trovo in ragionevole difficoltà ad usare josm.
ho visto che c'è una lista per newbie ma da josm non vinen visualizzata.
fatico a selezionare e taggare i percorsi
Controlla di essere sul layer giusto per selezionare il percorso
(quello che di
2008/11/3 Roberto Moretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mi trovo in ragionevole difficoltà ad usare josm.
ho visto che c'è una lista per newbie ma da josm non vinen visualizzata.
fatico a selezionare e taggare i percorsi
Controlla di essere sul layer
Vero è anche che per la nostra zona (Riva del Garda e Ledro) non ci sono foto
aeree dettagliate che permettano di ricavarne delle informazioni usabili (vedi
ad esempio sulla pagina di OSM del Trentino le aree al momento coperte:
2008/11/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
- frazioni piccole, poco importanti, con hamlet;
- gruppi di case con denominazione, disegnare il contorno degli edifici con
landuse=residential ed attribuirgli il nome.
a me sembra che dalla descrizione inglese di hamlet, lo si debba
applicare a
Alberto Malagoli wrote:
buone notizie!
tutti i dati topografici pubblicati su
http://cartografia.comune.modena.it/index2.html sono liberamente
utilizzabili!!
non mi hanno risposto subito perche prima volevano leggere le
specifiche della licenza creative commons e vedere se si poteva
buone notizie!
tutti i dati topografici pubblicati su
http://cartografia.comune.modena.it/index2.html sono liberamente
utilizzabili!!
non mi hanno risposto subito perche prima volevano leggere le specifiche
della licenza creative commons e vedere se si poteva adattare alla loro
situazione..
in
Il 3 novembre 2008 14.26, Edoardo Marascalchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
ci inoltri la loro risposta per cortesia?
e soprattutto se fosse possibile fatti scrivere qualcosa, in modo da
pubblicarlo sul wiki
Edoardo
ciao
Luca
___
Talk-it mailing
Vero è anche che per la nostra zona (Riva del Garda e Ledro) non ci sono foto
aeree dettagliate che permettano di ricavarne delle informazioni usabili (vedi
ad esempio sulla pagina di OSM del Trentino le aree al momento coperte:
Ciao,
qualcuno sa consigliarmi circa il tag da mettere per le ciclo officine?
Sul manuale in rete ho trovato solo shop, rental e parking per le bici.
In teoria potrei utilizzare il tag shop, perché fanno anche la
vendita. Ma volevo sapere se è in vista la preparazione di qualche tag
più
Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
s- seleziona
a- aggiungi node
x- modo geometria
p- separa 1 way in 2 (split)
c- metti insieme 2 way
g- stacca un way da un altro (unglue)
m- fusioni 2 nodi (merge)
Ciao
Qualcuno sa quando sara' disponibile in JOSM la funzione crea way
parallele che al
2008/11/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ps fammi sapree quando ci si può incontrare
Fossi venuto a predazzo avresti imparato un bel po' di cose :-P
Comunque se si vuole si può organizzare una giornata per i neo
mappatori trentini e vicini che ne pensate?
ciao
Luca
Da quanto mi risulta locality è da utilizzare per località disabitate: An
unpopulated, named place., e così difatti lo uso anch'io.
Io uso village per tutte le frazioni a meno che non siano costituite da poche
case, dove invece utilizzo hamlet: Generally smaller than a village, just a
few
Mi scuso per il ritardo della risposta, generalmente cerco di rispondere in
giornata, ma il suo quesito mi ha costretto a cercare di approfondire (un
pochino) la questione.
Se mi avesse semplicemente chiesto se poteva utilizzare il nostro
materiale, la risposta sarebbe stata molto più facile
cosa dovrei chiedere esattamente?
2008/11/3 Luca Delucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il 3 novembre 2008 14.26, Edoardo Marascalchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
ci inoltri la loro risposta per cortesia?
e soprattutto se fosse possibile fatti scrivere qualcosa, in modo da
pubblicarlo sul wiki
2008/11/3 Roberto Moretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ciao,
qualcuno sa consigliarmi circa il tag da mettere per le ciclo officine?
Sul manuale in rete ho trovato solo shop, rental e parking per le bici.
In teoria potrei utilizzare il tag shop, perché fanno anche la
vendita. Ma volevo sapere se è in
Niccolo Rigacci ha scritto:
Vorrei importare circa 59000 toponimi di centri abitati (origine
Istat) dentro OpenStreetMap.
Non voglio fare importazione di massa, ma uno strumento web che
aiuti i mappatori secondo questo schema:
Perche' non di massa?
Ormai con i limiti amministrativi a
Il 3 novembre 2008 15.03, Alberto Malagoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
cosa dovrei chiedere esattamente?
di scrivere due righe dove si dichiara esplicitamente che si possono
utilizzare i dati per il progetto osm tipo gli unici fin'ora presenti
sono questi [1][2]
ciao
Luca
La tag "shop=bicycle" sta ad indicare "un negozio che vende bici,
equipaggiamento per ciclisti e pu noleggiare o riparare le
biciclette", quindi identifica anche le ciclo officine; con questa
definizione, anch'io penso non ci sia qualcosa di pi specifico in
preparazione
Ciao,
Giorgio
Luca
Ciao a tutti,
mi sono appena iscritto alla mail list. Sono un ragazzo di Parma che fa
parte del Parma LUG (per gli amici PLUG.. :D).
L'iniziativa OSM mi piace molto e vorrei organizzare con il PLUG una
giornata all'insegna del mappiamo la citta'! come e' gia' successo da
altre parti.
Mi sapreste
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:06:11PM +0100, niubii wrote:
Niccolo Rigacci ha scritto:
Non voglio fare importazione di massa, ma uno strumento web che
aiuti i mappatori secondo questo schema:
Perche' non di massa?
Perche' la qualita' non e' eccezionale: ci sono diversi toponimi
Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
Se ci lavoriamo in 200 vuol dire che dobbiamo fare il review di
300 toponimi a testa, non molto lavoro ma molta qualita'.
io son qui..
--
Edoardo Marascalchi
ICT Consultant
Tel +39.347.008.00.02
website: http://www.edoardomarascalchi.it
skype: My status
e purtroppo ho staccato le finestre sulla destra che mi piacerebbe
riagganciare ai bordi della finestra di josm.
basta chiuderlo e poi riaprirlo con il pulsante a sinistra
Finestre a posto grazie
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Il 3 novembre 2008 16.21, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Mi sapreste dare informazioni a riguardo. Di qualsiasi tipo: da cosa serve a
se c'e' qualche guru nella materia che potrebbe fare un intervento
all'interno della giornata (magari anche solo via internet tramite
conferenza.. :-p)
io
Ciao Leo,
a Parma ci sono già dei mappers, tant'e' che non è un deserto..
*http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=44.8052158081179lon=10.321223884488585zoom=13layers=BF000F*
Quello che puoi fare è:
1. iscriverti ai servizi di Ito [1] e selezionarti l'area di Parma. In
questo modo, oltre a
Salve a tutti, eccomi a chiedere commenti alla comunità.
Vorrei importare circa 59000 toponimi di centri abitati (origine
Istat) dentro OpenStreetMap.
Non voglio fare importazione di massa, ma uno strumento web che
aiuti i mappatori secondo questo schema:
1) Inquadrare su mappa web una zona
Come sapete ho da poco inizizato a mappare la mia zona.
Domenica mattina per la prima volta ho visto apparire i dati inseriti sul
server online...
Ma poi già in serata tutto è tornato come prima.
Incredibile visto che le prime stradine che ho inserite sono state
renderizzate in meno di 24h.
Che
2008/11/3 Fester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Come sapete ho da poco inizizato a mappare la mia zona.
Domenica mattina per la prima volta ho visto apparire i dati inseriti sul
server online...
Ma poi già in serata tutto è tornato come prima.
Incredibile visto che le prime stradine che ho inserite sono
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
