Ciao,
Ho provato solo un paio di volte ad usarlo. Mi sembra che l’opzione hstore
fosse l’aspetto critico, forse si potrebbe risolvere con nocolumn [1].
Ciao,
Lorenzo
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql#Import_style
Il giorno 17 ago 2020, alle ore 18:39, Roberto Brazzelli
Ciao, perche' non ti crei una vista direttamente nel db ??Poi puoi
usarla in qgis come fosse una tabella.
tipo:CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW nome_vista AS SELECT ... (tutti i
campi che ti servono),a.tags -> 'ref'::text AS ref,a.tags ->
'bridge'::text AS bridge,a.tags -> 'tunnel'::text
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 18:40, Roberto Brazzelli
wrote:
> Ciao,
>
ciao,
> per motivi ancora da verificare con le espressioni di qgis non riesco
> a filtrare con la funzione hstore_to_map la colonna tags dei dati osm.pbf
> caricati su DB con osm2pgsql.
> L'unico modo con cui funziona la
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2020, at 11:26, geofr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Ciao, perche' non ti crei una vista direttamente nel db ??
> Poi puoi usarla in qgis come fosse una tabella.
>
> tipo:
> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW nome_vista AS
> SELECT
> ... (tutti i campi che ti servono),
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2020, at 21:59, Roberto Brazzelli wrote:
>
>
> Ciao,
> alla vista ci ho già pensato ma il mio problema è che ho uno script
> automatizzato che carica il nuovo osm.pbf
> con osm2pgsql nel mio database e ogni volta crea una una nuova tabella e se
> sono
Ciao,
alla vista ci ho già pensato ma il mio problema è che ho uno script
automatizzato che carica il nuovo osm.pbf
con osm2pgsql nel mio database e ogni volta crea una una nuova tabella e se
sono presenti delle viste la procedura
ovviamente non va a buon fine.
Avete suggerimenti per mantenere
i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
and it is not a polygon, and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke
and did it all by hand.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:36 PM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar
>:
>
>I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary
Cook County GIS most likely has the most authoritative dataset. You can
download it here:
https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/534226c6b1034985aca1e14a2eb234af_2?geometry=-88.214%2C42.072%2C-87.560%2C42.161
On 8/18/2020 8:51 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 21:59, Roberto Brazzelli
wrote:
> Ciao,
>
Ciao,
> alla vista ci ho già pensato ma il mio problema è che ho uno script
> automatizzato che carica il nuovo osm.pbf
> con osm2pgsql nel mio database e ogni volta crea una una nuova tabella e
> se sono presenti delle viste
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:23 PM -05:00 from John D. :
>
>i was told i could not use non OSM licenses.
>
>
>>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:19 PM -05:00 from "Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk" <
>>talk@openstreetmap.org >:
>>
>>Cook County GIS most likely has the most authoritative dataset. You can
I wasn't saying you should import it. You were disputing about which
dataset was more accurate. The County GIS is usually the best. You could
compare the 2 in dispute, and use the county data to settle the argument.
Many TIGER Lines are better now but in the past have been greatly
scorned for
FYI;
for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa city
bounders.
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html
and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true map
data.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349
Do you have a more authoritative source for municipal boundaries than the
US Census Bureau?
If you don't, it'll be hard for you to convince everyone here that the US
Census data is wrong.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> FYI;
>
>
i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano
>:
>
>All,
>
>I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town (Wheeling, IL)
>using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data source, and re-used all of the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>
> and it is not a polygon,
>
As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect, be polygons, in
other words, they have to close.
>
lines no relations yes
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>>
>>and it is not a polygon,
>As
FINAL UPDATE 2020
Valued User (talk-be@openstreetmap.org),
This Message is sent to you about your Account which will expire
on. 8/18/2020 1:07:45 p.m.
If you wish to continue using this Account, Upgrade to higher
package. Ignoring this message will cause the account to be
closed.
UPDATE
> I många fall bliver det då bara natural=sand eftersom att OSM kräver en
> del för att badplatsen skal kunna markeras som en sådan (skylt som
> absoluta minimum).
Nja. natural=sand är en sandfläck var som helst i naturen.
natural=beach är en sandyta vid vatten, formad av vattnets vågor. En sådan
Muy buenas, Miguel y compañía.
En primer lugar, es posible un error al reciclar una respuesta al hilo
original para crear este, con un Asunto diferente. Se me escapa porqué
mantiene la memoria del original, pero lo has resuelto de esta manera.
Sobre el tema de la hidrología en general y la
Une flopée de départements a été ajoutée sur wms.openstreetmap.fr:
2018 à 15cm: 75 78 91 94 95
2018 à 20cm: 29 33 37 38 64
2019 à 20cm: 2A 2B 27 31 50 53 56 65 72 76
Vous les retrouvez sur les couches orthohr annuelles: "orthohr_2018" et
"orthohr_2019"
ainsi que sur la couche "orthohr"
Gracias Abelardo por mover esta discusión a la lista.
A mi me sale con un hilo diferente en Gmail pero enlazado al de jcc78 en
Thunderbird. Puede ser debido a que Abelardo recicló una respuesta al
hilo original para crear el suyo (¿?). Por ello he pegado en un otro
correo vacío y con el mismo
For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to
accuracy of data.
For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has been collected by ground
survey and with two photos of everything. Some other third party data has
been less accurate. At this point it becomes tricky as
Pritariu Tomui, kad atraktyvumą reikia spręsti patiems, o ne vadovautis
parkų įkūrėjų pritempinėjimais. Ten juk dirba žmonės, kurių vienas iš
tikslų – bandyti įrodyti, kad algą gauna ne už dyka. Jie juk net pagal
apibūdinimą negali būti objektyvūs.
2020-08-12 12:36, Tomas Straupis rašė:
Muchas gracias Abelardo,
Mi opinión es plantear el problema de menor a mayor dificultad, y eso pasa,
antes de nada, por pensar seriamente en la importación y el etiquetado de
los datos. Algo que, por otro lado, ya se definió hace tiempo y se ha
tratado en otras ocasiones [1] así como, para el
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 12:01, wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:53:00 +0100
> From: Jez Nicholson
> To: David Woolley
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> It is possible that the initial data from SourceLondon is licence tainted
> as they manually created
Les codes postaux en revanche suivent la topologie des voies publiques
pour des raisons de facilité de distribution postale, sans tenir
compte des limites territoriales adminsitratives (et donc pas non plus
du FANTOIR.
Plus ou moins, je reprends le 40 rue du Bignon qui est à la fois sur les
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:18 +0100, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
> Are we allowed to put the points on a non-OSM map to ask local
> mappers to survey?
Legally I think it's a bit ambiguous, but current practice is to do
exactly that. See tools like [1] where most of the data isn't
compatible with the
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 00:44, Philip Barnes wrote:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.62023=-3.07049#map=18/52.62023/-3.07049
Wonderful; thank you.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing
On 18/08/2020 00:11, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
I'm hoping to import a dataset of EV vehicle charging points in London.
I've created a wiki page here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SourceLondon
There was a lot of discussion about importing EV charging station data
recently, so the first
Le 18/08/2020 à 11:33, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :
J'ai plus l'impression que les contributeurs occasionnels mettent tout
Influencés (de mauvaise manière) par les "preset" d'iD.
--
deuzeffe - je sais, je l'ai fait quand j’étais bleuette très claire.
Aug 18, 2020, 13:18 by steven.hirsch...@gmail.com:
> And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the
> points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey?
>
It would be better to put location on OSM map and ask mappers to
survey there.
As long as they survey and enter
Hi Steven,
Nice work getting hold of SourceLondon, and for getting it on the wiki.
It is possible that the initial data from SourceLondon is licence tainted
as they manually created the points by using Google Maps. This would block
a straight import, but might allow for a conflation exercise.
https://osm-hr.org/2020/08/14/ortofoto-2019-i-prosirena-topografska-karta/
Dragi kartoljupci,
Državna geodetska uprava je u zadnjih par mjeseci donijela dvije odluke
o stavljanju novih podataka u službenu uporabu.
Prva odluka
I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
better authoritative data or information. My motivation for this was
to fix a mangled boundary relation that didn't have consistent outer
and inner members. The changes came in two changesets,
What link are you using for this? I downloaded the places boundary
information from here:
https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php
As I said, I'm happy to change, but I can't change without actual
information.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Rob Nickerson
wrote:
> For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to
> accuracy of data.
>
> For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has been collected by ground
> survey and with two photos of everything. Some other third party data
On 18/08/2020 16:43, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
nothing you did matches.
Unfortunately, just saying that does not really help. What URL are you
actually looking at? Under what licence is the data at that URL made
It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
changeset comments, as they don't need to be discussed on the mailing
list.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:36 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
> better authoritative
Buenas,
me he apuntado en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios/Gu%C3%ADa_de_importaci%C3%B3n/Gesti%C3%B3n_de_proyectos#Pasos_previos
para la importación del Catastro en el municipio de Sacecorbo de la
provincia de Guadalajara.
Me he creado
i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and nothing you did
matches.
i live here and a block away from the edens spur just saying.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:38 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar
>:
>
>It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
Bonjour,
Je suis en train de finaliser le réseau de transport en commun sur
Narbonne (hors transport scolaire) et je cherche à faire afficher les
diagrammes de chaque ligne de la même façon que sur
https://overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?ref=10=Libero
Sur la relation route_master n°
18 Aug 2020, 16:28 by aamac...@gmail.com:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Rob Nickerson <> rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> >
> wrote:
>
>> For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to
>> accuracy of data.
>>
>> For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has
Bonjour,
Le 10/08/2020 à 11:08, Christian Quest a écrit :
> Le 10/08/2020 à 10:31, Axel Listes a écrit :
>>
>> Pour les mêmes raisons, je voudrais moi aussi supprimer toutes mes
>> photos téléversées ces dernières années sur Mapillary.
>
>
> Tu as accepté de mettre ces photos sous licence CC,
So to address the main issues so far:
Could the data be "tainted" by being derived from a copyrighted map:
- Is it just Google that is the risk here? If SourceLondon used
Ordnance Survey maps to determine the node locations, would there not
be a similar issue? So the only circumstance where the
Le mar. 18 août 2020 à 19:16, Axel Listes a écrit :
> > Demander à Mapillary de les supprimer, revient à les rendre
> > indisponibles pour tous, sauf pour eux (because licence irrévocable).
> > C'est donc contre-productif.
>
> C'est une question de principes comme pour Laurence, je refuse d’être
Je m'attendais à obtenir une ligne avec une boucle comme ce qui est obtenu sur
la ville de Bern. La ligne aller et la seconde boucle la ligne retour quand les
arrêts sont différents (nom différent)
Je me doute que le problème viens de la façon dont les arrêts sont répertorié
dans la relation
Hallo Community,
gibt es jemanden der mir in QGis erklären könnte wie ich eine Ebene im
Lagebezug epsg:25832 erstelle, dort 2-3 Punkte eingebe und diese dann als
geojson (mit CRS property) oder shapefile (mit .prj Datei) exportieren kann?
Hintergrund ist daß ich gerne mit meinem Gnss im
Bonjour,
Lu sur
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-August/085315.html
Une carte de POI pour les cyclistes réalisée par 3 étudiants à la demande
de la région de Bruxelles :
https://cyclofix.osm.be/map/
__
Yves
___
Talk-fr mailing list
i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
and it is not a polygon, and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke
and did it all by hand.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:36 PM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar
>:
>
>I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary
lines no relations yes
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>>
>>and it is not a polygon,
>As
FYI;
for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa city
bounders.
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html
and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true map
data.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349
Do you have a more authoritative source for municipal boundaries than the
US Census Bureau?
If you don't, it'll be hard for you to convince everyone here that the US
Census data is wrong.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> FYI;
>
>
i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano
>:
>
>All,
>
>I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town (Wheeling, IL)
>using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data source, and re-used all of the
All,
I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town (Wheeling, IL)
using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data source, and re-used all of
the original boundary relations. Unfortunately it appears that all of Cook
County needs to be updated to reflect the county GIS data (found
I see.
Considering that, I've reverted my changes.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:41 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
>
>
>
> Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano <
>
You still aren't giving us very much to go on. There's obviously some
boundary that you consider to be inarguably correct. You need either to
enter the data yourself or tell us where to find it and where the
discrepancies are.
Sometimes that involves quite a lot of research. I have a ton of data
I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary relation is
broken again. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but my attempts to
figure out what sources this user is using and to reconcile this with
what they are editing appear to be antagonizing them. I have also lost
my patience so I
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>
> and it is not a polygon,
>
As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect, be polygons, in
other words, they have to close.
>
58 matches
Mail list logo
