Re: exchange and usability

2005-07-12 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Alexander, On 12-07-2005 06:20, you [ASK] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: (snip) ASK now its suddenly editing the message... but thats the real issue ASK with HTML mails in TB. Exactly. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.51 Pro /thebat

Re: Exchange Usability

2005-07-12 Thread Matt Thoene
On Monday, July 11, 2005 @ 9:49:02 PM [-0700], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Ok. I guess my response then is UNCONFIRMED. Works for me. :) Forward me any HTML message *inline*, please. Thats the whole point. You hit fwd and the HTML editor opens? That doesn't happen. TB can't do that. When you

Re: Exchange Usability

2005-07-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alexander, On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:51:55 +0200GMT (11-7-2005, 23:51 +0200, where I live), you wrote: I just timed the process and I saved the message and forwarded it to myself as a .msg file in about 12 seconds. ASK Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-) Why not create a filter that

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

2005-07-12 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Goncalo, How can we request that? German - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_de English - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_en French - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_fr -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker:

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:46:50 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 10:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: I could pick both 'compress' and 'purge and compress' from the context menu after merely deleting an attachment. I tried it from the menu tooand that was also working. PH I tried it using

Re: Exchange Usability

2005-07-12 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just timed the process and I saved the message and forwarded it to myself as a .msg file in about 12 seconds. ASK Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-) Why not create a filter that does so on a hotkey? I

Re[2]: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, July 11, 2005, hggdh wrote: I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further description about this error is missing. Max, what this means? This is a WinSock error. It means the socket in question (which one, I do not know, but I would guess it is

Re: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marek, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:48:35 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 11:48 +0200, where I live), you wrote: This is a WinSock error. It means the socket in question (which one, I do not know, but I would guess it is related to TB!) is already in use. MM I found conflict, two accounts used the same

Re[2]: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Tuesday, July 12, 2005, Roelof Otten wrote: That's nothing special. In general all accounts are using the same port and TB has no problem whatsoever to address the same server on the same port at the same time. both had localhost and port 1110. The error's more likely to be

Re[3]: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Ivan
Hello, Marek! I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further description about this error is missing. I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. By default all accounts have the same ports ;) I rarely got same message. I thought that is because rss2mail 1.3 installed.

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

2005-07-12 Thread Jay Walker
On 7/12/05, Miroslav Florensen wrote: How can we request that? German - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_de English - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_en French - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_fr So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly 2.5Gb storage with

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Paul Van Noord
7/12/2005 6:41 AM Hi Peter, On 7/12/2005 Peter Hampf wrote: PH IMO it must be possible to compress a folder after removing an attachment PH from any message. Seems logical to me as a programmer. I have found it significantly more valuable to store attachments in a separate folder.

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

2005-07-12 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:36:40 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly 2.5Gb storage with Gmail, Ritlabs is recommending a spammed 300Mb storage on Lycos? Yes, and they force you to use it! -- Alex.

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

2005-07-12 Thread Jay Walker
On 7/12/05, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:36:40 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly 2.5Gb storage with Gmail, Ritlabs is recommending a spammed 300Mb storage on Lycos? Yes,

Re: exchange and usability

2005-07-12 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 3:26:29 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: DAC From: Slate Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: DAC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, July 9, 2005, 5:10:53 AM DAC Subject: Today's Papers: Notes from the Underground Isn't included to your HTML part. Probably wasn't part of the

Re: [OT] It worries me...

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:10:41 +0200 GMT (30/06/2005, 00:10 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK I think the beta version always were somewhat bigger than the release ASK versions, maybe they contain extra debug hunks or whatever... You wish... -- Cheers, Thomas. We have

IMAP: -1,-2

2005-07-12 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello tbbeta, What do the -1 and -2 mean as in the following: 7/12/2005, 09:16:01: IMAP - 1: 7/12/2005, 09:16:10: IMAP - 2: Is this two different connections. If so I have it set to use 3 connections, but I have never seen -3. Does any one else see higher numbers? -- Best regards, Stuart

Re: IMAP: -1,-2

2005-07-12 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Tuesday, July 12, 2005, Stuart Cuddy wrote: 7/12/2005, 09:16:01: IMAP - 1: 7/12/2005, 09:16:10: IMAP - 2: Is this two different connections. If so I have it set to use 3 connections, but I have never seen -3. Does any one else see higher numbers? yes, I have set 10 connections

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Allie Martin, On Saturday, July 02, 2005, you wrote: I've been playing some serious catch up. Work is being incredibly evil, so I'm having issues keeping up at the moment I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. As have I more recently. However, I'm now having an Inbox problem that

Re: another reason for the ability to edit incoming mail

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dwight, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:42:48 -0500 GMT (01/07/2005, 23:42 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC I have been gradually changing subscriptions over from my various POP DAC accounts to fastmail. I just received a confirmation message, which I DAC would like to edit because it tells me

Re: Edit shortcuts (was: 3.5.36)

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stuart, On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:44:51 -0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 09:44 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF I know I need to use RMB on toolbar / Customise / etc to edit TF shortcuts. However, this makes the function unaccessable to newbies. TF Any chance we can get a menu item Edit shortcuts

Re[3]: IMAP: -1,-2

2005-07-12 Thread Vili
Hello Stuart, MM yes, I have set 10 connections and see all from one to ten. Is it because I only have a couple of folders. As I learnt yesterday :), you have to restart TB! to make that connection number change effective. -- Vili

Re: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ivan, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:34:49 +0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 17:34 +0700 GMT), Ivan wrote: I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. I By default all accounts have the same ports ;) Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the same IP address (localhost =

Re: Test x-rogue

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Raymund, On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:25:16 +0200 GMT (08/07/2005, 02:25 +0700 GMT), Raymund Tump wrote: RT But a :rogue: is nothing more than a smiley for TB! and so it can't RT choose to display it or not. Smileys are displayed in the message body. Rogues are displayed in the grey header. Yes,

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Allie Martin
Hi Jonathan, On 12/07/2005 09:27 AM -0500, you wrote: See, this is where I get confused. On my settings, I have don't synchronize on all, and I don't have it set to peek inside certain folders for mail counts, and yet it still goes inside every folder to see the contents. I'm guessing that

Re: Webmail, that threads correctly

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 03:51:47 +0200 GMT (01/07/2005, 08:51 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Could you offer me a FREE webmail with POP3 access that I could get an V email from and if I write, I dont mess up the thread on this list? V Anyone using something like this? You can use your

Re: character sets

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Den, On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:50:28 +0500 GMT (04/07/2005, 21:50 +0700 GMT), Den V. Yafyasov wrote: DVY Wrong auto-detecting character set in html-messages, as a result a bad DVY symbols in replay message. I saw your pics, but not being able to read Cyrillic, I don't know what your problem

Re[2]: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Ivan
Hello, Thomas! I By default all accounts have the same ports ;) Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the same IP address (localhost = 127.1.1.0), a conflict occurs. 127.0.0.1 ;) I have many accounts(5-10) with settings equal 127.0.0.1:110. And usually all is ok. I got

Re: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread hggdh
Marek Mikus wrote: I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. But it was very hard to detect this, I hope, Ritlabs will improve this error message to display, which account are in conflict. All I think could be done here -- and it *should* be done -- is to add on the error

Re[2]: Webmail, that threads correctly

2005-07-12 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 03:51:47 +0200 GMT (01/07/2005, 08:51 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Could you offer me a FREE webmail with POP3 access that I could get an V email from and if I write, I dont mess up the thread on this list? V Anyone using something like this? You can use your

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Jonathan, On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing. JA I've not used

Re[2]: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Cees
Het was op dinsdag 12 juli 2005 om 21:35 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Compressing a folder after removing an attachment' : Hallo Peter, PH But TB only compresses a folder, if there is a deleted message! PH I have just filed a report here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4896 PH Can

Re[3]: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread NetVicious
martes, 12 jul 2005 at 12:17, it seems you wrote: At home OTFE, POP3/IMAP mixed. The account in question is POP3. On my laptop PLAIN (TB is on an excrypted virtual disc), POP3. Both show the same behaviour (i.e. no folder compression after simply deletig an attachment) Here OTFE and

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:37:23 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 12:37 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PH - When Bind attachements only when sending out mail is checked, TB Bear with please. Though I remember playing with that setting a couple of betas ago, I can't find right now. -- Groetjes,

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 2:35 PM, you wrote: PH But TB only compresses a folder, if there is a deleted message! I have just filed a report here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4896 Can anybody confirm this bug on the BT? Peter, I have followed your steps. TB!

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing. JA I've not

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

2005-07-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:31:29 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 22:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PH Account settings/Files and Directories. But it is only available PH when NOT using OTFE! That explains why I couldn't find it. -- Groetjes, Roelof As I feared, you have no sense of humor.

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Vili, On 12-07-2005 22:50, you [V] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written to you... :-) -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat

External Exception

2005-07-12 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Flying Rodent fans, Now I have no idea what causes this but I loaded up my bat today and thought hmm the processors doing something intensive, and for some reason couldn't seem to do much with TB!. So I fiddle around trying to find the culprit, stopping avg etc.. Still up the

Re: Help Project

2005-07-12 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Dennis, On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 06:11:52 -0400 GMT(6/9/2005, 5:11 AM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis Hays wrote: We're diligently working away behind the scenes. A little slow down due to some personal commitments and a broken computer (now fixed). I'll post a newer PDF later

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-12 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written to you... :-) :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) -- Vili

Re: Error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ivan, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:10:44 +0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 23:10 +0700 GMT), Ivan wrote: Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the same IP address (localhost = 127.1.1.0), a conflict occurs. I 127.0.0.1 ;) Of course. ;-) I I have many accounts(5-10) with

Re: Webmail, that threads correctly

2005-07-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:25:04 -0400 GMT (13/07/2005, 00:25 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Thank, we solved this case ca. 2 weeks ago :)) But thank you. I am V using GMail now. OK, I was out of the country and just came back. -- Cheers, Thomas. What to not say to the nice policeman: I