Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

I can't confirm ASK> that (but I'm not an IMAP user). If you were an Exchange user like Vili you would probably think otherwise. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias When a cow laughs, does milk come out its nose?

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

post it before. I truly think that RIT would benefit very much from deciding the timing to promote betas to release from our feedback/judgment. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I Print on Steel with an Industrial Laser Current beta

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

rstand MB> the question, nor it's origin. I, too, found the question odd so I expressed that. It's a pity that some bug fixes break (apparently) unrelated features. Nevertheless, we still have an illustrious and long bug list. Maybe we could vote the top 10 bugs within the various

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

thing I don't agree much. Duplicates should be removed to the trash folder instead of wiped. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I don't tip the scales, I bribe 'em ! Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' inform

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

exit without being killed. TB! either know the size if it's main window maximized or the size of the windows in normal size but it doesn't keep the size of the window when we switch from maximized to normal size (restore down) once you close it, it will only keep the last size (eithe

Re[2]: 3.5.30

the way TB handles my database while converting to OTFE or AY> executing a search with OTFE. I had severe problems in the past with diskeeper... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias If it works perfectly, there's something wrong. __

Re: Attachment bar not remembering position in the editor

d that yesterday and it doesn't follow the attachment position defined for the reading message. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias LX v2.00 "Harry... keep the change." Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' inf

Re[3]: OTFE Woes

o that, because there are global settings (related MM> to all accounts) that we have to protect as well. Could you give more details? Maybe we can think of a work around for that. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I'm just doodlin' my life away... ___

Re: 3.5.30

se confirm that it now starts OK. It was working flawlessly and suddenly, without doing anything... Well, just check the attached image. This bat needs to go to reab. :/ -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias A fool wants to be king. A wise man wonders if he can

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : ASK> Hello Goncalo Farias & everyone else, ASK> on 19-Jun-2005 at 14:19 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: >> Well, you may have more than one user with an administrative role in a >> single computer. ASK> An admin is an admin

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

defender. Also, Symantec AV is rather sluggish... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias No matter what happens, someone always knew it would. Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.ht

Re[5]: OTFE Woes

need to AM> tick a radio box to include whatever files are necessary to run AM> OTFE. It should be. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Race Car spelled backwards is Race Car!!! Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re[5]: OTFE Woes

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : AY> On 6/19/05, Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> AY>> Alexander, one of the main reasons for encrypting a data base is >> AY>> because others might get access to your computer for one reason or >>

Re[5]: OTFE Woes

urs that the script is AY> broken and should be fixed or changed. As always, my opinion is that everything should be left at the discretion of the user. So, those who have a more restrictive view could stick to it without imposing their '

Re[3]: OTFE Woes

ing man, I would bet that they even happen to you too. PVN> You would lose your bet with me. I have management techniques that PVN> disallow physical access to my machines without permission. How is that? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias þ RNet 1.08I:2121 The

Re[3]: OTFE Woes

27;s an administrator's action which is already secured. Symantec AV has a password to uninstall - I have administrative rights but the other admin didn't want me to remove the AV. Go figure. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Grav

Re[3]: OTFE Woes

t;> the user's data with an uninstall would be positive. This should >> always be a purposeful and separate action from an uninstall action. AM> I strongly agree here! Maybe when the user doesn't want to use the program anymore... :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Rule #15

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

ther than an administrator) has access to ASK> your computer to install or remove programs. Thats like locking ASK> the inside doors of your house while not putting the keys away, ASK> and leaving your front door open at the same time. Well, you may have more than one user with an adm

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : ASK> Hello Goncalo Farias & everyone else, ASK> on 19-Jun-2005 at 12:56 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: >> If I recall, EVEN Microsoft asks for a password for their encrypted .pst >> files :) ASK> If you delete them? That wou

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

d for the OTFE identification, in my AY> case a password. If I recall, EVEN Microsoft asks for a password for their encrypted .pst files :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I'll inconvienence you when it's conveinient. __

Re[2]: 3.5.29

L> 26, 27, 28. I have to got back to 3.05.25. ML> I reinstalled the program two times, but it ML> doesn't help. You should check mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias 1-900-976-BORG Come

Re[2]: OTFE Woes

parate action from an PVN> uninstall action. When it asks and the user consents? (just being a little democratic here) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias W[h]ere know tagline as gone before Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TB

Re[2]: 3.5.26 don't start

Nope, I'm using Win XP SP2 too. What kind of firewall do you have? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias 1's on my attacks, and 20's on my checks. Dang! Current beta is 3.5.28 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.s

Re: OTFE Woes

nd went AY> off to eat breakfast - I notice that the OTFE search does complete AY> eventually. But it is ridiculously slow. Perhaps the Stop button also AY> works like that as well. I noticed that (without OTFE) the stop button is slow in reaction. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Did Adam and Ev

Re: To people at whom 3.5.26 don't start

order to help. I would like to try that too. As I said before, I own a VmWare license so I may setup a virtual machine to test several setups. Just let me know. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Gasoline and a match really can make a cat go WHOOFFF!

Re[7]: Distributed "AS IS"

on too often seems to be the GP> development computer. I disagree with you on this. I was a Ak-mail user and never had problems with it. I just switch from it to TB! because development was kind of dead and the English version isn't updated anymore. People here using Mulberry s

Re[5]: Distributed "AS IS"

e problems shouldn't see day light (with proper internal testing). It's a must to build an image that everybody associates with quality (like I do with VmWare). -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Make like, an alligator and drag ass.

Re[3]: Distributed "AS IS"

heir best but we're not happy with so many bugs... the bugs must be terminated. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I am Tweety of Borg. I tawt I attimilated a Puddy Tat! Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http:

Re: Distributed "AS IS"

ULAs. Most M> software include similar terms. The EULA are meant to protect the software companies from being sued. If a software company must use the EULA to justify buggy software it better get a new core business... like selling apples

Re[3]: No more OTFE?

>>mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MM> OTFE shouldn't be any slower than regular mode. If it's much MM> slower, than it's a bug. If you'll put it to /bt/ with as much MM> info as possible, we'd be grateful. I've seen people using :text: and /text/ and stuff like

Re[2]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings

; there is a long series of addresses TF> Weren't we talking about the CC? Yes, CC like Connection Center. I've noticed people tend to use acronyms when they may not be totally clear EVEN among the subscribers of the list. -- Best regards, Goncalo Fari

Re[4]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings, OT

delete it if it goes against your sensibility. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Time for culture, gone Chopin, Bach in a minuet Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.ht

Re[2]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings

down menu? How am I differently configured from MB> everyone who is confirming this? Don't you have that button? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Polish invention : Ejectable helicopter seats<> Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Us

Re[6]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : AY> On 6/11/05, Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> They should sort out most of the know problems. We have a few >> erratic behaviors regarding the editors (html or microed), IMAP >> doesn't wo

Re[2]: The Bat!

as; I just FS>> wonder what happened. The developers probably didn't bother to get rid of old FS>> useless routines and wrote new code on them, very much in the FS>> Microsoft way. Or am I wrong? L> A lot of it is additional forms, extra resources, additional button L>

Re[2]: The Bat!

ytes HO> 2.02.03: 3.347.061 bytes HO> 3.01.33: 4.594.176 bytes HO>8.776.704 bytes including Intpack HO> 3.5final 9.561.600 bytes including Intpack HO> Anyway, the size of the download is still OK fo

Re[2]: The Bat!

older install files (1.x and 2.x) does not include this pack HO> (4,5MB) You clearly didn't take a look at TB!'s executable, did you? thebat.exe 3.5.25.0 - 10,3 MB (10.827.064 bytes) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias The college I went to was so small the debate team was a s _

Re[4]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings

Hi Avi, In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : AY> On 6/11/05, Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In my opinion that's a minor problem (tiny, in fact) considering the >> current IMAP status. AY> I agree. And this minor problem would pr

Re[2]: 3.5.25: SMTP server settings

, some of those problems related with the HTML support (I've reported one regarding empty (non-existing) lines between text lines in Exchange environments). I'm not saying that your problem isn't important, it just isnt't getting much consensus about it's importan

Re[4]: RITlabs Private Disk

ill be a major update, and both products will be updated. Thanks for the update Maxim (as you may find out, I purchased the product). -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias CD \TELIX\ACCESS\QEDIT\TAGLINE:MESSAGE. Current b

Re[2]: RITlabs Private Disk

and his reliability EC> in terms of Security. Ritlabs Private Disk is in fact Dekart's Private Disk which was recently updated while Ritlabs' wasn't. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias It's who you look like, not who you are. _

Re[2]: What about The Bat! wizards

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : TB> --On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 18:47:02 +0100 Goncalo Farias TB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, some issues regarding a bad implementation of IMAP should be sorted >> out first. TB> Define the word "Some&

Re[2]: 3.5.26 - Parser module is invalid

eaking other things. It seems that they fix things but don't try it to check for side effects. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Challenge is the fuel that drives the winner. Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' informati

Re[2]: 3.5.26 - Parser module is invalid

d and they should do some in-house testing before sending out this crippled betas. Just my opinion. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias "Time passed, which, basically, is its job." -EQUAL RITES Current beta is 3.5.26 | &

Re: What about The Bat! wizards

es regarding a bad implementation of IMAP should be sorted out first. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Be vewy, vewy quiet. I'm hunting tagwines! Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/th

Re[2]: Deficiencies in v3.5

of whining. PVN> It wastes everyone's time and accomplishes nothing. Well, this isn't very friendly. We see so much garbage in the list I really don't see why wanting the possibility to open an external editor should be such a case for flame throwing.

Re[2]: Scrollbar problem in Account Tree

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : CT> Hello Allie, CT> Saturday, June 4, 2005, 2:51:45 AM, you wrote: >> Actually, the very same problem affects the message list CT> This has been reported already, I think. Several times, I believe... -- Best regards, Goncalo Fa

Re[6]: Reflections on IMAP & POP3

I just did. Amazing! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias A thing well said will be wit in all languages. Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To

Re[2]: Reflections on IMAP & POP3

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : NVP> Hi Goncalo GF>> Do you want a gmail account, Natasha? It has 1 GB mailbox. NVP> Fantastic! Yes, please. What do I need to do? You should have my invitation by now... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias BUSH.SYS corrupted, re

Re[4]: Reflections on IMAP & POP3

u want a gmail account, Natasha? It has 1 GB mailbox. V> It has 2.2 GB :))) Really? It's a new feature? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Windows Error:01D Unable to figure out our own code. Syst Current beta is 3.5.25 |

Re[2]: Reflections on IMAP & POP3

> offering to send this. Do you want a gmail account, Natasha? It has 1 GB mailbox. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Blessed are the inept for they shall inherit the skies. Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA' info

Re[2]: Reflections on IMAP & POP3 [Was Re: The most un-obvious things]

heard of Sexism, ageism and I've even had to take a Government TB> Authority to court over racism, but Email-Clientism? Isn't this thread going a little off-topic? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Never sleep with anyone crazier than yourself. _

Re[2]: Why so slow?

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : g> Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> FG> Any ideas? >> >> Sure! Do you have an Anti-Virus Plugin? g> Yes I do, but don't tell me the file is stored in the remote folder, g> then redownloaded

Re: Why so slow?

> PAINFUL (now you see why I read TBBETA on gmane most of the time I'm FG> at home :-) FG> Any ideas? Sure! Do you have an Anti-Virus Plugin? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias CAUTION! Programmer X-ing.. Cur

Re: 3.5.24

work at all. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Bad luck is being run over by the welcome wagon. Current beta is 3.5.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta t

Re[4]: 3.5.21.0 new-/non-/fixed issues

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : AY> On 5/29/05, Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Avi, I do not intend to minimize your problem but did anybody else >> confirmed your report? If I understood your bug report correctly, I >> was unable to re

Re[2]: 3.5.21.0 new-/non-/fixed issues

27;d also like to see an option to install OTFE at the time of a AY> program update/upgrade. And genuine support for PGP 9 would also be AY> appreciated. That's for the wish list I guess. I would add that one should be able to enable OTFE even after installation, on an account c

Re: External exception 80000003 opening messages in 3.5.19

n 3.5.18.0, fault address 0x006790bb. NVP> Formoreinformation,seeHelpandSupportCenter at NVP> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. It seems to be version 3.5.18.0 and not 3.5.19.0... -- Best regard

Re[2]: 3.5.19

ect an account from the dropdown menu. And I AY> still don't see any support for PGP 9. :-) I had TB! minimized to the tray and opened the context menu (w/ the right mouse button). Switched to a diferent account in the "Active Account" and the connection centeer did't op

Re[2]: 3.5.18

I have an AMD Athlon XP 3000+ and after the connection center is closed I get a peak of cpu usage as shown for about 15 seconds. Is this normal? Also, I'm using BitDefender plugin with BitDefender 8. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias "My God, it's full of stores!"

Re[2]: 3.5.18

toss AY> away all of the cosmetic changes of 3.5 and go back to the earlier AY> version. In other words, there is nothing in 3.5 that compensates AY> me for the hassle I endure because of this bug. I was unable to understand the bug you're reporting. Can you explain it (to me) with

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

m, with the black GF>> bars you see nothing else :/ L> Is that just perhaps because its black text on a black background? Most likely! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias You tell 'em September Morn, no one has anything on you. _

Re[3]: 3.5.0.17

n the message window and now I'm GF> getting an AV when I double click a message in the message list. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Just gimma a slice of... Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA&#

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

m, with the black bars you see nothing else :/ -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Oral Roberts: brother of Anal Roberts Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT:

Re[3]: 3.5.0.17

ich is focused, and as a result many short cuts dont work, so >>> escape closes the search, then another the msg. This could get >>> annoying. MM> Who else can reproduce this? Could you please send me your MM> tbuser.def file? Me! -

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

ew message, takes focus. MB>> But I see by your other post that the problem has "auto-solved" MB>> itself. Hmm. Sometimes there's no accounting for The Bat! Yes. Confirmed! Also, using enter to open a message also puts focus on the Quick Search toolbar. No AV's

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

ew, toolbars, turn on quick search. L> Close that msg, open a new one.. it should reappear for you. It's working using the MENU but if one uses the right click and activates the Quick Search toolbar it won't be the next time a message is opened. I think this is a bug.

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

ch toolbar within the message window and now I'm getting an AV when I double click a message in the message list. --  Best regards, Goncalo Farias The flogging will continue until morale improves... Current be

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

. This could get L> annoying. I confirm the double click behavior with version 16 and with auto-preview enabled. JUST double click a message in the message list and the new window will open with focus on the Quick Search bar. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Q: What'

Re[2]: 3.5.0.17

g the problem! I confirm the double click behavior even with version 16 and with auto-preview enabled. JUST double click a message in the message list and the new window will open with focus on the Quick Search bar. I confirm. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Make like, a sanitary towel.and pre

Re[3]: 3.5.0.16

ule thebat.exe at 28F0. PH> Invalid pointer operation. PH> --- PH> OK PH> --- PH> I closed TB - and 3 seconds after all visible windows have been closed I got PH> the above Invalid Pointer.

Re[2]: Columns that move..

sktop and my laptop and both suffer from this 'moving columns' issue. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Overwrite existing keystroke macro [yn]? - BRIEF Editor Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http:

Re[2]: Columns that move..

That leaves me and Livio and at least I have no idea what is special MO> about our setups :-/ Mine also moves. The Messages Limit Expansion also doesn't work for me. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Tagline delivery delayed due to bad roads. ___

Re[2]: RC/5 (and still in RC/7): occasionally POP3-Fetch-Task-Hang

irm the same behavior but I'm using the BitDefender plugin so it doesn't seem to be related with the plugins. I deleted the stopped task and the connection center closed but then it asked about some tasks being active and the only

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC7 is now available

a beta series. Release Candidates -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Oxymoron: Mild Interest Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as

Re[2]: 3.5RC4 can't disable Quick Search Toolbar

rch Toolbar, I was able to do so in RC2 RO>> and previous. RO> I need to correct this, I can disable two out of three toolbars from RO> the main screen, when I end with the Quick Search, I can't delete RO> that, but when I end with another one, I can't disable that. C

Re[2]: total disappointment

s, have you ever >> test compiled EXE file on your OWN machines? At least run a test that >> it is executable! >> >> I'm very disappointed with such bad unimaginable way of management. M> Did you ever hear the phrase "Shit happens"? I prefer the Dogber

Re[3]: Major issues with RC1

2.10, for instance)? PS: I found that I had version 3.02.10 and the same plugin/av configuration works flawlessly. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias If I had a hammer, I'd hit you over the head. Current beta is 3.5 Return R

Re[2]: Major issues with RC1

he TB AVG g> plugin is also 7.0.308 I don't think it has anything to do with the AV itself but with the way the plugin scans the email. Were you able to use it with previous versions (3.02.10, for instance)? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias

Re[2]: Major issues with RC1

eport a few times but the AVG plugin MT> has worked fine for me in every beta. I confirm the issue with the BitDefender plugin. Overall it work fine but doing a FOLDER AV-Check is broken (@Menu FOLDER->Check for Virus). -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias If guns

Re[2]: Bug in account with passow0rd

sign next to it? PO> - double clicking on the account name? If I recall it's exactly the same but I'll check it at my laptop soon. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Experience: What you get when you don't get what you want ___

Re: Bug in account with passow0rd

he requested password. Second time is not necessary. I can TM> close the second request window with ESC. TM> Bug? Confirmed. Oddity at least! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Anything that can go wr ... # ^% Bus Error -- Core Dumped __

Re: Mwemory leak with RC1

only 20k (no g> messages sent or received). g> Repeat as often as you want... watch you memory disappear g> Logged as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4531 if you want to confirm. Confirmed. Used memory increases after several check mails! -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias God is Dead -

Re: RC1 -- AVs continue on Entering Search

ress. RN> In RC1 the AV addresses seem to be varying but the read address is a RN> consistent 0008. The printing AV seems to be a consistent RN> for both. Not confirmed with any of the mentioned versions. Just pressing F7 leads to the cascading AVs? -- Best regards, Gon

Re[2]: Antivirus support broken in last 3.0.9.x betaversions

ng and NL> deling with viruses properly when fetching. I confirm this behavior with BitDefender AV plugin. It seems that it's not working that flawlessly after all... :/ -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Install failed. Attempting to transfer virus to c:

Re[2]: Antivirus support broken in last 3.0.9.x betaversions

flawlessly. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias This v.rus d..tro.s ta...nes. Current beta is 3.0.9.19 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a

TB 3.09.18 - AV on "Dispatch mail on Server -> All Messages"

Hi, I had an AV on the Mail Dispatcher. I had around 300+ messages on my mail box and after selecting around 150 for deletion. I pressed the left most button to initiate the operation, got an AV but all messages were deleted. Please confirm. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Orcs

TB 3.09.18 - Glitchs - Please confirm

anged" question. The "delete message" button doesn't close the (opened) message window, instead it loads the next/previous message which is the behavior of the "delete and follow..." buttons. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias

Re[2]: 3.0.9.18 new-/non-/fixed issues

d (menu/toolbar/F7) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Mr Sulu, set course for the ZOOM Zone, warp 28800 Current beta is 3.0.9.18 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT:

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.9.18 Return is now available

; GF> question. Ah, I forgot, the "delete message" button doesn't close the message window, instead it loads the next/previous message which is the behavior of the "delete and follow..." buttons. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias It was like the time I stap

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.18 Return is now available

nitial size. The only way I found to save the new size is to move from one folder to another and answer affirmatively to the "view mode changed" question. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Promote rape,robbery & murder...join the ACLU. ___

Re[2]: Lost in Beta Testing... Where are we going?

customisable interface. What then? -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Confucius say: Many men smoke but Fu Man Chu Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[4]: Lost in Beta Testing... Where are we going?

the new interface. I'm probably wrong since it looks like they're writing code from scratch. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Don't I know you? Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re[2]: Lost in Beta Testing... Where are we going?

a pretty customizable interface. This betas are so unstable that I don't even dare to unzip 'em. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias We must believe in free will. We have no choice. Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using T

Re[2]: Lost in Beta Testing... Where are we going?

In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> No hard feelings, Alexander - but I really think some of us should >> be a bit more patient. M> Fully agree with you. At this rhythm they should add an extra digit to the build number! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias A mind i

Re[2]: Lost in Beta Testing... Where are we going?

"I". I (wasn't that proposed a long time ago and some people reacted poorly to the «concept»?) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias That man is richest whose pleasures are cheapest. Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Us

Re[2]: Can't receive mail--cascading AVS [was Re: [The Bat! 3.0.9.16 Return] AV while shutting down The Bat!]

;t keep you safe unless they have a firewall component. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Baseball, Hotdogs, Apple pie, NRA! Current beta is 3.0.9.16 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUD

Re[2]: Attention Moderators

Why not implement the alpha, pre-beta, beta prefix? Does it constrain your testing? Do you REALLY see a negative side? I, personally, find it clarifying! -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias All right Spread `em! - While playing cops and robbers... __

Re[2]: v3.0.9.5 Return

xplain why version 3.02.10 didn't pop any AV while all versions above did. >> Did Charlene try to import the message base into a fresh install of >> TB 3.02.10? M> I'm afraid Charlene will have to answer that. Lets wait then... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias RTFM: Bu

Re[2]: v3.0.9.5 Return

on a fresh system, TB works. But when I >> restore my "old" stuff all versions higher than 3.02.10 will collapse. That's because a fresh install has no message. :) Did Charlene try to import the message base into a fresh install of TB 3.02.10? -- Best regards, Goncalo F

<    1   2   3   4   5   >