Hello George,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:23:03 -0800 GMT (06/01/2005, 10:23 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
GM As I understand the problem, you have a lot of complicated common
GM filters. Since the common filters are evaluated before account
GM filters, you have to specify continue processing
Hello Thomas,
M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy. Otherwise
M you could easily do what you wish.
How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters?
George Mitchel has explained it perfectly and, as I can see, you have
seen our point.
--
Best
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 05-Jan-2005 at 02:23 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
However, I need the account level filters only to makr the messages with
something so I know which account they were first sent to, before being
moved to the folders that they share, so I know which
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 02:23, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
BA Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this is a
BA bug or wanted. But I think this is wanted, because if a filter
BA matches a message, filtering stops (if not [X] Continue processing
BA with other filters is
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common
MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue
MO processing with other filters is ticked for the parent filter.
Nice idea. If only common sub-filters worked:
Hello Alexander,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:57 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:01 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Wouldn't it be possible to pick the original TO information in a %IF
ASK clause and automagically determine the correct account to use for the
ASK reply?
No, because the address
Hello Marcus,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:49:30 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:49 +0700 GMT),
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common
MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue
MO processing with other filters is ticked for the
Hello list,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:23:11 +0700 GMT (05/01/2005, 08:23 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I need to be able to reply from the account that the mail was
TF originally sent to, though. Maybe I am think along the wrong track.
TF Does anybody have an idea how I could do what I
Hæ!
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue
processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the
other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any
seconders?
Me!!!
--
Kveðja,
Hello Thomas,
I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed
before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished.
Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish
list as an option?
No, please. The problem is that Common filters are
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common
TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody
TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an
TF option?
It's already there:
Hello George,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:47:45 -0800 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:47 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common
TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody
TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed
before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished.
Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700
TF GMT), MAU wrote:
M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy.
M Otherwise you could easily do what you wish.
TF How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters?
TF
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Fernandez wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
However, I can reproduce the problem now: When the common filter
catches, the account-level filters are not triggered any more.
Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this is a bug or
wanted. But I think this is
Hello Boris Anders everyone else,
on 04-Jan-2005 at 18:09 you (Boris Anders) wrote:
Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this is a bug or
wanted. But I think this is wanted, because if a filter matches a
message, filtering stops (if not [X] Continue processing with other
Hello Boris,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:09:46 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 00:09 +0700 GMT),
Boris Anders wrote:
However, I can reproduce the problem now: When the common filter
catches, the account-level filters are not triggered any more.
BA Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Fernandez wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Common filters don't work at all on this machine (running The Bat!
3.0.2.4 Rush under Win98).
Reason: Share with settings for common filters are not sticky.
Can anybody reproduce this with this beta?
If I remember right,
Hello Boris,
Sunday, January 2, 2005, 4:07:21 AM, you wrote:
Hello Boris,
A reminder of what Boris Anders typed on:
January 2, 2005 at 11:07:21 GMT +0100
BA Thomas Fernandez wrote (in
BA mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Common filters don't work at all on this machine (running The Bat!
3.0.2.4
Hello Boris,
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:07:21 +0100 GMT (02/01/2005, 17:07 +0700 GMT),
Boris Anders wrote:
Can anybody reproduce this with this beta?
BA If I remember right, there was long time ago such a problem - why don't
BA you use the current beta (and look, whether bug still exist):
BA
Hello List,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:14:30 +0700 GMT (24/12/2004, 21:14 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
SC Tried doing this with Common filter moving and Account filter doing
SC the coloring and then tried Account filter moving and Common filter
SC doing the coloring. Both worked by moving and
Hello Stuart,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:07:55 -0600 GMT (24/12/2004, 11:07 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Tried doing this with Common filter moving and Account filter doing
SC the coloring and then tried Account filter moving and Common filter
SC doing the coloring. Both worked by moving and
Hello TBBETA,
Those of you who are also subscribed to TBUDL will have seen this
already, but I am still not sure whether I am doing something wrong or
whether it's a bug. The goal is to move messages to appropriate
folders in the main account regardless of whether they first arrive in
the main
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 8:08:11 PM, you wrote:
TF Is this a bug or am I trying something not intended? 9Val said that
TF the link to the message object will not be lost by moving.
Tried doing this with Common filter moving and Account filter doing
the coloring and then tried
24 matches
Mail list logo
