Hello all,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, Mary Bull wrote:
I am soo behind-the-times! Thanks a mil for the support!! :)
Well, when Diman Pavlov changed the status from Verify-Fail back to
Verify-Wait, the version it says it is fixed in is conserved as v.
3.51.10.
Possibly that's a typo or an
Hello Marek!
On Thursday, July 28, 2005, 2:32 AM, you wrote:
Possibly that's a typo or an oversight. It is most certainly
*NOT* fixed in v. 3.51.10. :(
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it
really is fixed.
latest available version number in BT is 3.51.10,
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 5:49 PM, you wrote:
It appears that for the smiley to quote, it must have printable white
space after it. It does not quote if there is nothing after it, or if
there is just a carriage return and line feed only after it.
Can anyone confirm :(
Hello all,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, Ian A. White wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
--
Bye
Hoi Ian
If the smiley is the last item on a line and you select that line for quoting,
it depends on what you select as to whether it will selectively quote or not.
If you drag the cursor so that the smiley at the end of the line is just
selected, it will not quote.
If you select the line
Hello Marek!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:04 PM, you wrote:
I received an update to the BT item advising that this bug had been
fixed, but in reality it has not.
BT report was fixed today, latest build was released yesterday, You
must expect this bugfix in next build, not in previous.
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:08 PM, you wrote:
Can anyone confirm :(
Absolutely. In addition, as I wrote in my note attached to the BT,
any smiley on the last line will not be quoted unless another
line/paragraph below the one with the smiley/s is selected. But only
if the
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:12 PM, you wrote:
MB If you would like to, perhaps you will add another supporting note, in
MB regard to the bug's still being present in v. 3.51.10. I would very
MB much appreciate your doing that.
MB http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
I
Hoi Mary
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
--
Groetjes
Natasha
The Bat! 3.51.10 Pro on Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:19 PM, you wrote:
Natasha, if you have the time, could you put a further note to that effect at
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3889
Already done. :realtardis:
I am soo behind-the-times! Thanks a mil for the support!! :)
Well, when Diman
Hoi Mary
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no help
there. The change log (whichcanalsobefoundat
Hello Natasha!
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still retrieves 3.51.9 - so no
help
there. The
Hello Mary!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:07 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for this welcome Private Mail!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
I guess we just have to wait for the next beta release, to see if it really
is
fixed.
I've just checked the daily build link: this still
Hoi Mary
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to Natasha and to the list.
None necessary to me, and I'm
Hello Natasha!
On Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 7:26 PM, you wrote:
Well, I guess I have a messed-up filter. Wasn't a PM. And I'm getting a
little
tired at the end of a long day, so I failed to double-check my To field
before
sending.
Happens to us all at one time or another.
Apologies to
On 7/28/05, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natasha!
Come on, girls, please take it offline already. That's four messages
so far, and I am starting to feel like a captive voyeur. :yech:
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.51.10
16 matches
Mail list logo
