Hi TBBETA
What I did with an IMAP account:
1. Set a new folder under INBOX
2. Set a new filter - filter message with found header string - move
to new folder
3. Re-filter the INBOX
4. After some messages found filtering stopped. When I re-start
re-filtering when process finds a message it stops
Martin,
On 05-09-2012 19:56, you wrote in mid:18910170225.20120905195...@yahoo.com:
Something seems not to work.
IMAP filtering seems to have a number of problems. Apparently, Ritlabs does not
seem to think this is worthwhile to fix.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Hi Ethan,
This site is now flagged as un trusted.
https://www.mulberrymail.com/
The site is using a self-signed certificate, that's all. Of course,
why a simple homepage would be using SSL at all is beyond me.
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:a...@treadstone79.de
TheBat
Eddie,
Dear Gleason,
--- Gleason / Monday Mon 04. Jun 2012, 07:04 AM
IMAP Filtering
When Cyrus Daboo took Mulberry into open source, I subscribed to the
developer's mailing list he offered. [...]
Thanks Gleason for this insight. So, do I understand from your
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 8:35:38 AM, Gleason wrote:
One other thing I would ask for in TheB is the option to have a popup
window asking in which imap folder to place the sent copy of outgoing
messages. Mulberry and Pegasus have that.
This would be an excellent addition, indeed!
--
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 12:07:04 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
One other thing I would ask for in TheB is the option to have a popup
window asking in which imap folder to place the sent copy of outgoing
messages. Mulberry and Pegasus have that.
This would be an excellent addition, indeed!
Raymund,
Hi Dwight,
One other thing I would ask for in TheB is the option to have a popup
window asking in which imap folder to place the sent copy of outgoing
messages. Mulberry and Pegasus have that.
This would be an excellent addition, indeed!
What would you use it for?
I have a
Raymund,
Hi Gleason,
I once used a outgoing mail filter to put a copy of a send mail into
the same folder as the mail I replied to so that it would thread
along.
Yes, and that is more than most people need.
Well, I just realized that I obviously had that filter in place for
some of my
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 1:18:54 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
My question was more for what purpose. That's the reason why I gave an
example...
that seems just as obvious. Although I suppose the reasons might vary
from user to user, and all still be valid reasons.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
Raymund Tump,
Hi Dwight,
My question was more for what purpose. That's the reason why I gave an
example...
that seems just as obvious. Although I suppose the reasons might vary
from user to user, and all still be valid reasons.
Right. Just found out that my old and clumsy way to
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 2:36:15 PM, Gleason Pace wrote:
Right. Just found out that my old and clumsy way to get a folder with
all mails and replies of one friend can be far easier done with a VF.
Right, but that isn't the problem we are looking for a solution to.
making a virtual
Title: IMAP Filtering
Dear all,
I am playing with IMAP again but this time I try to create Filters on TB! that shall be recognized by gMail. Those Filters I see are only stored on my TB! IMAP account but not in my gMail account.
Does that mean that creating IMAP filtering is not possible
On Sunday, June 3, 2012, 9:26:01 AM, Eddie wrote:
I am playing with IMAP again but this time I try to create Filters
on TB! that shall be recognized by gMail. Those Filters I see are
only stored on my TB! IMAP account but not in my gMail account.
Does that mean that creating IMAP filtering
are
only stored on my TB! IMAP account but not in my gMail account.
Does that mean that creating IMAP filtering is not possible under TB!?
I'm not familiar with any email client which makes filters on an IMAP
server.
--
Gleason
On Sunday, June 3, 2012, 3:50:13 PM, Gleason wrote:
There is only one. Mulberry. The king of imap clients. Of course it
does have other faults.
Ithought it was dead. Hasn't released anything since
21-February-2007. Hard to get a browser to go to its side because of
Dwight,
On Sunday, June 3, 2012, 3:50:13 PM, Gleason wrote:
There is only one. Mulberry. The king of imap clients. Of course it
does have other faults.
Ithought it was dead. Hasn't released anything since
21-February-2007. Hard to get a browser to go to its
On Sunday, June 3, 2012, 4:34:27 PM, Gleason wrote:
There does continue to be open source work on it. I have a functional
Windows build from May 2011 I can send you.
Thanks, but I'll pass. I think the last machine I was running it on
would be before XP. I'm fine with TB! and TB for now.
Hello Gleason,
Sunday, June 3, 2012, 5:34:27 PM, you wrote:
There does continue to be open source work on it. I have a functional
Windows build from May 2011 I can send you.
Interesting.
This site is now flagged as un trusted.
https://www.mulberrymail.com/
Also see the following link:
Ethan,
When Cyrus Daboo took Mulberry into open source, I subscribed to the
developer's mailing list he offered. I told him that, in spite of the
fact that open source has a sort of religious following, it is not a
way to get a lot of top quality work done on Mulberry. He of course
ignored
Title: Re: IMAP Filtering
Dear Gleason,
--- Gleason / Monday Mon 04. Jun 2012, 07:04 AM
IMAP Filtering
When Cyrus Daboo took Mulberry into open source, I subscribed to the
developer's mailing list he offered. [...]
Thanks Gleason for this insight. So, do I understand from your
Hi all,
I just received one of the few messages that ends up being filtered
locally by TB! and not the server. Initially I thought the message had
not been filtered since it was sitting right there in the Inbox. I
selected it and 'no message loaded' remained in the preview pane. I
hit reload, and
Curtis,
On 22-12-2005 14:52, you [C] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
C Things are therefore still glitchy in this release, even for those
C like myself having better than an intolerable experience with IMAP.
C :)
I have also seen this in the last versions.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
On 23/12/2005 at 12:23:19 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I have also seen this in the last versions.
It's good at purging. I just purged over 2000 messages each in a couple
folders. Happened quite quickly and without problems.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition /
I moved my entire message base to a new install on a new computer. I
have a couple imap accounts, both with multiple sets of client side
filters. On one account, filters are working perfectly. On the other,
not at all.
I've tried re-filtering several times and see that indeed the logs say
that
Matt Thoene wrote...
I moved my entire message base to a new install on a new computer. I
have a couple imap accounts, both with multiple sets of client side
filters. On one account, filters are working perfectly. On the other,
not at all.
I've tried re-filtering several times and see that
Het is woensdag 4 mei 2005 en 21:14:31 uur :
Hallo tbbeta,
see attachment... it remains that way; doesn't do what it should.
--
groeten,
Cees
Put Orville Bullitt's brain in a pigeon and it'd fly backwards.
Hi all,
I don't know if it's me or TB! who doesn't understand my rule
correctly... ;)
I've server-side spam filtering on my IMAP account (Fastmail.fm),
which is quite great.
Sieve on my server modifies the header of spam mails, so I can mark
these filtered mails as read.
I search for X-Spam:
Hello Manuel,
MB Perhaps anyone could show me the way, I pasted my filter below.
Works finefor me with manually generated message. So problem
can be in:
1. headers of the real message
2. filter execution (i.e. it doesn't executed correctly)
3. filter wasn't tested at all.
Could you
Hello 9Val,
just now (on 04/20/2005 at 13:03) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try to check if it works after manual refiltering or after
cache removal?
What I found out is really curios. I tried and sent messages to me,
which would match the criteria.
Everything was filtered correct
Hello Allie,
AM On both occasions it took 4 passes with the manual filtering for all
AM messages to be filtered. You filter and 3 are behind. You filter
AM again, one is behind. You filter again, the one remains. Filter again
AM and finally, it is moved.
If it'll happen again, can you check
Hi 9Val,
On 04/01/2005 10:23 AM, you wrote:
If it'll happen again, can you check log to see there is problem - in
filters work with IMAP messages or with message moving (as I remember
there are some problems, when messages were copied, not moved)
I'll bee sure to check the logs next time
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 @ 9:29:35 AM [-0700], AC Martin wrote:
Yes. I do prefer some of TB!'s filtering, especially filtering based on
address book and the execution of sounds upon filtering to particular
folders and with particular filter matches.
Hmm...so if you filter at the server,
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 3:25:41 PM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene
wrote:
Hmm...so if you filter at the server, it will not trigger TB sounds
when it hits the corresponding folders locally?
Yeah. But two things:
- the sounds are triggered even when read messages are added, i.e.,
messages I
filter and 3 are behind. You filter
again, one is behind. You filter again, the one remains. Filter again
and finally, it is moved.
Anyone else seeing this?
You could use serverside filtering.
I also had problems with The Bat! IMAP filtering!
But then I just set it all up on the server on now
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 at 3:47:53 AM [GMT -0500], Kian
Andersen wrote:
You could use serverside filtering.
This is what I do for the bulk of my mail.
I also had problems with The Bat! IMAP filtering! But then I just
set it all up on the server on now everything is good! This also
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 @ 2:58:54 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
You could use serverside filtering.
This is what I do for the bulk of my mail.
Allie...what interface do you use for server-side filtering? Does
MDaemon Pro have this feature available?
I'm having strange problems with
Hi Matt Thoene,
On 23/12/2004 12:06 PM, you wrote:
Allie...what interface do you use for server-side filtering? Does
MDaemon Pro have this feature available?
It will filter at the time of distribution to local accounts and it will
filter after distribution to accounts. The account level
Hi all,
This is my second batch of between 10 and 15 messages received.
Filters are created to filter these messages and autofiltering is
enabled.
On both occasions it took 4 passes with the manual filtering for all
messages to be filtered. You filter and 3 are behind. You filter
again, one is
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, December 22, 2004, 3:27:07 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Anyone else seeing this?
Yes I have TB lists on MRB and use filters. Sometimes I see counts for
the inbox folder and it takes a couple of times of selecting other
accounts/folders before the message finally ends up in
Hi all,
IMAP autofiltering now seems to work quite smoothly, i.e., without the
AV's and cache corruptions as before. I'm quite pleased that it works
but not without a couple cosmetic issues.
When a new Inbox message is filtered, the Inbox count registers the
message. So for a moment the Inbox
Allie Martin wrote:
IMAP autofiltering now seems to work quite smoothly, i.e., without
the AV's and cache corruptions as before. I'm quite pleased that it
works but not without a couple cosmetic issues.
Agreed :-)
When a new Inbox message is filtered, the Inbox count registers the
message. So
41 matches
Mail list logo
