Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 6:14:19 AM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW It seems that since upgrading to 3.51.10 more people have started to
JW complain that messages they send to me are not delivered.
Delivery is not the job of The Bat!. The Bat!s job is to *receive* ;-)
JW I am also
On 8/4/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I'd say yes. Something formatted the text in a way The Bat! ain't
using, so I'd say it's a sender side thing. Maybe you want to have a
look in these messages headers for X-Mailer ... Maybe the people you
receive the Part.ATT mail from are using the same
Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 10:27:44 AM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW On 8/4/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I'd say yes. Something formatted the text in a way The Bat! ain't
using, so I'd say it's a sender side thing. Maybe you want to have a
look in these messages headers for X-Mailer ...
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 10:41Peter Palmreuther wrote:
What you say makes sense. So one person who sends me these .att files
is using Apple Mail (2.622). So maybe it's a Mac thing?
I'd say that's possible and reasonable. I can imagine the Apple mailer
sending messages as RTF
Hi me,
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 11:25 Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
The author of this entry told me that the bug still exists, although Marek
set it to resolved.
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of
On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197
Yes, this definitely sounds like
Hello Jay,
On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently
open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197
Yes, this definitely
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 13:45 Vili wrote:
part.ATT means that it is part of a multipart attachment that cannot
be decoded. Normally, OE used to send out this kind of attachments.
There's no need to write attachments in quotation.
As you can see in BT, TB! doesn't fully support RFC in
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
part.att problem?
Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
sensitive, I'll pass it on.
--
jaywalker
Windows
Hello,
People, could you please check/confirm at bugtrack?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5003
With best regards.
- TB! v.3.51.10 on Windows XP Service Pack 2 v.5.1.2600, up 1 days, 4h 15m 8s
- BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyMacros 1.11a, TBPajsMacro v.0.6.5.11
--
Konstantin Zhilenko
[EMAIL
Good day, Konstantin.
KZ People, could you please check/confirm at bugtrack?
KZ https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5003
it's well-known problem. Sollution is WIP.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: 2.6
mQIPA0GaX6EAAAEQAK97LcaIg1kGx2kwqBGPPv6ziQNB+jBCCHim7eBSFBLLElOw
098hY0iKZgTPYhHEJrSS55nHdEhoIiy6Nv/8PqNnWD839IFCDEZOe6olBlEltY46
LvMxD9Y4//+uUCwOBTVQTUYy33Rd3E7oR8rmwgn0dCljulQ49IJyzSySyeFpdrbj
Hello Jay,
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
part.att problem?
Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
sensitive, I'll pass it on.
:)))
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 8:48:40 AM [-0700], Vili wrote:
:))) Ok.
Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
first some line attachments?
I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
mail...
I get them all the time but have just been
Hello Matt,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 8:48:40 AM [-0700], Vili wrote:
:))) Ok.
Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
first some line attachments?
I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
mail...
I get them all the time but have just
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 @ 9:50:07 AM [-0700], Matt Thoene wrote:
:))) Ok.
Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
first some line attachments?
I saw part.att as attach ONLY, when part.att was attached to the
mail...
I get them all the time but have just been
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 17:48 Vili wrote:
Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
first some line attachments?
I hope this one will behave like described and show some Part things. ;)
I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right -
Hello Vili!
On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 11:56 AM, you wrote:
I get them all the time but have just been ignoring them. I can send you
an example if you haven't already received one...let me know.
Please send me an example, export the whole mail as Unix mailbox and
attached to a mail in
Hello Greg,
Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 8:48:50 PM, among other things, you wrote:
GS PROBLEM when copying from Excel 2002 to HTML email. So my original
comment
GS stands, but only apparently to newer versions of Excel. Hmmm? Sorry
about the
GS HTML email, but think it is appropriate,
Hello Greg!
On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
I don't know how to do that Unix mailbox thing though. Otherwise, I
would not mind sharing...snip
Select the message from the message list in the main window, then
Tools | Export message to | UNIX mailbox and enter file name
Hi Manuel!
- À propos publicité.doc
part_01.doc
- grüße.doc
part_02.doc
- resumé.png
part.png
and at last
part.txt
--
So long folks,
Raymund
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Mary,
On Thursday, August 04, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
I don't know how to do that Unix mailbox thing though. Otherwise, I
would not mind sharing...snip
Select the message from the message list in the main window, then
Tools | Export message to | UNIX mailbox and enter file name
Hello Manuel,
Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the
first some line attachments?
I hope this one will behave like described and show some Part things. ;)
I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right -
unless the list-daemon modifies
Hello Manuel,
Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content.
The original names are:
- À propos publicité.doc
- grüße.doc
- resumé.png
So, let's see how TB! works... ;)
It does not even show that it has attachments...
--
Vili
Hello Manuel,
Attached are three documents - all show some uninteresting content.
The original names are:
- À propos publicité.doc
- grüße.doc
- resumé.png
So, let's see how TB! works... ;)
Ok, here is the deal and the source of the problem:
If you see the source of your sent email, it
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 21:34, Vili wrote:
Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not
to name their documents with special characters? I see...
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not
to name their documents with special characters? I see...
I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error
hurts me, too. I tried to joke :))
--
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 22:02, Vili wrote:
So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers
not to name their documents with special characters? I see...
I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error
hurts me, too. I tried to joke :))
Sorry, very bad typo... ;)
Since it doesn't hurt, I can joke about quite easily... ;)
-- hurt /me/ as a Linux user.
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi Ya'll,
I just came across an interesting discovery. If I delete an email, or 100
emails, they should stay deleted, and not removed unless I alone decide to
purge them. I have my IMAP set to refresh folders while on-line every 2
minutes. It seems when my mail is deleted, and TB! refreshes; the
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 at 7:44:37 PM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
I just came across an interesting discovery. If I delete an email, or 100
emails, they should stay deleted, and not removed unless I alone decide to
purge them. I have my IMAP set to refresh folders while on-line every 2
Hi -=Curtis=-,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:41:35 -0500 UTC (8/4/2005, 9:41 PM -0500 UTC my
time), -=Curtis=- wrote:
C Do you have any of those options set, i.e., to compress folder on exit
C or when switching to another folder?
An excellent question, and yes, both of them. However, I did not switch
Hello Manuel,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 9:50:04 PM Manuel [MB] wrote:
MB On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 21:34, Vili wrote:
Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :)
MB So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers
not
MB to name their documents with
Hello Jay,
On Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 1:00:08 PM Jay [JW] wrote:
JW On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently
open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
34 matches
Mail list logo
