Re: Did I miss the funeral?

2010-06-13 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello Jay, Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:25:04 AM, you wrote (in part): I know - and respect - the preference of this community for plain-text email. I share that preference. But I also recognize that, my preference aside, I do receive important HTML mail. And I get frustrated by

Re: Did I miss the funeral?

2010-06-13 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Jay, On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:25:04 +0300GMT Jay Walker wrote: JW Look, I receive electronic plane tickets that I even hesitate to read JW in TB. I certainly would never print them from TB. Yes, there is a JW workaround. I can open them in my Web browser and then read them and JW print them

Re: Did I miss the funeral?

2010-06-13 Thread Jay Walker
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Feli Wilcke feli...@gmx.net wrote: I'm quite sure that TB is not the only mailclient that has a different method for displaying HTML than Outlook. Okay, but so what? All I said is that Outlook displays the HTML that I receive much better than TB. Since you

Re: Did I miss the funeral?

2010-06-13 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Feli, On 13-06-2010 10:58, you wrote in mid:851460283.20100613105...@gmx.net: I'm quite sure that TB is not the only mailclient that has a different method for displaying HTML than Outlook. I work in a CMS consulting company. We also code newsletters. All mail clients are different and all

HTML mails (was: Did I miss the funeral?)

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Feli, On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:58:21 +0200 GMT (13/Jun/10, 15:58 PM +0700 GMT), Feli Wilcke wrote: JW Look, I receive electronic plane tickets that I even hesitate to read JW in TB. I certainly would never print them from TB. Yes, there is a JW workaround. I can open them in my Web browser

HTML mails (was:: Did I miss the funeral?)

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dwight, On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:28:48 -0500 GMT (13/Jun/10, 2:28 AM +0700 GMT), Dwight Corrin wrote: A normal HTML viewer. I dont want to send examples. Ritlabs should install an Outlook and go over like a 1000 HTML mails. When TB matches up to Outlook for all of them, then the job done.

New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello, Tbbeta. The new version will be version 5.0. The registration system will be changed. We didn’t yet completely figured out the final changes to the registration system, but the preliminary changes are the following: registration will allow using The Bat! for a particular period of time.

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Vilius Šumskas
ever made from version to version. We have removed 1.7MB or old source code so far, and are using the new code instead. The program Does this mean that The Bat will finally work on supported Windows versions only and will make advances of those version? Like Jump Lists, etc. -- Best

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello, Vilius. You wrote on Sunday, June 13, 2010, 7:53:12 PM: Does this mean that The Bat will finally work on supported Windows versions only and will make advances of those version? Like Jump Lists, etc. We didn't work on Windows-specific features like Jump-lists of Windows 7.

Re: HTML mails

2010-06-13 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:13:22 +0700GMT Thomas Fernandez wrote: FW I'm quite sure that TB is not the only mailclient that has a different FW method for displaying HTML than Outlook. TF I agree with that, but it is not a question of the method to render TF HTML emails, it's a

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Maxim, Sunday, June 13, 2010, 10:45:36 AM, you wrote: Hello, Tbbeta. The new version will be version 5.0. The registration system will be changed. We didn’t yet completely figured out the final changes to the registration system, but the preliminary changes are the following:

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, MM The new version will be version 5.0. The registration system will MM be changed [...] Upon the expiration of the term, no updates to MM newer versions will be possible unless the user prolongs the MM period by paying the fee. You realize that using this modus RIT will have to start

Re: Did I miss the funeral?

2010-06-13 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:30:08 AM, Jay Walker wrote: Okay, but so what? All I said is that Outlook displays the HTML that I receive much better than TB. Since you don't receive my email, I think that I am a better authority on that subject than you are. :) I have interest in seeing

Re: Editing the subject line

2010-06-13 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, June 10, 2010, 12:21:16 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I'm not sure I said anything about IMAP (I don't use it anyway), but TBBETA seems to be slow because of the rewrite. I'm sure you did not mention IMAP. But you mentioned it was a good time to address this, and I assumed

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Franz Schoeler
Hello, Tbbeta. The new version will be version 5.0. The registration system will be changed. We didn’t yet completely figured out the final changes to the registration system, but the preliminary changes are the following: registration will allow using The Bat! for a particular period of

Re: New versions of The Bat!

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:45:36 +0300 GMT (13/Jun/10, 23:45 PM +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM The new version will be version 5.0. MM The registration system will be changed. We didn’t yet completely MM figured out the final changes to the registration system, but the MM

Re: Editing the subject line

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dwight, On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:21:46 -0500 GMT (13/Jun/10, 2:21 AM +0700 GMT), Dwight Corrin wrote: I'm not sure I said anything about IMAP (I don't use it anyway), but TBBETA seems to be slow because of the rewrite. DC I'm sure you did not mention IMAP. But you mentioned it was a