Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 12:28:07 [GMT -0700] (which was 21:28 where I live) Randy wrote: > Are you sure? Everything else appears to work. No, that's why I wrote AFAIK ;-) -- Henk M. de Bruijn __ The Bat! Natural E-Mail System™

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, at 04:18:18 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:18 where I live) Henk de Bruijn wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, at 00:13:37 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:13 where I > live) 9val wrote: > ... >> Show-stopper >> [-] (#0005248) Error message with change the language > ... > Changing the langu

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, at 04:42:12 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 where I live) Vili wrote: >>> Show-stopper >>> [-] (#0005248) Error message with change the language >> ... >> Changing the language gives me continuous AV's >> Acces violation at address 7C918FEA in module 'ntdll.dll'. Write of >> addre

Re: NFS

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis
Thomas Fernandez wrote: In any case, what I am saying is that this problem did not happen with the Old Filtering System, which was perfectly usable with these amounts of filter conditions. That's why the New Filtering system was a step back, to the extent that I feel uncomfortable with it. Thr

NFS (was: About release)

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:01:09 +0100 GMT (30/10/2005, 11:01 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: >> 1.) If you have more than 10 filter conditions, you will have to wait >> several seconds (several minutes in case of 100 filter conditions) V> Curiosity: is there ANY email client, that can handle th

Re[2]: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, > 1.) If you have more than 10 filter conditions, you will have to wait > several seconds (several minutes in case of 100 filter conditions) Curiosity: is there ANY email client, that can handle this much filter condition? -- Vili The Bat 3.62.07 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsom

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello 9Val, > Cosmetic fixes (specially for duet Villi-Marek ;) ) :)) > [-] (#0005231) Action parameters in scheduler rendered in Chinese and blank > text > [-] (#0005211) Tab "All" is automatically added into "Message list > tabs" context menu and Preferences section > [-] (#0005250) Action na

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Henk, >> Show-stopper >> [-] (#0005248) Error message with change the language > ... > Changing the language gives me continuous AV's > Acces violation at address 7C918FEA in module 'ntdll.dll'. Write of > address 0010. > and > Exeption EAccesViolation in module thebat.exe at 4AEE. A

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello 9Val, On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 03:07:22 +0300 GMT (30/10/2005, 07:07 +0700 GMT), 9Val wrote: GS>> Now 9Val I do appreciate your comments. Per GS>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you suggest that IMAP queue GS>> will be subject of next beta series. 9> Yes, it is. And now, after release, it could be devel

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tony, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:09:15 +0100 GMT (30/10/2005, 03:09 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: TB> I also think, judging by the personal mail that I've received in the TB> past, that a lot of people aren't brave enough to voice their opinion TB> on the subject in public. Curtis and you are e

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, at 00:13:37 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:13 where I live) 9val wrote: ... > Show-stopper > [-] (#0005248) Error message with change the language ... Changing the language gives me continuous AV's Acces violation at address 7C918FEA in module 'ntdll.dll'. Write of address

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Paul Van Noord
10/29/2005 6:06 PM Hi Sebastian, On 10/29/2005 Sebastian Murawski wrote: SM> Wrong links: 404 - HTTP not found Works here! -- Take Care, Paul The Bat! v.3.61.14 Echo (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 Current beta is 3.62.05 |

Re: sending with latest beta & one before

2005-10-29 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 29-Oct-05 8:20pm -0500, Jan Rifkinson wrote: > I have periodic problems sending msg with the last two betas. I may > even have a problem sending w this one. Can't send, no error msg. > Can't save draft, no error msg. Just plain nothing. According to your sig, you are using: TB!3.61.07

sending with latest beta & one before

2005-10-29 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Battyfolk, I have periodic problems sending msg with the last two betas. I may even have a problem sending w this one. Can't send, no error msg. Can't save draft, no error msg. Just plain nothing. Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB!3.61.07 Echo (Beta), BayesIt! 0.8.4, Windows 2000,

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread 9Val
Hello Greg, GS> Well I saw the troops circling followed by 9Val putting up a staunch GS> defense. No defense, I'm just want to clarify the situation and show the another side. GS> Now 9Val I do appreciate your comments. Per GS> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you suggest that IMAP queue GS> will

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread 9Val
Hello Peter, 9>> 1. Is it unstable? PG> It is unstable. But more important for me is that feature wise it is a PG> downgrade from the v.3.0. That is why on my main computer I have TB! PG> v.3.0.2.5. Currently zero level is 3.60.07 and this version is above zero. What about downgrade... a

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread 9Val
Hello Alexander, ASK> You have to admit that a large number of these bugfixes is actually ASK> "getting things back to work how they used to" because you're working on ASK> internal changes with unicode support and whatnot. But, sorry Val, these ASK> don't qualify as bug fixes for me. Anyway i

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread JakeLM
[ Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 23.37.52 (GMT +0200)] Richard, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 23:27:33 [GMT+0200] (which was 29/10/2005, at 23.27 where I live ) you wrote: SM>> Wrong links: 404 - HTTP not found > Worked here fine for the home edition. Me too ..with the professional edition ;) --

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Mary Bull
Hello 9Val! On Saturday, October 29, 2005, 4:13 PM, you wrote: > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-62.msi This link worked perfectly for me. Fastest download *ever* for an msi. Smooth faultless install. I really like v. 3.62 msi and its versions .05 and .07. Would have

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Cees! > there's a big one see attachment; no can do, no can work. Had to > revert to an older version. Hm, installation with professional version went smoothly here... @ Sebastian: I was also able to download the Professional-MSI and the language pack. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Cees
Het was op zaterdag 29 oktober 2005 om 23:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available' : Hoi 9Val, 9> The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available from: 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-62.msi well, I'm not a 'giver upper' ;) redownloaded the packag

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Sebastian, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 you wrote in SM> Wrong links: 404 - HTTP not found Worked here fine for the home edition. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.62.07 with SpamPal & POP3 account | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0.543.5

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Cees
Het was op zaterdag 29 oktober 2005 om 23:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available' : Hoi 9Val, 9> The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available from: 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-62.msi 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_hom

Re: The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Sebastian Murawski
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in Saturday evening, 9Val wrote something like this: > Hi All, > The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available from: > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-62.msi > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/file

The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread 9Val
Hi All, The Bat! 3.62.07 is now available from: http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-62.msi http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_home_3-62.msi http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/intpack.msi Here is a short list of changes: Show-stopper [-] (#0005248) Er

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 19:45, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Thanks for your comments, Peter. I fully agree with you! Seconded. It's like half baked bread, smells gorgeous, tastes bloody awful. - -- Tony Boom PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc -

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 18:42, Curtis wrote: > However, my hope has now been converted to indifference. I've been > involved with TB! support and these lists for so long that I haven't > been treating it as just another e-mail client. I'd give it more sla

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 17:55, Greg Strong wrote: > Now 9Val I do appreciate your comments. Per > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you suggest that IMAP queue > will be subject of next beta series. Since IMAP has been kind of front > and center on TBBETA for so long

Re[2]: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Randy, >>> I'm also seeing incorrect characters in the attached dialogue box >>> (possibly a Unicode issue?). >> In which menu did you find this? How can I see this screen? > On any signed message there is an icon in the header bar on the > far-right that you can click to verify the signatur

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Mike Rourke
Curtis wrote: - I've given up on TB! IMAP for now since it let me down again when put to the test with a low bandwidth situation. It's no longer fun fiddling around. I just want it to work. It will become fun again, when real changes are being made and I can test them. So since nothing much is h

Re: 3.62.05 AV while sending

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 21:28:34 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:28 where I live) Henk de Bruijn wrote: > While hitting the send button of my recent message I got: > AV at address 00B440D4 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 1FFF. > Pressing OK solved the situation. > Message was sent though..

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 12:29:32 PM: >> I'm also seeing incorrect characters in the attached dialogue box >> (possibly a Unicode issue?). > In which menu did you find this? How can I see this screen? On any signed message there is a

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 17:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You lucky one! I don't think I'm a lucky one. I like to think I contributed in some way over the years and that's why I got a gratis upgrade. That's probably while I feel the way I do now, I fe

Re[2]: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Randy, >> I'm using the current final release but I am unable to import any PGP >> keys. Whether I try to import from a text file or from the 'Import >> OpenPGP Public Key' button, the key never appears in my Key Manager. >> Has anyone else experienced this? > I'm also seeing incorrect char

3.62.05 AV while sending

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
While hitting the send button of my recent message I got: AV at address 00B440D4 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 1FFF. Pressing OK solved the situation. Message was sent though.. -- Henk M. de Bruijn __ The Bat! Nat

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 12:24:11 PM: >> I'm using The Bat!'s internal OpenPGP implementation. > AFAIK that is not enough. You have to install a version of PGP or GPG to > get it to work. For Key Manager The Bat! uses PGP or GPG. Are

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Friday, October 28, 2005 at 10:52:00 AM: > I'm using the current final release but I am unable to import any PGP > keys. Whether I try to import from a text file or from the 'Import > OpenPGP Public Key' button, the key never appears in m

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 11:57:44 [GMT -0700] (which was 20:57 where I live) Randy wrote: > Here's what Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on > Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 11:36:38 AM: >> Which program are you using next to The Bat! PGP or GnuPG? > I'm using The Bat!'s internal OpenPGP implemen

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 11:36:38 AM: > Which program are you using next to The Bat! PGP or GnuPG? I'm using The Bat!'s internal OpenPGP implementation. -- :R. It's like drinking a meatloaf. pgpIoT0K0pEee.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Michael Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Fjelsten wrote: > I will definitely NOT pay for any more TB! versions, unless I get the > IMAP I was promised in - not in version 3 - no, in version 2 (TWO)! I conclude: Ritlabs lost a long year customer who recommended TheBat! in past to numer

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Saturday, October 29, 2005 08:32 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote: >> Important point here. The fixed bug list is impressive - quite sure. >> But you, 9Val, have to admit that there is a huge amount of bugs >> which were introduced by fancy features and unicode. > > I'd say that unicode - although not

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 10:45:46 [GMT -0700] (which was 19:45 where I live) Randy wrote: >> I'm using the current final release but I am unable to import any PGP >> keys. Whether I try to import from a text file or from the 'Import >> OpenPGP Public Key' button, the key never appears in my Key Ma

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Manuel, On 29-10-2005 17:55, you [MB] wrote in : MB> Important point here. The fixed bug list is impressive - quite sure. MB> But you, 9Val, have to admit that there is a huge amount of bugs MB> which were introduced by fancy features and unicode. I'd say that unicode - although not used by me pe

Re: IMAP folder rename problem

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
> >> What to do? > > Right click on account name, Manage imap folders. In the new window > > press Refresh list. > Yepp - thanks. BTW it's "Reset" - not "Refresh" ;-) I had Hungarian interface, that said Frissites :) I made a mirror translation :) -- Vili

Re: Unable to Import PGP Keys

2005-10-29 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Friday, October 28, 2005 at 10:52:00 AM: > I'm using the current final release but I am unable to import any PGP > keys. Whether I try to import from a text file or from the 'Import > OpenPGP Public Key' button, the key never appears in m

Re: IMAP folder rename problem

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis
--On Saturday, October 29, 2005 05:14 PM +0200 Martin Schoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an IMAP account with three folders. Yesterday I changed the > names of the folders on the WebMail interface of this account. > > TheBat can't read now the folders because they have new names - ok > th

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis
--On Saturday, October 29, 2005 05:55 PM +0200 Manuel Breitfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right. There are even people who use v1 and are satisfied. ;) Ingrid (my wife) still uses a v2 build. I don't trouble it since she's never said it crashed, and it works for her. I fear that I may d

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Gary
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 08:13:43PM +0300 or thereabouts, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > > so when you download something, that says some normal program, you don't > > know what you have installed, even though it shows familiar .exe programs. > Well, it's not true for signed code (which is contained i

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis
--On Saturday, October 29, 2005 11:55 AM -0500 Greg Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At first I wasn't going to say anything, but I must admit > seeing Tony's and Allie's comments did cause me to respond. At first I wasn't going to say anything too, and then I saw 9Val's comments. As Yoda woul

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Gary, > it maybe functional, but you never know what was installed on these pages, > so when you download something, that says some normal program, you don't > know what you have installed, even though it shows familiar .exe programs. Well, it's not true for signed code (which is contained

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Tony Boom, wrote on Saturday, 29th October 2005 at 17:05:45 (GMT +0100), which was 18:05 in Bratislava -- > I don't ever remember any talk about V3 and the first I knew about > it was a email from RL with my license. You lucky one! Perhaps if I received a free v3 licence I wouldn't

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 17:49 you (Vili) wrote: ASK>>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clicking_on_a_Link_Shortcut_in_Windows_Displays_an_Error_(Firefox) >> The page was no more available > Yes, it was :) You just forgot to put the ")" to the end of the page. > In Alexander mes

Re: IMAP folder rename problem

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Vili, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 5:42:07 PM, you wrote: >> TheBat can't read now the folders because they have new names - ok >> this I understand. But I can't rename them in TheBat - the rename >> process seems to send the old name at first but server can't >> find the old folder name. W

Re: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:48:02 -0400 GMT (29/10/2005, 22:48 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V> I have this on my two "heaviest" used accounts... (Most mails arrives V> here). V> What about your accounts? These are my company accounts, so at home they are "least important". In the office, I am

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 16:55, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Let me name you, Allie, and Tony (I really enjoy each of your > comments here > *g*). That's a pity and that's the point that needs discussion - > nothing > else. I personally love The Bat! Th

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Oct 2005, at 16:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We somehow forgave > Ritlabs the premature v2 release I seem to remember having to wait literally years for Version 2 and then what felt like a few weeks for Version 3. I don't ever remember

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Saturday, October 29, 2005 05:14 PM Curtis wrote: > - There are quite a lot ... a disturbing lot who still use v2 software > because it's more stable for them. You're right. There are even people who use v1 and are satisfied. ;) > Why? Works better for them. The later releases that > contain

Re[3]: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Francis, ASK>> Found it. ASK>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clicking_on_a_Link_Shortcut_in_Windows_Displays_an_Error_(Firefox) > The page was no more available Yes, it was :) You just forgot to put the ")" to the end of the page. In Alexander message that was not part of the link, at me. --

Re[2]: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, V>> !10/29/2005, 13:51:56: FETCH - Connection to host broken (last V>> commands sent were: "TOP 8 0", "TOP 9 0") > I check 12 accounts regularly. I get this same sometimes at three > accounts - and they are all with the same ISP. No problems with > accounts at other ISPs. I blame it

Re[2]: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Hello Gary, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 11:15:29 AM, you wrote: G> I am currently not trusting any program on the site. Agreed! -- Ethan J. Mings Current beta is 3.62.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/theb

Re: IMAP folder rename problem

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
> TheBat can't read now the folders because they have new names - ok > this I understand. But I can't rename them in TheBat - the rename > process seems to send the old name at first but server can't > find the old folder name. With other words: I can't rename them in > TheBat. > What to do? Right

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Francis Segond
Bonjour Alexander, Il est indéniable que Alexander S. Kunz a proféré le samedi 29 octobre 2005 à 17:07:01 GMT +0200 ASK> Found it. ASK> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clicking_on_a_Link_Shortcut_in_Windows_Displays_an_Error_(Firefox) The page was no more available but I found it in the Google

Re: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:11:08 +0200 GMT (29/10/2005, 19:11 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V> !10/29/2005, 13:51:56: FETCH - Connection to host broken (last V> commands sent were: "TOP 8 0", "TOP 9 0") I check 12 accounts regularly. I get this same sometimes at three accounts - and they are a

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Alexander, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 5:16:57 PM, you wrote: > Hello Martin Schoch & everyone else, > on 29-Okt-2005 at 12:50 you (Martin Schoch) wrote: >>> Was the site hacked? >> Seems up again. > Or hacked again? You are right - new game for kids... -- Best regards, Martin TheBa

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Curtis, wrote on Saturday, 29th October 2005 at 10:14:36 (GMT -0500), which was 17:14 in Bratislava -- > - There are quite a lot ... a disturbing lot who still use v2 software > because it's more stable for them. [...] Allie says it all in so many admirably eloquent and benign words

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Martin Schoch & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 12:50 you (Martin Schoch) wrote: >> Was the site hacked? > Seems up again. Or hacked again? In the meantime use http://www.ritlabs.org ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) As soon as I get through wi

IMAP folder rename problem

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi list I have an IMAP account with three folders. Yesterday I changed the names of the folders on the WebMail interface of this account. TheBat can't read now the folders because they have new names - ok this I understand. But I can't rename them in TheBat - the rename process seems to send the

Adding system config to COMMENT header

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello everyone, its nice to see that more & more people add their system configuration to the COMMENT header field when they post to the TB lists. For those who use it, may I suggest to add the protocol you use, ie. POP3, IMAP or Exchange? Sometimes its good to know this. -- Best regards, Alex

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis
--On Saturday, October 29, 2005 12:12 AM +0300 9Val <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are here honest people, who will note, that this is just bug-fix > changelog? And clever enough to understand, that beta-testers see > dynamics and therefore forget the difference between discrete >

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Gary
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 11:37:18AM +0200 or thereabouts, Stefan Riegler wrote: > > Today, I've tried to enter the TB Site (http://www.ritlabs.com/) and > > the only thing I get is: "hacked by Mythhurricane & NfT-SpiDeR" > > Well not a fine thingy... But it seems they were indeed very nice :) on

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Peter Gannushkin
Hello 9Val, Friday, October 28, 2005, you wrote to me: 9> 1. Is it unstable? It is unstable. But more important for me is that feature wise it is a downgrade from the v.3.0. That is why on my main computer I have TB! v.3.0.2.5. -- Best regards, Peter Gannushkin URL: http://downtownmusic.net/

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Francis Segond & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 16:07 you (Francis Segond) wrote: ASK>> I'm asking because this was a common problem with the Firefox ASK>> browser. The solution was to change the file associations for HTTP ASK>> and HTTPS. > Could you give me a hint? Where should I chang

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Ming Chang
Hello 9Val, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 5:12:15 AM, you wrote: 9> It seems that it starts again and in the same maner. Nothing new. 9> So... Lets check the facts. Please, answer honestly to the following 9> questions: 9> 1. Is it unstable? 9> 2. Do you still remember about stable

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28 Oct 2005, at 23:44, MAU wrote: > ,- [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Showstopper ] > | In software development, a showstopper is a computer bug which > prevents > | a project from going forward, as opposed to a minor bug which can be > | do

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Francis Segond
Bonjour Alexander, ASK> Are you sure this started with 3.62.05? Yes, definitely! The point is that downgrading back to 3.61.10 (where this didn't occur), the problem now remains. In other words: 3.61.10 worked fine and after installing the new TB, I got this annoying thing on both versions. ASK

Re[2]: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, >> Then I would be ashamed, if I were you, if you agree with that >> showstopper statement... No offense MAU, I really appreciate your >> logical statements. > No offence Vili. At my age it takes much more than that, if anything at > all, to be offended :) :) This is what

Re[2]: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Mark, V>> Again: you, me, beta list members can live with these bugs. But V>> not an enduser. He should not be faced any of them... > Most of the time they aren't. And as for: Chinese letters in Scheduler, Message tab misery, crash after Language change are IN FRONT of a user... V>> I

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, > Then I would be ashamed, if I were you, if you agree with that > showstopper statement... No offense MAU, I really appreciate your > logical statements. No offence Vili. At my age it takes much more than that, if anything at all, to be offended :) -- Best regards, Mi

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Vili, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 2:12:07 PM, you wrote: V> Again: you, me, beta list members can live with these bugs. But not an V> enduser. He should not be faced any of them... Most of the time they aren't. And as for: V> I am now working in a world class research institute. We are

Re: Build 3.62 released

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 14:30 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: >>> A very p*ssed TB>> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed off TB>> :) > Might that be a difference between AE and BE? Indeed - at least according to dict.leo.org ...int

Re: Build 3.62 released

2005-10-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tony, On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:42:27 +0100 GMT (29/10/2005, 01:42 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: >> A very p*ssed TB> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed TB> off :) Might that be a difference between AE and BE? Cookidence! -- Cheers, Thomas. There are a l

Re[2]: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, >> Ask any software developers, if they agree with this statement you >> quoted or not. > I have been in software development since 1968. Yes, 1968. :) Then I would be ashamed, if I were you, if you agree with that showstopper statement... No offense MAU, I really appr

Re[2]: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Vili
Hello Alexander, > I only have two POP3 accounts (used to be 4), but I never ever had a > hanging mail download. I have ca. 10. With the two most used ones I get these regularly, when FIRST hit Alt+F2: 10/29/2005, 13:51:51: FETCH - receiving mail messages 10/29/2005, 13:51:51: FETCH - connecte

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Ian, M>> Yes, that's certainly odd. What kind of connection you have? > > 512/128 kbps ADSL. > > It could be that my ISP has started throttling the connection however > I have not had this happen previously when they have done this. > > When they throttle, it is not as though they switch me

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Francis Segond & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 13:25 you (Francis Segond) wrote: > Clicking on a link in a mail appears to double the action: it opens > two identical windows in my browser instead of one. > I use Windows ME, Firefox 1.0.7 and TB 3.62.05. > Any confirmation? Are you su

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Francis, > Clicking on a link in a mail appears to double the action: it opens > two identical windows in my browser instead of one. > > I use Windows ME, Firefox 1.0.7 and TB 3.62.05. > > Any confirmation? Not here with WinXP and IE 6. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spa

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 13:25:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:25 where I live) Francis Segond wrote: > Clicking on a link in a mail appears to double the action: it opens > two identical windows in my browser instead of one. > I use Windows ME, Firefox 1.0.7 and TB 3.62.05. > Any confirmation? Not

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Francis Segond
Clicking on a link in a mail appears to double the action: it opens two identical windows in my browser instead of one. I use Windows ME, Firefox 1.0.7 and TB 3.62.05. Any confirmation? Regards -- FRANCIS J. SEGOND Webpage: http://faustroll.net, http://butsu.org

Re: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Peter Hampf & everyone else, on 26-Okt-2005 at 23:35 you (Peter Hampf) wrote: > It is definitely NOT solved. Just the contrary: Almost every time I try > to get new mail for all accounts, TB is unable to connect to *at least* 1 > account. I don't have the original message from August any m

Re: The Bat! 3.62.03 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 12:29:08 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:29 where I live) Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello Henk M. de Bruijn & everyone else, > on 29-Okt-2005 at 09:52 you (Henk M. de Bruijn) wrote: >>> 5 beers that the first thing you'll REALLY miss >> I hope it's Kólsch ;-) > That was quic

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Frank, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 10:54:36 AM, you wrote: > Was the site hacked? Seems up again. -- Best regards, Martin TheBat! 3.62.05 Pro on Windows 98 4 10 A Current beta is 3.62.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http

Re: The Bat! 3.62.03 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Henk M. de Bruijn & everyone else, on 29-Okt-2005 at 09:52 you (Henk M. de Bruijn) wrote: >> 5 beers that the first thing you'll REALLY miss > I hope it's Kólsch ;-) That was quick. :-) I can't offer Kölsch. I'm from Bavaria. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 2

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Robert, Saturday, October 29, 2005, 11:46:31 AM, you wrote: > How many new bugs have been introduced in this version ? This is exactly the point which worries me very much - several times we could see that a bug fix produced (a) new bug(s) and this gives the impression that the total of bu

Re[2]: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Fabio Muzzi
Hello Alexander, Thursday, October 27, 2005, 7:19:38 PM, you wrote: >> I have an idea about the crippled IP stack in XP sp2, that refuses to let >> a program open too many connections at the same time... ASK> Only for, erm, "half open" connections, that is, opening a port and waiting ASK> for a

Re[7]: and unable to connect

2005-10-29 Thread Fabio Muzzi
Hello Peter, Thursday, October 27, 2005, 1:41:44 PM, you wrote: FM>> I have an idea about the crippled IP stack in XP sp2, that refuses to FM>> let a program open too many connections at the same time... PH> AFAIR I incresed that value months ago, but I fail to recall the exact place PH> where I

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Robert van der Hulst
Hi 9Val, On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, at 00:12:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 23:12 where I live) you wrote about: 'About release' > It seems that it starts again and in the same maner. Nothing new. > So... Lets check the facts. Please, answer honestly to the following > questions: > > 1. Is it

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread Stefan Riegler
Hello List! Hi Frank Dzicher, on 29.10.2005 at 10:54 [UTC +0200] you wrote: > Today, I've tried to enter the TB Site (http://www.ritlabs.com/) and > the only thing I get is: "hacked by Mythhurricane & NfT-SpiDeR" Well not a fine thingy... But it seems they were indeed very nice :) Cause the sit

Re: The Bat site was hacked?

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Frank, > Was the site hacked? Yes, it seems so. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.62.05 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.62.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.si

Re: The Bat! 3.62.05 is now available

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, > A story (a la Message List tabs and associated bugs): you go to a nice > party. There is a lot of food on the table, fruits, etc. You are very > hungry. You go closer... At one corner, on the table, there is a > plate, with a tiny little sh.t on it. Are you still hungry?

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, > Ask any software developers, if they agree with this statement you > quoted or not. I have been in software development since 1968. Yes, 1968. :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.62.05 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 ___

  1   2   >