On Fri 15-Oct-04 11:59am -0400, Paul White wrote:
On Friday, 15 October 2004 at 14:24 (UK time), Bill McCarthy said:
Suppose I want to review and delete while I'm still in
the folder view. I hit the hotkey and nothing happens
in the message list - yet the mail is really deleted
On Thu 14-Oct-04 12:30pm -0400, Krzysztof Radzikowski wrote:
normal windows behavior - also works in word excel etc
Not here, ctrl+ gives an insert dialog. Ctrl- gives a
delete dialog.
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Bat! 3.0.1.33 Pro - BayesIt! 0.7.3 - XP Pro SP2 - POP3
On Wed 13-Oct-04 2:18pm -0400, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing beta cycle.
You have done a terrific job and I really
On Tue 12-Oct-04 2:36pm -0400, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
We've uploaded the EXE file that contains the fix for
the panel bug to
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_rc10.rar
I just copied that over my RC5 EXE. It still contains
the virutal folder count bug reported in:
On Mon 11-Oct-04 5:01am -0400, 9Val wrote:
The Bat! 3.01 RC7 is now available from
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb301rc7.rar
The only purpose of that RC is to find out if the problem with empty
message pane is fixed.
There's only an exe in that rar. Could you please add
On Mon 11-Oct-04 2:13pm -0400, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I've found a problem in a script that uploads
the Professional MSI file. It did upload it to a
wrong directory to the server. Could you please
re-download it from the same URL to be everything OK.
Please make sure it is time-stamped as
On Fri 1-Oct-04 2:49pm -0400, 9Val wrote:
BM Although it appears pretty clean now, I'm now getting an AV
BM on sent - but I haven't had to close or End Process TB!.
Can you give error address?
I sent five mails to myself before getting another one. It
improves with time? :-) Here's the
On Fri 24-Sep-04 2:25pm -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2004-09-24 at 21:03:50 Bill McCarthy wrote:
(1) That's not the sender field. The sender field for all
messages here is:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(2) Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. I was talking about the
NFS filter condition
On Fri 24-Sep-04 5:23pm -0400, 9Val wrote:
BM This problem was fixed in an early beta. Worked fine in 17,
BM now fails again in 18.
Hmm, looks like somebody reverted file to previous revision :(
Re-fixed
Great, looking forward to 19 :-)
BTW, my work-a-round is also failing. I had:
On Fri 24-Sep-04 5:20pm -0400, Livio wrote:
same thing with beta 18
I have tried in beta files but I have not found this error...
I forward as attachment with Outlook at the office. The
email is empty except for the attachment. Starting today,
after installing the new beta, I'm now seeing
On Thu 16-Sep-04 2:01am -0400, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Since v3 appeared in a hurry, it seems the X-Mailer setting is enabled
as a default option.
Better yet, I wish Ritlabs would finally just change the
Editor attribute to yes. In this group, I'd like it to
read:
The Bat! 3.0.0.15 pro -
On Sun 19-Sep-04 1:06pm -0400, Alexey N. Vinogradov wrote:
Version 0.6.5 (bugfix)
- PCRE funcions weren't handled correctly due to wrong calling convention
Rexexd is now working fine. The Tree is a very nice tool.
This weekend's shot, but next weekend I'll test more complex
regex with it.
--
On Sat 18-Sep-04 4:22pm -0400, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
*** if you used previous (0.6.3 and below) version it is recommended to delete
all .idx files in base folder which in the filter's working folder.
done, deleted all *.idx files
Hmm, if I read the instructions correctly, you weren't
On Sat 18-Sep-04 10:04am -0400, Alexey N. Vinogradov wrote:
Regexp debugger can be invoked by macro %REGEXED which can receive an optional
parameter with regexp to be edited. The resulting regular expression will be
written as the result of this macro. The most usable way (as I think) is to
On Mon 13-Sep-04 11:06am -0400, 9Val wrote:
BM A manual filter that sets message as read does not update
BM the folder list count of unread messages.
IMAP/POP?
POP
I just checked this with beta 14. My Read filter is
manual only by hotkey (Ctrl-Alt-X) and ONLY marks the
message as read (as an
On Mon 13-Sep-04 10:38am -0400, 9Val wrote:
BM Sender tests should have failed.
Fixed.
Thanks! It works fine.
BM Delivery-To
Can't reproduce
Of course, I meant to write Delivered-To. I just checked
again with Beta 14. In my TBBeta folder I checked to make
sure that the message tested
On Sat 11-Sep-04 4:25am -0400, MAU wrote:
I have an Incoming Involved filter that assigns messages to colour
group Involved (blue) to messages for threads or sub-threads in which I
am participating. It does so by checking if my domain appears in one of
the MIDs of the References field:
The filter used the NFS construct:
Header field - Delivered-To v contains - the_address
(where the v is the little drop down box thingy)
BTW, I got it to work with the following:
Header - match - ^(?i-s)delivered-to:.*the_address
--
Best regards,
Bill
Hello TB Beta List,
My filter failed on a mail with this sender line:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The filter used the NFS construct:
Header field - sender v contains - comp.lang.forth
(where the v is the little drop down box thingy)
BTW, I got it to work with the following:
Header
On Sun 5-Sep-04 4:38pm -0400, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
How do you separate the different choices for Contains any of.
My guess is that one of these is too aggressive and is acting on and
deleting more than it is meant to.
I've tried listing the choices. Hitting enter after each address
resizes
Hello TB Beta List,
What are people talking about here? There is no beta - right?
Shouldn't comments and questions on 2.04.4 be addressed to TBUDL?
Discussions of issues about the released product should be
available to all users of the product, not just those that beta
tested it and its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 29-Aug-03 8:23pm -0400, Graeme J Hosking wrote:
So where is this Menu Navigator button supposed to be?
Up on the right of the main window title bar, just left of the
minimize button. It's a little question mark in square.
Not here. It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 29-Aug-03 3:42am -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/6 is now available from
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tb200b06.rar
Hotkeys no longer work!
I've noticed that if the filter is marked active, they work but I
Hello TB Beta List,
After I registered v2, I returned to v1.62r and saw I was not
registered! If I can only be registered for one, I'll pick 1.62r and
just run the beta unregistered.
I tried to register 1.62r but it requires a password that didn't come
with the program's registration. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 7-Aug-03 9:48am -0400, Tamas Kardos wrote:
Can someone confirm this?
Do you have an example from this mailing list (just give us an MID)?
It sure looks like C and E are improperly threaded. Did either of
those messages have an In-Reply-To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 4-Aug-03 8:18pm -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
I see no problem for release and Beta using the same directory. As
long as you don't change the folder structure, no problems are
expected.
That's great news - I've been using separate mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 4:08pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge
X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as
spamware.
BM This just sounds like paranoia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 12:12am -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
JA It seems to me that RITLabs has just saved themselves a world of pain
JA for now.
You've just saved me from a lot of typing. Thank you! ;-)
That was exactly what I was going to say.
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 11:35am -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
At 12:33 AM on Sunday, July 27, 2003 it seems you posted the
following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to
%SETHEADER etc. macros:
How about an option to not show any X-Mailer?
Of course,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to Greg Strong, Richard Newman and Manuel Diaz for reporting
you confirmations to Bug Track!
Unfortunately, Ray (from RITLabs?) still doesn't quite get it :-(
Here's the response from ray:
,- [ Ray - 17 Jul 2003 16:58 CDT ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 18-Jul-03 1:10am -0400, Roger Phillips wrote:
Thursday, July 17, 2003, 10:07:32 PM, you wrote on this subject:
Confirmed for 1.63 beta7.
Thanks, Roger. It looks like this bug has been around for a long
time.
- --
Best regards,
Bill
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 17-Jul-03 10:57pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I had to look twice. The little title of that calendar says July
2002, but the bottom correctly states July 2003. And this is only
true for the AFTER choices; BEFORE works fine.
Thanks for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 2-Jul-03 6:35pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Allie, I'm curious why your public key can't be found. I use
keyserver ldap://certserver.pgp.com. That shouldn't matter, since
these public keyrings sync with each other.
Are you using a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 3-Jul-03 4:59am -0400, Stuart Hemming wrote:
I've got 3 tabs in my SmartBat! If the first is active and I click on
the 2nd all is good. Likewise if I click from 2nd to 3rd. But if I
click from the 1st to the 3rd the tabs change but the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 26-Jun-03 3:53am -0400, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Both LDIF and vCard exports address book templates applied to a single
persons, but none of the export methods preserves templates applied to
groups.
I've tried this out in both 1.62r and 1.63
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 25-Jun-03 10:06am -0400, Ethan J. Mings wrote:
The Bat! Beta List
Subject: Where is Beta12
Hmm, you put your message below the cut line - nice going :-)
I believe you said there was no outstanding issues and it was time for
a final beta.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 19-Jun-03 6:25am -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
Actually, Allie, what you're describing is the way it worked before
I added the following line to my gpg.conf:
Are you sure about this? GnuPG has always been an all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 18-Jun-03 5:49am -0400, Tony Boom wrote:
A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on:
Wednesday, June 18, 2003 at 22:41:25 GMT -0400
How did changing finding '.' anywhere to finding 'e' anywhere solve
your problem of moving parked messages
On Tue 17-Jun-03 11:54am -0400, Andreas Wosgien wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:33:37 +0200, MAU wrote:
I use these two QTs (Quick Templates) for that purpose:
Me too. But unfortunately, these QTs don't work with the latest beta
versions.
I haven't tested this, but you could probably just
On Tue 17-Jun-03 11:33am -0400, MAU wrote:
I use these two QTs (Quick Templates) for that purpose:
Yes, QTs can be used to produce normal behavior. But normal behavior
should be available with built-in macros. QT's are for customizing,
like Box Quotes, Clean Quotes, Clean Subject, and all
On Fri 13-Jun-03 7:20pm -0400, Hagen Scheiner wrote:
On TBeta 11 reply to all doesn't work? Can somebody confirm this?
I've noticed some weirdness in both the beta and gild.
Suppose an email has a Reply-To address of R, a From address of F, a
To address of T and a CC address of C.
If you're
On Fri 13-Jun-03 8:22am -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
I haven't decided whether it's more work to go through all my (1)
templates to add `%Comment=%-` at the end, or (2) QTs and add the
same thing after each actual comment. Or, perhaps, (3) change all
legitimate comments to a dummy variable
)On Thu 12-Jun-03 3:33am-0400, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
=[Begin wrap]=
%IF:'%_FirstTime'='':'%-
%___%_Wrap_Text(%Clipboard)%-
%___%_FirstTime=No'%-
I'm surprise your wrap macro works for more than one use. You set
%_FirstTime to No and never reset it back.
This begs the question of
On Wed 11-Jun-03 5:28am-0400, Stuart Hemming wrote:
I've got an account that is setup to sign messages when complete.
If I press F5 whilst I have this account highlighted and send the subsequent
message it is signed, but if I'm in a common folder with a template that
includes the
)On Tue 10-Jun-03 3:46pm-0400, Greg Strong wrote:
,- [ Initials QT ]
| %SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(\w).*?([EMAIL PROTECTED](\w).*?)?([EMAIL
PROTECTED](\w).*?)?$%-
| %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%QINCLUDE('Full Name')%-
| %SUBPATT(1)%SUBPATT(3)%SUBPATT(5)
`-
I started reading this but got stuck.
Hello TB Beta List,
In Add_Reference Now Works posted to the TB Tech List, I presented a
fairly robust solution to rethread messages. It works with both
In-Reply-To and References block. There can be none, only one block,
both blocks and they can be anywhere in the message, contiguous or not
Hello TB Beta List,
I love the new PGP support. There's one glaring omission.
Current the Default Key is Global. So if my wife wants to sign or
decrypt, she needs to first go through these 5 steps:
(1) click on tools
(2) click on OpenPGP
(3) click on OpenPGP Key Manager...
(4) right
On Sat 7-Jun-03 8:06am-0400, Marta Rogaliska wrote:
Friday, June 6, 2003, 11:30:12 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
Z %SETHEADER(Subject,Re:
Z %SetPattRegExp='(?i)\A\:?(\s*(re|aw|ha|rcpt|fw|fwd|forw|odp|pd)%-
Z (\[\d{1,3}\])?:\s*|\[.*?\])*\s*(.*?)\Z'%-
Z
On Sat 7-Jun-03 8:39am-0400, Luc wrote:
Good afternoon Tony,
It was foretold that on 7-6-2003 @ 12:18:48 GMT+0100 (which was
13:18:48 where I live) Tony Boom would mumble:
snipped a bit
TB I see it now on Marks and Allie's but your reply had two parts but with
TB nothing in view on
On Sat 7-Jun-03 9:49pm-0400, Allie Martin wrote:
For the moment, I'm back to the GnuPG plugin which is working a treat
since:
- TB! generates PGP/MIME signed +/- encrypted message just fine with it
since beta 9.
- GnuPG's plugin still has working passphrase caching.
- GnuPG's plugin
Hello TB Beta List,
I've read that some say Clean Subject macros are working. Others say
they're not.
Here's a simply demo. Create a AB reply macro on your own address. I
created a one liner: %Subject=Reply: %OSubject
I then replied to a message to myself with subject: Ref Test
The reply
On Thu 5-Jun-03 9:54pm-0400, Mark Smitka wrote:
I would've expected that the goal of b8 would've been to fix bugs found
in b7 (and earlier versions), and to work toward a 1.63 final.
Yes, plus to add features that are missing, like access to external
editors, pre-inbox filtering, pre-outbox
201 - 252 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
