Hello Mary--also Goncalo, Paul, Stuart, and others interested!
On Friday, June 23, 2006, 10:14 AM, you wrote:
>> I wasn't saying that it had anything to do with Mary's problem but
>> that they had a soft "conflict" in the past and it could happen again.
>> I wouldn't take it off just like tha
Hello Goncalo!
On Friday, June 23, 2006, 10:04 AM, you wrote:
GF>>> http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpost/history.php
GF>>> - Outpost Firewall Pro 2.7 (build 485/412). Release date: May 31, 2005
PVN>> An issue more than a year old that has _no_ relationship to
PVN>> Mary's problem.
> I wasn'
In reply to :
GF>> I wouldn't take Outpost off so fast. Outpost had problems with TB in the
GF>> past:
GF>> http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpost/history.php
GF>> - Outpost Firewall Pro 2.7 (build 485/412). Release date: May 31, 2005
PVN> An issue more than a year old that has _no_ relati
> I wouldn't take Outpost off so fast. Outpost had problems with TB in the
> past:
And I'm not using it anyway.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by , MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a.
Today's Stock Market New
6/23/2006 5:26 AM
On 6/22/2006 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF> I wouldn't take Outpost off so fast. Outpost had problems with TB in the
GF> past:
GF> http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpost/history.php
GF> - Outpost Firewall Pro 2.7 (build 485/412). Release date: May 31, 2005
An issue more than
In reply to :
MB>> I'm wondering if my AV (NOD32) is playing into the mix. Although I
MB>> have it set not to check e-mail, but only to check files when I open
MB>> them.
MB>> Or my firewall, Outpost.
PVN> I can't speak for NOD32 but others are using it without your symptoms.
PVN> I do not beli
Hello Alexander!
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 12:30 PM, you wrote:
>>> I suspect there is something else in your 49 processes that is the
>>> culprit.
>> Thanks. I'll keep looking! :)
> Look for a process called "thebat.exe"... that might be the one!
> SCNR ;-)
:rofl2:
Well, I've got them par
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 22-Jun-2006 at 18:19 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
>> I suspect there is something else in your 49 processes that is the
>> culprit.
> Thanks. I'll keep looking! :)
Look for a process called "thebat.exe"... that might be the one!
SCNR ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexa
Hello Paul!
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 11:13 AM, you wrote:
MB>> I'm wondering if my AV (NOD32) is playing into the mix. Although I
MB>> have it set not to check e-mail, but only to check files when I open
MB>> them.
MB>> Or my firewall, Outpost.
> I can't speak for NOD32 but others are using
6/22/2006 12:10 PM
Hi Mary,
On 6/22/2006 Mary Bull wrote:
MB> I'm wondering if my AV (NOD32) is playing into the mix. Although I
MB> have it set not to check e-mail, but only to check files when I open
MB> them.
MB> Or my firewall, Outpost.
I can't speak for NOD32 but others are using it with
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 10:26 AM, you wrote:
>> I will just keep experimenting with various settings, to see if I can
>> nail the culprit down. At first I thought maybe my dpi setting might
>> be at fault (I have it at 120, which XP Settings/Advanced describes as
>> Large).
> Mi
> I will just keep experimenting with various settings, to see if I can
> nail the culprit down. At first I thought maybe my dpi setting might
> be at fault (I have it at 120, which XP Settings/Advanced describes as
> Large).
Mine's normally on 'normal'
> I also did a vigorous weeding out of Temp
Hello WL!
On Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 9:38 PM, you wrote:
> It seems like we keep running into the same problems :)
Yes. Don't know whether to put a :( or a :) here. :)
> Although I guess I lucked out on this issue...
Indeed.
I think the only other person experiencing this latest is Stuar
Hello, Mary.
It seems like we keep running into the same problems :)
Although I guess I lucked out on this issue...
On 6/21/06, Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 3:32 AM, you wrote:
>> As soon as I clicked OK, the Mail Ticker appeared--but flashing so
>> rapidly
Hello WL!
On Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 3:32 AM, you wrote:
>> As soon as I clicked OK, the Mail Ticker appeared--but flashing so
>> rapidly as to seem to be flickering.
> So this reminded of a similar problem I had way earlier...
> What is the opacity of the mail ticker set to? Does anything
> c
> Does anything change if it is set completely opaque?
It doesn't here, no.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by , MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a.
Helicopters can't fly; they're just so ugly the earth repels th
On 6/19/06, Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Stuart!
On Monday, June 19, 2006, 2:43 AM, you wrote:
> Clearly it's something to do with the start up code as restarting TB!
> with the ticker enable prevents the program from running correctly,
> but starting it /after/ the program is run
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, June 20, 2006, 3:55 AM, you wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5917
> I would if I could but BT seems to be down; I'm just getting database
> errors.
Seems to be back up now.
But a quiet day on TBBETA. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.80.06 on Windows
> Thanks a mil! Here's the link:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5917
I would if I could but BT seems to be down; I'm just getting database
errors.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by , MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70
Hello Stuart!
On Monday, June 19, 2006, 10:21 AM, you wrote:
>> As soon as I clicked OK, the Mail Ticker appeared--but flashing so
>> rapidly as to seem to be flickering.
> This is where things differ; it worked OK for me that this point it
> was after restatrting TB! that the flickering started
> Then with v. 3.81.04 running, I changed "Hide" to "Always" in
> Options/Preferences/Messages/Mail Ticker.
> As soon as I clicked OK, the Mail Ticker appeared--but flashing so
> rapidly as to seem to be flickering.
This is where things differ; it worked OK for me that this point it
was after rest
Hello Stuart!
On Monday, June 19, 2006, 2:43 AM, you wrote:
> Clearly it's something to do with the start up code as restarting TB!
> with the ticker enable prevents the program from running correctly,
> but starting it /after/ the program is running leaves it all running
> OK.
Stuart, thank you
Clearly it's something to do with the start up code as restarting TB!
with the ticker enable prevents the program from running correctly,
but starting it /after/ the program is running leaves it all running
OK.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
> As per Mary's experience Stuart - do TB work for you if you disable
> the ticker? Looking to isolate the pattern for you...
Now that's odd! I've just enable the ticker (I had to switch it off in
the old version as Mary suggested) and it appears to work. Hmm. I'm
going to shut TB! down and resta
> As per Mary's experience Stuart - do TB work for you if you disable
> the ticker?
Yes, if I disable the ticker it seems to work fine. However, the loss
of the ticker is a greater inconvenience than the loss of the 'fixes'
in this latest beta so I'm going to go back.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using Th
Hello all,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, Simon wrote:
> Since .03 I noted that my Icons for anti-spam marking had altered slightly,
> see attached.
> Note that the right hand side of the one Icon [mark as junk] appears sliced
> off?
> Any confirmations?
yes, Mark as not Junk is OK, Mark as Junk i
miércoles, 14 jun 2006 at 21:50, it seems you wrote:
> Any confirmations?
Confirmed here also. Please send a BT and place here a link.
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.81.04 Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)
/\/ e t \/ i c i o
In reply to :
MB> Unfortunately, although TB! v. 3.81.04 behaved well for maybe half an
MB> hour in the exe I got from your .zip, it became unstable--first sign,
MB> the MailTicker started flickering, and then the TB! main window
MB> partially unpainted itself.
MB> Really weird. So I'm running
Hello Goncalo!
On Saturday, June 17, 2006, 8:34 PM, you wrote:
> IsuggestyougrabsomethinglikeBitDefender Free
> (http://www.bitdefender.com/site/Main/view/Download-Free-Products.html#)
> and run a virus check, just in case. Behaving well for half an hour
> ain't normal
Hi Mary Bull,
Sunday, June 18, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> P.S.: Reverted to v. 3.80.06, because I missed the MailTicker too much
> when running v. 3.81.04.
I like the mail ticker also, it is a true companion through the
shallowness of my desktop. Only when running Google Earth i
6/14/2006 4:33 PM
Hi Mary,
On 6/14/2006 Mary Bull wrote:
MB> Then why would v. 3.80.06 not be having the same launch problem?
MB> I have not done anything to the video driver. Could it have tweaked
MB> itself?
MB> Anyway, thanks for the suggestion, Paul, and I'll check it out.
I'm not saying
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 you wrote in
MB> But it's nice to have the TBBETA pipeline flowing again.
Flooding here at the moment ;-)
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.04 with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 10:21:03 AM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.04 is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/beta/tbb38104.rar
> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
Ok, but when
Hello Charlene!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 3:16 PM, you wrote:
>> Now the question is, why am I having this problem and nobody else?
> I solely see the mail ticker flashing if the java of Gogle Earth is
> interfering with it. It is fine again when Google is off. Can it be that
> you have an ap
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 4:06 PM, you wrote:
MB>> and accidentally deleted my sig in the editor window.
> No, it's there but about 30 lines further down the message page! ;-)
Ah, foolish me! :rofl2:
But it's nice to have the TBBETA pipeline flowing again. :)
--
Best regard
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, June 16, 2006, 5:11 AM, you wrote:
> I've just tried the exe in Simon's zip and got the same result as with
> the original from the RITLabs site; flashing ticker, persistent splash
> screen and a main screen that doesn't draw properly.
Ah, confirmation! Although I hate i
I've just tried the exe in Simon's zip and got the same result as with
the original from the RITLabs site; flashing ticker, persistent splash
screen and a main screen that doesn't draw properly.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by , MyGa
> I cannot get either 3.81.04 or 3.81.03 to launch properly.
> When I click on my TB! shortcut on the Desktop, the result is a
> lingering splash screen, a TB! main window incompletely painted, and a
> flickering Mail Ticker. And there things stick.
> I am using TB! Pro, but no OTFE, on Windows X
Hi Mary Bull,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Now the question is, why am I having this problem and nobody else?
I solely see the mail ticker flashing if the java of Gogle Earth is
interfering with it. It is fine again when Google is off. Can it be that
you have an
Hello Mary,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 you wrote in
MB> and accidentally deleted my sig in the editor window.
No, it's there but about 30 lines further down the message page! ;-)
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.04 with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, at 12:21:03 [GMT +0300] (which was 11:21 where I
live) 9val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.04 is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/beta/tbb38104.rar
> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
Up and running with OTFE :-)
Hello Mary!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 3:04 PM, you wrote:
>> What happens if you disable the Mailticker and then launch?
> Launched in a flash and is displaying perfectly!
> So, as long as I configure the MailTicker to "Hide," I can run v.
> 3,80.04.
Sorry for the sloppy typing. Meant 3.81.
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 2:39 PM, you wrote:
MB>> But, no joy, still. The installed 3.81.04 won't fully
MB>> paint the window on launch, and it presents also a
MB>> flickering MailTicker.
> What happens if you disable the Mailticker and then launch?
Launched in a flash and is d
Hello Charlene!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 2:25 PM, you wrote:
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Mary
> Either your place or mine the delimiter is broken.
Sorry. I did a lot of revisions trying to express myself clearly to
you, and accidentally deleted my sig in the editor window. So I did a
copy and
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 2:39 PM, you wrote:
MB>> But, no joy, still. The installed 3.81.04 won't fully
MB>> paint the window on launch, and it presents also a
MB>> flickering MailTicker.
> What happens if you disable the Mailticker and then launch?
Okay! I'll try that!!
--
B
Hello Paul!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 2:37 PM, you wrote:
> t seems to me that you are experiencing conflicts with your video
> driver or the way you have tweaked it. It may be valuable to download
> and install the latest drivers for your video chip/card.
Then why would v. 3.80.06 not be hav
6/14/2006 3:33 PM
Hi Mary,
On 6/14/2006 Mary Bull wrote:
MB> TB! 3.80.06 runs perfectly. So there can't be any permanent change in
MB> the Registry from anything SpywareBlaster might have done to earlier
MB> downloads/installs?
MB> I am at my wit's end about this and inclined to give up and st
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 1:46 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Then I did a fresh download of TB! 3.81.04 from the TB!
MB>> rar link that 9Val sent. Before doing that, I sent the
MB>> previous rar to the Recycle Bin, so there would be no
MB>> possibility of errors through an overwrite in the
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 1:46 PM, you wrote:
> Is your browser definitely grabbing a entirely new copy of the rar file?
I believe Opera's cache was empty when I did the earlier downloads
using Opera. Unless something is wrong with Opera's display of the
Cache folder.
I have now
Dear Mary,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Done. But WinRar may not after all be the whole culprit in my latest
> TB! beta problems.
Really seems so :(
> Before I even saw your suggestion, and while running TB! beta v.
> 3.81.04 that I had installed from Simon's
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 1:41 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I had been using WINRAR to unpack TB!'s rar packages,
MB>> using the command "Extract to the specified folder."
MB>> Never a problem until now.
> How weird! That is exactly how I do things this end too.
:)
> Which version of W
Hello Charlene!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 12:30 PM, you wrote:
>> Now I have to figure out what to do about that. :(
> Wouldn't this be the right time to give the Winrar beta a try?
> http://www.rarlabs.com/download.htm
Done. But WinRar may not after all be the whole culprit in my latest
TB!
Hi Alexander S. Kunz,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Erm. You can always copy the text from the AV with CTRL+C and paste it
> somewhere. :-)
:)) A Ctrl+C a day keeps a mod's interjection away.
SCNR
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using
Hello Charlene!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 12:30 PM, you wrote:
>> Now I have to figure out what to do about that. :(
> Wouldn't this be the right time to give the Winrar beta a try?
> http://www.rarlabs.com/download.htm
> Or maybe only to get a fresh copy of a stable version. As you know, all
Hi Mary,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Now I have to figure out what to do about that. :(
Wouldn't this be the right time to give the Winrar beta a try?
http://www.rarlabs.com/download.htm
Or maybe only to get a fresh copy of a stable version. As you know, all
u
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 9:32 AM, you wrote:
> Just in case you are getting some form of corruption, I've put the
> version of .04 I've installed on my website Mary, here -:
> http://www.cg-online.me.uk/1/38104.zip
Up and running, as you can see from my sig. Thanks a million!
Hello Leif Gregory & everyone else,
on 14-Jun-2006 at 18:39 you (Leif Gregory) wrote:
>> BTW2: Sometimes HTML isn't half bad, hm? ;)
> Never said it should never be used. I'm just against using when it
> serves no purpose. (i.e. like this reply.) :-)
Erm. You can always copy the text from the A
Hello Charlene,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 10:15:00 AM, you wrote:
> BTW: I see two entries in TM concerning TB: One is TB's main program
> and the second is "create new message". If I kill the latter, TB
> completely vanishes. I would expect that only the one I picked would
> be terminated and not
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 9:32 AM, you wrote:
>> At first I thought I might have a faulty download. ...
>> I am using TB! Pro, but no OTFE, on Windows XP SP2.
>> Any ideas about what could be going wrong for me?
> Just in case you are getting some form of corruption, I've put t
Hi Leif Gregory,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Whoops. Found an AV.
Confirmed. And the TB had to be killed by TM to quit, because the AVs
always reappeared after confirming.
BTW: I see two entries in TM concerning TB:
One is TB's main program and the second is
Hello Dwight,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 6:12:26 AM, you wrote:
> didn't get the usual question whether wanted to run a beta, and not
> marked beta in help/about either.
Whoops. Found an AV. I created a new message, clicked into the body, clicked on "Add Smile", started scrolling down through
Hello George,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 3:25:35 AM, you wrote:
>> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
> Yes, now it's working all right! Thanks for the update :)
Confirmed here too.
--
TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x5D167202
__
Dwight,
> On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 4:21:03 AM, 9Val wrote:
>> The Bat! 3.81.04
> didn't get the usual question whether wanted to run a beta
Perhaps an unintended improvement. Perhaps this is not a beta?
> , and not
> marked beta in help/about either.
--
Gleason
Using The
Hello Dwight,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 you wrote in
DAC> didn't get the usual question whether wanted to run a beta, and not
DAC> marked beta in help/about either.
Confirmed.
Sorry, my bad as my last message referred to .03 and not this
one. I must read messages properly before replying :-(
--
Re
Hello Dwight,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 you wrote in
DAC> didn't get the usual question whether wanted to run a beta,
I did with mine.
DAC> and not marked beta in help/about either.
It is here (pro version).
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.03 BETA with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins
Hi Mary,
In your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent on Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 3:08:55
PM, you wrote:
> At first I thought I might have a faulty download. The
> size given in Properties for 3.81.04rar is 3.83 MB and for
> 3.81.03rar is 3.81 MB. It doesn't seem as if I would get
> three bad dow
Hello 9Val!
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 4:21 AM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.04 is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/beta/tbb38104.rar
> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
I cannot get either 3.81.04 or 3.81.03 to launch properly.
Whe
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 4:21:03 AM, 9Val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.04
didn't get the usual question whether wanted to run a beta, and not
marked beta in help/about either.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with
On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9Val wrote:
> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
confirmed (encryption by eToken). - Thank you!
Best regards,
Maik
--
Bis vincit, qui se vincit in victoria.
[Publilius Syrus, Sententiae 64]
Using The Bat! v3.81.04 (on-the-fly-encryption by
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, June 14, 2006, 12:21:03 PM, you wrote:
> The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
Yes, now it's working all right! Thanks for the update :)
--
George M. Menegakis
Using The Bat v3.81.04 on Windows XP Service Pack 2
__
Hello,
The Bat! 3.81.04 is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/beta/tbb38104.rar
The only fix is correct start with OTFE enabled.
--
9Val
71 matches
Mail list logo
