Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:17:35 -0400, Rick wrote: I am curious. You complain a lot about the Bat. No, I don't. Are you reporting the issues that bother you, I did report the rather outdated Help file more than 2 years ago, without any hope of RL taking care of it. Now, out of curiosity, I

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:33:31 -0500, Dwight wrote: Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once... and it continues to be true. Yes. Over the years I've learned that Beta! Fanboy's reactions fall into 3 rather

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Arjan, Saturday, April 30, 2011, 12:29:05 PM, you wrote: AdG Over the years I've learned that Beta! Fanboy's reactions fall into 3 AdG rather stereotypical categories: Let's conclude that part of this thread by adding that these reactions invariably are given in answer to postings made

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:41:56 +0200, Mark wrote: Let's conclude that part of this thread by adding that these reactions invariably are given in answer to postings made by what in (y)our language is called an azijnpisser, a translation from the French pisse-vinaigre. 5) The best method to

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Arjan, Saturday, April 30, 2011, 2:02:50 PM, you wrote: AdG 5) The best method to defend yourself against what is in yout eyes AdG unjust or unfair criticism is to put the motives of the critic in AdG question. Why should I defend myself for something I am not responsible for? It is not

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:37:23 +0200, Mark Partous wrote: Now you can call me whatever you want, I won't react anymore: someone has to stop this pointless conversation. 6) If you're starting to suspect you have no longer control over the conversation or feel you're are in danger of losing the

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Arjan, On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:29:05 +0200 GMT (30/Apr/11, 17:29 PM +0700 GMT), Arjan de Groot wrote: AdG 3) When they feel TB! is being unfairly criticized they invariably AdG argue that their beloved toy can do things that no other mail client AdG can do. AdG The 3d argument is, of

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:36:27 -0400, Rick wrote: They rewrote the program and are fixing bugs as fast as they can Yes, it's just the same old story with a long grey beard. They are reworking the program, they are trying hard to fix bugs and while they do that are introducing new bugs at at least

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Friday, April 29, 2011, 7:40:54 AM, Arjan de Groot wrote: Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once... and it continues to be true. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Arjan, Friday, April 29, 2011, 2:40:54 PM, you wrote: AdG Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once... Alas, that too! And it didn't help anything or anyone (except perhaps yourself) then either. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! Version

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Rick
Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once... I am curious. You complain a lot about the Bat. Are you reporting the issues that bother you, getting confirmations and entering them in the bug tracker? -- Rick When

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Joe
Friday, April 29, 2011, 2:17:35 PM, you wrote: Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once... I am curious. You complain a lot about the Bat. Are you reporting the issues that bother you, getting confirmations and

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-29 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, J If they can't fix the basic things that I purchased the product J for, I will be forced to leave. That's a challenge to the J development team. But, I don't think they really care about one J user leaving They ought to. There aren't so many left. -- MfG, Alto

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-28 Thread Tony Hoare
Hello Maxim, The Bat! 5.0.9.6 (BETA) is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5096.rar I can see that you're tackling some pretty major issues but please also spend some time on virtual folder updating and negative counts. It would stop a lot of us moaning. --

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-28 Thread Joe
I can see that you're tackling some pretty major issues but please also spend some time on virtual folder updating and negative counts. It would stop a lot of us moaning. Agreed. All the issues I see on this list worked fine in release 4. Release 5 should have never gone out the door. It

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tony, On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:50:13 +0100 GMT (28/Apr/11, 19:50 PM +0700 GMT), Tony Hoare wrote: TH I can see that you're tackling some pretty major issues but please TH also spend some time on virtual folder updating and negative counts. TH It would stop a lot of us moaning. I'm not

Re: 5.0.9.6 - Virtual folders

2011-04-28 Thread Rick
I don't blame the programmers. I think management needs to be changed. I believe that the the management DOES some of the programming. A little kindness is in order. They rewrote the program and are fixing bugs as fast as they can Some of their implementations are superior to anything else