Mod: Cut mark (was: TheBat! cannot close)

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Andrew,

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:18:09 +0200GMT (24-9-2004, 15:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

AA> regards, Andy

AA> [Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
AA>  on a "made from scratch" P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]


AA> 

AA> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Andrew.

  )<)))'>

Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
of a , i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
the signature and list footers since everything below and including
the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting.

You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in
your templates.

Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added
to your signature by the list server.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.16
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Terry,

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:11:10 -0500GMT (24-9-2004, 14:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

TLF> Has anyone else noticed the action buttons are now mis-labeled on
TLF> the "Pick e-mail addresses" dialog? (They are now 4, 44, 3, 33,
TLF> r, s - not sure when this happened - hardly ever use that dialog
TLF> - not a big deal really )

It's known and fixed in the current beta. IIRC it's related to the
language you're using in the interface.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.16
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Mark Partous]

Hello Andrew,

Saturday, September 25, 2004, 1:28:46 AM, you wrote:

AA> Only since I configured NAV 2002 to scan incoming. (This info was also
AA> in an earlier post. Please read the thread before posting!)

Have it your way.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.0.0.18





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Andrew Aronoff]

Hello Mark,

> If I understand it well, you have always had this problem with TB! ?

Only since I configured NAV 2002 to scan incoming. (This info was also
in an earlier post. Please read the thread before posting!)

> I have started using Windows 2000 later than you, but I _never_ had
> to boot it in order to kill a task.

Glad to hear it.

regards, Andy

[Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
 on a "made from scratch" P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Curses to the idiot

[Mark Partous]

Hello Arthur,

Friday, September 24, 2004, 7:34:32 PM, you wrote:

AW> And I'm writing (on paper no less!) "When apologizing to people, make
AW> sure that you're responding to that person, and not broadcasting to the
AW> list, idiot." about a thousand times. That ought to keep me quiet and
AW> busy for a while.

Would you please make a scan of your paper and make that available on the
web, so that we all can see you really wrote it a thousand times?  :-)

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.0.0.18
and hoping his TB! doesn't start sending automated replies right now :-)




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Mark Partous]

Hello Andrew,

Saturday, September 25, 2004, 12:49:11 AM, you wrote:

AA> NAV 2002 (8.07.17C)

AA> [Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4

If I understand it well, you have always had this problem with TB! ?

I have started using Windows 2000 later than you, but I _never_ had to boot
it in order to kill a task. Memory Zipper had to come to a rescue some times.
Only time TB! was involved was in one beta-version.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.0.0.18





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Andrew Aronoff]

Hello Mark,

> What is the version number of NAV you are using?

NAV 2002 (8.07.17C)

regards, Andy

[Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
 on a "made from scratch" P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Mark Partous]

Hello Andrew,

Friday, September 24, 2004, 7:17:18 PM, you wrote:

AA> Well, actually, I don't want to buy another AV solution. NAV works
AA> just fine with most e-mail clients. Seems kind of silly to buy another
AA> product B due to product A's bugs. And, I don't know that my version
AA> of TB! would do any better with any other AV product.

Sorry if you already gave the answer to this question: What is the version
number of NAV you are using?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.0.0.18





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

TB! v3.0 and Norton AV conflict bad enough to switch

[Terry Frazier]

I recently upgraded from TB! 1.62r to 3.0 hoping to get better IMAP
support. I did get that. Sadly, I also got a program that doesn't work
very well in other ways.

There seems to be a significant conflict between TB! v3.0 and Norton
AV 2003, such that if Norton is scanning e-mail TB! can't figure out
how to shut down a connection and close. This doesn't make sense to
me. Norton AV has to be one of the most common software packages
installed on Windoze computers. I know it does some things that create
problems, but it's the 900lb gorilla of AV software and everyone else
has figured out how to work with it.

Frankly, I have a  lot more invested in my AV/firewall software than
my e-mail client, so if I have to change one it will be TB!. But I
have used TB! exclusively for five years and always been happy with
it. I'm not eager to change. But this is a dumb conflict.

Does anyone know whether RITLabs is addressing this issue head-on and
planning a near-term fix?

-- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 20:14:14 (GMT +0200),
Peter Meyns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hi Britt,

> on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:32:44 +0200GMT, you wrote:

BM>> Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:

>>> Herb Warren,
>>> James W. Sewall Company

BM>> One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
BM>> messaging ;-)

> He most probably is. I remember that only few users got The Bat!
> running under WINE... ;-)

BM>> Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.

> Yes, indeed. LOL




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:57:59 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:20:13 PM, you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
>> Sean Rima did scrawl:




>>> Hello Dierk,

>>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Sean!

 On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

 OK: What?

 To be more precise: What - went wrong?




>>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

>>> Sean



>> Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
>> out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
>> flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
>> the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.



> It is one of those things that happen




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Britt,

on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:32:44 +0200GMT, you wrote:

BM> Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:

>> Herb Warren,
>> James W. Sewall Company

BM> One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
BM> messaging ;-)

He most probably is. I remember that only few users got The Bat!
running under WINE... ;-)

BM> Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.

Yes, indeed. LOL

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.0.0.18, on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM

The irony of life is that no one gets out alive...

Winamp currently playing: Strawbs - Hero and Heroine

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: PGP Key Request

[Sean Rima]

Hello Arthur,

Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:20:13 PM, you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
> Sean Rima did scrawl:




>> Hello Dierk,

>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

>>> Hello Sean!

>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

>>> OK: What?

>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

>> Sean



> Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
> out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
> flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
> the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.



It is one of those things that happen


-- 
Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431

using Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.4


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Curses to the idiot

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Who set up the automated reply on my machine. Oh, wait. It's me. In that
case, I'm going to simply slink off into a corner and hide quietly.
Nothing is automatically sending anything anymore, and I'm ensuring that
I'm not replying to myself.

And I'm writing (on paper no less!) "When apologizing to people, make
sure that you're responding to that person, and not broadcasting to the
list, idiot." about a thousand times. That ought to keep me quiet and
busy for a while.

A thousand pardons to all on the list.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRarpW3c64KxgfCEQKgEACfU8CuvDSLuW+3ldpjuOv0yIL4Rb4An1Uy
nm9ChkebRm/Qbj/uw17vUWBU
=P4p2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 19:04:16 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis did scrawl:




> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:46 PM you wrote:

>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

> Ah, OK, so no rampant folder template. Sigh, I was looking forward to
> Marck's instructions about them.

> BTW, could one of the moderator's please temporarily unsubscribe
> Arthur (or whatever his real first name is) Warren? It looks like his
> loop ain't going to break ...


Nope, I've got it under control. And yes, I have multiple names.
'Arthur' is the legitimate, legal first name, but hardly anybody that
knows me uses it. I blame my parents.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRYM5W3c64KxgfCEQKlawCfZXnhRqmrcFHDtu3QHjTB4kSgjs4AnAlI
BG+SEKGKl6OgWzKjBn85jeXv
=lNaG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Andrew Aronoff]

Hello Mark,

FOA, thanks for your response.

> You might want to look into NOD32 or another AV solution

Well, actually, I don't want to buy another AV solution. NAV works
just fine with most e-mail clients. Seems kind of silly to buy another
product B due to product A's bugs. And, I don't know that my version
of TB! would do any better with any other AV product.

> I don't usually try to exit while TB is in the process of retrieving
> mail.

I don't either. I've already found that when the TB! Connection Centre
hangs, it *never* completes message reception. I have *no choice* but
to perform a hard reset.

> TB is in a locked thread

It's TB! that's locking the damned thread and it's inexcusable that it
never times out.

> ... TB can't shut down because it's waiting for Norton to relinquish
> its hold on a process that TB has no control over.

Of course TB! has control over it. It just needs to time out, let go,
complain with an error message and retry later. After all, that's
essentially what happens when I perform a hard reset. (Asking W2K to
reboot via Start, Shut Down..., Restart does *not* work.) A hard reset
ain't magic; it just stops all tasks whether they're ready or not. If
I can restore control via a hard reset, TB! can _certainly_ do
something better programmatically.

> Decreasing the frequency of mail checking might improve things.

I check every 10 minutes. IMHO, the checking frequency has *nothing*
to do with the problem. In almost every case, TB! hangs after resuming
from S3 standby (standby-to-RAM) if and only if I neglect to first
resume my broadband connection by browsing to some external site.

This is a _deplorable_ problem for an e-mail client under an NT-type
system. I've been using W2K since mid-2000. The *only* times I've ever
rebooted to kill a task were due to this TB! bug.

regards, Andy

[Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
 on a "made from scratch" P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis did scrawl:




> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

> OK: What?

> To be more precise: What - went wrong?


Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.


- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRXh5W3c64KxgfCEQKmVACfdvAsxJmE0Zu9v+JPxGyq2pCt6LgAn0yD
tB4wdqBnMYS+xYMrtGj1LgfT
=koGR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima did scrawl:




> Hello Dierk,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

>> Hello Sean!

>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

>> OK: What?

>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

> Sean



Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.



- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRXTZW3c64KxgfCEQLOYACePCalcYISHtChUDz1IIrzJQFGBgAAn2lM
vJtD3pifz8hQn4epg0sT0/Kl
=3w+C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
Kevin Coates did scrawl:




> Hi Dierk,

> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
> wrote in :

DH>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

DH>> OK: What?

DH>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
> switching to the preferred account templates.



Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.

It's not a folder template, I just never checked to make sure that I
wasn't included in the auto-responder.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRXO5W3c64KxgfCEQIg8wCfc871Lm0oHrPrSOg/qCBlHD4xTAQAoJE8
TXv62GAtTl+YZNV6nsHRgR73
=1ZDH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:32:44 (GMT +0200),
Britt Malka did scrawl:




> Hi Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:

>> Herb Warren,
>> James W. Sewall Company

> One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
> messaging ;-)

Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.

> Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.

Until it goes horribly, horribly, wrong; yes.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRW5JW3c64KxgfCEQIDxgCdH/YgCZa6SsJuTf7iGbPqsnffbJ0AoIdr
vLEipX6Sgsk3RMZ7tK+pFRTb
=oupv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
Leif Gregory did scrawl:




> Hello Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
 Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
> it.

> Thanks.

Arrgh. You know, this has been running and active for about three years
now. It's no longer "automatically" responding. Sorry about that, and
no, I've no idea what's going on.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVRWCpW3c64KxgfCEQLHlwCffiuxAnnnOJ/952+LiFbVIPKz0ZwAn1bh
4ZGyvTat3pT6PdXLUnJCzDFN
=rRym
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 13:00:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:40 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:17 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
>>> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 Hello Arthur,

 Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

 Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
 it.

 Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:32:44 (GMT +0200),
Britt Malka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hi Arthur,
 
> Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:

>> Herb Warren,
>> James W. Sewall Company

> One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
> messaging ;-)

> Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello Sean!

On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:46 PM you wrote:

> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

Ah, OK, so no rampant folder template. Sigh, I was looking forward to
Marck's instructions about them.

BTW, could one of the moderator's please temporarily unsubscribe
Arthur (or whatever his real first name is) Warren? It looks like his
loop ain't going to break ...




-- 
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept

The Bat 3.0.0.18 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2

Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request

Life is a sexually transmitted disease. (Alexander Veljanov)






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:28 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
> Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hi Dierk,

>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
>> wrote in :

DH>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

DH>>> OK: What?

DH>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

>> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
>> switching to the preferred account templates.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:31 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
>> Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hello Dierk,

>>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Sean!

 On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

 OK: What?

 To be more precise: What - went wrong?




>>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

>>> Sean




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:57 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Sean!

>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

>> OK: What?

>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:17 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
>> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hello Arthur,

>>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

>>> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
>>> it.

>>> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Britt Malka]

Hi Arthur,
 
Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:

> Herb Warren,
> James W. Sewall Company

One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
messaging ;-)

Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.

-- 

Kind regards,

Britt Malka

 |\/|
 | \__/ | 
 \/\/ 
 |  | 
  \\  //  
   \  /   
\/


... Ok, alright then, but if she's not a killer, she's a target.

... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ...




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
> Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Dierk,

>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

>>> Hello Sean!

>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

>>> OK: What?

>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

>> Sean




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:28 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
 Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hi Dierk,

> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
> wrote in :

DH>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

DH>> OK: What?

DH>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
> switching to the preferred account templates.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:57 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
 Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

> OK: What?

> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:17 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Arthur,

>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

>> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
>> it.

>> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Dierk,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

>> Hello Sean!

>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

>> OK: What?

>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

> Sean





-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
>>> Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 Hi Dierk,

 On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
 wrote in :

DH> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

DH> OK: What?

DH> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

 Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
 switching to the preferred account templates.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 Hello Sean!

 On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

 OK: What?

 To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
 Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
 Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
> it.

> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: PGP Key Request

[Sean Rima]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Dierk,

Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

> OK: What?

> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

Sean

- --
Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431

using Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: ""

iQA/AwUBQVRLujXl9OCFh1uzEQJ0bgCgwHBqQMytwdhFwH3CbSPXghaxg7AAoKLH
XVdNQtdeU1FJ3pYJNk+uEusj
=eOQg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Mark Wieder]

Andrew-

You might want to look into NOD32 or another AV solution as a
replacement for Norton. I too have had my share of problems with the
TB/NAV combination - lng mail retrieval times, 100% CPU usage,
inability to kill tasks, and have not had this problem with NOD32. Of
course, I don't usually try to exit while TB is in the process of
retrieving mail.

I think the problem scenario is this: TB goes to retrieve mail, NAV
grabs the incoming mail to scan, and TB is in a locked thread waiting
for NAV to be done with its processing before handing it back to TB.
Then TB can continue putting the email in the right folder, executing
filters, etc. During this time NAV is working with the email in a
temporary file and copies need to be made, NAV checks permissions,
etc.

This is the way AV programs work and there's nothing wrong with this
process, but Norton AV seems to get its claws down very deep into
system processes to the point where nothing else can be done in the
meantime. I believe what's happening is that TB can't shut down
because it's waiting for Norton to relinquish its hold on a process
that TB has no control over.

Decreasing the frequency of mail checking might improve things. I have
mine set to check every five minutes and that seems to keep everyone
happy.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
>> Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hi Dierk,

>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
>>> wrote in :

DH On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

DH OK: What?

DH To be more precise: What - went wrong?

>>> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
>>> switching to the preferred account templates.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hello Sean!

>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

>>> OK: What?

>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
>>> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 Hello Arthur,

 Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

 Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
 it.

 Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Sean!

>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

>> OK: What?

>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
> Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hi Dierk,

>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
>> wrote in :

DH>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

DH>>> OK: What?

DH>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

>> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
>> switching to the preferred account templates.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
>> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hello Arthur,

>>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

>>> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
>>> it.

>>> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
 Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

> OK: What?

> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hi Dierk,

> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
> wrote in :

DH>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

DH>> OK: What?

DH>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

> Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
> switching to the preferred account templates.





-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
> Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Arthur,

>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
 Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

>> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
>> it.

>> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Kevin Coates]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dierk,

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
wrote in :

DH> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

DH> OK: What?

DH> To be more precise: What - went wrong?

Probably an errant folder template. I had that occur myself before
switching to the preferred account templates.

- --
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA

Using TB! v3.0.0.17 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2

(see kludges for my pgp key)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQFBVEPMvZSrVDqOXK0RAoKIAJ409L4Ib9g7uLkFhvi/+jK2oCUTNwCfXo+U
Zxoly/WZdcXp6kOmBwigl10=
=iRcn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 Hello Sean!

 On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

 OK: What?

 To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
 On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
 Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

> Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
> it.

> Thanks.




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Leif Gregory]

Hello Arthur,

Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
>> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:

Herb... It looks like you have some kind of loop going. Please kill
it.

Thanks.



-- 
 __       TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php

Tagline of the day:
Circle number 321 on reader service card.






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
> Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
>> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>>> Hello Sean!

>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

>>> OK: What?

>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Terry Frazier]

Friday, September 24, 2004 9:18 AM Andrew wrote:
> AFAICT, the problem is caused by a very bad interface between TB! and
> NAV. (I'm using NAV 2002.) Before I configured NAV to scan incoming
> e-mail, I *never* had this problem. However, blaming the problem on
> NAV is too easy. It's TB! that I can't kill as a process; I firmly
> believe that there's no good reason for this other than some very
> sloppy programming.

>> Has anyone found a solid solution to this?

> I have noticed that the problem is most likely to occur after I resume
> the PC from standby. If I use the browser to connect to any web site
> first and *then* start up TB!, the freezing problem does not occur or,
> at least, seems to occur less often.

  Excellent! Excellent! I turned off e-mail scanning for Norton A/V
  2003 and TB! shutdown normally. I don't know what other factors --
  sleep, standby, etc -- affect it as I haven't experimented yet.

  This *is* dumb -- an e-mail program too stupid to handle scanning
  of incoming messages by common third-party packages. I mean, how
  many people _don't_ run some sort of third-party A/V? Maybe it's
  just TB!'s tolerance of Norton. In any case, quite disappointing
  behavior from a package I've used and relied on for years.

  Thanks for the tip.

-- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
> Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
>> Hello Sean!

>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1

>> OK: What?

>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Arthur Warren]

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Sean!

> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1

> OK: What?

> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Key Request

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello Sean!

On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

OK: What?

To be more precise: What - went wrong?



-- 
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept

The Bat 3.0.0.17 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2

Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request

Be contend with what you get, and what you get will be contend with
you. (Derek Leveret)






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

PGP Key Request

[Sean Rima]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1











  PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: ""

iQA/AwUBQVQ3DTXl9OCFh1uzEQK4igCgpDVv3ywtxqZ2FJ0pOTlM3j/sU2sAoKKG
VkNSWck/HS2PzhOaZVpT09cG
=tNxA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Andrew Aronoff]

Hello Terry,

> But I _cannot_ get TB! to shut down.

I have this problem, too. The only way I can shut TB! is to reboot.
It's inconceivable that such an action should be necessary under W2K
SP4, but there's no way to kill the task. I can't do it with Task
Manager and "KILL -F" at the command line doesn't work, either.

AFAICT, the problem is caused by a very bad interface between TB! and
NAV. (I'm using NAV 2002.) Before I configured NAV to scan incoming
e-mail, I *never* had this problem. However, blaming the problem on
NAV is too easy. It's TB! that I can't kill as a process; I firmly
believe that there's no good reason for this other than some very
sloppy programming.

> Has anyone found a solid solution to this?

I have noticed that the problem is most likely to occur after I resume
the PC from standby. If I use the browser to connect to any web site
first and *then* start up TB!, the freezing problem does not occur or,
at least, seems to occur less often.

regards, Andy

[Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
 on a "made from scratch" P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Terry Frazier]

Friday, September 24, 2004 7:23 AM Roelof wrote:
TF>> I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
TF>> I can't find a solution to the TB! "some tasks are active" problem.

> There isn't, as long as there are any tasks active, TB won't close.

> When you're connecting to your server have you tried to abort the
> connection from the CC, I don't mean to close th CC, as that merely
> hides it, but using the Abort button.

  Yes, I have cleared the CC with the Abort button. The IMAP is cfg'd
  to disconnect so in some cases there isn't anything in CC to abort.
  Even in such a case, and where there are no apparent processes
  running in Task Manager, I still get the "some tasks are now active"
  warning.

  I don't mind killing the tasks manually, at least for now, if I can
  just find them.

> Did you try other IMAP clients, to see whether they've got problems
> disconnecting your server?
  No, not yet. I may give MozillaMail a try this weekend, as there is
  a new app I want to try that is written for Moz but won't run in
  FireFox. I do use two different IMAP servers at different hosts. But
  TB! isn't giving any indication that would lead me to a specific
  connection problem.

> 
> You've got your signature delimiter wrong
  Thanks.

  
-- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TheBat! cannot close

[Terry Frazier]

Friday, September 24, 2004 8:00 AM Arthur wrote:
> I never have. Mind you, I'm still working with a stone-age version of
> TB!, but it will regularly hang on the "connecting to server" phase
> (according to the CC). You can press 'Cancel' and 'Abort' all you want,
> and no joy. I've just kind of learned to live with it.

  I used 1.62r forever and never had a problem. But last week I
  upgraded to 3.0 to try the IMAP capability. This problem only occurs
  (for me) with 3.0.
  
-- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Terry L Fritts]

Friday, September 24, 2004 you wrote:
---
> I also have been facing these problemince previous few versions.
> Even aborting does not help. Due to this, I have almost stopped
> using the bat and shifted to Eudora.

  Since I upgraded to version 3 I have not had this problem once.

  Before version 3 my bat! would "lock up" (during message download
  from any of the several mail servers I use) several times per day
  and I would have to kill the task from Windows Task Manager.  Abort
  never worked for me either.  Very frustrating - especially if I
  forgot to restart the Bat!

  I did learn that I could make the situation better if I used the
  Dispatch Mail on Server and use Read and Delete and/or reduce the
  number of messages in a batch if many had built up.

  Has anyone else noticed the action buttons are now mis-labeled on
  the "Pick e-mail addresses" dialog?  (They are now 4, 44, 3, 33, r,
  s - not sure when this happened - hardly ever use that dialog - not
  a big deal really )


--

Terry Fritts




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Arthur Warren]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 06:36:16 (GMT -0400),
Terry Frazier did scrawl:

> I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
> I can't find a solution to the TB! "some tasks are active" problem.
> I've tried setting IMAP servers to disconnect, entering /EXIT from the
> command line, looking for the .IPC file, etc. I don't seem to have any
> extraneous temp files.

> But I _cannot_ get TB! to shut down. This is very irritating, as when
> I do a force quit with Task Manager I lose some of my preference
> settings.

> Has anyone found a solid solution to this? Any help appreciated.

I never have. Mind you, I'm still working with a stone-age version of
TB!, but it will regularly hang on the "connecting to server" phase
(according to the CC). You can press 'Cancel' and 'Abort' all you want,
and no joy. I've just kind of learned to live with it.

- --
Herb Warren

  Using The Bat! 1.62r
  on: Windows 2000 5.0
  Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Send mail with the subject "PGP Key Request" for public key

iQA/AwUBQVQMfZW3c64KxgfCEQKTBgCg8201pjZBpJyUVY/bukF6K6bYhaQAnjD3
qNgNUZTTiVYtSpGAMqjtQbau
=vcGW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[K. Shantanu]

* Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040924 05:55]:
> There isn't, as long as there are any tasks active, TB won't close.

I also have been facing these problemince previous few versions.
Even aborting does not help. Due to this, I have almost stopped
using the bat and shifted to Eudora.
Shantanu



http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Terry,

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:36:16 -0400GMT (24-9-2004, 12:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

TF> I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
TF> I can't find a solution to the TB! "some tasks are active" problem.

There isn't, as long as there are any tasks active, TB won't close.

When you're connecting to your server have you tried to abort the
connection from the CC, I don't mean to close th CC, as that merely
hides it, but using the Abort button.

Did you try other IMAP clients, to see whether they've got problems
disconnecting your server?

TF>  -- 



You've got your signature delimiter wrong, it is 
and it should be the other way around  on a line by
itself.



-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.16
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TheBat! cannot close

[Terry Frazier]

Friday, September 24, 2004 6:36 AM Terry wrote:
> I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
> I can't find a solution to the TB! "some tasks are active" problem.
> I've tried setting IMAP servers to disconnect, entering /EXIT from the
> command line, looking for the .IPC file, etc. I don't seem to have any
> extraneous temp files.
  Here is another piece of info that may be helpful --

Friday, September 24, 2004 6:36 AM Allie wrote:
> Are you running any plugins or antivirus/antispam proxies? These are
> known to interfere with TB!'s negotiations with remote servers.
  
  I am not running any plugins nor proxies, though I am using Norton
  A/V to filter incoming/outgoing mail.

 -- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

TheBat! cannot close

[Terry Frazier]

I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
I can't find a solution to the TB! "some tasks are active" problem.
I've tried setting IMAP servers to disconnect, entering /EXIT from the
command line, looking for the .IPC file, etc. I don't seem to have any
extraneous temp files.

But I _cannot_ get TB! to shut down. This is very irritating, as when
I do a force quit with Task Manager I lose some of my preference
settings.

Has anyone found a solid solution to this? Any help appreciated.

 -- 
Cordially,
 -twf

=
Terry Frazier   Atlanta, GA, USA
Using The Bat! v3.0
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html