On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:32:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:16:22 PM, Nick wrote:
Anyway, it's resolved for now... hopefully _that_ particular piece of scum
won't find my Inbox anymore. :o)
Was it directed specifically towards you? Hate to tell you this
but
Hello TBUDLers,
Has anyone got unread [bat] posts in temp folder that never
reached Inbox folder??? I experienced that today: I was just
about to clean the contents of c:\windows\temp when something
possessed me to read the messages!:o
Note: I had to close TB with
Hello Sir,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 at 19:46:01 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
SJ Note: I had to close TB with ctrl+alt+del in the middle of
SJ receiving mail, because some other application went totally
SJ bananas and TB didn't respond at all. How could those post end in
SJ temp folder instead in Inbox?
Hello John De Hoog,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:51:16 +0900 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 8:51:16 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
John De Hoog wrote:
Hi, all,
Nick Andriash wrote...
NA Now I've created a filter through Special/Create Filter, and have created
NA two of
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 4:34:10 PM, Jason wrote:
Please, any advice would be helpful.
Move the mail subdirectory. That is pretty much all that is needed.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:30:35 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
It constitutes about 5% of my spam
Then use the filtering system that I set forth months ago and
Allie has reiterated several times since then. 5% of your spam is
where sender=receiver. Well, if sender=receiver then, clearly,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 01:49:27AM +0100, Roel wrote:
- open 'regedit' export this key:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!
- import that key on the other pc...
all your accounts will be back again, including all their
settings...
Assuming, of course, that they are going to
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:30:17 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Actually I've already incorporated that method, and was going to respond
to Allie's post. I was losing track of some important mail that found it's
way into my Spam Folder.
That was happening to me initially but I created
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
- import that key on the other pc...
all your accounts will be back again, including all their
settings...
SL Assuming, of
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:49:27 +0100, Roel wrote:
this is what you've got to do:
- copy/move all the mail-folders subfolders to the other computer
(whichis pretty obvious g)
- open 'regedit' export this key:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!
- import that key on the other
Hello, Batmen and women,
Steve Lamb wrote...
- import that key on the other pc...
all your accounts will be back again, including all their
settings...
Assuming, of course, that they are going to go onto the same drive. Bad
assumption.
If not, edit the drive references in the
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 00:19:44 +, Simon wrote:
I'm trying to get The Bat! to integrate into IE5 properly. Even when
you choose TB! as the default email client under options it won't
enable 'Send/Page by Email' 'Send/Link by Email' etc.
I have edited the registry adding given /{command}
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 04:54:05PM -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
I wish it were that easy, but anything that gets BCC'd to you gets
tossed in the trash too. :(
That is why in the system I put forth months ago there were two details
that Allie may not have put in.
1: Messages are marked as
Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:16:22 PM, Nick wrote:
Anyway, it's resolved for now... hopefully _that_ particular piece of scum
won't find my Inbox anymore. :o)
Was it directed specifically towards you? Hate to tell you this but
filtering on the address it comes from is a worthless venture.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:37:18 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Is that really a fair comparison?
Well Yes. An email attachment is encoded into 7bit data.
Right there you inrease the size of the file by 1/8th. So an 8Mg
file becomes 9Mb. Of course, they don't use all of the 7bit
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 02:03:25 +0100, Roel wrote:
Fix for this:
delete the account-settings (and any other drive-related stuff) from
the reg-file, import the reg-file, create all the accounts so tb! is pointing
to their base-mail-dir again push 'ctrl-alt-shift-L'... all the
folders will be
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Simon,
S I have edited the registry adding given /{command} lines in TB!
S help but no success. I also compiled a FULL distributable ver of
S
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:54:50PM -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
This method, though very effective except for the Nicks most
recent example where a spam message was indeed addressed directly to
him, doesn't seem to go down well with the others Steve. I'm wondering
why.
It is
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 02:03:25AM +0100, Roel wrote:
Fix for this:
delete the account-settings (and any other drive-related stuff) from
the reg-file, import the reg-file, create all the accounts so tb! is pointing
to their base-mail-dir again push 'ctrl-alt-shift-L'... all the
folders will
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:32:15 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 11:32:15 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Most places
cancel the addresses after they spammed for no more than a few hours. In the
time it took you to create that
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 10:43:19 +0900, Leif Gregory wrote:
AM At least I could never get it to. I think IMAP support is needed
AM for that which TB! doesn't support yet. It will in version 2.
grin Hey, at least you got all the letters right, they're just in
the wrong order! MAPI support is
Hi Allie Martin,
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 12:55:06 AM you wrote:
Yes, I'm a bad, bad boy for sending email that big. Who cares.
Fix the problem. Why should TB! use in excess of 192 megs of ram
when trying to import (or open) an email with a 8 meg attachment?!
This
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 10:28:31 AM, Allie wrote:
About receiving mail... I've not seen TB fault on this, but I've
sometimes got the impression that throughput is poor with large
mails. Receiving a mail of, say, 8 MB seems to take significantly
longer than ftping a file that size. I
Hello Syafril,
what is "keep alive utility" using you? And what is the result of problems by
Soth (big attachments)?
Regards
Wielandmailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available
TP It would still be useful (well, I guess I'm assuming that it can be
TP made to work g), and how much less irritating for EVERYONE that it
TP wasn't popping up in all of these times when it was absoulutely NOT
TP wanted?
JA Agreed. How often does it really pop up if you don't want to use it?
Hello TBUDL,
Andrash said:
Boxer 99 comes very close and of course is superior at
formatting unquoted material but it's $60 a license.
Yes, Boxer99 _is_ a shareware, but the only thing that will
happen if you don't pay it is the nagging message that the trial
period is out.
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 10:59:29 AM, Sir Jinx! wrote:
Andrash said:
Boxer 99 comes very close and of course is superior at
formatting unquoted material but it's $60 a license.
Uhh... who exactly is "Andrash"? I know of no other on this List that has
a surname close to mine, so
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 1:45:47 PM, Nick wrote:
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 10:59:29 AM, Sir Jinx! wrote:
Andrash said:
Boxer 99 comes very close and of course is superior at
formatting unquoted material but it's $60 a license.
Uhh... who exactly is "Andrash"? I know of no
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Nick,
NA On Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 10:59:29 AM, Sir Jinx! wrote:
Andrash said:
Boxer 99 comes very close and of course is
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 8:32:15 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
Was it directed specifically towards you? Hate to tell you this but
filtering on the address it comes from is a worthless venture. Most places
cancel the addresses after they spammed for no more than a few hours. In the
time
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 2:47:02 PM, Nick wrote:
Yeah, I was afraid of something like that. I wish TB had an "easy" way of
adding some kind of search criteria to weed out Spam. Actually, I think
it's more the responsibility of my ISP to do that. Thanks for the tip
Steve.
Read the
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:02:36 +0100, Roel wrote:
it was Allie who wrote this on january 15th...
and it was in the 'external vs internal editor'-thread...
Uhm, really? :) I don't remember either though I very well
could have, since I know Boxer99 and did have it installed for about
an
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 3:03:57 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
Read the message from Allie. He had described, again, the spam filtering
system I suggested a few months ago which is just that, an easy way for TB! to
weed out spam.
Actually I've already incorporated that method, and was
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 3:30:17 PM, Nick wrote:
Actually I've already incorporated that method, and was going to respond
to Allie's post. I was losing track of some important mail that found it's
way into my Spam Folder. It somehow made it's way through all of the other
filters obviously.
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:38:06 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 8:38:06 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
I've always had a problem with most of the filters that TB sets up. For
instance, here is the From: line from a spam I
At 01:39 PM 15/02/2000, tracer wrote:
John, but its a total waste of time trying to hit this kind of address
one by one. But if as I mentioned before and just in another message
one could filter on the fact that sender=receiver, one needs exactly
one kill filter
I'm not sure I know what you
Monday, February 14, 2000, 10:33:01 PM, tracer wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is EXACTLY the case I want a special filter for
SENDER=RECEIVER: means SPAM
Well, considering the sender was the zhdice guy and the receiver was Nick
I fail to see how it applies to what
Hello List,
I'd like some input on how to transfer The Bat and all my e-mail
files/folders/configurations to a new computer. When I was using
Eudora, this was very easy (just copy the mailbox files over and
everything was done). Is there an easy way of doing this with The Bat,
too? I can't
Hello, Batmen and women,
tracer wrote...
John, but its a total waste of time trying to hit this kind of address
one by one. But if as I mentioned before and just in another message
one could filter on the fact that sender=receiver, one needs exactly
one kill filter
Both of those are
Hello Again.
Just upgraded to 1.41 Beta 3 but no joy there either (see below). Must
be some way of integrating The Bat! system wide?
Sín (Simon)
The Bat ver: 1.41 Beta 3
Last message:
A Chara The Bat! users.
I'm trying to get The Bat! to integrate into IE5 properly. Even when
you choose TB!
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Jason,
JE Hello List,
JE I'd like some input on how to transfer The Bat and all my e-mail
JE files/folders/configurations to a new computer.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t This is EXACTLY the case I want a special filter for
t SENDER=RECEIVER: means SPAM
t It constitutes about 5% of my spam
t As the senders vary its difficult to filter them one by one but the
t property used, ie sender=receiver should be recognisable.
AM Anyway to bring all that banter to perspective, get rid of spam by
AM first excluding all mail that is legitimately for you and then
AM consider the rest spam. With this method I hardly ever get legitimate
AM mail ending up in my spam folder or spam ending up in my inbox.
I wish it were that
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:54:05 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
AM Anyway to bring all that banter to perspective, get rid of spam by
AM first excluding all mail that is legitimately for you and then
AM consider the rest spam. With this method I hardly ever get legitimate
AM mail ending up in my spam
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Allie,
AM After all of that I see no need to export the registry then. It
AM may just avoid registration.
the registry also contains all the
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 02:39:37AM +0100, Roel wrote:
the registry also contains all the window-positions, most of the
menu-switches, editor-preferences, ...
it's not all that important, but it's nice if you don't need to
set it all back to the way you want it to be...
It is best that
A Chara Roel,
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 1:28:31 AM, you wrote:
R dunno if it'll work, but try this:
R create shortcuts to tb! with the correct options in (those *.lnk
R files) and let the registry point to them
R hth :-)
Ahh well! At least I got my 'Bat! Button' working in IE5 with a
Hello Allie Martin,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:04:22 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 1:04:22 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Also Nick, in the medical fraternity we sometimes make a
diagnosis by exclusion. IOW, we do tests to see if the
This question may have been lost in the flurry of messages about
filtering techniques, so let me ask again.
If you could make a list of common domains to be rejected if they
appear in the To: header, that would go a long way toward killing
SPAM mail. The Bat! kill filter interface has
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:15:35 -0500GMT (16/02/2000, 07:15 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
it was Allie who wrote this on january 15th...
and it was in the 'external vs internal editor'-thread...
AM Uhm, really? :) I don't remember either though I very well
AM could have,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:33:17 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM Uhm, really? :) I don't remember either though I very well
AM could have, since I know Boxer99 and did have it installed for about
AM an hour, testing it.
I missed the beginning of this thread. So what is Boxer99?
Hi John,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:11:27 +0900GMT (16/02/2000, 12:11 +0800GMT),
John De Hoog wrote:
JDH The present kill filter options are Originator, Subject, and
JDH Routing. I'm surprised there is no To: option. Better yet, let the
JDH user specify the header in filter arguments. And make it
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:40:33 -0500GMT (16/02/2000, 12:40 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM It's been a while Thomas. :) Boxer99 is a plain text editor
AM with some above average features. It offers good email specific
AM editing support. Costs $60 though. :(
I was on
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:00:33 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Do you have an URL for Boxer99?
No, but you'll find it listed at winfiles.com under the text
editors section.
--
CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.39 *:* Windows NT5.0
---
** Ideas are not responsible for their followers! **
54 matches
Mail list logo
