Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report

Hello Allie, Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 7:28:31 PM, you wrote: That's true. You can see it when attaching a very large file to a new message via the "attach a file" button. Using dd it works well. AM Funny I just attached a 30MB file using the attach file AM toolbar button with no

Re[3]: The Bat! and Big files

A Chara Oliver, Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 8:09:17 AM, you wrote: OS Hello Allie,. AM Funny I just attached a 30MB file using the attach file AM toolbar button with no problem. Where exactly does the problem with AM attaching using this method occur?... OS As I meant a file

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello Allie Martin, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:54:50 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:54:50 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:30:35 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: It constitutes about 5% of my spam Then use the filtering

Re: The Bat! and Big files

Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 1:20:22 AM, Simon wrote: Unless of course you have nowhere to store your files online? That's what the File Transfer Protocol is for, surely? Which is not the case as there are services out there that provide free FTP space that others can access. Zkey

Re: Kill filter question

Hi Gary, G Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will prohibit G whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into The Bat!? Yes, only some headers are downloaded in this case. G So G the purpose of the kill filter is to kill it before you see it. Yes. -- Regards,

Re[5]: The Bat! and Big files

Hi Oliver, ... OS Anyway, my original problem is still there... If I have a file of, OS say, 6mb of size, which will encode to around 8mb when attached to OS email, why does transfering those 8mb via TB take much longer than OS transfering another file of 8mb original size via ftp?

Re[2]: Kill filter question

Hi Wolfgang, On Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 1:33:58 PM, you wrote about "Kill filter question": G Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will G prohibit whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into G The Bat!? W Yes, only some headers are downloaded in this

Re: File Attachments (A different question)

Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:22:55 PM, Ralf wrote: SL If you tell it not to. It, however, is an option and on my version it SL does store it with the message. Where is that option? Options. Hmm, are you talking about outgoing or incoming mail? The author of the original message

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hi tracer, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 19:18:10 +0700GMT (16/02/2000, 20:18 +0800GMT), tracer wrote: t Also an option to generate a fake bounce message back to the spam t address would be nice. It may get you off some mailing lists spammers t use No use. In almost all cases, your "bounce message"

Re: File Attachments (A different question)

Hi Soth, you wrote on Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 13:39:02: S The problem is that if I attach a file to an outgoing email, send the S email and then look in the sent folder, I can see the attached file as S part of the email -- as long as I haven't erased (or moved) the file. S IE/ it's not

File Attachments (A different question)

I have a question about file attachments, and I'm wondering if it's something that I'm doing wrong, or something that TB! isn't doing quite right. ;-) The problem is that if I attach a file to an outgoing email, send the email and then look in the sent folder, I can see the attached file as part

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello Tom Plunket, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:52:09 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:52:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tom Plunket wrote: This is also a common action of many spam-aware mailers (the users, that is). Some people want to send something out to

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello Steve Lamb, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:30:35 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:30:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Monday, February 14, 2000, 10:33:01 PM, tracer wrote: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is EXACTLY the case I

Re: Transfering to new computer?

Hello Allie Martin, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 20:25:09 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 8:25:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 02:03:25 +0100, Roel wrote: Fix for this: delete the account-settings (and any other

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello Steve Lamb, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:00:20 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 9:00:20 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:54:50PM -0500, Allie Martin wrote: This method, though very effective except for the

Kill filter question

Hi TB! Group, I have a question, as a relative newbie, regarding this filtering. Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will prohibit whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into The Bat!? So the purpose of the kill filter is to kill it before you see it. --

Re: The Bat! and Big files

Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 10:18:51 AM, Oliver wrote: remaining haven't ever heard of ftp, all they know is how to enter the url to the yahoo business pages (and their favorite xxx sites ;). Not http://www.highpowergraphics.com/freedrive.html -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your

Quoted line prefixes

I can't tell you how many times I reply to someone with an email address that has no embedded name... For example, I have this friend who's email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (names changed to protect the guilty, and there's an underscore in there), and TB! makes the quote prefix "Cpbc". I

The Bat! - bug report - No Longer Able to Retrieve Mail from IMAP Server

Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.39 Serial Number FE9D2891 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 4 and would like to report a bug The bug description: I can no longer retrieve mail from an IMAP server. Steps to reproduce the bug: Today when I

I Just started getting this problem with the Bat.

Hello TBUDL, I just started getting this problem, if I start my DUN connection before any programs (my normal method) The Bat will than start another start up connection. This happens when I have Opera and bat running, or agent and the bat running, or just the bat alone. My settings are

Re[5]: The Bat! and Big files - 2

A Chara Oliver, Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 6:18:51 PM, you wrote: OS Hi Simon, . OS Anyway... it's faster and easier. If someone tells me "please send me OS that file", I don't need to upload it somewhere, get in a hassle OS because the server doesn't respond

Re[3]: Kill filter question

Hi Gary, ... G Thanks Wolfgang for your response, I appreciate it. Taking this one G step further, any other filter I set up other than the kill filter G will go automatically to the file that I designate. I can set up a G regular filter to go to the trash automatically. So the difference G

Re: File Attachments (A different question)

Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 4:59:51 AM, Ralf wrote: Neither does TB!. If you tell it not to. It, however, is an option and on my version it does store it with the message. I was getting tired of deleting messages with PGP signatures and having the PGP signatures clutter up my attach

Re[4]: Kill filter question

Hi Wolfgang, On Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:00:04 PM, you wrote about "Kill filter question": G regular filter to go to the trash automatically. So the difference G between a kill filter and the regular filter going to the trash G would be that with the kill filter I would not see it, W

Re: The Bat! and Big files

Hello Steve, On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 10:32:04 GMT -0800 (which was 10:32 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 10:18:51 AM, Oliver wrote: remaining haven't ever heard of ftp, all they know is how to enter the url to the yahoo business pages

Re: File Attachments (A different question)

Hi Steve, you wrote on Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 23:16:47: Neither does TB!. SL If you tell it not to. It, however, is an option and on my version it SL does store it with the message. Where is that option? SL I was getting tired of deleting messages with PGP signatures and SL

Re: File Attachments (A different question)

Hello Soth, On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 07:39:02 GMT -0500 (which was 4:39 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I have a question about file attachments, and I'm wondering if it's something that I'm doing wrong, or something that TB! isn't doing quite right. ;-) The

Re: Kill filter question

Hello Listmembers, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 at 20:33:58 [GMT +0100] Wolfgang Kynast wrote: G Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will prohibit G whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into The Bat!? Yes, only some headers are downloaded in this case. I didn't prove

Re: Kill filter question

G Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will prohibit G whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into The Bat!? Yes, only some headers are downloaded in this case. DH I didn't prove this really - but I _feel_ that all headers are loaded DH but only the allowed

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello John De Hoog, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:36:35 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:36:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: Hello, Batmen and women, tracer wrote... John, but its a total waste of time trying to hit this kind of address one by

Re[3]: The Bat! - bug report

I guess I should step in and clarify somewhat. The problem is on receiving large files via email. Normally, if I want to send a very large file, I will ftp it to somebody. But, I'm a web developer (among other things) and don't have the luxury of dealing with many computer-literate people.

Re: Quoted line prefixes

Hi Tom, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:52:32 -0800GMT (17/02/2000, 03:52 +0800GMT), Tom Plunket wrote: TP and TB! makes the quote prefix "Cpbc". I don't mind that it TP sometimes does the wrong thing, but is there any easy way to TP reattribute a quote? In this case I suppose search-and-replace works

Re: I Just started getting this problem with the Bat.

Hi Pasquale, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:34:50 -0500GMT (17/02/2000, 02:34 +0800GMT), Pasquale J. Festa Sr. wrote: PJFS I just started getting this problem, if I start my DUN connection PJFS before any programs (my normal method) The Bat will than start another PJFS start up connection. This

Re: Kill filter question

Hi Dieter, On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:46:56 +0100GMT (17/02/2000, 07:46 +0800GMT), Dieter Hummel wrote: G Am I to understand that if I set up a kill filter, it will prohibit G whenever I set up as the filter from downloading into The Bat!? Yes, only some headers are downloaded in this case.