ON Friday, November 1, 2002, 10:07:55 PM, you wrote:
L If, in your filter, on the advaced tab you enable message is not
L flagged and then flag the message before reading and hit delete, it doesn't get
L filtered.
Hi Luc,
I have filters using the message is not flagged functions but the
ON Saturday, November 2, 2002, 9:56:41 PM, you wrote:
DW And now it gets even more weird - it appears to be working now even
DW when I use the toolbar button or Ctrl-N. I haven't changed *anything*
DW about it since - oh, Wednesday? Thursday? - and it didn't work
DW yesterday - but now it does!
Hello,
Thank You! For your reply.
Im *very* satisfied with TB, the reason why I asked this question:
We use MS Outlook at work, me TB at home and my parents use Eudora.
So I must easily switch between the 3.
MDP TB has the ability to export message is various formats, including
MDP .msg files.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, November 03, 2002
8:17:31 AM
RE: Sorry for the OT but
Greetings,
All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
experiencing this problem?
Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask this
question.
-
Hi DG,
on Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:19:56 -0500GMT (03.11.02, 14:19 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:145772801.20021103081956;myrealbox.com :
DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS experiencing this problem?
DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:145772801.20021103081956;myrealbox.com,
Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:'
DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS experiencing this problem?
DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask
DRS this
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 08:19:56 -0500 GMT (which was 14:19 local
time), DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS experiencing this problem?
The last message I received from tbot is dated Sun, 3 Nov 2002
03:03:59 +0700.
DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs.
Hello, Thomas:
Thank you very much. Your instructions were very clear -- and I broke
new ground today creating a special TBUDL Reply template that guards
against inadvertent top-posting.
Here it is, from TBUDL in my address book:
Hello, %OFromFName:
Best regards,
%FromFName
Best wishes,
Hello David!
On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote:
the template below
Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)):
Hello, %OFromFName:
((^ Why that?))
%QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply))
%CURSOR ((putting you
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 10:52:24 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello David!
DH the template below
DH Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)):
Hello, %OFromFName:
DH ((^ Why that?))
DH %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply))
My server requires authentication for smtp, but does not allow
cram-md5. (I assume that is a type of authentication.) I do not
have MD5 checked under transport, but nonetheless in the log I can
see that TB is trying to use 'software' cram-md5 authentication.
Bottom line, I am unable to send
Hi John,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 12:54 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
J essage has not been sent. Server reply - sorry, that domain isn't in my
J list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
this sounds like a qmail server.
J It is not a server
Hello,
I have an address list of 55 people and, the last time I sent a
message with an attachment, 55 individual mail attachments were sent
along with 55 individual messages after I had used the Mass mailing
using template option to invoke a quick template. I can't remember
this happening before
Try just plain SMTP auth..account/properties/transport/SMTP
authentication, then click perform SMTP auth check use settings
of mail
retrieval. Uncheck Require MD5, and do *not* check on the bottom
Pop before SMTP
I have done all that- that is the problem- I can't see how to
actually
Hi John,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 2:12 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
Try just plain SMTP auth..account/properties/transport/SMTP
authentication, then click perform SMTP auth check use settings of
mail retrieval. Uncheck Require MD5, and do *not* check on the
Did you double check also on the transport POP auth (Receive Mail)
to see
that MD5 was not checked? Also the account/properties/transport
panel was okay and set to regular.
Yes, did all of that. Any other ideas? TB is set to automatically
use cram if it can, even if you don't check the
Hi John,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 2:30 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
J Yes, did all of that. Any other ideas? TB is set to automatically
J use cram if it can, even if you don't check the box.
Fresh out of ideas, except what version of TB! did you try this with?
Hello John,
My server requires authentication for smtp, but does not allow
cram-md5. (I assume that is a type of authentication.) I do not
have MD5 checked under transport, but nonetheless in the log I can
see that TB is trying to use 'software' cram-md5 authentication.
From TB's Help:
Hello Melissa,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:35:22 AM, you wrote:
MR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR Hash: SHA1
MR On Saturday, November 02, 2002, at 2:57:51 PM PDT, Tom Sadler wrote:
I'm currently using NOD32 as my AV scanner, and I'd like to put a
tagline in all outgoing mail to the
Hi Gary,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 14:47:15 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
J For some reason, my server must look like it accepts cram checks,
J even though it doesn't.
G No, TB! does not automatically change from just plain delivery to an SMTP
G auth if the server looks like it accepts them.
G Fresh out of ideas, except what version of TB! did you try this
with? TB!
G by default, is not set for MD5 auth.
V 1.61
G No, TB! does not automatically change from just plain delivery to
an SMTP
G auth if the server looks like it accepts them. There is no
protocol for
G this automatic
Hello Richard,
Apart from using a BCC (which then does not allow for the personal
hello that the Quick Template allows) how do I stop the attachment
being sent 55 times. Fortunately it was only a small one this time
:-)
Although I have never used it myself, I believe the idea of Mass
mailing
Hi Miguel,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:01 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
M ,- [ SMTP Authentication ]
M |
M | Once connected to an SMTP server, The Bat! checks which of the
M | server's RFC-2554-authentication mechanisms is available, and chooses
M | the
G Now that is interesting... I don't remember TB! doing that before
...
G (long ago)..
G For reference, qmail does not support auth or MD5 auth, or POP
before
G SMTP, or SMTP before POP, in its basic installation. One must add
G additional packages and actually build them into qmail.
If that is
Hello Miguel,
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 at 22:10:26[GMT +0100](21:10 where I live) you wrote
in mid:7035679314.20021103221026;ermspain.com :
MAU If the message includes an attachment it will be send
MAU along with each message, in your case 55 times. If you want to only
MAU send the attachment once you
Hi Lars,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:03 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
L So, if John's server reports the ability of CRAM-MD5 authentication,
L TB! will (try to) use it, no matter whether Require secure (MD5)
L authentication is checked or not. Of course this fails
Hi John,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:14 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
G For reference, qmail does not support auth or MD5 auth, or POP before
G SMTP, or SMTP before POP, in its basic installation. One must add
G additional packages and actually build them into
G This is what I thought.. I believe you have cable. They don't
usually
G support auth, cable companies that is..
G Can you call tech support and ask them why you are getting the
5.7.1.
G error, or more specifically the
G Server reply - sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts
G
Friday, November 1, 2002, 11:54:51 AM, you wrote:
LL Just downloaded The Bat 1.61 and noticed it does convert *from* Eudora
LL (Though converting the other Eudora account will be tricky, its not in
LL Qualcomm/Eudora.) but to be truthful I am out of work at the moment. If I
LL like The Bat
Hi John,
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:49 PM, you put forth, in part, about Can't stop
CRAM-MD5?:
J I had this problem with pocomail, but there was a setting in the ini
J file to disable md5. I was hoping there was a similar setting
J somewhere with TB, apparently not.
Not that I am aware
Hello, Dierk:
Sunday, November 03, 2002, 11:52:24 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello David!
DH On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote:
DH the template below
DH Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)):
Hello, %OFromFName:
DH ((^ Why that?))
DH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
3-Nov-2002, 12:38 -0600 (18:38 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in
mid:16337465292.20021103123801;premiernet.net said:
MB This is a big help to me, too, Dierk. And so much more concisely
MB done than my long Reply post to David. Which really didn't
Hello Marck,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:16:48 PM, you wrote:
MDP Here's another tip (and your cut mark works beautifully BTW)...
Thanks.
Best regards,
Marymailto:xxx
MDP I recommend that you remove the mailto link for all public postings.
MDP
Hello Andre,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote:
AW Why can't you post to tbot? If you're subscribed you should also be
AW able to post..
Maybe he means it's possible to post but since he doesn't get mail
from TBOT he doesn't know if it gets there ??
Hopefully Allie will be able
I have an account with about 9,000 messages. I would like to convert
it to IMAP so that I can access them when I am away from my main
computer. I have my own email server (ALT-N Mdaemon) so I can tell
it what folders I want, but I do not know how to get my messages
that exist in my POP3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:199561318.20021103095751;tpg.com.au,
Tom Sadler [TS] wrote:'
TS I'm currently using NOD32 as my AV scanner, and I'd like to put
TS a tagline in all outgoing mail to the effect that the mail has
TS been scanned by NOD32, version such and such.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gi'day Allie,
Thanks to both yourself and Thomas Fernandez for the helpful replies.
It's reassuring to see that some people can get past their personal
pet hates and help.
On Monday, 4 November 2002 at 20:30:56GMT -0500 (which was 12:30 PM where I
Hello David,
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:41:31 -0500 GMT (04/11/02, 05:41 +0700 GMT),
David R. Austen wrote:
DH -- ((this is two dashes then a space followed by a Return))
Best regards,
I hope this is fine. Thank you very much for your able coaching.
--
Best regards,
David
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:21:01 + GMT (04/11/02, 04:21 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
MAU If the message includes an attachment it will be send
MAU along with each message, in your case 55 times. If you want to only
MAU send the attachment once you will have to include the 55
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:52:59 +0700 GMT (02/11/02, 10:52 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I had to go to Options / Editor Prefs / Display / Font: change, and
change the font manually to a Thai font in order to be able to read
the message. Of course, after reading it, I had to
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:30:24 +0700 GMT (04/11/02, 12:30 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
If you want to send the attachment only once, why is BCC is an option
you would want to chose?
Typo. Why is BCC *not* an option
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat!
Hello Thomas,
More than slightly Off Topic reply here, to you:
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 11:30:24 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Richard,
And then you appended this sig:
Warum hatte Bach so viele Kinder, Kant jedoch kein einziges? - Weil
Bach sich auf die Kunst der Fuge verstand, waehrend Kant nur
42 matches
Mail list logo
