Hi Wolffe,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 3:14:07 AM, you wrote:
W> On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 chinchi stated:
c>> Hi Miguel,
c>> Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
c>> I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as unread
c>> using the message dispatch
Hello,
I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
the program continues...
Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ?
Thanks,
Friendly,
Christophe mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
> sorry to ask here, but you guys seem all to be so advanced in
> programming, that the answer will be one shot for you.
> I want to learn a programming language, which one should I take? I
> have
Crap! No, it don't work... I still need help.
--
Best Regards,
~John
- - - ~John wrote - - -
> I did it! I did it!
> Here is how I done it, I was trying too hard.
> I created this "Only Me" filter:
>
> Move to "Not to me" folder
> ", [EMAIL PROTECTED]"|"[EMAIL PROTE
I did it! I did it!
Here is how I done it, I was trying too hard.
I created this "Only Me" filter:
Move to "Not to me" folder
", [EMAIL PROTECTED]"|"[EMAIL PROTECTED],"
Location : Recipient
Presence : Yes
and placed it last in the list,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ~John,
@5-Feb-1998, 17:14 -0600 (23:14 UK time) ~John [j] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
j> I have been getting allot of Spam here lately that is addressed
j> to me along with several random or generated e-mail addresses. So
j>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wondering if one can set up a filter to trash
email with a date that isn't current? I receive
occasional spam dated like year 2025 or 1992 or a different month,
etc.
Thanks,
David
- --
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Written Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 6
I have been getting allot of Spam here lately that is addressed to me
along with several random or generated e-mail addresses.
So my question is, how do I create a filter that will "trash" any
e-mail to me [in either the To: or CC:] that has my address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) listed with *any* other e-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
>>> To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
>>> ^
JA>> I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA>> just fine, one via a post
Hello!
Wed Feb 5 2003 23:26:01 Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately the The Bat! converts such directly routed addresses
>> to the following form causing another bounce:
JA> [..]
>> To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
>> ^
JA> I had notice
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 Artemich stated:
A> Hi,
A> When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename filter.
A> Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
A> like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
A> Does anybody know how to rename this
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 chinchi stated:
c> Hi Miguel,
c> Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
c> I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as unread
c> using the message dispatcher and then downloaded them in to an
c> empty local inbox. I did t
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 9:41:18 PM you [RO] wrote (at least
in part):
RO> Without [] I got a test delivered
Which is strange enough. The square brackets are for the server being
able to distinguish between dot-delimited host.network.name and an
IP-address.
Really strange
Hello Roelof Otten,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:41:18GMT +0100
(which was 3:41 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten
ruminated:
JA>> IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA>> otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA>> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Spike wrote...
JA>> I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA>> just fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a sendmail
JA>> SMTP server. Once each over telnet, and via TB!, all 4 ar
Hallo Jonathan,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:18:38 -0600GMT (5-2-03, 21:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JA> IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA> otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA> the RFC (see RFC822 sec 6.2.3). They are strongly suggest
Hello Jonathan Angliss,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 14:26:01GMT -0600
(which was 3:26 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss
responded:
JA> I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails just
JA> fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
> I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
> address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]).
[..]
> In case you want anyone at mail.tp.ru host to be not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote...
> AGSAA> I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an
> IP AGSAA> address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is
> a AGSAA> good example.
> [192.168.203.12] isn't an ip-
Hello Spike,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 8:49:01 PM you [S] wrote (at least
in part):
AGSAA>> I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA>> directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
S> 8< Snipped alot!
S> Correct me if I am wrong,
Hallo Andrey,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:14:26 +0300GMT (5-2-03, 19:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AGSAA> I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
AGSAA> address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a
AGSAA> good example.
[192.168.203.12] isn't an ip-address. L
Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris),
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:14:26GMT +0300
(which was 1:14 PM in the tropics where I live) Andrey G. Sergeev
(AKA Andris) postulated:
AGSAA> I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA> directly (e.g. mailbo
Hello all,
I'm curious to know if anyone is using (or has tried to) the manual
re-thread script that I explained... a couple of weeks ago?. If so, how
does it work for you? Have you done any changes to improve it or fine
tune it?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> But the inbox arrangement is not working. TM cannot "see" what is
> in TB!. (Nor does hitting TM's 'retrieve' operate TB!'s retrieve
> function, although I'm less concerned about that.)
> Any idea what might be keeping these children from playi
Hello!
I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
---[Cut]---
[andris@strigidae scripts]$ host mail.tp.ru.
mail.tp.ru has address 80.80.100.216
mail.tp.ru mail is handled (pri=5) by tp.aaanet.ru
[andris
Hi Kenneth,
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:37:43 -0500 "Kenneth S. Rhee"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone get the error message--"invalid argument for date encoded"
> when you start the BAT?
Many before ...
> Any possible solutions?
A _working_ wolution is to delete all address book entries you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kenneth,
@05-Feb-2003, 12:25 -0500 (17:25 UK time) Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP>> This happens when you have imported addresses from the OE
MDP>> address book and allowed it to import Birth Dates too.
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:22:00 PM, you wrote:
MDP> This happens when you have imported addresses from the OE address
MDP> book and allowed it to import Birth Dates too.
MDP> One thing -
Incomplete message?
Anyway, when I uncheck the vcf option in the preference menu, the
er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kenneth,
@05-Feb-2003, 11:37 -0500 (16:37 UK time) Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
KSR> Has anyone get the error message--"invalid argument for date
KSR> encoded" when you start the BAT?Any possible solu
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:42:03 -0600 GMT (05/02/03, 23:42 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> Yes, it is. For some reason, TB does not correctly store the UIDL of
>> the mails already downloaded, if you delete messages on server.\
> Actually, UIDL is an optional part to POP3, whi
I have started using a program called "Time Matters" (ver. 4). It has
an e-mail component, which in turn has a few ways of working. One of
the ways is to interact with the user's alternative MAPI-compliant
e-mail client. In this mode, e-mail sent out of Time Matters becomes
processed in that pro
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, 15:45:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just wondered whether any anti-spam programs are out there which
> integrate with TB! or failing that, good unobtrusive anti-spam programs?
I use SpamAssassin (yes, in Windows). It's free and pretty powerful. Very
configurab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
>> When I am downloading mail from the server, if the process gets
>> timed out or my connection drops before the session is complete the
>> next time I attempt to download it always starts ov
Has anyone get the error message--"invalid argument for date encoded"
when you start the BAT?Any possible solutions?
Thanks.
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Mark Partous wrote...
> While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
> A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> with a BCC to my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]), my wife ([
Hello Artemich,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:53 +0100 GMT (05/02/03, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Artemich wrote:
> When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename filter.
> Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
> like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
Hi Jurgen,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:42:48 +0100 Jurgen Haug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hallo Fledermäuse,
Nice ... what do you think how (in percent of readers) understand your
greeting on this list?
> sorry to ask here,
No. You _know_ your question is off-topic, you even mark the subject
acord
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:01:55 +0100
Mark Partous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MP>>> When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP>>> is no problem.
RO>> I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
> You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
Hi Eddie,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:16:00 +0100
Eddie Castelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have you tried with an other Version such as v1.63b5 or so?
Is there any reason why somebody who requests on TBUDL should give the
current Beta a try _before_ anybody has stated it could have that
problem sol
Hi Miguel,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
MAU> Hello Gerard,
>> Do they remove dupes without asking or is TB! the cause of the dupes?
MAU> No, TB is not the cause of dupes, at least of the ones I have verified.
I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox a
Hello Gerard,
> Do they remove dupes without asking or is TB! the cause of the dupes?
No, TB is not the cause of dupes, at least of the ones I have verified.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current v
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 1:47:42 PM, you wrote:
MP>> When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP>> is no problem.
RO> I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
"When I send such an
Hallo Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:28:52 +0100GMT (5-2-03, 12:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MP> While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
MP> I receive one message, the one to myself, I suppose.
That would be logical.
MP> When I look on the server, I find 2 more messages, both to f.i.
M
Hallo Fledermäuse,
sorry to ask here, but you guys seem all to be so advanced in
programming, that the answer will be one shot for you.
I want to learn a programming language, which one should I take? I
have some basic knowledge (used to program in GFA-Basic on my old Amiga,
can do HTML, CSS, Java
ON Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:05:43 PM, you wrote:
c> The need for kill dupes arises because I use IMAP and there's
c> nothing in TB that would sync all the messages back and forth. May
c> be I should use POP with it till ver 2.0 comes out...
I have been using it as well and found t
Dear Mark,
--->>> Mark Partous / Mittwoch, 05.02.2003, 12:28:52
BCC
> While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
> [...]
> Result:
> I receive one message [...]
> When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there is
> no problem.
> Any idea what's going on?
ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@5-Feb-2003, 12:59 +0100 (11:59 UK time) Mark Partous [MP] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MP> Tried, but did not find a way to automaticaly drain Emails from
MP> people belonging to the same group, to 1 map.
I use the "Ad
Hello Bats,
Tried, but did not find a way to automaticaly drain Emails from people
belonging to the same group, to 1 map.
If this is possible, what if someone belongs to more than 1 group?
--
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
Hello Bats,
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a BCC to
my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]),
my wife ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and myself again,
but now to an external address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Result
Hi Thomas,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 2:58:47 PM, you wrote:
TF> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:05:03 +0530 GMT (05/02/03, 14:35 +0700 GMT),
TF> chinchi wrote:
>> How reliable is the 'kill dupes' command in TB? I have seen it
>> delete messages that weren't really dupes at all, even tho TB says
Hi,
When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename filter.
Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
Does anybody know how to rename this filter back?
Tanks in advance.
--
Artiom Koren
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rob [R] wrote:'
R> So what's the best way to install it for every user ; just import the
R> registry file again for every user
Yes.
R> or is there a better way ??
As far as I know, this is the on
Hi,
i just installed Windows 2000 Pro on my system - as the 2nd OS, so i can
now dual-boot ... Linux will follow later ;-)
Of course i wanted to move TB to Win2K, so i exported the RIT registry
settings in Win98, installed TB in Win2K, after changing the C: to D: in
all paths imported the regist
Hello chinchi,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:05:03 +0530 GMT (05/02/03, 14:35 +0700 GMT),
chinchi wrote:
> How reliable is the 'kill dupes' command in TB? I have seen it
> delete messages that weren't really dupes at all, even tho TB says
> that it deletes messages with the same ID and it's n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert,
@5-Feb-2003, 08:45 +0200 (06:45 UK time) Robert Golovniov said:
> What are the anti-smap plugins available for The Bat!?
Right now these are in development for the new Beta and are
discussed on the TBDEV mailing list.
- --
Cheers -- .\
Hello Richard,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 01:34:08 -0500 GMT (05/02/03, 13:34 +0700 GMT),
Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
> When I am downloading mail from the server, if the process gets timed
> out or my connection drops before the session is complete the next time
> I attempt to download it always starts
ON Tuesday, February 4, 2003, 2:35:37 PM, you wrote:
S> I have an AB template
S> for that list, which when I MANUALLY forward a message to it,
S> also applies the BCC for the friend. If I let the filter handle
S> it, the BCC address to the friend DOESN'T get included.
Hi Spike,
I assume you not
> Your problem is, TB! isn't getting chance to send the QUIT message to
> the server, as you get kicked off. This results in the clean up
> process not happening. Apart from using the Mail Dispatcher, and the
> "Kill Dupes" option, there isn't much you can do without sorting out
> your connection p
Hi,
Will the filter for deleting messages on the server work with IMAP
servers if the messages are in Inbox and not any other folders?
--
Best regards,
chinchi
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.co
59 matches
Mail list logo
