O Oracles of TB!
One of my users has reported that pictures embedded in some HTML
email he has received are appearing much larger in TB than in
'other' email clients. The pictures in question are relative large
jpegs.
Anyone know why these images are appearing extremely large in TB!,
Hi
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve any beneficial purpose to sort the filters according
to their relative usage to 'streamline' the inbox
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 6:26:17 AM, William Moore wrote:
I changed the partition structure so when I restored TB! files I had to
point TB! to the new paths. No problem. Unfortunately I seem to have
'lost' all my Smart Bat entries :-( TB! is still looking for them on
(and trying to write new
Hello Julian
Thank you for your email dated Monday, July 28, 2003, 8:45:17 AM,
in which you wrote:
Unfortunately I seem to have 'lost' all my Smart Bat entries
JBL all you need to do is right click on the SmartBat Window,
JBL choose New Pad, and then browse to the new location of your smartbat
On Sun 27-Jul-03 6:04pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
AFAIK, No
Hello Bill,
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string bill mccarthy OR string
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you get a match with any or both.
However, if
Some time around 7/27/2003 22:23:11, I think I heard Thomas Fernandez say:
I do not remember when the behaviour was changed (because that was not
added to the changelog), but I think it works this way even in the
(old) Beta you have.
Thanks for the info. :-) I have just set one account from
omputers.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
X-Tblist-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2003 08:28:00.0810 (UTC) FILETIME=[2811C0A0:01C354E2]
X-Bayesian-Result: Clean
omputers.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
X-Tblist-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2003 08:28:49.0793 (UTC) FILETIME=[4543F710:01C354E2]
X-Bayesian-Result: Clean
Hi there!
I am still fighting the problem of invisible e-mails. Some E-Mails I
receive are automatically shown as an empty message in the HTML
viewer.
Switching to plain text I see a few words of the message, roundabout
50 characters, then it stops.
Any idea what's causing this or how this
Hello Stuart,
omputers.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
X-Tblist-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2003 08:28:00.0810 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2811C0A0:01C354E2]
Hi,
When I reply to a message any quoted text is not wrapped. Is there a
way to have this automatically wrapped?
--
William
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
@28-Jul-2003, 17:03 +0930 (08:33 UK time) David McIver [DM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The:
DM Anyone know why these images are appearing extremely large in
DM TB!, and not in other email clients?
At a guess, it would be because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi William,
@28-Jul-2003, 11:55 William Sigmund [WS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
WS When I reply to a message any quoted text is not wrapped. Is
WS there a way to have this automatically wrapped?
There is a recursive rewrap macro on the TBFAQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mau,
@28-Jul-2003, 13:00 +0200 (12:00 UK time) MAU [M] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stuart:
omputers.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: X-Tblist-Id:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Marck,
Stuart's messages are filtered by Allie Martin's system to strip off
a rather large disclaimer that is put onto them by Stuart's Company
mail server.
It's looks to me as if the filter is messing up when the References
header gets too big... Just a guess.
Ah, I forgot about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Mciver, [DM] wrote:
DM One of my users has reported that pictures embedded in some HTML
DM email he has received are appearing much larger in TB than in
DM 'other' email clients. The pictures in question are relative large
DM jpegs.
Ok.
DM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mau,
@28-Jul-2003, 13:17 +0200 (12:17 UK time) MAU [M] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
It's looks to me as if the filter is messing up when the
References header gets too big... Just a guess.
M Ah, I forgot about Allie's filter. It
Hello MAU,
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hi Bat! Fans,
I received the following message in the bottom window (Log Panel) on the failure
of a send:-
28-July-2003, 13:45:56: SEND - Some messages were not sent - check
the log for details
So I looked in the log for the details (Shift Ctrl A) and saw the
exact same message.
Where do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mau, [M] wrote:
M Something is wrong with your last two messages. As you can see, part
M of the headers appear in the body. Actually, this is how your message
M (header included) looks:
It's not Stuart's fault.
I've been processing his messages for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck, [M] wrote:
M It may be the first time Stuart has replied to a thread that goes
M that deep! :-).
It's the first time Stuart's mail is being sent by a different server.
:)
It's now time to implement your suggestion and have MDaemon do the
On Monday, July 28, 2003 at 11:52 AM, Christian wrote:
I am still fighting the problem of invisible e-mails. Some E-Mails I
receive are automatically shown as an empty message in the HTML
viewer.
Switching to plain text I see a few words of the message, roundabout
50 characters, then it
Hello tbudl,
how to color code msg as per filter..
new to the bat 1.62r
thanks in advance
--
Best regards,
P.K.Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
I am still fighting the problem of invisible e-mails. snip
T You wouldn't happen to be using Popfile, would you? I had a similar
T problem and it ended up being a problem with Popfile. I submitted a
T bug report and was told by the Popfile developers that it would be
T fixed for the next
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M Something is wrong with your last two messages. As you can see, part of
M the headers appear in the body.
Allie tells me that all is well again.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available
On Mon 28-Jul-03 6:13am -0400, MAU wrote:
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string bill mccarthy OR string
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you get a match
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
P.K.Roy (Fd), [PKR] wrote:
PKR how to color code msg as per filter.. new to the bat 1.62r thanks
PKR in advance
Under the actions tab of the filter rule configuration, there's an option
to 'Set the message's colour group to..'.
You can setup your
On Mon 28-Jul-03 7:39am -0400, MAU wrote:
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to
Hello tbudl,
testing
--
Best regards,
P.K.Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PKRF testing
Testing what, dear?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... 670 Approximate number of the Beast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Hemming, [SH] wrote:
PKRF testing
SH Testing what, dear?
Messages to the list including his, aren't reaching him.
The listserv logs do say that messages are being successfully delivered
to his address. I notified him about this so he's
Hello Bill,
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to work as a concatenation operator. I sent an
email to myself and filtered for a sender of bill mccarthy (without
the quotes) - it did not work. Can you provide an example that
Hello Bill,
Hmm, so '' is a concatenation operator in TB. Is that documented
anywhere?
No, it is not and, obviously, it is not documented. See my other reply
to you.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stuart,
@28-Jul-2003, 14:57 Stuart Hemming [SH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PKRF testing
SH Testing what, dear?
Poor Mr/s. Roy hasn't yet seen a posting come from TBUDL. The logs say
they're being sent, s/he just never sees them.
- --
Hello Stuart,
Allie tells me that all is well again.
It is :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM Messages to the list including his, aren't reaching him.
OIC
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... My opinions may have changed, but not the fact
Hello Colin,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:40:20 +0100 GMT (28/07/03, 14:40 +0700 GMT),
Colin Turner wrote:
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve
Hello John,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:48:14 +1000 GMT (28/07/03, 18:48 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
28-July-2003, 13:45:56: SEND - Some messages were not sent - check
the log for details
So I looked in the log for the details (Shift Ctrl A) and saw the
exact same message.
Where do I
Hello fellows,
On Friday, May 30, 2003, 0:33:29, Me wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
C Problem comes using template macro and/or command prompt parameter
C A to attach the file via:
C %ATTACHFILE=Z:\msgfile.msg in template
C or
C thebat.exe
Hello all,
I know this has been discussed in the past, and probably several times,
but I would like to insist once more:
Take a message received with these header lines
...
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Sender: Cristina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
From: support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
If I
Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit that header so
it appears the way the sender intended?
--
JN
I do not seem to have a problem with replies wrapping correctly, but I
just tried to forward an html message, and it didn't wrap. The only
part I need to wrap is the message body of the forwarded message; my
present macro reproduces some of the sender information from the
incoming message into the
Hello Joseph,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:10:55 -0500 GMT (28/07/03, 22:10 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph N., [JN] wrote:
JN Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
JN trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
JN modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit that header
JN so it
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 11:47 AM, you wrote:
AM Most spam filters offer a less obtrusive way of indicating that messages
AM are in fact spam. One such way is to add header entries to the messages.
AM You can then use a Kludge filter to pick up the added header.
AM For example with spampal,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC this is what I have setup, BUT it also stopped the spam filter from
PC working in TB. Since I don't use the subject to define spam, but the
PC x-headers, it moves the spam to a new folder ( not inbox) and the spam
PC
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:07 PM, you wrote:
AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AM Hash: SHA1
AM Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC this is what I have setup, BUT it also stopped the spam filter from
PC working in TB. Since I don't use the subject to define spam, but the
PC x-headers, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC If I put it below, then it would come into my inbox, and I wouldn't know
PC spampal had called it spam, since I don't change the subject. If I
PC manually read it, and send it to spamcop, then I don't need spampal do
PC If I put it below, then it would come into my inbox, and I wouldn't know
PC spampal had called it spam, since I don't change the subject. If I
PC manually read it, and send it to spamcop, then I don't need spampal do
PC I?
AM Why don't you have the filter move the message to a spam folder?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC ok, if I used Spamcop filter, yes, I read the mail message,
PC determine that it is spam, CTRL-ALT-S to send AND move it to a SPAM
PC folder. This requires me reading the message, determining it is
PC spam, and dealing
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:40 PM, you wrote:
AM Hmmm. I think you're doing too much. SpamPal will work well enough
AM alone. It can be made to use the SpamCop blacklisted IP list anyway.
AM Personally, I don't use SpamCop's IP list because there I get too many
AM false positives.
actually I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear John,
JP So I looked in the log for the details (Shift Ctrl A) and saw the
JP exact same message.
JP Where do I find the so called details?
The point of this message is to get you into the log full view when
you see it in the bottom log combo...
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC actually I am using popfile and I created a TB filter using the :
PC X-Text-Classification: spam
PC as the filter, and I haven't had a false-positive yet.
Ok. Then. My suggestion is to stop using SpamCop to help
Hello Everyone!
I forgot my PGP passphrase, so I deleted the old pair of keys and
created a new pair. But now The Bat! says in an error message: You do
not have an OpenPGP private key. Create it first!
I can see the new keys plainly when I bring up the keyring from the
tray. Can anyone help with
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 2:44 PM, you wrote:
PC On Monday, July 28, 2003, 2:26 PM, you wrote:
PC X-Text-Classification: spam
PC as the filter, and I haven't had a false-positive yet.
AM Ok. Then. My suggestion is to stop using SpamCop to help detect spam and
AM use only POPfile. It'll work
28-Jul-2003 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JP Where do I find the so called details?
The point of this message is to get you into the log full view when
you see it in the bottom log combo...
I remember that my former mailer Ak-Mail logged pop/smtp server
communication (commands like HELO,
Mum,
I've put all the pictures on a CD along with some music from Ray's
band - the Swing Commanders!
Enjoy
Love
__
Tony Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tonybro.com
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 3:58 PM, you wrote:
hm, can I be the first to guess folder template???
TB Mum,
TB I've put all the pictures on a CD along with some music from Ray's
TB band - the Swing Commanders!
TB Enjoy
TB Love
--
Paul
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Paul,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 2:05:29 PM, you wrote:
PC hm, can I be the first to guess folder template???
Ok, you get a cookie... ;-)
TB I've put all the pictures on a CD along with some music from
TB Ray's band - the Swing Commanders!
Are the Swing Commanders any good?
TB Love
We love
Hello Allie,
Miguel, aka MAU, will attest to POPfiles 99.99% accuracy. ;) ;) ;)
Only 99.74% Allie :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
28-Jul-2003 22:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel, aka MAU, will attest to POPfiles 99.99% accuracy. ;) ;) ;)
Only 99.74% Allie :-)
What, it hasn't gotten any better since last time? Lme! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Hello John fellow Batters,
On or about Monday, July 28, 2003 at 21:48:14GMT +1000 (which was 6:48
AM in the tropics where I live) John Phillips posted:
JP Where do I find the so called details?
I would be VERY interested in an option to turn on/off DETAILED
logging.
I am not a programmer, but
Hello Alexander,
What, it hasn't gotten any better since last time? Lme! ;-)
Of course it has. Last time it was way down to 99.73% ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is
On Monday, July 28, 2003, Allie Martin wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Most spam filters offer a less obtrusive way of indicating that
AM messages are in fact spam. One such way is to add header entries
AM to the messages.
AM You can then use a Kludge filter to pick up the added header.
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 3:23:18 PM, you wrote:
I am receiving masses of spam emails every day through my inbox. I
have gone into the specials tools and set lots and lots of filters to
capture this rubbish. But the next mail-out just comes to me without
filtering out what I don't want.
Definite agreement here. A way to toggle verbose logging on would be
the most useful addition I could think of for TB.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current version is 1.62r | Using
Paul-
Monday, July 28, 2003, 1:14:54 PM, you wrote:
TB I've put all the pictures on a CD along with some music from
TB Ray's band - the Swing Commanders!
LG Are the Swing Commanders any good?
How about a url for Swing Commanders mp3s?
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000
Granville Cousins writes:
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
If you're using a POP mailbox (not IMAP), use POPFile. Then you only need
one spam filter in TB to remove anything POPFile has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph N., [JN] wrote:
JN ... The problem is that the business-related MUA can filter only by
JN sender, recipient, or subject. So if I set SpamPal not to modify the
JN subject line, then my business app wouldn't be able to filter out
JN the spam.
I
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 7:45:08 PM, Granville Cousins wrote:
GC How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
GC the email address or the subject line being identical on each
GC mail-out.
You could use something like Popfile or Spampal, something which looks
at what's
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:59:23 -0400 GMT (29/07/03, 01:59 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
PC besides that, I have actually gotten replies from ISPs when I sent a
PC spam to spamcop. I thought we were supposed to be anonymous using
PC spamcop. Unfortunately I believe I have gotten
Hello Joseph,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:49:20 -0500 GMT (29/07/03, 05:49 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
My business e-mail goes into a primitive MUA that is a component of a
not-primitive practice management database.
You don't seem to have any choice here. But out of curiosity: what
kind of
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:52:42 -0700 GMT (29/07/03, 06:52 +0700 GMT),
Mark Wieder wrote:
TB I've put all the pictures on a CD along with some music from
TB Ray's band - the Swing Commanders!
LG Are the Swing Commanders any good?
How about a url for Swing Commanders mp3s?
I thought
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:23:11 +0700 GMT (28/07/03, 09:23 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:08:37 -0400 GMT (28/07/03, 01:08 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
TF So I think TB should also keep the UIDs of message that have already
TF been downloaded if
75 matches
Mail list logo
