Re: Search missing some msgs in 2.10.3

Hello Steve, On Sat, 1 May 2004 11:12:14 +1000 GMT (01/05/2004, 08:12 +0700 GMT), Steve Mullarkey wrote: SM Upgraded from from 2.10.1 to 2.10.3 and find that Search function is SM missing many msgs. I was searching All folders for a Sender/Receiver SM match. It found some but not all msgs. I

Re: Reading Chinese characters in email client under English Win 98.

Hello Ryooki, On Sat, 1 May 2004 00:25:28 + (UTC) GMT (01/05/2004, 07:25 +0700 GMT), Ryooki wrote: R I can read Chinese characters when I'm using Outlook Express. I'm just R wondering if The Bat! is able to do the same as Outlook. :) Seems like a lot of R work to just read the Chinese

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Jan, On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:21:11 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 03:21 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: I disagree. It is easy for me to just click the unread tab. I was advised earlier that I create create a virutal foder that does the same. I choose the tab. JR IMO, not too much easier

Re: Any XRay users can answer this q?

ON Friday, April 30, 2004, 12:31:48 AM, you wrote: MG Have intalled XRay to switch SMTP servers. MG What should the local and the remote port numbers be? Hi Marten, Remote is the port of the SMTP server of your ISP. Normally this is 25. The local port number is the number you specify in TB!

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Cut mark)

Hallo Marck, On Sat, 1 May 2004 10:06:33 +0100GMT (1-5-04, 11:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MDP Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make MDP any difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being MDP courteous to other readers since at least three

Re: Mod: Cut mark

Dear Roelof, @1-May-2004, 11:33 +0200 (01-May 10:33 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... snip RO Just consider this as an academic matter, because IMNSHO anybody RO using MIME PGP to avoid a cut mark is a genuine nut case. Just RO consider the difference in

Re: Eek! A Bat HTML (hyperlink) question!

Hello Melissa, When I move the mouse pointer over the link, the little hand shows up as if it's a clickable link, but when I click on it, nothing happens. Have you tried to click a second or third time? I seem to recall some people complaining about the first click not working. Although I

Spampal and Mygate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm posting this here as I feel it's a general rather than Beta question. I've tried with all sorts of settings and just can't get SpamPal to recognise Mygate at all. In Mygate I have my NNTP server as port 119 and I've set up a POP3 port of

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Dwight, Yes, I think it is very helpful. One has a list of all folders with unread messages, no matter how deeply buried in the account list tree, That's it. :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03

Re[2]: Search missing some msgs in 2.10.3

Hi Thomas, On Sat, 1 May 2004, at 12:52:03 [GMT +0700] (which was 3:52 PM on Saturday, 1 May 2004 [GMT +1000] where I live) you wrote: TF Hello Steve, TF On Sat, 1 May 2004 11:12:14 +1000 GMT (01/05/2004, 08:12 +0700 GMT), TF Steve Mullarkey wrote: SM Upgraded from from 2.10.1 to 2.10.3

many messages in account (Backup fails)

Hi, How many messages do you have in your TheBat!-mailaccounts? I have reached 26 mails in one account (yes, a quarter million) and though I can back it up, I can't restore it on my notebook, I always get error reading file C:\path\to\backup.tbk Is there a limit of size of a backupfile or the

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

Hi Thomas. At 2:15 AM on Saturday, May 01, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR Personally, I wish RIT would make it an option JR or excise it. It is indeed an option. Main menu: View / Folder Tabs. JR Indeed, it is not. The

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Jody, Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote: do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.10 on

Re: s/mime problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:22:19 +0200 (1:22 PM here), Peter Meyns [PM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PM I don't really know. It seems to work as usual here. I'd PM scrutinize the settings in Account » Properties » General » Edit PM personal

NEW Template Macro Plug-In : VED-VER 1.00

Hi, I've made available a plug-in to complement TB! + VEDIT users. Nothing fancy, but useful if perhaps you're a user of the file/disk/text editor Vedit. Basically the plug-in/vdm macro combination fetches version, serial number and revision date information from any of the three versions of

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

E-Mail Message ~~ From: Dave Gorman Date: Saturday, May 01, 2004 at 7:41 AM Subject: Re: IMAP rules .. _ _\/_ o/\o DG Hello Jody, DG Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote: do incoming rules

Re: Search missing some msgs in 2.10.3

Hello Steve, On Sat, 1 May 2004 20:39:12 +1000 GMT (01/05/2004, 17:39 +0700 GMT), Steve Mullarkey wrote: SM I do a search in 2.10.1 and get 'x' msgs. I upgrade to 2.10.3, do an SM identical search and get far less than 'x' msgs. I see. I didn't try that one. Sounds bad. -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Jan, On Sat, 1 May 2004 07:47:07 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 18:47 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: I cannot follow you. It is an ooption, yes it is. But you want to use it anyway. And say later on that the feature is redundant. But you don't want to use the option to turn it off. Hm? JR

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

Hello Thomas, On Sun, 2 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF Then just switch it off. That was my point. Then it won't take up TF space, it will be gone. Or is there something I'm not getting? Other TF tabs are uneffected by the setting for the unread tab. JR For you it's useful. That

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Richard, On Sat, 1 May 2004 19:40:52 +0100 GMT (02/05/2004, 01:40 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: TF It is. Opt out by going to View / Folder Tabs in the main menu and TF take the tickmark off. RW But the trouble is that it stops viewing of all virtual folder tabs too. RW There's only

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

Hello Thomas, On Sun, 2 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF But there are TF no tabs left, not even the all tab, when I switch it off. You're absolutely right! I must have wanted to have seen the ALL tab but they all go as you say. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.10.03

Re[2]: Spampal and Mygate

Hello Martin, On Sat, 1 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MW POP3 110 (ISP) MW SpamPal 110 (SpamPal local proxy 127.0.0.1) MW Mygate 110 (gate 127.0.0.1) 1100 (local server 127.0.0.1) MW TB! 1100 (127.0.0.1) Well, as far as I can see those are the settings I have although POP3 is 119

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Jody, Saturday, May 1, 2004, 11:13:22 AM, you wrote: do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? DG No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this DG point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. Sad ... because I for one would

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello MAU, Friday, April 30, 2004, 4:28:12 PM, MAU wrote: M Redundancy. What does it mean? ;-) see http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionaryva=Redundancyx=17y=21 -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Re[4]: Spampal and Mygate

Hello Martin, On Sat, 1 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MW It's more likely to be this... MW NNTP 119 (ISP) Yes, that's what it's set to. MW Mygate 110 (gate 127.0.0.1) Can't do that as my TB! mail account uses that so I've set up a 4 number (1700) gate. MW SpamPal 110

Re:IMAP rules ..

Hi Dave, But I, and several others on this list, are quite frustrated with the snail's pace with which RITLabs is approaching IMAP improvements. Tell you what. Go to Ritlab's website and try and find references to TB and IMAP. While you're there , try and find the forum, too. As I recall there

Re: Eek! A Bat HTML (hyperlink) question!

Hi, On Friday, April 30, 2004, at 10:46:28 PM PST, I wrote: I wonder if anyone would like to send me, via private email, a message formatted with HTML that includes such a hyperlink? Perhaps there's just something wrong with how my viewer is handling them? Several of you were kind enough to

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Hello all, Saturday, May 1, 2004, Dave Gorman wrote: do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. new filtering system is under development

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

Hi Thomas. At 2:15 PM on Saturday, May 01, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR There is *only* one tab I am referring to in this thread it is the JR built in tab -- 'unread'. That is not an option. JR I like the tab feature as

Re[6]: Spampal and Mygate

Hello Martin, On Sat, 1 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MW What are you running on localhost:110? Actually nothing on localhost 110 as my TB! mail account is [EMAIL PROTECTED] MW To summarise using different MW ports (use whatever you like): MW NNTP feed (hostname:119) - Yes MW

Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

So far, the best approach I have found thus far for TB is the Bayes Filter Plugin (by Achim Winkler) plus SpamBayes. TB plus the BFP runs at 19 megs of RAM; SpamBayes (using the same training data, more than 3,000 spam and 3,000 ham) uses just 11 megs. I used POPfile for a long time, but it

Re: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

On Sat, 01 May 2004 20:49:31 -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote: So far, the best approach I have found thus far for TB is the Bayes Filter Plugin (by Achim Winkler) plus SpamBayes. [etc] Just wondering why everyone seems so obsessed with Bayesian filtering. I'm using SpamPal. which has the

Re: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

So far, I'm happy with the built-in BayesIT filter in TheBat! but another tool that combines DNSBL with RegEx filters and Bayesian filtering is SpamCombat. The only downside is that it doesn't run as a proxy, so in between filtering in SpamCombat and opening TheBat! and getting your messages,

Re:Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

Hi Arjan, I'm using SpamPal. which has the added benefits of DNSBL lookups and Spamassassin based regular expression filtering. Me too. AND with the Bayesian plugin detection rates are so close to 100% as not to matter. Maybe two spam mails a week make it through to my inbox. Works

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Greg, On Sat, 1 May 2004 15:18:20 -0500 GMT (02/05/2004, 03:18 +0700 GMT), Greg Strong wrote: M Redundancy. What does it mean? ;-) GS see GS http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionaryva=Redundancyx=17y=21 I don't think he meant it as a question, as it's the same word in

Re:Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

Hi Jonathan, TB plus the BFP runs at 19 megs of RAM; SpamBayes (using the same training data, more than 3,000 spam and 3,000 ham) uses just 11 megs. I've just looked at my SpamPal memory usage - just over 6Mb peak memory usage on a WinXp machine! -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.10.01

Re: Uread Message Tab

Hello Jan, On Sat, 1 May 2004 18:01:56 -0400 GMT (02/05/2004, 05:01 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: Then just switch it off. That was my point. Then it won't take up space, it will be gone. Or is there something I'm not getting? Other tabs are uneffected by the setting for the unread tab.