Hallo Allister,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:15:13 +1200GMT (25-6-2005, 1:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AJ stem from having a shared mail folder. An implication is that I should
AJ re-install using the defaults. To get this to work on the second
AJ Windows account would, in theory, require a
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:19:04 +0100 GMT (25/06/2005, 08:19 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I would have no objections against a beep, though.
M Perhaps you would be kind enough to support
M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4829
Done.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Mit einem Kostuemball kann
Hello Mica,
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:47:39 +0200 GMT (24/06/2005, 18:47 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM Pardon my Chinese, I'll try with less challeng{ing|ed?} English this
MM time. (-:
Thanks, I appreciate your efforts. :-)
My brain just doesn't work like a computer, it needs human syntax
Hello Robin Anson everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 05:17 you (Robin Anson) wrote:
It can't be moved easily, but it can be moved. Here is a Microsoft
Knowledge Base article that addresses it.
Thank you. I know that article. :) Its either re-installing Windows, or
going thru lengthy and
Hello Allister Jenks everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 01:15 you (Allister Jenks) wrote:
Hence my point earlier that TB! is NOT multi-user aware (in a Windows
sense).
Given your criteria, no program is multiuser aware, because they all use
their own set of settings for each user that logs on
When version 3.5 was released, I installed it and tried it for 3 days
before deciding that it was unusable with my setup (Courier IMAP
server).
So I reverted to version 3.0.1.33 (which I'd been using with no major
problems since it was released).
Since then, in one account I have had a phantom
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:50:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
ASK Given your criteria, no program is multiuser aware, because they all use
ASK their own set of settings for each user that logs on (IE, OE, Outlook,
ASK Opera, Firefox are all perfectly multi-user aware, and they are not when
ASK you look
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 7:50:18 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO You don't have to install TB again.
RO TB's registry entries are created by executing the program, so it
RO suffices to run TB after you've deleted its entries from the registry.
Ah! Another snippet. See, when I was first trying to solve
Hello Allister Jenks everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 13:42 you (Allister Jenks) wrote:
I want what I want because of the way TB! has been working by default.
The fact that it now has different defaults didn't help me when I
followed RIT's instructions and installed new versions over old.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 25 Jun 2005,
@ @ at 16:33:38 +0700, when Thomas Fernandez wrote:
My brain just doesn't work like a computer, it needs human syntax
for communication. Thanks for your kind
Hello Alexander S. Kunz,
Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:00:24 PM, you wrote:
ASK How much of a total message is the subject line? Train your Bayes Filter,
ASK and it'll adapt to that. May take a week or so, though.
Will look into that!
ASK Which spam filter is that?
The Achim Winkler flavor Bayes
Hello Mark Partous,
Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:49:54 PM, you wrote:
MP Hello qe3ee,
MP Friday, June 24, 2005, 7:44:08 PM, you wrote:
q I fear I have to start all over again train that @#%3!Ϥ filter again...
q Is there a shortcut getting back on track?
MP FWIW, since a couple of days 100%
Hello Mica,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:35:07 +0200 GMT (25/06/2005, 21:35 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM Mine doesn't work this way either. (-: I am sorry if my message was
MM hard to read for you, I simply wanted to give more informations
MM using less space/bytes/bits/nibbles/time.
Try,
Hello Tim,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:46:06 +1000 GMT (25/06/2005, 17:46 +0700 GMT),
Tim wrote:
T Since then, in one account I have had a phantom message. This account
T continually shows 1 unread message, even when there is nothing new. It
T is my listmail account (the one I Use for this and all
14 matches
Mail list logo
