MACRO list in TB! help file

Hello TBUDL, Does anyone know whether the MACRO list in the latest help file distributed with TB! is current and exhaustive? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #12276. Who Wen Dig Eros? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version

Re: TB Hangs

Defaults. Settings in FF: http://privateofcourse.co.uk/share/tb_hang_02.png HTH -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #29589. Now Shew Dig Ore? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: TB Hangs

way exactly? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24384. Woe Rig New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TB Hangs

, and if I'd understood it first off I'd have laughed then, and it wouldn't have taken until after you'd explained it to me ;-) Greetings from a Comodo/Nod32 user (on 2 PC's, that is, the other 5 have KIS (Kaspersky) installed). :-D I'm still a cheapskate! -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #36968

Re: Headers and hyphens

Hello Robin, This is what you said on Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:14:58 +1000 your time: No, you need to use the macro %Setheader.(X-Newheader,string=n). The syntax you tried does not accept special characters (including -) That would explain it. Thankyou. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #35029. We Oho

Re: Headers and hyphens

surprised then that it hasn't bee changed given that the macro has been superseded. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 9578. We Go Sworn Hied? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Headers and hyphens

this but it breaks the macro at the hyphen, so the header isn't added and in the actual message body I see: -Newheader=string=n How do I get around this? Thanks. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 2577. I News Go Whored? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Protocol logging and date

that the hosting company could check their own logs. And as I've left TB! up and running for this purpose, it would have been good to be able to differentiate between days. There is not really any good reason not to add the date as well as the time to the logging. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 1989

Re: Protocol Logging: date in logs

Hello TBUDL, This is a duplicate thread, apologies. Been having problems with mail reaching the list. Please ignore this. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #12560. Wow E'er Nod Gish? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version

Re: Sorry: a test

already enabled. I've been receiving mail from the list today; mail I'd sent to the list a few days ago all suddenly got delivered to the list today and to me. Don't know why that is, just glad that things seem like they're back to 'normal'. :-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #30157. Win Show Gee Rod

Re: Protocol logging and date

could always request this under The Bat! wishes at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt and see what happens. Yes, I'll do that, thanks. 'No point sitting on my hands' ;-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #33301. Nod O'er Hew Wigs? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Protocol logging and date

Hello TBUDL, Is there any way to enable the date in the protocol logging logs? The time is displayed but no date. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 2419. Dor Weighs On We? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6

Re: Protocol logging and date

that the hosting company could check their own logs. And as I've left TB! up and running for this purpose, it would have been good to be able to differentiate between days. There is not really any good reason not to add the date as well as the time to the logging. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 1989

Protocol Logging: date in logs

Hello TBUDL, Is there any way to enable the date in the protocol logging logs? The time is displayed but no date. And also, is it possible to obfuscate the password in the logs, or prevent it from being shown? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #19147. Wen Owe Gird Soh? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro

Re: Sorry: a test

it was. Unfortunately, I'm still having problems. I'm recieving mail from the list but mail I send isn't getting to the list. Of course if this gets to the list it'll be luck. Think I'll have to email Marck. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #22754. Hie Grow Wed Son? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Sorting Office: Subfilters

it with the sub filters and activated continue process with other filters, just as an experiment. The filter below then worked and sorted the emails. So it's obviously of use for this reason. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

said: There are pluses and minuses to that. So I was referring to the visual pluses and minuses that you click to expand and minimise the folder tree. Yeah, I know! If you've got a load of nested folders of course it's a lot more clicking :-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods

Sorting Office: Subfilters

@ Continue processing other filters etc. Is this a 'proper' way to do it? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

until now. I dabbled a while back then reverted to a more 'traditional' set up. Old habits I suppose. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

. In fact, all my inboxes contain zero messages Yup, exactly the same here. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

and outgoing filtering and manually sorting / deleting other stuff that is left. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Sorting Office: Subfilters

it back :-D -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶     TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Sorry: a test

service reports no problems after I enquired. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 6352. Hewed Swoon Rig? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

(Privateofcourse) #12472. Row Wed Neo Gish? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Defining the increment method for extracted attachments

msg0012.WAV msg0013.WAV msg0014.WAV msg0015.WAV msg0016.WAV This is not useful in any respect. Anyone got any tips or suggestions? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 9025. We Row Snide Hog? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Inbox organisation: folders inside or outside?

to my related folders often become quite unwieldilyI do have to rein in and simplify. My wife says it's a curse...on her! lol -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #10340. Drew Go In Whose? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version

Duplicated and lost folders

. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #16829. His Now Owe Dreg? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

The Bat! and Avast's Antivirus plugin (AvBatEx.bav)

noticed these problems? There are no warnings to give you any indication that the problem exists, other than when checking account logs and manually doing a virus check within TB! -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #34643. Nog Ire Wows Edh? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: The Bat! and Avast's Antivirus plugin (AvBatEx.bav)

: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7639 -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #18733. Wow On Rids Ghee? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: anti-SPAM solutions

Hello Raymond and Jens, This is what you both said on Mon, 15 Jun 2009: AntispamSniper [...] Thanks, I'll take a look myself first, and then assess whether saying nothing would be better (for me) than suggesting it ;-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #23818. God Hews No Weir? ¶     TB! 4.2.4

Re: anti-SPAM solutions

, but there ya go ;-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #21123. Row Gown Die Hes? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: anti-SPAM solutions

keep having to update the filters in cPanel. But I've just been reading about the free Comodo AntiSpam software, which is a free challenge and response system. This 'looks' promising, and may be the solution I've been looking for my personal communications. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 9200. I

anti-SPAM solutions

suspect that for some this is better than nothing at all. I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #18866. Her Wow Gins Oed? ¶     TB! 4.2.4 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using

Re: Account tree at start up

! So removing the FolderTabs.CDB may fix the problem with TB! always expanding certain accounts, but it seems that some extra info is being stored elsewhere...in the registry perhaps. Not that I wish to drag this topic out needlessly. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #37362. Do New She Or Wig? ¶     TB

Re: Account tree at start up

information is actually stored somewhere and therefore can be deleted? -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #18103. Oed Iww Hog Erns? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: Account tree at start up

then deleted FolderTabs.CDB and launched TB! again. The same account tree and branches were expanded even after deleting the file. So it made no difference whatsoever deleting FolderTabs.CDB. So maybe the last state is saved some place else. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #23376. We Nows Dig Hero? ¶     TB

Re: reading confirmation

. Excellent, thanks for pointing that out. Couldn't find it for looking. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #10313. We God Whirs Eon? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: reading confirmation

Hello Stuart, This is what you said on Wed, 27 May 2009 18:47:16 -0500 your time: Account/Properties/Templates/READING confirmation/Set to Ignore Thanks for the directions. Brain not fully engaged, autofocus on the blink, and too little sleep... ;-) -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #3568. Hoe

Re: Account tree at start up

expanded, but I noticed that that behaviour stopped since TB 4.1.11. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #23802. Re-Do Hews Go Win? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

reading confirmation

are automatically generating a reading confirmation which is immediately queued in the SPAM account's outbox. I then have to empty the outbox, which is getting on my pip! Is there a surefire way to prevent TB! from creating these without any repetitive intervention? -- Simon (Privateofcourse

Re: Can I make folder creation default to NOT show unread messages in Mail Ticker?

on the folder's context menu...and it only took a few seconds. Thanks for the heads up, much appreciated! -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #13472. Inh Wows Go Reed? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: Can I make folder creation default to NOT show unread messages in Mail Ticker?

else. Regardless, that's something I'd like to see added under the 'New' context menu sub-menu...because out of habit I seem to look there first to create a new message when a folder is highlighted. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #35703. We He Sow Gid Ron? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: TB Application Hang

, for the sake of my blood pressure I think I'll just turn the option off ;-) FYI To turn off updating for extensions: Tools/Options/Advanced/Update -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #16004. How Grew Done Is? ¶     TB! 4.1.11 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Let's write an English manual for The Bat! that is suitable for printing

for errors and validated by other 'expert users'. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #19341. We Hnd Owes Giro? ¶     TB! 4.0.38 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.38.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: What's best version to upgrade to so that I can change folder properties? [WAS: Re: Disappearing messages in 4.0.34]

/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb403418.rar This folder issue is reported to have been fixed in beta 13, so I shall try this out as well. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #17848. Win Ergo Sew Hod? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current

Re: What's best version to upgrade to so that I can change folder properties? [WAS: Re: Disappearing messages in 4.0.34]

loading), not a beta (the link I got it from had it listed as a beta), and it warned me about converting all indexes before continuing... so I bailed out and reverted to the current stable release, coward that I am! Doh! -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #9243. He Won Gid Sower? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro

Re: No Roguemoticons updates?

there indefinitely. Obviously unable to finish the request. I'm surprised anyone else has managed it quite honestly. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #15888. We Goer Win Dohs? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0

Re: Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

' can answer this, because it is an infuriating bug. There's no official update as far as I am aware, although these things are often fixed in the betas, it could have been dealt with. If there's a beta with a fix I'll gladly install it. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #3117. Sorgo Hew Edwin? ¶     TB

Re: Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

, to ensure that email messages doesn't get left on an unecrypted partition again I've installed TB! to the TrueCrypt partition as well. At least if TB! decides to move my messages they will still remain inside the 'encrypted container' at shutdown. Still, very curious. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24802

Re: Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

for the moment then. And at least I know there's nothing else causing the problem. Experienced the same problem myself. Hope Ritlabs uploads a new install version soon. Ditto! Can't be having folders full of messages going AWOL. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #31770. Dor Go Wees Whin? ¶     TB

Re: Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #27727. Wig Weed On Rhos? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

and they are all between 19 and 20+ kb. I haven't backed up this last fortnight so I need to recover my messages...if at all possible. I have backups from before that, but these communications are important. This is a royal PITA! :-/ -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #1495. We Go Own Hiders? ¶     TB

Re: Very annoyed indeed: messages vanished

Hello Privateofcourse, Hmm, very curious. After hunting about I found the NEW location of the missing messages. I never thought to look in the TB! installation folder for these missing messages, but there they were, all 92MB of them, in their corresponding sub folders (four folders, each

Re: Confirm Receipt, Reading Confirmation

confirmation. So I'd say that this feature has become broken...well in TB! it is. Of course haven't tried sending to a another client. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #16192. Wow Hie Dong Res? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version

Re: One time encryption

in an insecure email...and it's just not good practice to do that IMO. Or am I worrying about nothing? Certainly not. I think it is completely sensible to think about these things and find solutions for them. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #27836. Woe Wig End Rhos? ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Threading by references and received time and Outlook

' which is by references and received time. Has anyone had this experience or similar? I've only just noticed this behaviour lately. It is very annoying I might add. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #1104. Qualm Dry Wore Sis ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: Threading by references and received time and Outlook

to recognise Outlook threading headers one day. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #2283. Squaw Led I Mrs Roy ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Threading by references and received time and Outlook

, and so forth... So, without Outlook providing and initial message-ID TB! won't thread the messages. I can of course thread by References and subject and received time and hope that the right messages are threaded together, but still... -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #1792. Arm Dress Wily Quo ¶     TB

Re: Threading by references and received time and Outlook

a downside, but I haven't come across it yet...although I'm sure someone will enlighten me if there is. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #609. Masque Slid Worry ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: Filters: Run External Process

when I do actually have the time to faff about with it. Your input appreciated though. Not beaten, just putting it on the back burner for the moment ;-) Cheers.. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #792. Lisa Qed Rum So Wry ¶     TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3

Re: TB getting slow, taking lots of memory (with lots of emails in store)

Hello Zeynel, Friday, September 17, 2004, 10:38:06 PM, you wrote: ...snip... ZAÖ I was submitted a wish about increasing speed of loading folders at ZAÖ startup, if anyone would like to support; Yes, that's a good idea, and something I've been thinking about as well. Let's face it, when