On Thursday, May 30, 2002, Vlad Petrusevich wrote...
>> There has been a couple of threads recently about the corruption/bad
>> handling of the history file used when sending emails. Try disabling
>> using the history when writing emails. Options - Preferences - System
>> - Autocomplete from: (r
Hi!
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, 2:09:52 PM, you wrote:
> There has been a couple of threads recently about the corruption/bad
> handling of the history file used when sending emails. Try disabling
> using the history when writing emails. Options - Preferences - System
> - Autocomplete from: (rem
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, Vlad Petrusevich wrote...
> When going New Message -> TO: -> History I got two error messages
> Address violation at address in module 'comctl32.dll'.
> and second in module 'user32.dll'
> While trying to enter an address not from address book I got a
>
Hi!
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, 2:22:25 PM, you wrote:
> I think due to the number of times this is coming up... might this not
> be a good idea to submit as a bug?
I sent it as a bug report to RitLabs. So we will see how soon they
will find a fix for it.
Vlad
=
Hi!
I experienced the similar problems running The Bat! 1.60m,
with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
When going New Message -> TO: -> History I got two error messages
Address violation at address in module 'comctl32.dll'.
and
second in module 'user32.dll'
While trying to enter an addr
Service Pack 2
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1-5-2002 at 0:45, Michael Disabato wrote:
H>>> Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR>> I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
> How about the new bugs? :)
Like I said: nothing new. ;)
Haico
_
l be in
ACM> the dialog that appears.
ACM> - --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
iQA/AwUBPM8i9j3ZlJQqDEkFEQKrpwCg/dHcFf1X9uGc33HFBo7CNdfKp1AAn0lm
dMWB41/fE8YEqYCMrAVfj6HJ
=377O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
/ Paul
___
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 5:17:32 PM, Ricardo scribbled:
H>> Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR> I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
How about the new bugs? :)
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 11.19, Haico decía:
>> Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
>> see 1.60h.
H> Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes
(Mar
On 30-4-2002 at 15:53, syv wrote:
Hi,
s>>> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s>>> file.
TM>> Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
> Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, Tim Musson wrote:
1.60h
s>> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s>> file.
TM> Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c
s/General, click on the "edit personal certificates"
JN> tab and, if necessary, import your Thawte certificate.
JN> JN
JN> Allie C Martin wrote on Monday, April 29, 2002:
/ Paul
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: h
Hey syv,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60h) Educational
to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 5:36:49 PM.
s> Hi tbudl,
s> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s> file.
Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:56 PM, you wrote:
ACM> Yes. The S/MIME keys are different from the PGP keys. You have to go
ACM> to a central authority and have them generate key pair/s for you. You
ACM> can follow the tutorial found here http://www.mi
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Mode
n Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Evans
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:12:56 AM, you wrote:
> I too had problems with h everytime I closed TB! it crashed and gave me an error
>message. Now back on C and all happy again
Yes I also got the same errors when exiting the Bat 1.60h including an
Invalid page fault and a r
______
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ope7ZRSEWYam/tFOmNwCeK/my
UtArADesICXL/1zurSyOfCQ=
=TLg/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Mode
·
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> iD8DBQE8zd/zOeQkq5KdzaARAjZuAJ9w+Ee7EIl+mLl2euQRSqGdL0Q36ACg5Hf0
> Sh4NQARYKtDim5Nzu3BpE4M=
> =zlkR
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> Current Ver: 1.60h
> FAQ: http://faq.theb
27;.
ACM> - --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPM34HdIjYUK2z54KEQIkgwCeNgKE8+rRAj+rOH9W9EPwkZz1ZXEAn3Y0
4Otp/HPAz0r6cz4h+iVxJ72O
=6I6q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
______
ct=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8zfe2V8nrYCsHF+IRArkKAKCE2gsVaym1x1QuT8iRFcZRwdZguACfWaJu
HDDbKMJwwZOdNId3J+fgBeI=
=DzUu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscr
I'm not having any trouble with vanishing messages, but periodically
over the past couple of days, TB (1.60h) seems unable to connect to
the server after a while. This is quickly remedied by disconnecting
and dialing up again.
Never had this problem before 'h', however, and w
gHcUM70i32JNFQ=
=VynS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
read it ?
LL> Hello Melissa,
LL> Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote:
Reese>> When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not
open any
Reese>> message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c
over
Reese>> 1.60h, all was back to normal.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8zfEyV8nrYCsHF+IRAn/yAJ9yscgnxnIoCKZFrYFMawDj3l1QdQCeJiep
kOw9yChLnG4vLW3JCYEajSU=
=IkUl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe:
SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPM3v8tIjYUK2z54KEQISOwCeJQXQ22R+kK9ZnP4hceeAJ5QntL4Anipb
LcRi2hTThbLbbkqE9k7M001U
=lk42
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ
2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8zd/zOeQkq5KdzaARAjZuAJ9w+Ee7EIl+mLl2euQRSqGdL0Q36ACg5Hf0
Sh4NQARYKtDim5Nzu3BpE4M=
=zlkR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.th
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60h on Windows XP version 5,1
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailt
dress book. Incorrect and frustrating behavior
--
JN
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
I just upgraded from 1.53 to 1.60h and find that I now cannot author
emails to people who are NOT in my address book already. What happens
is that the instant I type a letter into "To", "CC", or "BCC" that
makes it clear that the address is not one The Bat can fill
Hi tbudl,
What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROT
000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)
iD4DBQE8zbS1OeQkq5KdzaARAlJwAJUZWVoOjZlCMT2E13nM1ehw4SI3AJ0Utuee
T0HLaDCrfsO9dXuujwmy1g==
=Bj6J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
8DBQE8zbTzOeQkq5KdzaARAioMAKDJv5dVTQHjWs3Qx0/5c+fVku2dKwCg1bAL
nDQPVwAPyKPNs0SVOceM0NY=
=r6GK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbud
QJ
Martin> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PR
colors.
The SMIME have a icon and when viewed show a green signature
icon (symbol).
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.theba
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8za15V8nrYCsHF+IRAsreAJ4gR58M3N8y8qe/OU8LUtjHV3fRFACggzws
4/Swn0krvjo41ZjqD2REwtA=
=8bQJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FA
t; setting), are now showing to
be "VALID" signatures. There are a lot of inconsistencies
here in the different users experiences... But The Bat
version 1.60h is working okay for me.
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
___
and see how things work out
ACM>>> with that option enabled.
This message showed as having a VALID signature when I
viewed it ( has the green icon ), my setting is on
Microsoft API.
--
Best regards,
Lynna ma
qegQudpD5nEeU32sZzpWq2sAoM4g
dO2NiV2k0RMLND+pPPoqKB6Y
=5brn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.co
Hello Melissa,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote:
Reese> When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any
Reese> message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c over
Reese> 1.60h, all was back to normal.
Reese> Melissa
Is it possible t
Hello reclutamiento,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:44:06 AM, you wrote:
reclutamiento> I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
reclutamiento> emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
reclutamiento> To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is t
v1.60c
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wm80aq1zwwbqmoAnj87
E8A0Utfa/pLLdudvIJhma9iT
=g0/x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mai
]
Using The Bat! 1.60 on Windows XP version 5,1
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech L
XlCVNEe
=WheR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Allie,
@29 April 2002, 13:33:07 -0500 (19:33 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACM>> Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out
ACM>> with that option enabled.
> I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs
>
706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60h on Windows XP version 5,1
____
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:05:29 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
>> When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
> ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
> normal.
I would submit that you shouldn't be forced to do that to read s/mime
m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
...
>>> When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
MDP>> ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
MDP>> normal.
ACM> Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:
...
>> When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
MDP> ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
MDP> normal.
Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Melissa,
@29 April 2002, 09:49:53 -0700 (17:49 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any
> message that was signed using S/M
I too had problems with h everytime I closed TB! it crashed and gave me an error
message. Now back on C and all happy again
-Original Message-
From: "Robert F. Beeger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:48:05 +0200
Subject: 1.60h is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 9:36:14 AM PST, Robert F. Beeger wrote:
> I don't fool around with betas, either.
> I had 1.53. Upgraded to 1.60, 1.60c and at least 1.60h.
> So fooling around with betas is not the issue in my case.
Hello reclutamiento,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:44:06 PM, you wrote:
rsn> I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
rsn> emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
rsn> To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
rsn> problem. I u
I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
problem. I upgraded from 1.60c release version, and to this moment I
have not run into any problem. Nor I have ever
Hello!
I've read about 1.60h here. One wrote that it would be much faster. So
I downloaded 1.60h, unpacked the whole contents of the_bat.exe with
WinRAR 3b7 into my TheBat-Folder and started it.
I found no speed improvements but found that most of the bodies of the messages
in my Send
Roel, that has worked and they open up just like
the other emails.
--
David Stone (UK) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! Version 1.60h. Platform Windows 98SE 4.10. Ver. A
I.E. version 5.50.4807.2300IC SP2
____
Current Ver: 1
Hello John,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:58:54 AM, you wrote:
Sands> I have the same problem. The message in this group from Michael
Sands> Disabato created at 3:12 PM today is not readable in 1.60h.
I have no problems reading the messages from this same person and I
am now using
r Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zum Antworten bitte Lederhosen entfernen
* Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com *
You're too drunk when...You don't recognize wife unless seen
through bottom of glass...
Using The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 12:52:25 PM PST, David Stone wrote:
> Is it me should I have done something ;)
1.60h has a bug that prevents you from opening S/MIME signed messages
(the little "check mark" icon signifies that the messa
I have the same problem. The message in this group from Michael
Disabato created at 3:12 PM today is not readable in 1.60h.
John Sands
> -Original Message-
> From: David Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002, 3:52:25 PM,
> Subject: I cannot open
Hello,
Thought I'd try version 1.60h :)
However I find that email which have the small round yellow icon with
a tick over the envelope cannot be opened with 1.60h. I thought it
might be an old 'cannot view HTML email' problem I've had in the past.
When I reverted to 1.6
Hey TBUDL,
Wow, I am impressed (always have been, but more so now...)
I had not noticed TB! being slow, but I sure did notice a speed
increase after loading 1.60h! It used to take a few seconds on my P3
1.2Ghz processor, but now it is like .5 sec to load!
Other features are also
BAT 1.60H is out, at ritlabs site as of yesterday.
___
Running Bat v1.60h on Win2000Pro 5.00.2195 Service Pack 2 with Advanced
Direct Remailer v2.15, Mcaffe Online Engine Build 3217 4.1.60 DAT 4.0.4199
and Zone Alarm 3.0.118
67 matches
Mail list logo