Re: Filter problem?

Hello Susanne, On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:53:28 -0800GMT Susanne wrote: S> Just a question though: if the spam filter sends S> messages to the trash, would they be marked as S> spam? What is marked in Options/Preferences/Anti-Spam as target for the detected spam? If it's the trash folder then the pl

Re: Filter problem?

On Sat 24-Feb-07 2:30pm -0600, Susanne wrote: > I upgraded to TB version 3.95.6 and now the > emails that are not filtered to a special folder > and previously (version 2.12) landed in my inbox > are put directly into the Trash folder. > > How can I change it so they get directed into the > inbox

Re: Filter problem?

Hi, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 3:39:21 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is no special trainig option, you do this by defining a mail as > Spam or Ham. Thanks! Just a question though: if the spam filter sends messages to the trash, would they be marked as spam? -- Best regards, Susann

Re: Filter problem?

Hello Susanne, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 6:30:18 PM, you wrote: S> S> Hi, S> Saturday, February 24, 2007, 3:20:51 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Did you train the filter? Feed it with the same amount of spam and ham >> and it will know afterwards what to put to the inbox and what to the >

Re: Filter problem?

Hello Susanne, On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:30:18 -0800GMT Susanne wrote: S> I didn't see a "training" option when I set up the S> filter. S> Where can that be found? There is no special trainig option, you do this by defining a mail as Spam or Ham. You can use the menu "Specials/Mark as Junk" or "Spe

Re: Filter problem?

Hi, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 3:20:51 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Did you train the filter? Feed it with the same amount of spam and ham > and it will know afterwards what to put to the inbox and what to the > trash folder. Well, nothing is marked as spam, or put into the "Junk" folder f

Re: Filter problem?

Hello Susanne, On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:42:36 -0800GMT Susanne wrote: S> Saturday, February 24, 2007, 2:30:12 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> OK. Some spam filtering plugin? S> Yes, the BayesIT! plug in that came with TB. S> But why would it sent everything not filtered S> otherwise into the Trash

Re: Filter problem?

Hi, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 2:30:12 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I did, multiple times! There is no filter designed to send anything to >> the Trash folder. > OK. Some spam filtering plugin? Yes, the BayesIT! plug in that came with TB. But why would it sent everything not filtered ot

Re: Filter problem?

Hi, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 1:53:43 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There must be some filter that does this. You can check it in the > Sorting Office that is accessible through the account menu. I did, multiple times! There is no filter designed to send anything to the Trash folder. It'

Re: Filter problem?

Hi, Saturday, February 24, 2007, 12:30:42 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Also, when I try to change the template for this > folder to show what version of TB and what OS I'm > running, the template instantly reverts back to > its previous incarnation as soon as I add the > tbudl address in

Filter problem?

Hi, I upgraded to TB version 3.95.6 and now the emails that are not filtered to a special folder and previously (version 2.12) landed in my inbox are put directly into the Trash folder. How can I change it so they get directed into the inbox again? Also, when I try to change the template

Re[2]: Filter problem

Hello, Friday, February 9, 2007, 1:00:00 PM, you wrote: > As Roelof said - check out the order of the filters in the Sorting > Office again. :-) Make sure that the "Known" filter (if you have it) > comes *after* the other filters you created. > Try to move one of the filters that should sort me

Re[2]: Filter problem

Hello Roelof, Thursday, February 8, 2007, 10:27:26 AM, you wrote: > 1) Check whether your filters are active (on the options tab), that is > the default, so that shouldn't be the cause. > 2) Check whether the message is processed by another filter, filters > are checked top down and a message pr

Re: Filter problem

Hallo Joyce, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:11:55 -0700GMT (8-2-2007, 18:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JR> I have set up another filter going into another folder and I can't get JR> that one right either. I've used filters before, but just must have JR> taken a stupid pill. 1) Check whether your f

Mod: Cut mark (was: Filter problem)

Hallo Joyce, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:11:55 -0700GMT (8-2-2007, 18:11, where I live), you wrote: JR> Thank you JR> J Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singl

Filter problem

Hello TBUDL, I'm a brand new Bat user and I'm trying to set up my filters without success. Here is what I have done: Clicked on Sorting office icon Account shows my name Tab is General Name - Indiana Sender contains - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Under actions I have move to \\Joyce Ragels\Inbox\Indiana N

Bayes Filter Problem

Hello all, I did a fresh install of 3.5 then used a day old backup. I installed Bayes Filter again, now everytime i close TheBat i have to reinstall the Bayes Filter. It just wont stay installed. Anyone have an idea whats up -- Best regards, Barry _

Re: Filter problem

Hallo Leif, On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:38 -0700GMT (28-1-2005, 19:57 +0100, where I live), you wrote: LG> I want to manually filter a folder and move any message older than LG> 45 days into a different folder. Why manually and not automatically? Set folder specific alternative deletion on and

Re: Filter problem

Hello MAU, Friday, January 28, 2005, 1:00:51 PM, you wrote: M> I pasted it as an Incoming filter. Hmm. We'll time to dig into this one I guess. Thanks. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PC

Re: Filter problem

Hello Leif, > Anybody see what's wrong? No, because it works here. I pasted it as an Incoming filter. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Filter problem

Hello tbudl, I don't know what it is, but I can't get this bad-boy to work. I want to manually filter a folder and move any message older than 45 days into a different folder. TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [7241B1F8.01C50569.51F67C2A.6B2E98D6] Name: TBArchive Filter: {\0D\0

Re: regexp in selective download filter problem

* Timur Kadyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to filter out messages with "From:" field containing > address that starts with "238", and then has three digits before "@". > Regexp I'm using is ^238\d\d\d@ . Try (?m)^From:\s*238\d{3}@ any search in the entire header. You have to

regexp in selective download filter problem

I'm trying to filter out messages with "From:" field containing address that starts with "238", and then has three digits before "@". Regexp I'm using is ^238\d\d\d@ . I tested this regexp with regular filter -- it worked just fine (after I enabled regular expression filtering). Then I created a Se

Re: Filter problem "yet"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, telepro wrote... > Hello Jonathan, >> Well this is a start. What I have a feeling is you're adding filter >> strings to the alternatives, so that you only have 1 "Set" in the >> "alternative" rules, instead of multipl

Re[2]: Filter problem "yet"

Hello Jonathan, > Well this is a start. What I have a feeling is you're adding filter > strings to the alternatives, so that you only have 1 "Set" in the > "alternative" rules, instead of multiple "sets". This results in the > following effect: > [Filter 1] OR [Filter 2 AND Filter 3 AND Filte

Re[2]: Filter problem "yet"

Hello Miguel, >> I puted an expression >> stings location : presence : >> vivivi kludges no > All your messages match this rule because none of them include > "vivivi" in the headers (kludges) Ok, I understand :-) > I have a similar filter and I use: > strings locatio

Re: Filter problem "yet"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, telepro wrote... >> again probably catch all your mails again. If this is a spam filter, >> try putting: >> Strings Location Presence >> sex Anywhere Yes >> For the "Rule" page. > Ok I dit it >>>

Re[2]: Filter problem "yet"

Hello Jonathan, >> Therefore I'm obliged to put at least one string in the "rule" ? > Not really no, but it depends what you want the filter to do. yes an antispam filter ! >>> Try putting something in the first page ("Rules"), >> I try >> I puted an expression >> stings location :

Re: Filter problem "yet"

Hello telepro, > I puted an expression > stings location : presence : > vivivi kludges no All your messages match this rule because none of them include "vivivi" in the headers (kludges) I have a similar filter and I use: strings location : presence : X

Re: Filter problem "yet"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, telepro wrote... >> You have nothing in the starting filter. > No, nothing inside ! >> Which means it matches ALL >> mail, OR mail with "sexy AND sexy" in it. > Therefore I'm obliged to put at least one string in th

Re[2]: Filter problem "yet"

Hello Jonathan, >> I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with >> "alternatives" on keywords. The problem is that TB sends to the >> folder "antispam " created for that purpose, all the mails, same those >> who don't contain the strings, with no exception... In fact, it >> se

Re: Filter problem "yet"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, telepro wrote... > I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with > "alternatives" on keywords. The problem is that TB sends to the > folder "antispam " created for that purpose, all the mails, same th

Filter problem "yet"

Hello friends, I have not resolved my problem of filter I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with "alternatives" on keywords. The problem is that TB sends to the folder "antispam " created for that purpose, all the mails, same those who don't contain the strings, with no ex

Re-Filter Problem with Replied Message Rule

I have defined this rule (replied messages): Name: TOSPAMB Source Folder: SentBCC Move messages to folder: SPAMB Filtering Strings: SpamButcher -- Anywhere -- Yes Rule: Active Now I have messages with SpamButcher as the Sender in my SentBCC folder. Yet when I do a re-filter on Replied Messages,

Re: Filter Problem

Venu, On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, at 07:51:46 [GMT +0530] (which was 7:51 AM where I live) you wrote: V> Ofice/Filters, the folder does not show up now. So I cannot apply the V> filter. V> It shows up clearly in the Normal view The best way is to simply create the filter again. To ensure that you d

Re: Filter Problem

Hi Barry2, On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 8:46 PM, you mentioned about "Filter Problem": B> Same here, the posts that delve into the far reaches of Bat-dom don't B> appeal as of yet, though I generally skim through. To me, that's the beauty of TB! One can just ins

Re: Filter Problem

Hello Venu, Thursday, October 31, 2002, 2:21:46 AM, you wrote: V> Hello tbudl, V> I performed a restore from an earlier backup of 'The Bat", then found V> the folder containing the TBUDL messages had disappeared. V> Ctrl+Alt+Shift brought it back but I find that under 'Sorting V> Ofice/Filters, t

Filter Problem

Hello tbudl, I performed a restore from an earlier backup of 'The Bat", then found the folder containing the TBUDL messages had disappeared. Ctrl+Alt+Shift brought it back but I find that under 'Sorting Ofice/Filters, the folder does not show up now. So I cannot apply the filter. It shows up clearl

Non-English Characters Filter Problem

I'm trying to do a filter to get rid of messages with non-English characters. I set up a filter called non-English characters and then tried a rule which put Á | Ä in the Strings box and filtered for Presence Anywhere and told it to put the email in my Spam mailbox. That didn't work. I then tri

Filter problem wav solved

Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. Shahar. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: htt

Re: Another filter problem.

Hello Alberto, On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:29:59 +0100GMT (20-12-01, 18:29 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: AA> I receive two kind of mail for my web site: the first contains a AA> unique code and personal data; The second mail is a confirm containing AA> the same code and the . AA> I need to know

Re: Another filter problem.

Hi Alberto, On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:29:59 +0100GMT (21/12/2001, 01:29 +0800GMT), Alberto Almagioni wrote: AA> Oki this is the classical one million dollar question I'm gearing up... AA> (but I can not give one million dollar for the answer). ...and slowing down. ;-) AA> I need to know if it's

Another filter problem.

Oki this is the classical one million dollar question (but I can not give one million dollar for the answer). The problem is not very simple and i don't know if it's possible to solve with a filter. I receive two kind of mail for my web site: the first contains a unique code and personal data; Th

Re[2]: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, On Saturday, May 19, 2001 19:02:40 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter problem': >> [...] The common denominator is your sender name >> which is why I've filtered on that

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jan! On Saturday, May 19, 2001 at 6:39:24 PM you wrote: > I understand there is no problem with the sender's name but I > guess my point is that what I suggested (and works) seems to be > a simpler approach. The common denominator is you

Re[2]: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, On Saturday, May 19, 2001 17:46:39 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter problem': Dierk> I use Move to Trash for this, it is much safer, since Trash is only Dierk> emptied when I end the session

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jan! On Saturday, May 19, 2001 at 5:04:18 PM you wrote: > Have you considered creating a filter in the outgoing msg folder? That one works like a charm for around a year now, that is with modifications for PGP-Basics for some weeks. - -- D

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jan! On Saturday, May 19, 2001 at 4:35:06 PM you wrote: > The modification needed for your purposes would be under > Actions: delete msg (not off of server) I use Move to Trash for this, it is much safer, since Trash is only emptied when

Re[3]: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Also Dierk, Jan> Maybe I've misunderstood what the problem is Have you considered creating a filter in the outgoing msg folder? - -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! v1.53 Beta/6/WinMe/PGP Key ID: 0x3F14A060 ICQ 41116329 -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Re[2]: Filter problem

Hello Dierk, On Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:55:27 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter problem': Dierk> [...] Main rule (one set): dierkhaasis in Sender Yes AND Dierk> PGP-Baiscs in Subject Yes Alternative rules: Set 1. Dierk> dierkhaasis in Sender Yes

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Friday, May 18, 2001 at 6:00:20 PM you wrote: > Because they are caught by the alternative, which is connected by OR: No. > IOW this fitler is moving your messages to trash if they come from > you, OR (not exclusive) contain PGP-B

Re: Filter problem

Hello Dierk, On Fri, 18 May 2001 17:10:28 +0200 GMT (18/05/2001, 23:10 +0800 GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH> 3. Rule is, dierkhaasis in Sender Yes AND PGP-Basics in Subject Yes. DH> Why does this trash all mails with "PGP-Basics" in the subject DH> header. Because they are caught by the al

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck! On Friday, May 18, 2001 at 5:44:53 PM you wrote: > While I don't know the answer to this specific question OK, now it becomes really funny, I changed the said filter's main rule to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Sender Yes AND basic in Subject Y

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter! On Friday, May 18, 2001 at 5:38:08 PM you wrote: > as I understand it, it's the alternative rule that sends all PGP-Basics > messages to trash. They all have the list's acronym in their kludges. You > might try to cancel the alternative

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck! On Friday, May 18, 2001 at 5:44:53 PM you wrote: > I delete the *sent* version and keep the one which comes back > through the list (so I keep the one everyone else saw). Nice idea, but, I kill both ... I am not much of a keeper. If I

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, On 18 May 2001 at 17:10:28 +0200 (which was 16:10 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote to TBUDL and made these points: DH> Why does this trash all mails with "PGP-Basics" in the subject DH> header. While I don't know the answer to this

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, May 18, 2001 at 17:10 (my local time), Dierk Haasis presented us with these thoughts about "Filter problem": DH> I just created a kill filter for messages I sent to a mailing list DH> (it's actually a filter kil

Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL Members! I just created a kill filter for messages I sent to a mailing list (it's actually a filter killing all my own mails to a mailing list coming back to me). Interestingly the alternative rules for the TB! lists seem to work

Re: Filter problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Søren, On 24 January 2001 at 11:55:26 +0100 (which was 10:55 where I live) Søren Friis Østergaard wrote and made these points: SFØ> Is it possible to filter all mails from "@masterseeker.com" to SFØ> one folder w/out having to add

Re: Filter problem

> Is it possible to filter all mails from "@masterseeker.com" to one > folder w/out having to add every single user (ex. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") ??? just use @masterseeker.com as filtering string rasto w. -- __ Archi

Filter problem

Hey TBUDL, Is it possible to filter all mails from "@masterseeker.com" to one folder w/out having to add every single user (ex. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") ??? Oh yeah, one more thing. Where can I find a list of humoristic taglines to use as cookies in The Bat -- Mvh,

Re[2]: Filter problem?

> That's probably not the problem. I don't care for the | method of > creating OR connections in TB. I find they can be ambiguous. I won't go > into all the details, but suffice it to say that I prefer using one Main > rule and one Alternate rule for OR connections. Oh!! So THAT's what the Al

Re: Filter problem?

Hello BillG, On Monday, September 11, 2000 at 20:31:51 GMT -0400 (which was 5:31 PM where I live) witnesses say BillG typed: > I can't seem to perform a logical "or" function with the thebat's > filters. I have this rule > String: "InfoBeat Fun" | "adm-humor" > Location: subject > Presence:

Filter problem?

I can't seem to perform a logical "or" function with the thebat's filters. I have this rule String: "InfoBeat Fun" | "adm-humor" Location: subject Presence: yes My intention is to move any message with "InfoBeat Fun" or adm-humor in the subject. The rules catches the InfoBeat messages, but no

Re: filter problem

MW> I have a similar catchall message filter as the last filter for my MW> incoming mail - but instead of using not-"?" I MW> just left the filtering strings blank. ...and my catch-all filter checks for the existence of my email address in the Recipient fields. If it's n

Re[3]: filter problem

t; Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 02:07:38 -0700 From: phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.44) Personal Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re[2]: filter problem In-reply-To: <[EMAIL PR

Re: filter problem

Hello Larry Barrett, On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:20:12 -0300 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, June 13, 2000, 10:20:12 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Larry Barrett wrote: > Greetings, > My problem is one that I have had to happen on several different > occasions. I have tried, in vain, t

Re[2]: filter problem

Greetings Marek! On Tuesday, June 13, 2000 at 17:52:55 GMT +0200 (which was 8:52 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MM> Hello all, MM> Tuesday, June 13, 2000, Larry Barrett wrote: >> I would certainly be grateful for any suggestions. I might add that I >> use this same fi

Re: filter problem

Hello all, Tuesday, June 13, 2000, Larry Barrett wrote: > I would certainly be grateful for any suggestions. I might add that I > use this same filter pattern in another e-mail client - and it works. > It also works with The Bat! *most* of the time. My question is - why > the inconsistency?

Re: filter problem

In Reference to "filter problem" From Larry Barrett: L> I received an e-mail from a friend. I right clicked on it - went to L> specials, then to create filters. Everything is done as I have done L> for many other addresses. It seems that there are *some* that simpl

filter problem

Greetings, My problem is one that I have had to happen on several different occasions. I have tried, in vain, to discover what I am doing wrong. One example is the following: I received an e-mail from a friend. I right clicked on it - went to specials, then to create filters. Every