Just in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to
edit a received message Subject. I use SpamPal and it marks suspects
with **SPAM** in the subject line. Sometimes the Bayesian filter is
incorrect (we are both still learning) but when I move a clean email
to an inbox it is
. Erroneously classified mail (if you
have any) will still have the altered kludge, but it won't be in the
Subject field which would look rather annoying.
If you place your SpamPal filter after your mailing list filters, and
your Known filter (people in your address books), I think you'll find
little if any
Is there anyway of filtering particular attachments i.e. .pif using
The Bat!?
I am sure there is probably something but I have looked through the
help file but couldn't see anything.
Regards
Robyn Winter
R2 Dzigns
Melbourne Australia
is sound, since it could mean
very long filtering times on messages with large attachments. I
wouldn't like it when some filters with location=everywhere would
start checking multiple MB attachments.
BTW You started your question as an answer to another thread. That's
not the best thing to do
Hallo P,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:54:43 -0500GMT (28-8-03, 5:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ Just in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to
PJ edit a received message Subject.
No.
PJ I realize from reading some of the archives that editing a received
PJ message is for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RO The logic behind not filtering attachments is sound, since it
RO could mean very long filtering times on messages with large
RO attachments. I wouldn't like it when some filters with
RO location=everywhere would start checking multiple MB
Hi
Thank you for your answers and I will watch how I title and phrase my
questions in future.
Regards
Robyn Winter
R2 Dzigns
Melbourne Australia
This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information that is
Kevin Coates, [KC] wrote:
KC If you create a filter in The Bat to look for ^X-SpamPal: SPAM
KC (minus the quotes) in the kludge or anywhere you can move the
KC messages to your spam folder automatically.
Don't forget to enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options. The
search string
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re:
editing an inbox message:
PJ If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn how!
R Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB:
R Export the message
R Edit the subject with Notepad or another text editor.
R
Thursday, August 28, 2003, 10:36:11 AM, PJ wrote:
P On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
P re: editing an inbox message:
PJ If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn
PJ how!
You can also:
1. Drag the message to your Outbox folder.
2. Open it (double
It seems that P.Johnson (as quoted by a Canadian in Houston) said ...
Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB:
Export the message
Edit the subject with Notepad or another text editor.
Import the message back into TB.
Now you can delete the original message.
There might be a
On Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 3:52 PM, Bill wrote:
Ctrl-E opens the message for editing as I said. But when you try to
close the message, TB asks if you want to save it and, if you do,
demands an entry in the to field. Then it places the saved message
in the outbox. It's a pending message,
PROTECTED]
| To: P.Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| Subject: Re[3]: Filters, Spam
some filters with location=everywhere would
RO start checking multiple MB attachments.
Not necessarily sound logic. Filtering on attachment names could be
triggered by boundary kludges such as:
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=16e1877.jpg;
Content-Type: application/msword;
name=BRAZIL.doc
Hello P.Johnson,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:31:06 -0500 GMT (28/08/2003, 21:31 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
Can you tell me exactly how I would export and import back? I see an
export option under Tools but neither the msg or eml formats seem to
be editable.
Over here, all formats (.msg, .eml,
Thanks Dave and everyone. I'm finding dragging the message to the
Outbox and editing is the simplest way for me.
--
Pat
A Canadian in Houston
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 12:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D Thursday, August 28, 2003, 10:36:11 AM, PJ
Thursday, August 28, 2003, 11:32:17 AM, MAU wrote:
M As you say, it is probably the easiest method. However, you
M must be aware that this method does change some of the
M original RFC-822 header lines.
Good point. The solution is not perfect, but likely suffices in
most situations. I solve
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:59:27 AM, you wrote:
RO e. The
RO logic behind not filtering attachments is sound, since it could mean
RO very long filtering times on messages with large attachments. I
RO wouldn't like it when some filters with location=everywhere would
RO start
Hallo Jim,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:26:27 -0700GMT (22-8-03, 22:26 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JD Is there a faster/easier way to copy filters from one account in my
JD Bat to another other than copy/paste each individual filter at a
JD time?
As long as you haven't entered any filters
Myotis Mates,
Is there a faster/easier way to copy filters from one account in my
Bat to another other than copy/paste each individual filter at a
time?
Thanks for your help!
--
Best regards,
Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
[Using The Bat! 1.62r on Windows XP Service
On Friday, August 22, 2003, 4:26:27 PM, Jim D wrote:
JD Is there a faster/easier way to copy filters from one account in my
JD Bat to another other than copy/paste each individual filter at a
JD time?
Open the sorting office for the account which currently holds all the
filters. Copy each
S effective filters with TB but from using my BeOS Mail daemon
S I've been pretty impressed with what Bayesian filters can do
S and would love to try one out for TB.
Check the TBUDL archives for POPFile. I and many others are very
satisfied with it and TB!
--
Dave Kennedy
to get to techie and roll my own.
I know that it is possible to put together some pretty effective
filters with TB but from using my BeOS Mail daemon I've been pretty
impressed with what Bayesian filters can do and would love to try one
out for TB.
--
Cheers,
Steve
Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Steve,
@20-Aug-2003, 18:08 Steve Hodgson [SH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SH I've been playing around with beta 2 and noticed that there is
SH now a panel for anti-spam plug-ins. Are there actually any of
SH these available now?
You need to
Hæ!
Is there an easy way of copying a lot of filters to another account?
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de
Sunday, August 3, 2003, 10:38:58 AM, you wrote:
TN Is there an easy way of copying a lot of filters to another account?
Thorvald,
Not that I am aware of (useful feature request!).
However, what you can do is copy the filter(s) into Notepad and paste
them into the other account.
Create a new
On Sunday, August 3, 2003, 5:38:58 AM, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
TN Is there an easy way of copying a lot of filters to another account?
Highlight the first filter you want to copy, copy it (either using the
right-click menu or Ctrl-C). Open Notepad Paste it in there. Now
highlight the next
Hæ!
Thanks to Trevor and Deborah; this worked ok, even if this is quite
tediuos when the filter list is long... ;)
I wish there where global filters which work with all accounts...
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de/
[The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 Service Pack
On Sunday, August 3, 2003, 9:44:51 AM, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
TN I wish there where global filters which work with all accounts...
You *could* set up a filter in each account which would move *every*
email to a particular account, then set up global filters for *that*
account - which would do
Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:51:20 [GMT +0100] (8:51 AM EDT here) Trevor
Langford wrote:
Sunday, August 3, 2003, 10:38:58 AM, you wrote:
TN Is there an easy way of copying a lot of filters to another account?
Not that I am aware of (useful feature request!). However, what you
can do is copy the filter
Hello Deborah,
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:53:30 -0400 GMT (03/08/2003, 20:53 +0700 GMT),
Deborah W wrote:
TN I wish there where global filters which work with all accounts...
You *could* set up a filter in each account which would move *every*
email to a particular account, then set up global
Hello Granville,
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
I use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/) to classify spam and
then in TB I just have one filter that looks for the
X-Text
Hello tbudl,
In the same way as having Common Folders is it possible to have
Common Filters? At the moment I have a few common folders, and the
accounts that these filter into each have their own filters set up.
What I want to do is have one filter for multiple accounts that then
filter
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, 1:45 PM, you wrote:
MT In the same way as having Common Folders is it possible to have
MT Common Filters? At the moment I have a few common folders, and the
MT accounts that these filter into each have their own filters set up.
MT What I want to do is have one filter
Hello Paul Cartwright,
On or about Tuesday, July 29, 2003 at 13:55:59GMT -0400 (which was
12:55 PM in the tropics where I live) Paul Cartwright posted:
MT What I want to do is have one filter for multiple MT accounts
MT that then filter into the common folders.
MT I hope that makes sense!
PC
also see that Quick Templates
can be used across accounts.
The trick is to make filters sharable as well. There is the issue of
priority, and I would argue that for technical reasons, the shared (or
common) filters could be executed first.
It sounds simple, but the practical implementation could
repair utility...and not necessarily in that order!
I have too many accounts with too many filters doing the same thing..
--
Paul
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL
On Sun 27-Jul-03 6:04pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
AFAIK, No
in Recipient AND for
string [EMAIL PROTECTED] also in Recipient (two different strings). If
rule 1 AND rule 2 get a match, the filters does whatever.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r
Hello MAU,
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
in Recipient AND for
string [EMAIL PROTECTED] also in Recipient (two different strings). If
rule 1 AND rule 2 get a match, the filters does whatever.
Again, you're rewriting what I just said.
--
Best regards,
Bill
Current version is 1.62r
On Mon 28-Jul-03 7:39am -0400, MAU wrote:
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to
Hello Bill,
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to work as a concatenation operator. I sent an
email to myself and filtered for a sender of bill mccarthy (without
the quotes) - it did not work. Can you provide an example that
Hello Bill,
Hmm, so '' is a concatenation operator in TB. Is that documented
anywhere?
No, it is not and, obviously, it is not documented. See my other reply
to you.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 3:23:18 PM, you wrote:
I am receiving masses of spam emails every day through my inbox. I
have gone into the specials tools and set lots and lots of filters to
capture this rubbish. But the next mail-out just comes to me without
filtering out what I don't want
Granville Cousins writes:
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
If you're using a POP mailbox (not IMAP), use POPFile. Then you only need
one spam filter in TB to remove anything POPFile has
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 7:45:08 PM, Granville Cousins wrote:
GC How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
GC the email address or the subject line being identical on each
GC mail-out.
You could use something like Popfile or Spampal, something which looks
at what's
Hello tbudl,
All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
accounts. Tried sender, kludges etc. Without result. Nothing filters
On Sun 27-Jul-03 3:29pm -0400, Jos Klaassens wrote:
All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
accounts. Tried sender, kludges
Hello Bill,
Sunday, July 27, 2003, 10:00:15 PM, you wrote:
BM How about an example of a filter that doesn't work along with the
BM appropriate fields of an email that it didn't work on. BTW, make sure
BM you test it at the top of the list of filters so you are sure other
BM filters
addresses on the Alternatives tab with the
Add set button. It will look like...
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AltSet:1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AltSet:2: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since you wrote your filters ceased to work... well, I doubt this one
ever worked. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http
...
A MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A AltSet:1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A AltSet:2: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Since you wrote your filters ceased to work... well, I doubt this one
A ever worked. :-)
Indeed, this one never worked g. And I believe now I made the same
big mistake, because of my ignorance
On Sun 27-Jul-03 5:05pm -0400, Alexander wrote:
The main set is always AND. You won't receive an email that contains all
of the addresses you've specified.
You have to specify the other addresses on the Alternatives tab with the
Add set button. It will look like...
MainSet: [EMAIL
Finder, but didn't
know you could use them in filters
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP Service Pack 1
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:04:00 -0500 GMT (28/07/03, 05:04 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
You can (at least I know about |, never tested ). But I find it
more
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, Giamma wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G Any idea to how to make a `neutral` filter?
Giamma,
What's your basic objective? If you want to be able to mark a message
with a color grouping by hitting a key combination, then do not bother
with a filter. Just set the key
Hello Joseph,
Monday, July 14, 2003, Joseph N. wrote:
What's your basic objective? If you want to be able to mark a message
with a color grouping by hitting a key combination, then do not bother
with a filter. Just set the key combination (though someone else will
have to explain how; I
Ciao Joseph,
in data lunedì 14 luglio 2003, alle 16:05, hai scritto:
JN Giamma,
JN What's your basic objective? If you want to be able to mark a message
JN with a color grouping by hitting a key combination, then do not bother
JN with a filter.
`sorry, I`ve not seen this way...
(and some
Hi,
as suggested in Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , 23-05-2003 ,
I`ve created a filter to apply a colour group with a hot-key.
BeginFilter
Name: COLORA
Active: 1
Source: \\giamma\Inbox
Target: \\giamma\Inbox
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: 00
Actions:
Friday, June 20, 2003, 10:03:20 AM, you wrote:
BM On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:56am -0400, Vishal wrote:
BM I'm not seeing the problems you've mentioned.
I see by your sig that you're using 1.62r too, like me. Strange that you don't
run into the same situation, since Leif mentioned that this is an
Friday, June 20, 2003, 10:34:22 AM, you wrote:
LG The move to folder has long been an issue for people who just want to take
LG action on a message, but don't want to move it. Most people just set it to
LG inbox, but that could mess you up if your message is in a folder other than
LG the inbox to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishal, [V] wrote:
V I see by your sig that you're using 1.62r too, like me. Strange that
V you don't run into the same situation, since Leif mentioned that this
V is an ongoing problem. I presume he was talking about the current
V release version
Monday, June 23, 2003, 7:54:03 AM, you wrote:
AM That's for quick filter creation. The Special's/Create filter option, is by
AM default geared to moving the message to be filtered to a special folder.
AM For manual filter creation, the default is inbox to inbox.
Ah, I see what you mean.
Hello Vishal,
Sunday, June 22, 2003, 5:57:31 PM, you wrote:
V I don't choose Ok. I choose Edit and set my filtering options, but
V the folder gets created regardless.
Yeah, a little bit of a pain, but I guess half the people would want
it to autoset to Inbox and the other half want it to default
Monday, June 23, 2003, 10:26:24 AM, you wrote:
LG Hello Vishal,
LG Sunday, June 22, 2003, 5:57:31 PM, you wrote:
V I don't choose Ok. I choose Edit and set my filtering options, but
V the folder gets created regardless.
LG Yeah, a little bit of a pain, but I guess half the people would want
LG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishal, [V] wrote:
V Ah, I see what you mean. I've never tried creating a filter manually,
V as I find the context menu process much more intuitive.
Yes, I understand. However, in contrast, I've never used the context
menu method to create filters
23-Jun-2003 14:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even for quick filter creation, though, it would make more sense for TB *not* to
create a folder by default unless the user clicks Ok.
H, thats odd. I created a lot of filters with the context menu lately
and never had any folders auto-created
Monday, June 23, 2003, 1:30:19 PM, you wrote:
nwd H, thats odd. I created a lot of filters with the context menu lately
nwd and never had any folders auto-created. Maybe it only happens when you
nwd change the tab without adjusting the target folder first?
yep, that's what i was talking
Monday, June 23, 2003, 12:45:08 PM, you wrote:
AM Yes, I understand. However, in contrast, I've never used the context menu
AM method to create filters. I've always done so manually. I guess one sticks
AM to the method they got themselves accustomed to.
true.
AM It's really not that bad. I tend
Hi,
Whenever I try to create a new filter using the context menu option for a
particular message, TB creates a new folder corresponding to the name of the
filter by default. This happens even if I choose the 'Edit' option in the
initial filter creation dialog box. Most of the time I don't want to
On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:56am -0400, Vishal wrote:
I'm not seeing the problems you've mentioned. In a new Incoming Mail
filter, inbox to inbox is already the default. Just add the name, the
filtering string, set your colors, flags, etc, set the option to
continue filtering and move the filter toward
Hello Vishal,
Friday, June 20, 2003, 5:56:03 AM, you wrote:
V One option I've found is to change the 'Move to folder' option to
V 'Inbox', but since I really don't want to *move* the message
V anywhere(I just want to set flags or something), I think it's a
V design flaw for TB to make me go
Hallo Mike,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:57:23 -0500GMT (14-6-03, 0:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MR Is it possible to create filter rules that scan attachments?
No, TB doesn't do that, not even for filenames.
There are plug-ins for a variety of virus scanners that allow for
scanning the
Is it possible to create filter rules that scan attachments? My
question arises because of the daily barrage of bounced Klez mailings
(you know the ones that originate from someone else, but supply your
email as the From: )
I figured that, if I put yabbadabbado as my Organization, I could
filter
Hello Joan,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:02:16 +0100 GMT (19/03/03, 04:02 +0700 GMT),
Joan Josep wrote:
TF String: Reply-To:.*TBUDL
TF so that this dot-asterisk is interpreted as any characters
I do not see the need of .*
If tbudl is present, it is, whatever is around. I use tbudl as a
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 17, 2003, 10:28:12 PM, you wrote:
So the rules are ANDed? How do I get them to be ORed?
TF If they are all on the first tab (Rule, then they are ANDed. If you
TF put conditions onto the second tab (Alternatives), each alternative
TF is ORed to the first tab and to
Hallo Pete,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 03:02:23 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 9:02 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH I have 1.60 and am happy with it. Does 1.62 represent an important
PH improvement?
Mostly minor improvements, some bug-fixes, there were some stability
issues with 1.60.
The most important
Tuesday, March 18, 2003, 3:31:33 AM, you wrote:
PH I have 1.60 and am happy with it. Does 1.62 represent an important
PH improvement?
RO The most important improvement for you would be that you'd have a
RO help-file.
Well, if someone would email me the help file, I could save a download
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, at 10:28:12 [GMT +0700]
(which was 18/03/2003 (D/M/Y) 4:28 where I live) you wrote:
TF so that
TF this dot-asterisk is interpreted as any characters
I do not see the need of .*
If tbudl is present,
.
Filters have me stumped!
I have strings set up as follows:
TheBat Text
batSubject
TBUDL Recipient
tbudl Recipient
batRecipient
Source folder is inbox; destination folder, The Bat
I expected that any messages having any of those strings
Hallo Pete,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:46:08 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 0:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH Filters have me stumped!
PH I have strings set up as follows:
PH TheBat Text
PH batSubject
PH TBUDL Recipient
PH tbudl Recipient
PH bat
Hello Roelof,
Monday, March 17, 2003, 7:17:41 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Pete,
RO On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:46:08 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 0:46 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
PH Filters have me stumped!
PH I have strings set up as follows:
PH TheBat Text
PH batSubject
PH TBUDL
Hello Pete,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:48:19 -0500 GMT (18/03/03, 09:48 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
RO You're using five conditions. Unless you've setup all conditions as
RO separate conditions (on the 'Alternate' tab) all of these five
RO conditions have to met in order to trigger the filter.
For the sake of this discussion, I am looking for incoming e-mails
with YES or NO in their subjects. Both of the filters work, but
they act as EXCLUSIVE-ORs. I'd like them to act as INCLUSIVE-ORs.
My YES filter moves all YES e-mails to a TheBat! YES folder, and
exports their messages (per a YES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@5-Mar-2003, 09:38 -0500 (14:38 UK time) Daniel Grunberg [DG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
DG Since the order of my filters is first YES then NO, I tried checking
DG the Continue Processing with Other Filters option
the appropriate export templates), adding them to both file
c:\YES and file c:\NO. In other words I'd like both the YES filter and
the NO filter to act on such a message.
If your YES filter is before the NO one, on the Options tab of the YES
one select Continue processing with other filters
Hello Miguel,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:57:50 +0100 GMT (05/03/03, 21:57 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
If your YES filter is before the NO one, on the Options tab of the YES
one select Continue processing with other filters.
This won't work, because the YES filter has already moved
Hello Thomas,
This won't work, because the YES filter has already moved the message.
If a filter moves a message, no following filter can touch it.
You're right. I do something similar but I forgot that on the first
one I move from Inbox to Inbox and just _copy_ to desired folder.
Sorry :(
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:54:31 [GMT +] (9:54 AM EST here) Marck D
Pearlstone wrote:
... snip
DG Since the order of my filters is first YES then NO, I tried checking
DG the Continue Processing with Other Filters option of the YES filter.
DG That didn't work. Is there something I must do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@5-Mar-2003, 16:43 -0500 (21:43 UK time) Daniel Grunberg [DG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
YES and NO filters should appear first. Both should continue
processing. Both should move messages to Inbox. Both should
Create a copy
I've got a 'read messages' filter that, for messages in a particular
colour group, moves a message to a different folder. It works a treat,
except, if I mark as read an entire thread. The whole thread was in
the colour group but stayed put when marked using ctrl-shift-m. I had
to mark them all
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:58:11 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 19:58 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
If you used a global filter, how would TB! know where to apply the
filter. In fact, it may very well apply global filters first.
Hm. I would think in each account you give each global
QuickTemplates, you
TF update/maintain the global filters centrally, and each update of
TF course applies to each account in which this global filter is in the
TF filter list, and exactly at the position in the order of filters
TF where the global filter is mentioned.
TF Am I making sense?
You seem
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:31:52 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 20:31 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
You seem to be describing a sort of like 'common filter' system
dialog.
You define your common filters in this dialog. You then add them as
needed to your various accounts
that a particular
filter is linked to a copy in other accounts.
TF Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have
TF a menu item Global filters, and I create a filter there. What
TF would it do?
It would be applied to all accounts. It could be set to be applied
. Let's say under Options I have
TF a menu item Global filters, and I create a filter there. What
TF would it do?
I just created a filter that I wanted global. I created one that
would move messages containing a particular string to a particular
common folder. I want it run on all
Hello ~John,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:22:26 PM, you wrote:
~ Paul Smithson wrote:
P Why you would include a £ symbol
~ Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ?
You make a very valid point :)))
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
[strings]
£|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
[Location]
Subject
[Presence]
Yes
--
Regards,
~John
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195)
2 Hard-drives (6 40 gig) 439 Mb RAM AMD 455 Processor.
Programs running in the background:
Hello John,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
~ [strings]
~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
Why you would include a £ symbol.
As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
e-mails could be filtered out as spam just
I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master
set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to
multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session...
Friday, February 21, 2003, 11:23:51 AM, you wrote:
Here
701 - 800 of 1605 matches
Mail list logo
