Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:31:22 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 18:31 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] a long and very informative explanation. Thank you very much for your effort! :-) I never gave very much thought to what the role of a moderator implies, so I'm gl

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Marck, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 8:31:45 PM, you wrote: MDP> For anyone unfamiliar with Dead Horse policy, DEAD means DEAD. NO MDP> REPLIES to the list, only off-list or on TBOT. MArck, Sorry if any of my posts have gone past this, but at most I can only check the list once a day at the m

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Mary, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 7:26:20 PM, you wrote: MB> To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! Mary, I do believe you're flirting. Shame on you! ;-) I agree with what you've said though even though Allie had one occasion (when he was obviously having a bad day ) to

DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Csaba, @8-Feb-2003, 17:16 +0100 (16:16 UK time) Csaba Kiss [CK] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AM>> That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not AM>> allowed on the list and worse, you direct it at a AM>> mod

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 2:10 PM, you wrote: MB>> To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! A> Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. A> PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) Just say it is my feminine, southern use of language escaping fro

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB> To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) - -- -=] allie_M [=

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 11:35 AM, you wrote: AW>> This leaves aside the issue of just being polite to the folks who AW>> are volunteering their time and effort for your benefit and little AW>> if any gain, of course ... A> This *is* one of my points, come to think of it.

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:' JH> What is an 'Invalid Signature'? If the signature shows up as invalid it means that the message has not been altered since being signed by the sender. However, there's

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Williams [AW] wrote:' AW> Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its AW> much like antangoizing the fellow with a large caliber assault AW> rifle pointed at your hea

Re[3]: was: Hype over html text! now: PGP question

2003-02-08 Thread alists
Hello Allie, L> Saturday, February 8, 2003, 5:42:45 AM, you wrote: AM>> Are you referring to the PGP signature? I and the other moderators AM>> here agreed that we should PGP sign all our messages to the list. In AM>> this way, our messages can be easily verified, especially one l

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM> Yes, I'm seriously asking. Sorry for the confusion. It's not that I'm in any way more special and above reproach than any other member which is the impression that ma

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Alexander, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:52:03 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:52 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>> why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM>> member? ;-) AW> Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN> I'm not interested in diminishing or hiding anything. WN> My observation on logical inconsistency remains uncontested. I've already made my point on the issue. The only

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:36:20 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:36 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>> why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM>> member? ;-) AM> I don't know what the smiley is supposed to mean. Are you seriously

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Allie Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 09:35:48, Allie Martin said, more or less, the following: AM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- AM> Hash: SHA1 AM> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AM> Wal

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Alexander Williams
Peter Meyns: Saturday, February 8, 2003, 10:57:45 AM, you wrote: PM> Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and I'd PM> like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is it PM> worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other member? ;-) Well,

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK> I agree that the style of my remarks was over the limit, I will be CK> careful in the future or if I can't stand the pretentious atmosphere CK> I will leave. However, I don't u

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN> Furthermore, derogatory means, "...tending to lesson the reputation WN> of a person or thing." WN> It seems to me that the _remark_ of CK was not, in fact, derogatory. WN> I

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM> Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and PM> I'd like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is PM> it worse to direct it to

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Peter Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 08:57:45, Peter Meyns said, more or less, the following: PM> Hi Allie, PM> on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CK>> ...bitching about HTML being bloat. AM> That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not allowed on the AM> list and worse, you direct it at a

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK> The above message contained two lines of useful information. And one quoted line of text. CK> Yet look at how big it is with all the unnecessary crap. Are you referr

Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > ~john [j] wrote:' > j>> How do I join the BetaBat list ? > >You can use the following URL: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe > > - -- > -=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator} > >