Re: Mail filtering on IMAP folders?

2004-09-29 Thread Spam
Spam, [S] wrote: I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally and I get a new mail icon in the system tray. The problem

Re[2]: Mail filtering on IMAP folders?

2004-09-29 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Allie, On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 19:44 your local time, which was Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 01:44 my local time, Allie Martin [AM] wrote; AM There's nothing you can do about this. This is how TB!'s IMAP AM filtering behaves at the moment. 8 Snipped a bit 8 AM

Mail filtering on IMAP folders?

2004-09-28 Thread Spam
Hello everyone, I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally and I get a new mail icon in the system tray. The problem

Re: Mail filtering on IMAP folders?

2004-09-28 Thread Allie Martin
Spam, [S] wrote: I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally and I get a new mail icon in the system tray. The problem

Re: Mail filtering on IMAP folders?

2004-09-28 Thread Kevin Amazon
Hi Allie Martin - On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 19:44:54 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:44 PM where I live) you wrote: Otherwise, TB!'s IMAP is very frustrating when it comes to auto-filtering. To say the least. sigh -- Best Regards, Kevin PGP Keys:

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dan, On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:10:14 -0400 GMT (09/06/2004, 20:10 +0700 GMT), Dan Grunberg wrote: DG For what it's worth, this works for me: DG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | in the Kludges | Yes The only condition under which this will not work is when you have seperate folders for mailing lists,

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-09 Thread Dan Grunberg
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:52:01 -0500 (8:52 PM EDT here) Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Tuesday, June 08, 2004, Leif Gregory wrote... Duane ...and I've turned on Regular Expressions under the Options. Don't need the Regular Expressions. That'll break it. Would do in this example, Duane put

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Jonathan, Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 6:52:01 PM, you wrote: Jonathan Would do in this example, Duane put Jonathan Reply-To:.*TBUDL The .* Whoops. Musta not been paying too close attention. -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Tagline of the day: Stupidity got me into this

Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Duane Lambe
Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current), and jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the interface, etc. I've set up a filter for my Incoming IMAP box, as per the Welcome email, but I'm not sure I'm doing things right. For the account, I've gone to Incoming Mail,

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Duane, On 08 June 2004, 13:48 -0400 (08/06/200418:48 local time) Duane Lambe [DL] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DL Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current), and DL jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Duane, Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 11:48:05 AM, you wrote: Duane Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current), Duane and jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the Duane interface, etc. Welcome! :-) Duane I've set up a filter for my Incoming IMAP box, as per the

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Martin On Tuesday, June 8, 2004 19:14 our local time, Martin Webster [MW] wrote; MW If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your MW hands on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much MW improved IMAP support. Sorry to jump in here, but what is the improved

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Martin Webster
Hello Chris, On 08 June 2004, 20:09 Chris Weaven [CW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MW If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your MW hands on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much MW improved IMAP support. CW Sorry to jump in here, but what is the

Re[2]: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Duane Lambe
MW I'd use Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not worry about the MW regular expressions. Did as much, but I can't seem to get it to work... I /did/ put a space after the colon - not sure that that should be in there or not. Also, I'm IMAP-ping an Exchange box - I don't think that should make a

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread nednieuws | charles
Hello Martin, Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 8:14:24 PM, you wrote: MW If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your hands MW on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much improved IMAP MW support. Where do I get this beta? -- Regards, Charles.

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread nednieuws | charles
Hello nednieuws, Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 11:16:01 PM, you wrote: MW If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your hands MW on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much improved IMAP MW support. nc Where do I get this beta? Disregard... -- Regards, Charles.

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Duane, On 08 June 2004, 16:33 -0400 (08/06/200421:33 local time) Duane Lambe [DL] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MW I'd use Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not worry about the MW regular expressions. DL Did as much, but I can't seem to get

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Mail Filtering)

2004-06-08 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Leif, On 08 June 2004, 15:46 -0600 (08/06/200422:46 local time) Leif Gregory [LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LG A ma!!! You were doing so good.. What'd you do with your LG cut-mark / sig delimiter? I could see that one coming!

Re: Mail Filtering

2004-06-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Tuesday, June 08, 2004, Leif Gregory wrote... Duane ...and I've turned on Regular Expressions under the Options. Don't need the Regular Expressions. That'll break it. Would do in this example, Duane put Reply-To:.*TBUDL The .* wouldn't match anything if regular expressions were off, so