Monday, November 08, 1999
Hello Soth,
Sunday, Sunday, November 07, 1999, you wrote:
>> This is interesting. I have WinRAR but I couldn't find the command for
>> splitting file. How can it be done? I would really appreciate your
>> explanation because I would like to split TB on two flop
Monday, November 08, 1999
Hello Dejan,
Sunday, Sunday, November 07, 1999, you wrote:
Dejan> Hello Tracer,
Dejan> Friday, October 29, 1999, 2:10:22 PM, you wrote:
t>> Anyway, consider using winrar to split files in equal sized pieces
t>> and send those, one per email.. if you crash you only
Hello Mogens,
Sunday, November 07, 1999, 2:17:13 PM, you wrote:
MH> It is also possible to create rar achieves with a fixed size on your
MH> harddisk by entering the desired size instead of "automatic". That is
MH> a nice feature if you don't have the time to made all the floppies at
MH> the sa
Hi Soth,
Sunday, November 07, 1999, 9:03:14 AM, you wrote:
>> This is interesting. I have WinRAR but I couldn't find the command for
>> splitting file. How can it be done? I would really appreciate your
>> explanation because I would like to split TB on two floppies since
>> this version
> This is interesting. I have WinRAR but I couldn't find the command for
> splitting file. How can it be done? I would really appreciate your
> explanation because I would like to split TB on two floppies since
> this version is the first that is bigger then 1.44MB;)
*grin* wasn't going t
Hello Tracer,
Friday, October 29, 1999, 2:10:22 PM, you wrote:
t> Anyway, consider using winrar to split files in equal sized pieces
t> and send those, one per email.. if you crash you only have to redo
t> a small file not a huge file.
This is interesting. I have WinRAR but I couldn't find th
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ralf,
Saturday, Saturday, October 30, 1999, you wrote:
Ralf> Hi Oliver,
Ralf> you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ralf,
Saturday, Saturday, October 30, 1999, you wrote:
Ralf> Hi Oliver,
Ralf> you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ali,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
(snip)
Ali> Actually I read the mail, but sometimes I fail to remember names
Ali> associated with points made unless I'm well acquainted with the
Ali> individual such as Steve or Leif or Mark. My apologies for the
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Lionel,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
I forgot another option one has.
If netbeui is installed, all you have to do is have a partition shared
with a password on it and tell your friend the password and ip and he
can transfer direct in and out N
Hi Oliver,
you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
>>> Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
>>> error is reproducible with a 20 MB file on a 256 MB PIII. Hm.
RB>> Oliver, how long does it take on
Hi Ralf Buschmann,
On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 1999 at 21:07:26 you wrote:
RB> Hi Oliver,
RB> you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 8:20:42 PM:
Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
RV>>> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
>> Seems to be a probl
Hi all,
On Friday, October 29, 1999, 1:10:11 PM (-5 GMT), Roel scribbled:
> If you're looking for space on the web to store/exchange files, try
> these out: (no, I'm not affliated with them)
> www.docspace.com (25Mb free)
> www.mediadepot.com (30Mb free)
> just check 'em out & love 'em...
>
Hello Steve & everybody else on this topic,
SL> Most ISPs give you server space so you can put files up for others to get
SL> in case you need it. They also offer HTTP most of the time which is also a
SL> better protocol than SMTP/POP to move mail.
If you're looking for space on the web to
Hi Oliver,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 8:20:42 PM:
>>> Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
RV>> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
> Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
> error is reproducible with a 20 MB
Hi Oliver,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 8:13:01 PM:
[snip]
> I've been telling customers about that 64kb limit all the time...
> after having tried, I must say many mail server admins don't seem to
> care about that rumor ;) I send around large files, even 15 MB or so,
> oft
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
> Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
> ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
> any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
> an FTP server on my ca
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
> Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
> ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
> any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
> an FTP server on my ca
Hi all,
On Friday, October 29, 1999, 2:32:56 AM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled:
Ali>> Sending attachments is discouraged on this list. Your message
Ali>> alone is the equivalent of 10-15 others on average.
Ali>> The nature of your attachment and the fact that you sent it in the
Ali>> first place sh
Hi tracer,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 20:34:14:
>>> Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
Ray>> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
> Try dragging the big attachment..
Very interesting. It does not crash then. Also, attaching the file went
m
Friday, October 29, 1999
Hello Lionel,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
Lionel> Hello tracer,
Lionel> Friday, October 29, 1999, 5:59:36 AM, you wrote:
t>> Thats why splitting files and sending them as one by one seperate
t>> parts is better and more polite but really files should
Friday, October 29, 1999
Hello Ali,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
Ali> Hi all,
Ali> On Thursday, October 28, 1999, 1:34:14 PM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled:
>> Try dragging the big attachment.. the 22 mb attachment was in progress
>> of transfer (ie a 30 mb email!!!) but as I gue
Hello tracer,
Friday, October 29, 1999, 5:59:36 AM, you wrote:
t> Thats why splitting files and sending them as one by one seperate
t> parts is better and more polite but really files should be ftp'd.
t> Its really not that complicated to run an ftp server on your system so
t> that the receiver
Friday, October 29, 1999
Hello Steve,
Thursday, Thursday, October 28, 1999, you wrote:
Steve> Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 11:55:36 PM, Ralf wrote:
>> I've done it before. Well, a 5 megs attachment went along it's way just
>> fine. Why should some points reject a large message? Is there a gener
Hi all,
On Thursday, October 28, 1999, 1:34:14 PM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled:
> Try dragging the big attachment.. the 22 mb attachment was in progress
> of transfer (ie a 30 mb email!!!) but as I guess you donot want the
> game I cancelled it.
Sending attachments is discouraged on this list. Y
Hi all,
On Thursday, October 28, 1999, 1:13:01 PM (-5 GMT), Oliver scribbled:
SL>> The RFCs (I thought it was 822, but it is not, I am now looking for the
SL>> exact one) only guarantee up to 64kb. Furthermore large attachments were, and
SL>> still are, considered a denial of service. Ma
Friday, October 29, 1999
Hello Ray,
Thursday, Thursday, October 28, 1999, you wrote:
Ray> Hi Ralf,
Ray> Thursday, October 28, 1999, 12:15:07 AM, you wrote:
>> Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
Ray> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Ray> Ray
Ray>
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 1999 at 18:06:55 you wrote:
SL> Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 11:55:36 PM, Ralf wrote:
>> I've done it before. Well, a 5 megs attachment went along it's way just
>> fine. Why should some points reject a large message? Is there a general
>> rule or a RFC o
Hi Ray Vermey,
On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 1999 at 14:29:27 you wrote:
>> Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
RV> Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
error is reproducible with a 20 M
Thursday, October 28, 1999
Hello Ralf,
Thursday, Thursday, October 28, 1999, you wrote:
Ralf> Dear Ali,
Ralf> you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 00:59:59:
Ralf> [snip]
>>> And every person on the list who has any inkling of the standards
>>> just gnashed their teeth greatly. You are aw
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 11:55:36 PM, Ralf wrote:
> I've done it before. Well, a 5 megs attachment went along it's way just
> fine. Why should some points reject a large message? Is there a general
> rule or a RFC or something like that that restricts the maximum size of
> a message?
The
Hi Ralf,
Thursday, October 28, 1999, 12:15:07 AM, you wrote:
> Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Ray
For my PGP key click below:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp_key
--
--
Dear Steve,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 00:22:25:
> And every person on the list who has any inkling of the standards just
> gnashed their teeth greatly. You are aware that a 9Mb attachment will
> most likely not be accepted by any point along the way?
I've done it before. Well, a
Dear Ali,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 00:59:59:
[snip]
>> And every person on the list who has any inkling of the standards
>> just gnashed their teeth greatly. You are aware that a 9Mb attachment
>> will most likely not be accepted by any point along the way?
> So it's perhaps de
Hi all,
On Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 5:22:25 PM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled:
>> I open a new message, write a few lines and then try to attach a
>> ZIP file of about 9 megabytes to that message. After some lengthy
>> hard disk activity (at least 30 seconds) a message box saying "Out
>> of memor
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 3:15:07 PM, Ralf wrote:
> I open a new message, write a few lines and then try to attach a ZIP
> file of about 9 megabytes to that message. After some lengthy hard disk
> activity (at least 30 seconds) a message box saying "Out of memory!"
> comes up and the file is no
Hi all,
I'm running The Bat! v1.36 on German Windows 98 (first edition), PII-400
SCSI system with 128 megs RAM. At least 500 megs free on all local disk
drives.
I open a new message, write a few lines and then try to attach a ZIP
file of about 9 megabytes to that message. After some lengthy hard
37 matches
Mail list logo
