Hello Tony,
Saturday, April 30, 2016, 5:50:21 AM, you wrote:
> you can click on Setting/Labels and manage which labels Gmail will
> present to IMAP clients using the 'Show In IMAP' checkbox.
> TB! as a mail client simply shows what it sees.
> I hope that helps.
Thank you!
This was very
Hello Susanne,
Friday, April 29, 2016, 9:13:54 PM, you wrote:
> Can someone please explain in simple terms which folders I should
> subscribe to.
> All Mail was definitely a mistake, as the messages are duplicated in
> different folders.
> And "inbox" is not a choice.
> My folder tree in TB is
Hello Tony,
Friday, April 29, 2016, 4:55:59 AM, you wrote:
> They'll appear when you use
> Manage IMAP Folders, select the folders to subscribe to and then click
> OK.
I'm having a hard time understanding IMAP with TB.
Can someone please explain in simple terms which folders I should
subscribe
Hello Susanne,
Friday, April 29, 2016, 1:16:53 AM, you wrote:
>> I think they need to be the same. You should manage them by right clicking on
>> the name of the account and selecting Manage IMAP folders.
> Oh, man! Maybe I'll stick with Pop3 for now! ;)
You don't need to actually 'manage'
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, April 28, 2016, 4:56:35 PM, you wrote:
> I think they need to be the same. You should manage them by right clicking on
> the name of the account and selecting Manage IMAP folders.
Oh, man! Maybe I'll stick with Pop3 for now! ;)
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Susanne
Hello Susanne,
A reminder of what Susanne typed on:
Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 16:49:57 GMT -0700
S> Is it possible to have different folders in TB, and the Gmail account?
S> Or do I have to set up the same folders in Gmail, to make this work?
I think they need to be the same. You should
Hi
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 at 2:11:56 AM, in
mid:1526671477.20130624211...@denstarfarm.us, Robert D. wrote:
It works splendidly well except for one account. And
that one didn't always have the problem. And ... a
couple others did and they magically cleared up.
Needles to say, this has
Hi
On Monday 24 June 2013 at 2:26:13 PM, in
mid:1148489053.20130624092...@denstarfarm.us, Robert D. wrote:
I have one email account where, at start-up, no filters
work.When I run re-filter on that account, every
email, usually dozens, will correctly filter to the
common folders I use
Hello MFPA,
Monday, June 24, 2013, 2:21:06 PM, you wrote:
If you have separate filters for each account, I can't suggest
anything.
Yup ! A few email accounts have collected. Whatever Lists of interest
to which I was subscribed, stayed with the respective Email Account.
I move Inbox emails
Hello MFPA,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:30:10 +0100 your time, you said:
[...snip...]
You could test by maybe adding a check to see if the file exists and
display a message if it doesn't.
Yes, I have the folder open when I collect my mail, and I see the wavs
appear in the folder.
I take it the
Hello Simon,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:23:30 +0100 GMT (11/09/2008, 16:23 +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
PMFJI. I really don't know anything about running external programs,
but this paragraph just made me think of something:
S So, TB! is executing the exe, but it is being run somewhere else,
S not in
On 11 September 2008, 10:23, Simon wrote:
When I run my converter, it creates a couple of temp files and folders in
the system temp folder. When run manually I can see these being created and
removed as the program executes and ends. I also tried this with TB!
executing the .exe and TB! is
Hello Geoff, and Thomas,
Thanks both for your replies.
Spent far too long poncing about with this task now so I'll just set it as a
scheduled Windows task to check the folder daily and convert files, or run
it manually with a WinHotKey if I need to do it inbetween. I'll go back to
it some time
Hello Simon,
Thursday, September 11, 2008, 11:23:30 AM, Simon wrote:
So, TB! is executing the exe, but it is being run somewhere else, not in the
same folder as it is executed from. And I have no idea why that is, or how
to resolve it.
To check where it actually is run, you'd just have to
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 7:45:39 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
I am trying to use the 'Run External Process' action under a TB!
filter, but the command does not do as I would expect.
Never tried it.
I have a TB! folder that all my voicemail messages gets
But now none of the email filters I had for the lost folder are
working. The problem is that when the folder was lost, it was moved to
M What happens if you move the folder (in TB!) to the location the
M filters point to and then move it back? Don't know if you need to
M close/restart TB!
Hey Jack,
My MUA believes mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was written on Saturday, June 14, 2008 at 1:05:39 PM.
The problem is that when the folder was lost, it was moved to a new
location and the filters were all changed, automatically, to follow
it. Now that the folder is back where it belongs, the
Hello Jack,
Saturday, June 14, 2008, 6:05:39 PM, you wrote:
But now none of the email filters I had for the lost folder are
working. The problem is that when the folder was lost, it was moved to
a new location and the filters were all changed, automatically, to
follow it. Now that the
Hello Terry,
Monday, June 18, 2007, 10:09:26 PM, you wrote:
Currently our company's e-mail system is have problems. I can receive
messages but can not send. As a work around I have been replying to
e-mails in my work account than moving the messages to a personal
e-mail account and sending.
Hello Doug,
Tuesday, June 19, 2007, you wrote:
OR you could try just changing the Account Properties | Transport
details of the SMTP server to the details for your personal account
(if your service allows this). Then the mails from work are sent via
your personal account, but still have
Dear all,
That's right. They're just gone. Last thing I remember is that I
had to close down The Bat because it didn't want to end - now all filters of
one account are gone.
How come? More important: how to get them back?
Okay, I love the Restore feature. Still it's strange that all
Hello Marten,
Can anyine come up with any possible reasons why some (not all) filters may
suddenyl have stopped operating?
Incoming filters, or any type? Account or Common filters? Have you added,
changed, altered the order of or deleted any filter recently?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hello Marten,
Can anyine come up with any possible reasons why some (not all) filters may
suddenyl have stopped operating?
Incoming filters, or any type? Account or Common filters? Have you added,
changed, altered the order of or deleted any filter recently?
Yes - have added some - two
Hello Marten,
Can anyine come up with any possible reasons why some (not all) filters may
suddenyl have stopped operating?
Incoming filters, or any type? Account or Common filters? Have you added,
changed, altered the order of or deleted any filter recently?
Yes - have added some - two
MAU @ 2007-1-29 11:15:41 AM
Filters - stopped working mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most likely one of your added filters is 'inhibiting the trigger of
other filters. Remember they are 'executed' top-down.
And, unless it is marked are Continue processing... (it shows up
blue), only the first matching
Hello Chris,
3. TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
Name: Lists
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
Hello Chris,
Yep, the filters seem to be working ok now. So, it was a combination
of two things I think. First was removing the tick from the 'continue
processing' option on each of the rules. Second was changing the Spam
rule from 'Sender contains {nothing}' (whic
h is what it was under
Hello Chris,
3. TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
Name: Lists
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
Hello Chris,
3. TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [B9153070.01C60E1A.5B96D817.1622DA7A]
Name: Lists
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
I don't see any problem with this filter. I think your main problem, as
Hallo Chris,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?
You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function
Hello Chris,
I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
filters don't seem to be working in v3?
Three things:
1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you
Hallo Chris,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?
You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function
Hello Chris,
I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
filters don't seem to be working in v3?
Three things:
1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you
Hallo Jack,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried
JSL to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't. I eliminated ALL the strings
JSL and substituted for them just the @ sign. I
Hallo Jack,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:47:41 -0500GMT (26-10-2005, 12:47 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JSL I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my
JSL original text. I used the words individual folders implying multiple
JSL folder destinations when I should have said a
Hello Jack,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:50:49 -0500 GMT (26/10/2005, 17:50 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL I am inferring from your reply that the later version of TB that
JSL you're using has a different method of filtering. Would what I'm
JSL trying to do be any easier with a later version of
Hi
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 at 11:58:49 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field.
I would have thought you needed one filter for each folder you
wished to
Hi
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 at 11:47:41 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my
original text. I used the words individual folders implying multiple
folder destinations when I should have said a single folder
Hello Jack,
Welcome back.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:58:49 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 17:58 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
JSL incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
JSL one name in the RULE tab under
Hello Stuart,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:14:08 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 20:14 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system.
Oops, my bad.
SC I don't remember how to use the old system and I don't have access
SC to an old copy.
Me neither.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005,
@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on
On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the remainder of
the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter
Hallo admin,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:43:37 +0100GMT (6-10-2004, 19:43 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A Can anyone in the know gie me an indication of when the filters not
A working will be sorted?
Currently we're testing release candidate 5 for TB 3.01, so I guess
the most waiting has been
Hallo admin,
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:51:53 +0100GMT (7-10-2004, 13:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Currently we're testing release candidate 5 for TB 3.01, so I guess
the most waiting has been done.
A Sorry but that info means nothing to me - do you mean there is never
A an RC6 or that there
Hello Roelof,
Historians believe that on 07 October 2004, at 14:24:36 +0200 (which was
13:24 where I live) Roelof Otten you wrote (and possibly edited)
Currently we're testing release candidate 5 for TB 3.01, so I guess
the most waiting has been done.
Sorry but that info means nothing to me
ON Thursday, October 7, 2004, 3:45:52 PM, you wrote:
aacu They are not working! They will work if each individual folder is
aacu manually re-filtered, but leave them to themselves and they don't -
aacu seems to be mainly the Common Filters (yes, I have ticked all the
aacu folders in the thrid
On Fri 17-Sep-04 2:25pm -0400, Mean Drake wrote:
I have a small problems with filters. I want to delete mails over 1 MB
in size on server WITHOUT downloading them. I have set a filter for
the same and the action set is to delete it from server.
In Selective Download, the only options you have
Hallo Joe,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:53:30 -0400GMT (14-9-2004, 20:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
J I some noce filters build. I have to make some changes to them for
J various reasons. The one change is just to insert an AND in the
J mix. It seems I can only append. I can't insert or
Hallo Joe,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:33:45 -0400GMT (14-9-2004, 22:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
J I want to rearrange the filter itself. For example: I have a filter
J that has a block. In that block is an AND and an OR. I want to move
J the OR up before the block and maybe insert another
Hallo Stuart,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:54:10 +0100GMT (9-9-2004, 11:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SM Filters are driving me potty.
Don't despair.
SM I belong to a mailing list for Pentax camera owners. This list has
SM a lot of messages a day but I am only interested in messages that
SM are
Hallo Stuart,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:14:23 +0100GMT (9-9-2004, 16:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SM [*]ist[-][d] in the subject line or main text (where []
SM denotes optional and this is a complete word so I do not get
SM matches on words beginning with ist)
SM I assume this should be
Hi Cilfa,
@5-Nov-2003, 11:50 +0100 (05-Nov 10:50 UK time) Cilfa [C] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
C I would like to be able to manage my filters with a text file,
C instead of managing them with the sorting office. Is this
C possible
No. Well, you can keep a repository of useful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Edward,
On 21 September 2003, 07:18 -0700 (15:18 local time) Edward J. Krall [EJK] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EJK I must be missing something simple...
EJK I upgraded to V2, and am using an IMAP account. Filters used to work
EJK great
Hi Elaine,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, at 06:08:01 [GMT-0400] (which was 20:08:01
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
I am looking for an easy way out to search, find and edit.
I think we all are!
:-(
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 06:08:01 -0400 GMT (20/09/2003, 17:08 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
I have 209 folders with perhaps anywhere from one to four
filter rules per folder. Is there a way to alphabetize the
filters and is there a way to work with them away from TB!?
You don't want to
Bill Blinn Technology Editor, [BBT] wrote:
BBT There might be a better way. A new user asked about the ability to
BBT edit received messages. Without testing, I replied, Try Ctrl-E. So
BBT today I tried it and thought I had provided bad advice.
BBT Ctrl-E opens the message for editing as I said.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi P,
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 at 22:54 GMT -0500, P . Johnson [PJ]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PJ in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to
PJ edit a received message Subject. I use SpamPal and it marks
PJ suspects
Hallo P,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:54:43 -0500GMT (28-8-03, 5:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ Just in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to
PJ edit a received message Subject.
No.
PJ I realize from reading some of the archives that editing a received
PJ message is for
Kevin Coates, [KC] wrote:
KC If you create a filter in The Bat to look for ^X-SpamPal: SPAM
KC (minus the quotes) in the kludge or anywhere you can move the
KC messages to your spam folder automatically.
Don't forget to enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options. The
search string
Hello Dave,
1. Drag the message to your Outbox folder.
2. Open it (double click on it)
3. Edit subject
4. Save it (don't send it)
5. Move it back to original folder
As you say, it is probably the easiest method. However, you must be
aware that this method does change some of the original
Hello P.Johnson,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:31:06 -0500 GMT (28/08/2003, 21:31 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
Can you tell me exactly how I would export and import back? I see an
export option under Tools but neither the msg or eml formats seem to
be editable.
Over here, all formats (.msg, .eml,
Hello Granville,
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
I use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/) to classify spam and
then in TB I just have one filter that looks for the
On Sun 27-Jul-03 6:04pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
AFAIK, No
Hello Bill,
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string bill mccarthy OR string
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you get a match with any or both.
However, if
Hello MAU,
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
On Mon 28-Jul-03 6:13am -0400, MAU wrote:
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string bill mccarthy OR string
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you get a match
On Mon 28-Jul-03 7:39am -0400, MAU wrote:
It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
level and you are now looking for the single string
bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to
Hello Bill,
If you look for AB you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so g
I couldn't get it to work as a concatenation operator. I sent an
email to myself and filtered for a sender of bill mccarthy (without
the quotes) - it did not work. Can you provide an example that
Hello Bill,
Hmm, so '' is a concatenation operator in TB. Is that documented
anywhere?
No, it is not and, obviously, it is not documented. See my other reply
to you.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Granville Cousins writes:
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
If you're using a POP mailbox (not IMAP), use POPFile. Then you only need
one spam filter in TB to remove anything POPFile has
On Sun 27-Jul-03 3:29pm -0400, Jos Klaassens wrote:
All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
accounts. Tried sender, kludges
27-Jul-2003 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The main set is always AND. You won't receive an email that contains all
of the addresses you've specified.
You have to specify the other
On Sun 27-Jul-03 5:05pm -0400, Alexander wrote:
The main set is always AND. You won't receive an email that contains all
of the addresses you've specified.
You have to specify the other addresses on the Alternatives tab with the
Add set button. It will look like...
MainSet: [EMAIL
Hello Bill,
Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
I use these in the Search for field of the Message
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:04:00 -0500 GMT (28/07/03, 05:04 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:
So are you saying in one String field in the filter on the Rule tab
I can use the following?
and =
or = |
You can (at least I know about |, never tested ). But I find it
more
Hallo Mike,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:57:23 -0500GMT (14-6-03, 0:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MR Is it possible to create filter rules that scan attachments?
No, TB doesn't do that, not even for filenames.
There are plug-ins for a variety of virus scanners that allow for
scanning the
Hello Joan,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:02:16 +0100 GMT (19/03/03, 04:02 +0700 GMT),
Joan Josep wrote:
TF String: Reply-To:.*TBUDL
TF so that this dot-asterisk is interpreted as any characters
I do not see the need of .*
If tbudl is present, it is, whatever is around. I use tbudl as a
Hallo Pete,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 03:02:23 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 9:02 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH I have 1.60 and am happy with it. Does 1.62 represent an important
PH improvement?
Mostly minor improvements, some bug-fixes, there were some stability
issues with 1.60.
The most important
Hallo Pete,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:46:08 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 0:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH Filters have me stumped!
PH I have strings set up as follows:
PH TheBat Text
PH batSubject
PH TBUDL Recipient
PH tbudl Recipient
PH bat
Hello Pete,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:48:19 -0500 GMT (18/03/03, 09:48 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
RO You're using five conditions. Unless you've setup all conditions as
RO separate conditions (on the 'Alternate' tab) all of these five
RO conditions have to met in order to trigger the filter.
Hello John,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
~ [strings]
~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
Why you would include a £ symbol.
As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
e-mails could be filtered out as spam just
I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master
set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to
multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session...
Friday, February 21, 2003, 11:23:51 AM, you wrote:
Here is a
Hello Paul,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 12:00:16 PM, you wrote:
PS As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
PS e-mails could be filtered out as spam just because I
PS used the symbol of my countries currency (one of the
PS World's major currencies). If you are going to go
Paul Smithson wrote:
P Why you would include a £ symbol
Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ?
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Paul Smithson wrote:
P As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
P e-mails could be filtered out as spam just because I
P used the symbol of my countries currency
If someone is using currency symbols in the subject line, it is
probably because they are wanting to sell
Hi Spike,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:21:46 -0500GMT (21.02.03, 19:21 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
S Example from a recent Asian spam:
S Subject: ¡m¤@Ó§Y£±N¾î±½½u¤W¹£CÀ¸ªº¤j«¬¹qª±½Ï¥Í¡A¡i¨M¾Ô¡j¹CÀ¸±N©ó12¤ë
S
Hi Robert,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:25:52 -0600GMT (21.02.03, 19:25 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
RCW Roughly 1/3 of the spam I see looks like this:
RCW ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÇÒ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ , with no standard ASCII chars anywhere south of
RCW the header.
It only means
Hello ~John,
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
[strings]
£
You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
e-mail :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:21 PM, you wrote:
S I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master
S set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to
S multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session...
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
M e-mail :)
No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add
you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail
before my Spam filters would.
--
Regards,
~John
Hello ~John,
No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add
you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail
before my Spam filters would.
You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose
name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you
Hello Spike,
If you send me mail with $, £ or any other currency symbol in the
Subject line, you would certainly be sent to my TRASH folder, as you
are trying to sell me something I did not request.
I said: If we were doing business... :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose
M name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you pronounce ~John starting with
M the ~? ;-)
Very carefully!
LOL
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 |
You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
e-mail :)
Can't see why since this is what a whitelist would and should fix.
/ St
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Try replying to the right person. You just piggybacked my reply ;-)
I see that now...just forget I replied, people...and once again I
did not add anything clever to the discussion...
/ St
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hallo greekdivers,
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:06:28 +0200GMT (29-1-03, 21:06 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
g Is there a way with a filter to check the message subject and if
g the subject meets the requirements (of the filter) then it will
g deleted from the server without first going
Hello greekdivers,
Is there a way with a filter to check the message subject and if the
subject meets the requirements (of the filter) then it will deleted from the server
without first going into my inbox?
Yes, try Selective Download filters.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hello M.,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:23:11 -0700 GMT (16/12/02, 01:23 +0700 GMT),
M. Evans wrote:
Maybe others have mentioned this idea: let the same filter apply to
both Inbox and Outbox so that I don't have to keep defining the same
filter twice, once for recipient and once for sender.
Hello Chris,
Thursday, October 24, 2002, 8:43:26 PM, you wrote:
CW Spot my deliberate mistake!? For some reason I though active would make
CW it run automatically, rather than having 'Manual' checked! Doh :-\
CW It's working fine now! Just need to work on the delete filter which
CW should be
Hi Adam,
On Friday, October 25, 2002 14:26 your local time, which was 09:56 my
local time, Adam Adam [A] wrote;
CW It's working fine now! Just need to work on the delete filter which
CW should be childs play and also, how a quick key can run all the
CW filters for me (Re-Filter Folder).
A
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
