Test for On---
On Wednesday, January 6, 2010, at 5:56:21 AM, MFPA wrote:
Has anybody experience of this and/or an explanation?
Apple's OS/X is a variant of Unix, which uses only the linefeed character
to mark the end of each line. Windows uses the return/linefeed pair. I
suspect that the
Hi
On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 12:16:23 AM, in
mid:184290695.20090829001...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Can anybody confirm that a PGP encrypted and signed
message cannot be decrypted in TB! if you don't have
the sender's public key to check the signature?
Also, if somebody pastes their
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:02:21 +0100 GMT (03/Sep/09, 18:02 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Can anybody confirm that a PGP encrypted and signed
message cannot be decrypted in TB! if you don't have
the sender's public key to check the signature?
I don't use PGP at the moment, but isn't it
Hi
On Thursday 3 September 2009 at 4:03:02 PM, in
mid:56009531.20090903220...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
I don't use PGP at the moment, but isn't it one of the
points? I mean, you have to exchange public keys (or
download them from the keyservers) in order to be able
to
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:16:14 +0100 GMT (04/Sep/09, 1:16 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M You need your secret key to decrypt a message that somebody has
M encrypted to your public key. You do not need their key to decrypt
M the message.
This is the part I misunderstood. Thanks.
--
Hi
On Saturday 27 June 2009 at 9:25:33 AM, in
mid:974850556.20090627092...@srima.eu, Sean Rima wrote:
I have seen various filters for PGP/GPG to decrypt
incoming mails. Maybe it is me, but I can never get the
filter to ask for a password once a session and then
auto decypt encrypted
Hello MFPA,
Saturday, June 27, 2009, 11:14:29 AM, you wrote:
I have seen various filters for PGP/GPG to decrypt
incoming mails. Maybe it is me, but I can never get the
filter to ask for a password once a session and then
auto decypt encrypted messages. Ever 2 or 3 messages it
pops up
Hi
On Sunday 2 March 2008 at 9:05:30 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], O. Martin Moran
wrote:
There is something weird going on with The Bat! 4.0.14 and PGP 8.1.
I find that if I go to encrypt something and get as far as the
select keys to encrypt to screen, then back out, both The Bat! and
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, March 3, 2008 at 7:30:44 AM, MFPA wrote:
M Decrypting/verifying is fine. Encrypting/signing randomly fails
M to work, and when it fails it disables all pgp functions until
M PGPserv.exe and TB! are restarted. It is random but frequent
M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 2:22:06 PM, Peter wrote:
PM Sorry, no. The last version of PGP I used was 6.5.8ckt. (I still use
PM it for PGP-disk.) I prefer GnuPG now. Your signature verifies good
PM here though. :)
It is something to do with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi O.,
on Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:05:30 -0700GMT (02.03.2008, 22:05 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
OMM There is something weird going on with The Bat! 4.0.14 and PGP 8.1.
OMM I find that if I go to encrypt something and get as far as the
OMM select
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 26 Oct 2006,
@ @ at 19:53:51 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
When I receive a PGP/GPG-signed message, there is the icon in the
upper right which can be clicked to
Richard H. Stoddard @ 2006-10-26 9:53:51 AM
PGP-signed messages mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I've noticed some have the icon, presumably indicating it's
been signed, but there is no begin and end tags, and if I click
on the icon on those messages, I get the message there is nothing to
Richard H. Stoddard @ 2006-10-26 7:53:11 PM
PGP-signed messages mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, for your message I still got the message that the public
key wasn't found; perhaps I should have had it check more
keyservers.
My public key is available via (at least) blackhole.pca.dfn.de. For
Hello Roelof,
Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:20:23 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Tony,
RO On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:18:58 +0200GMT (20-4-2006, 18:18 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
T Today, after a windows reinstall, I can't get PGP 8 working.
T I have a fully registered PGP 8.
RO Tools - Open PGP
Hallo Tony,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:18:58 +0200GMT (20-4-2006, 18:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
T Today, after a windows reinstall, I can't get PGP 8 working.
T I have a fully registered PGP 8.
Tools - Open PGP version - ?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
I'm not a Vulcan, but I play one on TV -
Hi
On Monday 24 October 2005 at 10:45:40 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
I'm going to add a note to
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5222
Thank you, Mary.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
You're only young once; you can be immature forever
Using
Hi
On Friday 21 October 2005 at 4:36:31 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
If a PGP-encrypted message contains no text apart from a URL,
decrypting it by pressing the button in the preview pane shows a
completely blank message body.
BT report at
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, October 24, 2005, 12:58 PM, you wrote:
If a PGP-encrypted message contains no text apart from a URL,
decrypting it by pressing the button in the preview pane shows a
completely blank message body.
Not my experience. With Open PGP, the message is displayed still
Hi
On Monday 24 October 2005 at 7:45:56 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
Not my experience. With Open PGP, the message is displayed still
encrypted after pressing the button; plus I got a Windows Notification
that no application is associated with this.
That does sound
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, October 24, 2005, 3:42 PM, you wrote:
Not my experience. With Open PGP, the message is displayed still
encrypted after pressing the button; plus I got a Windows Notification
that no application is associated with this.
That does sound different to what happens here. I
Hello Mary and MFPA!
On Monday, October 24, 2005, 4:36 PM, you wrote:
The common factor is that an inline PGP encrypted message
containing just a URL does not decrypt as it should.
I'm going to test again, using the BT link and see if I get the odd
result I reported above, again.
I did the
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, October 24, 2005, 3:42 PM, you wrote:
Also, my tests may not be relevant enough for me to report them in a
note to 5222. What do you think?
The common factor is that an inline PGP encrypted message
containing just a URL does not decrypt as it should.
I have done some
Hi Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov,
On Tuesday, August 09, 2005, you wrote:
Good day, Jurgen.
Please send me yours PGP key.
Folder template? :)
--
Jonathan Angliss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpG88YePXoY1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version
Hi Jurgen Haug,
On Tuesday, August 09, 2005, you wrote:
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 9:00:25 PM, you asked for my PGP key. Please find it
attached.
This is an automated reply and your mail won't get read.
Looks like you might need to fix your auto-responder not use
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 12:34:39 AM, you wrote:
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 9:00:25 PM, you asked for my PGP key. Please find
it attached.
This is an automated reply and your mail won't get read.
Looks like you might need to fix your auto-responder not use
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 12:34:39 AM, you wrote:
This is an automated reply and your mail won't get read.
Looks like you might need to fix your auto-responder not use
reply-all, but just reply to sender.
hmmm, I am using this 'send automatic reply' item in the
Hello Allie,
On 23 May 2005, 21:43 you wrote:
If only women came with pulldown menus and online help.
...and a reset button. ;-)
--
As ever,
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
I've got a little list. I've got a little list. W S GILBERT
Hi Martin,
-- 24.05.2005 08:58 +0100:
If only women came with pulldown menus and online help.
...and a reset button. ;-)
I thought they do have buttons.
... nice day to you all. ;)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current version
Hello Martin.
--On 24 May 2005 08:58 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
..and a reset button. ;-)
A Shut your gob button would be nice too :)
--
Tony.
M.
pgpiIuqWn4sxK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 3.5
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 18:06 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8
installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 2:44:39 PM, you wrote:
TB God Allie we're good 'aint we :)
:-)
Besides that, is it (not the both of you, but PGP9) worth upgrading?
- - --
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hello Mark.
--On 24 May 2005 15:33 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Besides that, is it (not the both of you, but PGP9) worth upgrading?
That's for you to decide. I got fed up with all the agro I was getting with
trial versions or free Gnu versions, it was a confidence thing, so
Hello Tony,
A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBUDL typed on:
24 May 2005 at 16:08:56 GMT +0200
I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures
verify on here at all,
I doubt they will, I've just fired up TB! and none of them do, not even
here.
Is it usual to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Tony,
TB I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures
TB verify on here at all, but I'm getting there.
I got a bad signature for this one...
- --
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.5
-BEGIN PGP
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 4:02:09 PM, you wrote:
TB That's for you to decide. I got fed up with all the agro I was getting with
TB trial versions or free Gnu versions, it was a confidence thing, so in an
TB attempt to get some stability from PGP I fully bought and paid for PGP9
TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mark.
- --On 24 May 2005 17:35 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I got a bad signature for this one...
They should all be bad on TBUDL and TBBETA. They don't even register as
digital signatures here, even though I signed them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mark.
- --On 24 May 2005 17:37 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my visa
card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with address in
London. :-(
Ooops. I
Hallo Tony,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:47:28 +0100GMT (24-5-2005, 17:47 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TB I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the
TB dutaint lists. Try this one?
Verifies ok.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Mistrust first impulses, they are always good.
The
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 5:47:28 PM, you wrote:
TB I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the
TB dutaint lists. Try this one?
I get OK PGP verified for this one...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Roelof.
- --On 24 May 2005 17:59 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Verifies ok.
It's clear signed though, not MIME, not ideal but the only way I can get a
verification on these lists.
- --
Tony.
M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mark.
- --On 24 May 2005 18:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I get OK PGP verified for this one...
Clear signed, not MIME.
- --
Tony.
M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0
Comment: processed
Hi Tony,
On 24/05/2005 01:44 PM +0100, you wrote:
God Allie we're good 'aint we :)
Yeah. Good work!!
PGP9 was assimilated. ;)
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
(A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network?
Hi Tony,
On 24/05/2005 03:02 PM +0100, you wrote:
There are a few things I don't like, I prefer pre v9 tray right click
menu, with v9 you have to open the whole program to get to PGPkeys
and verifying in TB! opens the whole program interface as well. Apart
from that I like it.
Maybe
Hi Mark,
On 24/05/2005 05:37 PM +0200, you wrote:
I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my
visa card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with
address in London. :-(
May as well return the card. You're still vulnerable and really can't
be sure that your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Allie.
- --On 24 May 2005 11:31 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
PGP9 was assimilated. ;)
No problem for The Caribbean English Alliance. Now where's that big bad
black Jedi geezer with the funny torch, we'll sort him out next
Hello Allie,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 6:36:13 PM, you wrote:
AM May as well return the card. You're still vulnerable and really can't
AM be sure that your card was compromised on the Internet.
The day I found out, the card was canceled immediatly. See TBOT (tomorrow I'm
awake for 22 hours, time
Hi Tony,
On 24/5/2005 5:47 PM +0100, you wrote:
Did you get the file I sent by the way?
What file? :/
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
Wit levels low. Attempting to compensate.
Current version
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 12:55 -0300 you wrote about PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie
Hi Tony,
On 23/5/2005 4:59 PM +0100, you wrote:
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try
enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems.
LOL!!!
I'd try the usual way
Hello Tony,
On 23 May 2005, 16:59 you wrote:
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling
email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems.
Does this explain why your message ID is always
Hi Martin,
On 23/5/2005 5:19 PM +0100, you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP
address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a
message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g.
Hello Allie,
On 23 May 2005, 17:39 you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP
address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a
message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g.
Hello Alexander,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:53:05 PM, you wrote:
Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere
using
So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a client
instead...
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL
Hello Martin.
--On 23 May 2005 17:19 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 11:12 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it
worked. I did nothing else. shrug
Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law
abiding, looking after under
Hello Tony,
on Monday, 23. May 2005, at 16:59:55 [GMT +0100] you wrote regarding
PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there
Hello Alexander,
On 23 May 2005, 18:10 you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you?
To answer Tony's message first... I
Hello Tony,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote:
However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it
worked. I did nothing else. shrug
TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this?
TB I'm a good person,
OK...
TB law abiding,
Nice...
TB looking after under
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 19:06 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a
client instead...
This one will thread OK as well, not with TB! as a client.
--
Tony.
M
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 14:24 -0300 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support
for PGP 9 in the future?
That's one for the developers.
Oh look, it threads :)
--
Tony.
M
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:52 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it
will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway.
No threading at all.
Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of
Hello Mark.
--On 23 May 2005 19:38 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
TB don't do sex much either.
Oh-Oh must be the lying that does it! :-)
OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I was
younger.
I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as well
Hello Martin.
--On 23 May 2005 18:33 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Also, will you try Mulberry with 11?
If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is
in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same
problems.
--
Tony.
M
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 20:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
No threading at all.
After this post I promise my threading will be OK.
Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of
IMAP. With all those different (buggy) server types that need
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 20:34 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Also, will you try Mulberry with 11?
If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is
in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same
problems.
Nah, I won't
ON Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote:
TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law
TB abiding, looking after under privileged children, don't do drugs, don't go
TB to pubs, don't do sex much either. I must have been really bad in a
TB previous life!
Hi
Hello Gerard.
--On 23 May 2005 21:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I don know but you are missing a lot of the fun things ;-)
Shhh, can't stop, kids are all in bed asleep. Must get on... If you'll
excuse the pun :)
And stop baiting me, I've already been trouted twice
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 2:24 PM -0300, you wrote:
Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support
for PGP 9 in the future?
I had it working fine in TB! just before removing it for other reasons.
I think the current PGP support will tango with PGP9.
--
Allie Martin
On Monday, May 23, 2005 at 10:55:35 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas Martin wrote:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8
installed, and then ran
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:10:37 -0500GMT (18-2-2005, 21:10 +0100, where I
live), David Calvarese wrote:
DC On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
HdB live), Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own
PM implementation, but not
Hi
On Saturday 29 January 2005 at 5:03:29 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
I don't know how Outlook/OE handle those messages, though.
OE receives an empty message body with two attachments.
What should be the body of the message is an attached *.txt file.
The detached
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 19:03 Lithuanian Time, you wrote:
ASK I don't know how Outlook/OE handle those messages, though.
Outlook handles PGP/MIME signed messages quite well, it displays emails taxt
and signature is displayed as an attachment.
Outlook Express can't
Hello Ralph Inselsbacher everyone else,
on 29-Jan-2005 at 17:31 you (Ralph Inselsbacher) wrote:
I use PGP 8.1 with TB to sign my outgoing mails. In those mails there is
no trace, that they where signed.
Oh yes, there is. :-)
So, if i send a mail to - let's say - an outlook (express) user,
Hello Alexander,
A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz on TBUDL typed on:
Saturday, January 29, 2005 at 18:04:38 GMT +0100
ASK I don't know how Outlook/OE handle those messages,
Same was as TB! does, you see an attachment icon for you to click and view
the signature.
--
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 20 Dec 2004,
@ @ at 08:32:26 +1100, when Robin Anson wrote:
On Sun 19 December 2004, 3:52:05 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Just to add shortly that I found that PGP 6.0.2i,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Date : Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:32:26 +1100
Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:
Robin On Sun 19 December 2004, 3:52:05 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Just to add shortly that I found that PGP 6.0.2i, coming with PGPdisk,
is free, and that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Date : Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:18:34 +0100
Henk de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:
Henk Hello Mica,
Henk On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:52:05 +0100GMT (18-12-2004, 17:52 +0100, where
Henk I live), you wrote:
Henk ...snip
Henk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello B,
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:58:51 -0500GMT (19-12-2004, 15:58 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
ftp://ftp.hacktic.nl/pub/crypto/pgp/pgp60/pgp602i_freeware
Try this link ;)
Thanks! I already managed to download.
- --
cheers,
Henk
On Sun 19 December 2004, 3:52:05 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Just to add shortly that I found that PGP 6.0.2i, coming with PGPdisk,
is free, and that's the way how I solved use of an encrypted volume I
keep TB and Mail in, under both XP and Win98Se.
I used to run 6.0.2i for PGPdisk, but when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 21:04:27 +0200, when Peter Palmreuther wrote:
- PGP-Desktop is as expensive as DriveCrypt, the successor of Scramdisk,
but you get not only the disk
Hello Mica,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:52:05 +0100GMT (18-12-2004, 17:52 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
...snip
ftp://ftp.de.pgpi.org/pub/pgp/6.0/6.0.2i/PGPfreeware602i.exe
does not work :-(
--
Henk
__
The Bat! Natural Email
Hello Henk,
Saturday, December 18, 2004, 10:18:34 AM, you wrote:
HdB ftp://ftp.de.pgpi.org/pub/pgp/6.0/6.0.2i/PGPfreeware602i.exe
HdB does not work :-(
Try:
ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/crypto/pgp/
--
Best regards,
Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BayesIt! 0.5.5
Using The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 18 Dec 2004,
@ @ at 19:18:34 +0100, when Henk de Bruijn wrote:
Hello Mica,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:52:05 +0100GMT (18-12-2004, 17:52 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
...snip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Scott,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:31:58 -0800GMT (18-12-2004, 19:31 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
Try:
ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/crypto/pgp/
Thanks!
- --
cheers,
Henk
__
The
Hello Mica,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:47:31 +0100GMT (18-12-2004, 19:47 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
It worked on Sat Oct 16 2004 for me. I admit that most German FTP
servers work very slow for me, but must be there are other places this
version can be found. Try to google a bit by the file
Hello Steve,
Monday, November 22, 2004, 2:47:19 AM, you wrote:
ST Hello tbudl,
ST I've got a client running TB v. 2.12 where I had to reinstall
ST everything after a HD failure. They're also running PGP 8.
ST I can't seem to get the decryption to show up in the TB viewer. It
ST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, Steve! Monday, November 22, 2004. 23:25:59
On day Monday, November 22, 2004 you wrote:
I can't seem to get the decryption to show up in the TB viewer. It
always does a save-as to a text file. How do I get it
Hello Milan,
Monday, November 22, 2004, 2:33:21 PM, you wrote:
MG I don't know if this would help, but... I use GnuPG and I had the same
problem,
MG but only with messages encoded to UTF-8. I couldn't manage to read them from
MG inside TheBat, and had to do it from a command line by entering
Hi
On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 6:21:28 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Its the path to executable files (and such - goes for batch files
etc. as well). If you have added a directory-path to the system's
PATH environment variable, that directory will be searched for
commands if you enter
Hello MFPA,
Thursday, October 28, 2004, 4:30:53 AM, you wrote:
They're usually placed either in the TB! installation directory or in
any directory that's in your system path.
I keep seeing the terms system path and (in tip of the day)
system's PATH Environment variable. Does that mean
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] everyone else
27-Okt-2004 08:03, you wrote:
I have copied the 3 batpgpNN.dll files (the same ones from version 1.6x)
in The Bat!'s program directory. However, when I click on Tools
OpenPGP Choose OpenPGP Version, the Open PGP 6.0x/6.5x plugin is grayed
out.
I'm
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004 at 11:09:40 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander
S. Kunz wrote:
I'm not 100% sure, but IIRC v2 doesn't need the batpgpNN DLL's anymore.
You can install PGP (version 5,6,7 or 8) and should be able to select PGP
5,6,7,8 (built in support) from the menu; at least thats how it
Hi
On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 2:47:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
However, if you're running PGP v8, the integrated support is the best
to use.
But it still gives me problems such as reported at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3488
Is there a PGP v8 freeware?
Yes.
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004 at 8:47:25 PM [GMT -0500], Z5worg
wrote:
I have PGP 6.5.8 freeware. The batpgpNN DLL's were the ones downloaded
from Ritlab sometime ago. But as I said, I unzipped the files into the
Program directory, and the Choose OpenPGP Version option is grayed
out.
Where
Hi
On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 3:12:35 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
[...]
They're usually placed either in the TB! installation directory or in
any directory that's in your system path.
I keep seeing the terms system path and (in tip of the day)
system's PATH Environment variable. Does
Hi
On Monday, 18 October, 2004, at 12:22:48 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
You may wish not to use OpenPGP from within TB! and only externally.
There are those who do not wish to use integrated support.
I find that if I use TB!'s integrated support to encrypt and sign
with PGP 8.1 the message is
MFPA writes:
I find that if I use TB!'s integrated support to encrypt and sign
with PGP 8.1 the message is only sometimes sent, further attempts
to sign or encrypt using the integrated support bring up Access
Violation messages, and often I can no longer verify or decrypt
using the
Hi
On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 9:08:44 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
The first part of this problem appears to have been fixed in 3.x; I had
similar problems and now they seem to be gone, although it's still
early.
Good to hear. Looking forward to being able to use this feature
MFPA writes:
Good to hear. Looking forward to being able to use this feature reliably. I
downloaded the latest version of TB! last night. I suspect I shall
install and try it out soon.
I current have the client set to sign all of my messages to this list
(via folder templates), and it is
1 - 100 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
