Martin
On Thu 23 June 2005, 00:10:09 +1000, you wrote:
The only thing I found in the archives was writing a filter that
stores the file to disk, opens a text editor and later reimporting the
message. 50 times a day? Not me! There has to be a more clever way!
It's not the best way, but it
Ian
On Thu 23 June 2005, 08:52:05 +1000, you wrote:
Ensuring e-mails are as the sender sent is is important, and it is
only seen when there is a problem.
A plain text message is repudiable precisely because it can be edited so
easily. Unless both sender and recipient agree the message is as it
Hello Robin,
Martin
On Thu 23 June 2005, 00:10:09 +1000, you wrote:
The only thing I found in the archives was writing a filter that
stores the file to disk, opens a text editor and later reimporting the
message. 50 times a day? Not me! There has to be a more clever way!
It's not the best
Hello Dwight,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:24:47 -0500 GMT (23/06/2005, 06:24 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC By this logic, we should get rid of pens, because someday someone
DAC might use one to commit a forgery. I cannot imagine that an issue of
DAC the foundation of an email is ever going
Hello Ian,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:00:41 +1000 GMT (23/06/2005, 07:00 +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
IAW Apparently there are tools that let you do this, however as far as an
IAW e-mail program is concerned, it should not. If it does, then there
IAW should be some indication that the message has
Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Jun-23 11:28:20 AM
Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alas, when I export, edit, and import it, I don't even have that
indicator.
Why should it not?
There is no easy way to tell whether said message has been edited or
simply
Hello Chris,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:47:41 -0400 GMT (23/06/2005, 22:47 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:
Alas, when I export, edit, and import it, I don't even have that
indicator.
Why should it not?
C There is no easy way to tell whether said message has been edited or
C simply imported from a
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 9:35:00 AM, you wrote:
Correct. This my very point: I can edit the message externally and
then import it. What is the purpose of not allowing me to do it
internally?
Forgive me if I am missing something here but...can't you copy (or
move) a message to
Hello Terry!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 12:01 PM, you wrote:
Forgive me if I am missing something here but...can't you copy (or
move) a message to the outbox and than edit that message?
You can. We have had this discussion at least once before on TBUDL--a
long time ago--and my memory of this
Hello Mary,
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 10:34:54 AM, you wrote:
You can. We have had this discussion at least once before on TBUDL--a
long time ago--and my memory of this point is that, while you can do
that, when you then put the message in another folder, the time-stamp
changes.
So what
Hello Terry!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 1:54 PM, you wrote:
You can. We have had this discussion at least once before on
TBUDL--a long time ago--and my memory of this point is that, while
you can do that, when you then put the message in another folder,
the time-stamp changes.
So what
Hello Terry,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:54:55 -0700 GMT (24/06/2005, 01:54 +0700 GMT),
Terry G. Munson wrote:
TGM So what Thomas (and others) want to be able to do is edit a message and
have some
TGM indicator such as this mail has been edited after arrival but have
TGM the time stamp not change.
Hello tbudl,
I searched in the archives, but maybe I just don't know the right
english words to ask the right question... ;-)
I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some
companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting
or some other clever trick to do this?
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 9:10:09 AM, Martin Schuster wrote:
I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some
companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting
or some other clever trick to do this?
There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and
Hello Dwight,
I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some
companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting
or some other clever trick to do this?
There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and apparently
the developers that this would be
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 4:58:32 PM, you wrote:
MS Thought so, thanks for the reply. I just hope this bad habit will someday
MS dissappear...
OTOH, if you were trying to save the text of the message to a textfile,
automatically stripping the disclaimers, that can be done...
--
Hello Dwight,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:51 -0500 GMT (22/06/2005, 21:50 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and apparently
DAC the developers that this would be wrong, and so it is not allowed. To
DAC tamper with the mail someone sends you
Hello Ian,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:52:05 +1000 GMT (23/06/2005, 05:52 +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
IAW If RITLabs want to implement such a feature, then editing a message
IAW should see text added to the message indicating the message and/or
IAW head contents have been changed.
Yes, I agree.
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 5:52:05 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
Ensuring e-mails are as the sender sent is is important, and it is
only seen when there is a problem.
may be important, in some situations
I was recently caught up in such a situation recently where a client
refused to pay up and
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 5:52:05 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
None of this is important until problems arise.
I think the thing that is so wrongheaded about this insistence in
limiting the possibilities of TB! and making it less functional than
other e-mail clients, is that it is always
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00:41 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
Yes, ensuring an e-mail is as it was sent is only important in some
situations, however those situations are critical when they arise.
But that has nothing to do with enabling a user to annotate, condense,
edit incoming mail.
Should
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00:41 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
Yes, ensuring an e-mail is as it was sent is only important in some
situations, however those situations are critical when they arise.
Even more apt comparison:
we need to ban digital cameras, because someone might change or
enhance
22 matches
Mail list logo
