Re: Rogues and Smileys in Voyager

2007-02-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:33:32 +0100 GMT (12/02/2007, 01:33 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM [RegKey left by Voyager] As a matter of courtesy, I prefer to delete this key after using a friend's computer. Gr So, I should use regedit, search for Voyager and delete the key? PM In

Re: Rogues and Smileys in Voyager

2007-02-11 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Gmail_mcristina.ramos, I don't consider this off topic, so I crosspost my reply to TBUDL. :) On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:47:54 +GMT you wrote on TBOT: Gr I guess this is a repeated question, but can anyone tell me whether Gr we can use Rogues and Smileys in Voyager. Sure we can! :)) Just

Re[2]: Rogues and Smileys in Voyager

2007-02-11 Thread Gmail_mcristina.ramos
Hi Peter, On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, at 17:51:49 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:51 where I live) you wrote: Sure we can! :)) Just make sure to have your Images folder with the Rogues and Smileys copied to the Voyager directory on the stick, and it will work as with The Bat!. Done As a matter

Re: Rogues and Smileys in Voyager

2007-02-11 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Cristina, on Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:07:50 +GMT (11.02.2007, 19:07 +0100GMT here), you wrote: [RegKey left by Voyager] As a matter of courtesy, I prefer to delete this key after using a friend's computer. Gr So, I should use regedit, search for Voyager and delete the key? In principle,

Re: Rogues Updates

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Leif, On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:04:25 -0600 GMT (04/10/2005, 04:04 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: LG It works for both roguemoticons and smileys. LG However, it doesn't do you much good since the functionality was LG turned off in TB. Maybe one day we can convince 9val to turn it on as LG

Re: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 17 August 2005 at 5:36:53 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: I download the R.M. archive about once a month and don't care for the rest of the updates. What we need are incremental updates! :-) How about a Rogues Server so that TB! could ask to connect

Re: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello MFPA everyone else, on 03-Okt-2005 at 22:25 you (MFPA) wrote: I download the R.M. archive about once a month and don't care for the rest of the updates. What we need are incremental updates! :-) How about a Rogues Server so that TB! could ask to connect to the server if an unknown

Re[2]: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Alexander, Monday, October 3, 2005, 2:33:20 PM, you wrote: IIRC an early implementation worked like that. But it wasn't conform with TB's no contact to the outside world (other than for mail sending and retrieval) policy, and thus was, being regarded as a potential security and/or

Re[2]: Rogues Updates

2005-09-12 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Alexander, Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 5:36:53 PM, Alexander wrotened: Alexander Hello Jeff Gaines everyone else, Alexander on 17-Aug-2005 at 10:19 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote: Anybody else seen this? Alexander All the time... (I only get the notifications though). Someone starts to

Rogues Updates

2005-08-17 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group I have had five emails enclosing an updated 'rogues.zip' dated from 15 August to 17 August. I don't know if the lady whose details have been updated is trying different pictures or if there's something wrong with the auto-mailer, they are all sent to the same email address. Anybody

Re: Rogues Updates

2005-08-17 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jeff, On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:19:50 +0100GMT (17-8-2005, 10:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JG I don't know if the lady whose details have been updated is trying JG different pictures or if there's something wrong with the auto-mailer, She's posting messages from the past and then

OT: Changing Roguemoticons [was Re: Rogues Updates]

2005-08-17 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Jeff! On Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 3:19 AM, you wrote: I don't know if the lady whose details have been updated is trying different pictures or if there's something wrong with the auto-mailer, they are all sent to the same email address. Sorry, Jeff. I don't guess that you noticed a

Re: Rogues Updates

2005-08-17 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Jeff Gaines everyone else, on 17-Aug-2005 at 10:19 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote: Anybody else seen this? All the time... (I only get the notifications though). Someone starts to update their image, and another one follows, and the yet another one again, then the first person again... its

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello John, A reminder of what John Morse on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 00:02:17 GMT -0600 And yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. A rebel eh! Your nothing but a big softy, a true rebel wouldn't meekly apologize straight away after such a bold statement :) Have

Re[2]: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Sean Rima
Hello John, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 6:02:17 AM, you wrote: The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. And yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. So you wipe your ass before you goto the toilet then :) Sean --

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday, 21 November, 2004, at 6:02:17 AM, John Morse wrote: The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. The relevance to the subject of Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 is not immediately obvious. Why will you not stop top

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Pank Floyd
Sunday, November 21, 2004, 1:02:17 AM, John Morse ( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote: JM The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. Does this mean that you're not happy ? JM I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. Becky is a fine mailer and is an outstanding choice when one

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Lou
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:02:17 -0600, John Morse wrote:  The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore.  I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. And yes,  I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry.  ~John Have a look at Pocomail. I am probably going to move to it instead of

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Lou, A reminder of what Lou on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 05:39:04 GMT -0500 Have a look at Pocomail. I am probably going to move to it instead of TB 3.0. Life is tough, it is tougher if you're stupid. Funny how relevant taglines have a habit of cropping up at just the

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Lou
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:49:40 +, Tony Boom wrote:  Hello Lou,  A reminder of what Lou on TBUDL typed on:  21 November 2004 at 05:39:04 GMT -0500  Have a look at Pocomail. I am probably going to move to it  instead of TB 3.0.  Life is tough, it is tougher if you're stupid.  Funny how

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Lou, A reminder of what Lou on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 05:57:35 GMT -0500 I spent years figuring out why life was so tough for me. Lou Life is tough, it is tougher if you're stupid. Well there's your answer :) -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Lou, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 10:39:04 AM, you wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:02:17 -0600, John Morse wrote: The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. And yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. ~John Have

Re: Mod: DEAD HORSE (was: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-)

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 11:25:39 GMT + ' A! Gonna take weeks to get that smell out of my hair now :) -- Best regards,Tony. _

Re[3]: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Lou
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:54:51 +, Sean Rima wrote:  Hello Lou,  Sunday, November 21, 2004, 10:39:04 AM, you wrote:  On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:02:17 -0600, John Morse wrote:  The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore.  I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. And  yes, I'm

Re[4]: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Lou, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 11:38:46 AM, you wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:54:51 +, Sean Rima wrote: Hello Lou, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 10:39:04 AM, you wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:02:17 -0600, John Morse wrote: The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. I think

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Lou, @21-Nov-2004, 06:38 -0500 (21-Nov 11:38 UK time) Lou [L] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:  yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. Pease trim quotes - this has, and always had, no relevance.  Have a look at Pocomail. ... snip  I registered Becky before I started using TB!

Re: Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-)

2004-11-21 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Marck, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 11:48:01 AM, you wrote: Please trim replies to context. A sure fire indicator that insufficient trimming has been done is that the original greetings lines and signature remains in the quoted text. Darn I have been :trout: 'd :) Sean -- ICQ:

Re: Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-)

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 11:51:45 GMT + Darn I have been :trout: 'd :) That makes two of us today within ten minutes. Marck must have had a good days fly fishing yesterday :) -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-)

2004-11-21 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Tony, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 12:39:22 PM, you wrote: Darn I have been :trout: 'd :) That makes two of us today within ten minutes. Marck must have had a good days fly fishing yesterday :) I wonder if he was poaching :) Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Lou Yovin
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:46:40 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote  Then there is something amiss with the filter you have created and  not the system running it. You could paste the filter here or in  TBTech for our advice. There's nothing wrong with TB's  astonishingly good filter system - especially

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Lou, @21-Nov-2004, 07:43 -0500 (21-Nov 12:43 UK time) Lou Yovin [L] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:  ... You could paste the filter here or in  TBTech for our advice. L The first 2 filters in the account are: L (header contains, Action: move) X-Text-Classification: spam L (header contains,

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Lou, A reminder of what Lou Yovin on TBUDL typed on: 21 November 2004 at 07:43:38 GMT -0500 Certainly not complex. Most of the time, it works. Just had look at your website. Your method of telling someone their IP address is rather complex. Have a look at this...

Re: Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-)

2004-11-21 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 21 Nov 2004, @ @ at 11:51:45 +, when Sean Rima wrote: Darn I have been :trout: 'd :) Eeek! What a stink today on TBUDL. (-: - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at:

Re: [thebat] Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-21 Thread Lou
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:58:40 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:  Not complex enough I'd say.  Header contains implies that the header will always /begin/ with:  X-Text-Classification: spam  I'm not certain that your popfile headers have that strict a syntax. snip  Now your filters can be:  

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-20 Thread Chris
Milan Gurjanov @ 2004-Nov-19 8:17:39 PM -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=- mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And if anyone knows if this version will be developed in future is Bat 3.xx better than SecureBat? SecureBat has been (well, will be) incorporated into The Bat! 3. However, were I you, I

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-20 Thread John Morse
, 2004 11:37 PM Subject: Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=- Milan Gurjanov @ 2004-Nov-19 8:17:39 PM -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=- mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And if anyone knows if this version will be developed in future is Bat 3.xx better than SecureBat? SecureBat has been (well

-=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-19 Thread Milan Gurjanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Everyone! Saturday, November 20, 2004. 02:15:32 Is it possible to see rougeemoticons in this version of Bat? And if anyone knows if this version will be developed in future is Bat 3.xx better than SecureBat? 10x. -

Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-

2004-11-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Milan, On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:17:39 +0100GMT (20-11-2004, 2:17 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MG Is it possible to see rougeemoticons in this version of Bat? It was possible with TB 2.12 (IIRC), so I guess it would be possible with securebat too. MG And if anyone knows if this version

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-19 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello MFPA everyone else 19-Okt-2004 04:38, you wrote: And X-mailer to mailer. There is no such thing as a mailer header, the RFC suggestion is user-agent. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-18 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday, 13 October, 2004, at 9:25:29 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: Follow up is Ritlabs way of renaming the RFC References header field to make it more confusing. There seems to be no good reason for this. :-) You can see this renaming by selecting Preferences-Message Headers and

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-13 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Tue, 2004-10-12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its a reference (actually, the header that contains this follow up information is called references and not follow-up) to previous messages in the conversation - like saying this message (that you are writing) is a follow-up to these other

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-12 Thread expires30sept04
Hi On Monday, 4 October, 2004, at 4:45:32 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello Maria Cristina Ramos everyone else 04-Okt-2004 15:50, you wrote: This has nothing to do with Lynn's problem, but I'd like to know what's the Follow up. I know it's a header item you can turn on and off, but what

Re: Rogues

2004-10-05 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 12:11:22 AM, you wrote: Gotto see whether I can get it in the wiki, in that case it hasn't been completely for nothing. ;-) I'd highly appreciate that - its a very comprehensive site you created! -- Best regards, Alexander

Re: Rogues

2004-10-05 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Lynn, Monday, October 4, 2004, 4:49:02 PM, you wrote: L No, I just went and looked ... but I wonder why mine wouldn't work L with the rogues.msi file in the rogues folder; as soon as I moved L it to the 'images' folder, you came in fine ... Because the .MSI references a relative path

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-05 Thread Lynn
10/5/2004 LG Because the .MSI references a relative path to the Rogues images. LG TheBat! looks for the .MSL files in the images directory. We decided a LG while back to put images related to each .MSL file in their own LG directory so that one, it looks neater than having the images folder LG

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Message Headers. Look down your long list of choices. Be sure X-Rogues is checked. Your screen shot with Jürgen Haug's message in focus in the Preview Pane does not show the line (in my set-up it appears right below the Follow up: line) for X-Rogue:. If you check X-Rogues in View Folder/View

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
pcwsmileys.msl. If you have downloaded the latest from http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php And unzipped the pcwsmileys.zip into The Bat!/Images, that folder and that file will be in The Bat!/Images as well as the folder rogues and the file rogues.msl. If this is not working for you, please ask

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
Hello Mary, On 04 October 2004 at 07:46:55GMT -0500 (which was 13:46 where I live) Mary Bull wrote and made these points on the subject of Rogues pics: MB Your screen shot with Jürgen Haug's message in focus in the Preview MB Pane does not show the line (in my set-up it appears right below

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Maria! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 8:50 AM, you wrote: MCR what's the Follow up. I know it's a header item you can turn on and MCR off, but what is it precisely? Unless I'm totally confused, and that's possible, it is what The Bat! uses to thread messages with. -- Best regards, Mary

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread WilWilWil
==Original message text=== From: Mary Bull To: WilWilWil Date: Monday, October 4, 2004, 3:01:26 PM Subject: Rogues pics MB Hello WilWilWil! MB On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 6:09 PM, you wrote: W When I look in rogues.msl, I see :Hawthorne: with image link, W

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Mary Bull everyone else 04-Okt-2004 14:46, you wrote: In View, select Message Headers. Look down your long list of choices. Be sure X-Rogues is checked. Erm... this is not checked here and it still shows the images in the header pane. Displaying the x-rogues header itself only shows

Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello TBUDL, OK, now I've got a working V3 can I check a point on the rogues gallery please? I think that to get my picture to show up I have to put my name between colons as I have in this email (I don't think you'll get a picture until the DNA tests are complete). Presumably

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Maria Cristina Ramos everyone else 04-Okt-2004 15:50, you wrote: This has nothing to do with Lynn's problem, but I'd like to know what's the Follow up. I know it's a header item you can turn on and off, but what is it precisely? Its a reference (actually, the header that contains this

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 10:39 AM, you wrote: MB In View, select Message Headers. MB Look down your long list of choices. Be sure X-Rogues is checked. ASK Erm... this is not checked here and it still shows the images in ASK the header pane. Displaying the x-rogues header

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Roelof Otten
it to the 'Images' directory that's in your TB! installation | directory: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images | You should now have a directory called 'rogues' containing many | images as well as the file 'rogues.msl' in your Images directory. | Go into the preferences, and bring up the View/Editor

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
Hello Roelof, On 04 October 2004 at 18:36:48GMT +0200 (which was 17:36 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of Rogues: RO Yuck, that was nasty of you. You inserted Lynn's rogue-handle in your RO message and since it was placed before yours, it was used in the RO

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Roelof, On Monday, October 4, 2004, 5:36:48 PM, you wrote: Hallo Jeff, On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:39:21 +0100GMT (4-10-2004, 17:39 +0200, where I live), you wrote: [snipped] Yuck, that was nasty of you. You inserted Lynn's rogue-handle in your message and since it was placed before

Re[2]: Rogues pics New SS url ..

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MB Look down your long list of choices. Be sure X-Rogues is checked. It is ... MB Your screen shot with Jürgen Haug's message in focus in the Preview MB Pane does not show the line (in my set-up it appears right below the MB Follow up: line) for X-Rogue:. If you check X-Rogues

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MB Maybe she just needed to close and re-launch The Bat! We haven't heard MB from her yet, this morning. No, I've been running late, but after I checked the 'X-roges' in the 'view' menu (main window), I not only restarted TB, I rebooted the system .. and still no rogues

Re: Rogues pics New SS url ..

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 4:10 PM, you wrote: MB Look down your long list of choices. Be sure X-Rogues is checked. L It is ... Between the time I sent that post and your reply, someone corrected me and said that enabling X-rogues would not fix the problem. And it doesn't, so my

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 4:21 PM, you wrote: L (I can't recall if I have to be using the RTF L editor for that to work, but the offer is sincere!) No, you should be able to see your face in the headers using Plain Text View. And mine, and that of everyone else in the

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 JG I can also see that with some people their picture shows up even JG though I can't see the :xxx: bit in their JG email. e.g. Thorvald (like JG the hat!) has a picture but no :xxx: whereas Lynn has a :Hawthorne: JG in her sig, although interestingly her picture isn't showing.

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 RO | RO | Unzip it to the 'Images' directory that's in your TB! installation RO | directory: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images RO | You should now have a directory called 'rogues' containing many RO | images as well as the file 'rogues.msl' in your Images directory. RO

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lynn, On 04 October 2004 at 14:31:59GMT -0700 (which was 22:31 where I live) Lynn wrote and made these points on the subject of Rogues: L Maybe I should try composing w/rtf, but I can't imagine L that that would make what I can *see* any

Re[2]: Rogues pics New SS url ..

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
MB has fixed it, also-- Actually, the wiki is a lot more important than the rogues, so I'm glad his attention was there ... You knew it had to be some dumb thing, it was, and now I, too, can move on to something more important! -- Lynn :Hawthorne: :usaflag: :canadaflag: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MCR I don't think you can send a message written in RTF to the list. I did MCR that twice by mistake and they both came MCR returned saying the content MCR was not appropriate. Yes, I think that's true .. it's one of the reasons why I really don't want to mess with it; what I wasn't

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 4:45 PM, you wrote: L Yes!! I've got a rogue! Hi Roelof! L Somehow, the 'rogues.smi' file got into the \rogue folder, L but it was supposed to be in the *image* folder! L It works! At last! Well, Lynn, just ignore the screen shot of my C:/Program

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MB I am almost desperate enough to suggest that you send Leif a Private MB Mail about this. No need .. *and* I managed to successfully subscribe to the beta list, *and* (ta da!) I finally found out what was wrong with the templates! I do want to thank you, and all the rest of the

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 4:54 PM, you wrote: L Yes. Now all I have to figure out is how to get two flags L to show in the signature! L Always something You just have an extra letter in the :usflag: handle. :) -- Best regards, Mary :Trill: :canadaflag: :usflag: The Bat!

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MB Hooray for heroic fellow-batter Lynn! MB Lynn, where is Roelof's beer? I just sent a few cases up for the whole group, and a vat of coffee for the teetotalers! rofl I do thank you all! -- Lynn :Hawthorne: :usaflag: :canadaflag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 4:58 PM, you wrote: L *and* I managed to successfully subscribe to L the beta list, *and* (ta da!) I finally found out what was L wrong with the templates! Ta-da!! :grin: L I do want to thank you, and all the rest of the crew who L pitched in on this -

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Lynn, On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:21:12 -0700GMT (4-10-2004, 23:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: L A :batbeer: to the person who can figure out what I have L to do to see the rogues without going to PCWize! Check this: http://www.krakeel.cistron.nl/rogues/index.html L (I can't recall if I

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Roelof Otten
for nothing? I hadn't read this message, but only (one of) your message(s) to Mary and decide to visualize it over here: http://www.krakeel.cistron.nl/rogues/index.html Gotto see whether I can get it in the wiki, in that case it hasn't been completely for nothing. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof sorry, I

Re: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Monday, October 04, 2004, 5:11 PM, you wrote: RO Darned, you mean I created that web page for nothing? RO I hadn't read this message, but only (one of) your message(s) to Mary RO and decide to visualize it over here: RO http://www.krakeel.cistron.nl/rogues/index.html Roelof

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 L Always something MB You just have an extra letter in the handle. :lol: .. thanks .. fixed now, I believe .. tnx again! -- Lynn :Hawthorne: :usflag: :canadaflag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 MB No, no! It's just beginning. Now you need to create a Lynn Avatar and MB upload it to the MB http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php page! I'm not sure the world is ready for a Lynn avatar .. I think you should settle for the Hat! :rofl: -- Lynn :Hawthorne: :usflag:

Re[2]: Rogues

2004-10-04 Thread Lynn
10/4/2004 L Somehow, the 'rogues.smi' file got into the \rogue folder, L but it was supposed to be in the *image* folder! RO Darned, you mean I created that web page for nothing? No, I just went and looked ... but I wonder why mine wouldn't work with the rogues.msi file in the rogues folder

Re[3]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lynn, On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe this message that I have parked will help : Okay, how do you insert the X-Rogue: header? You can do that with this macro: %SetHeader(X-Rogue,:your_handle:)%- in your templates for this and other tb-lists. However,

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
?) and concentrate on the *other* end of the deal? For you to see other peoples' images you have to: 1) Download the rogues.zip file. 2) Unzip it to the TB program files folder as follows: a) The images live in images/rogues b) The rogues.msl file lives in images 3) Enable header view (View

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
the whole images folder and downloaded a new smileys and rogues file and started fresh. He also needs the view set to Rich Text, under-OPTIONS-PREFERENCES-viewers and a right-click under the headers for sender photo, display. THEN restart TB. -- Best regards, Paul

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 07:11:36 -0400 GMT (03/10/2004, 18:11 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: PC He also needs the view set to Rich Text, PC under-OPTIONS-PREFERENCES-viewers PC and a right-click under the headers for sender photo, display. Actually, I use the PTV and see the rogues

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
Hello Thomas, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 8:19:46 AM, you wrote: PC He also needs the view set to Rich Text, PC under-OPTIONS-PREFERENCES-viewers PC and a right-click under the headers for sender photo, display. TF Actually, I use the PTV and see the rogues pictures. oh, then it must be smileys

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Marck, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 3:26:24 AM, you wrote: MDP Thought I might point at at this juncture that all of these MDP instructions are about letting *others* see *your* image. Everybody is MDP flooding you with information on how to do this, yes we have been able MDP to see *you* for a

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Michael Acklin
Hello Marck, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 3:26:24 AM, you wrote: snip For you to see other peoples' images you have to: 1) Download the rogues.zip file. 2) Unzip it to the TB program files folder as follows: a) The images live in images/rogues b) The rogues.msl file lives in images 3

Re[3]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Michael, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 9:28:53 AM, you wrote: MA Has anyone been able to download the rogue.zip lately say this morning MA after 14:00 GMT? I downloaded this AM within the last two hours. Don't know about since 14:00 GMT. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL

DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 9:28 AM, you wrote: MA Is the person that takes care of this modifying the file and it is MA not available? or am I having a bad day The person doing the code is Leif Gregory. I wrote to him earlier this morning about this, but have not had a reply

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stuart, On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:40:23 -0500 GMT (03/10/2004, 20:40 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: SC Oddly enough, the message you just replied to was the first time I've SC been able to see Lynn's picture. I have seen reference to her hat SC before, but never seen the picture. It seems

Re[4]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Stuart, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 3:41:02 PM, you wrote: Hello Michael, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 9:28:53 AM, you wrote: MA Has anyone been able to download the rogue.zip lately say this morning MA after 14:00 GMT? I downloaded this AM within the last two hours. Don't know about

Re[2]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thomas, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 9:38:37 AM, you wrote: TF Hello Stuart, TF On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:40:23 -0500 GMT (03/10/2004, 20:40 +0700 GMT), TF Stuart Cuddy wrote: SC Oddly enough, the message you just replied to was the first time I've SC been able to see Lynn's picture. I have seen

Re[3]: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello List, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 10:00:54 AM, you wrote: SC C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images\Rouges.msl I am now seeing Lynn's picture on my message. Is it enough that : Hawthorne ;is mentioned in the message? -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
question: Are the other rogues gif/jpg files there too? SC I am now seeing Lynn's picture on my message. Is it enough that SC : Hawthorne ;is mentioned in the message? Yes, if you use the RTV. :-( The PTV will look only for the X-Rogues header. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Early to bed and early

Re: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Paul White
Hello Mary, On Sunday, 03 Oct 2004 at 15:47 (UK time), you said: MB Leif may indeed be working on the page, as I had some correspondence MB yesterday with him. It was about Recursive behavior (got up to 22 MB, MB should presently be 527 Kb) in the PCWSmileys Zip file. I wondered what was going

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
Hello Thomas, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 11:23:21 AM, you wrote: TF This is where the msl file is, and the file Lynn_Turriff.jpg will be TF in the C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images\Rouges directory. Good. I just looked on the rogues web site, and didn't see her. Has it been updated?? -- Best

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:39:35 -0400 GMT (03/10/2004, 22:39 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: TF This is where the msl file is, and the file Lynn_Turriff.jpg will be TF in the C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images\Rouges directory. Good. PC I just looked on the rogues web site, and didn't

Re: Rogues pics

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
Hello Thomas, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 11:45:58 AM, you wrote: PC I just looked on the rogues web site, and didn't see her. Has it been PC updated?? TF I last downloaded yesterday, and I see Lynn. Complete with hat. There TF might be a difference between the rogues website and the rogues.msl TF

Re: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 10:23 AM, you wrote: MB Leif may indeed be working on the page ... PW I wondered what was going on when I went to download the .zip PW file yesterday. I changed my mind when I saw it was 21.9Mb! I've PW downloaded the file in the last half hour and it's

Re[2]: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Sean Rima
- Hello Mary, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 7:24:51 PM, you wrote: Hello Paul! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 10:23 AM, you wrote: MB Leif may indeed be working on the page ... PW I wondered what was going on when I went to download the .zip PW file yesterday. I changed my mind when I saw it was

Re: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
Hello Mary, Sunday, October 3, 2004, 2:24:51 PM, you wrote: MB I still haven't heard from Leif today. I will keep everyone informed MB if anything changes. and I've been getting the 404 spider error code on the rogues.zip download.. do you have a new one you can send me?? -- Best regards,

Re: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Sean! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 1:32 PM, you wrote: SR I have been trying to download it allday and just keep getting a 404 SR error Sean, I have had the same error at the Roguemoticons download all day, also. That's: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip However, the

Re: DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 1:45 PM, you wrote: MB I still haven't heard from Leif today. I will keep everyone informed MB if anything changes. PC and I've been getting the 404 spider error code on the rogues.zip PC download.. do you have a new one you can send me?? No, I have no

  1   2   3   >