Re[4]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-12 Thread Paul
Hello Thomas, Sunday, December 12, 1999, 1:57:18 AM, you wrote: TF> Hallo tracer, TF> On Saturday, December 11, 1999, 7:24:39 PM (GMT+0800), tracer wrote: Paula>>> Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop Paula>>> everything to develop a Linux version (new name -

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-12 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Stanislav, Saturday, December 11, 1999, 6:36:27 PM, you wrote: SP>Well, but Delphi compiler for Linux is not released yet. You are right of course, I'm just impatient :-) We will have to wait, unless RIT can make a new TB from scratch. -- Best regards, Mark Using The Bat! 1.38e un

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-12 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Paula, Saturday, December 11, 1999, 8:54:50 PM, you wrote: PF> But, are any of these Linux users willing to pay for an application? Yes, I think there would be , I for one would pay for a decent e-mail app which works under Linux. There are a lot of new Linux users who boot straight into the

Re[3]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo tracer, On Saturday, December 11, 1999, 7:24:39 PM (GMT+0800), tracer wrote: Paula>> Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop Paula>> everything to develop a Linux version (new name - The Penguin!). Then, a Paula>> few of us long-time, loyal users find a way t

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Steve, On Sunday, December 12, 1999, 7:48:33 AM (GMT+0800), Steve Lamb wrote: >> One more thing, on a totally different track. Are there any good >> directories on the internet that provide data regarding the people >> behind the email address? Meaning, can you obtain more detailed data >>

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread tracer
Sunday, December 12, 1999 Hello >> *I* personally don't think so, unless Corel Linux proves to be working >> OS... They've released it finally a couple of days ago. But they >> charge for it... Acc to what I read they have 3 versions and a free one is available, you have to pay if you want the

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 11 Dec 99, at 19:49, Paula Ford wrote about "Re: SOT Linux port?": Well, Paula, I think you're quite right:-) In fact, I wasn't arguing against "TB for Linux" at all --- it *might* become a winner:-) But if you ask _me_, I'll tell you wh

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: >> But, are any of these Linux users willing to pay for an application? > There are three types of Linux users. Which group are you referring > to? I wasn't aware that there were established species of Linux users, especially since all my propel

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> This is not an area of competence for me, but that's why I'm asking: >> >> 1).- Aside from the received demand, what would be the advantage to >> using TB (and other applications) under Linux as distinct from under >> say Windows 200

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, December 11, 1999, tracer wrote: > You might be surprised as considering the clammering on the various > beta Linux groups about a decent email program, a good one IS sellable > probably not if its sold from Russia out though Why not, tracer? -- Paula Ford The Bat! 1.38e (reg

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread tracer
Saturday, December 11, 1999 Hello Paula, Saturday, Saturday, December 11, 1999, you wrote: Paula> Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop Paula> everything to develop a Linux version (new name - The Penguin!). Then, a Paula> few of us long-time, loyal users find a

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, December 11, 1999, 1:15:26 PM, Douglas wrote: > As Linux becomes more of a finished product, the costs associated with it > seem to be rising commensurately. My costs for my Linux server have remained the same for the past 2-3 years. Power. I have to pay for the power it consumes.

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, December 11, 1999, 12:54:50 PM, Paula wrote: > But, are any of these Linux users willing to pay for an application? There are three types of Linux users. Which group are you referring to? Group 1: Die hard free (speech) and free (beer) software advocates. Most likely not. Th

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 11 Dec 99, at 15:15, Douglas Hinds wrote about "Re[3]: SOT Linux port?": > This is not an area of competence for me, but that's why I'm asking: > > 1).- Aside from the received demand, what would be the advantage to > using TB (and other appli

Re[3]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Stanislav & all other TBUDL members, Stanislav, Paula and Mark have just written: PF>>> RIT Labs should drop everything to develop a Linux version MA>> RIT should move in fast before someone beats them to it, and SP> Well, but Delphi compiler for Linux is not released yet. This is not

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Mark Aston wrote: > Tell me about it, I missed the deadline for VA share applications by > one day, the e-mail with the forms etc. arrived late:-( > RIT should move in fast before someone beats them to it, there are > already several projects in progress

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Stanislav Polozov
Dear Mark, On Saturday, December 11, 1999, you wrote: PF>> Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop PF>> everything to develop a Linux version (new name - The Penguin!). Then, a PF>> few of us long-time, loyal users find a way to get it incorporated in PF>> the USA,

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-11 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Paula, Saturday, December 11, 1999, 3:03:50 AM, you wrote: PF> Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop PF> everything to develop a Linux version (new name - The Penguin!). Then, a PF> few of us long-time, loyal users find a way to get it incorporated in PF> the

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread Paula Ford
Judging by the response to VA Linux going public, RIT Labs should drop everything to develop a Linux version (new name - The Penguin!). Then, a few of us long-time, loyal users find a way to get it incorporated in the USA, roll out an IPO, and all get rich overnight. No need to have any prospects

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread tracer
Friday, December 10, 1999 Hello Mark, Friday, Friday, December 10, 1999, you wrote: Mark> Hi Oliver, Mark> Friday, December 10, 1999, 2:51:32 PM, you wrote: OS>> Hi tracer, OS>> On Freitag, 10. Dezember 1999 at 14:57:33 you wrote: t>>> Is Delphi 5 now under Linux? I didnt know that, Tha

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Oliver, Friday, December 10, 1999, 2:51:32 PM, you wrote: OS> Hi tracer, OS> On Freitag, 10. Dezember 1999 at 14:57:33 you wrote: t>> Is Delphi 5 now under Linux? I didnt know that, Thats nice, that t>> means a lot of code can now be cloned. OS> It isn't. It's supposed to be available

Re[3]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi tracer, On Freitag, 10. Dezember 1999 at 14:57:33 you wrote: t> Is Delphi 5 now under Linux? I didnt know that, Thats nice, that t> means a lot of code can now be cloned. It isn't. It's supposed to be available sometime around mid-2000, but when Borland says so it usually means more lik

Re[2]: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread tracer
Friday, December 10, 1999 Hello Mark, Friday, Friday, December 10, 1999, you wrote: Mark> Hi tracer, Mark> Friday, December 10, 1999, 4:08:04 AM, you wrote: DH What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version? Mark>>> If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to Mark>>>

Re: SOT Linux port?

1999-12-10 Thread Mark Aston
Hi tracer, Friday, December 10, 1999, 4:08:04 AM, you wrote: DH>>> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version? Mark>> If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to Mark>> change the interface language. t> Agreed, if only the BAT was under Linux... Well I guess there is