Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-16 Thread Scott
In which case IMHO it's kinda silly, annoying useless, considering one can easily set up a folder to grabs all unread msgs from all folders that excludes all other msgs, making it easier to read. Not that silly for someone like me, with 10 accounts and 496 folders :) I have about

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Scott, On Sun, 16 May 2004 01:37:04 -0500 GMT (16/05/2004, 13:37 +0700 GMT), Scott wrote: S I have about 30 accounts so I can see the value... well until I click on it and S just see about 10 folders called inbox... might be nice to see in the folder S list something about the account its

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-16 Thread MAU
Hello Scott, I have about 30 accounts so I can see the value... well until I click on it and just see about 10 folders called inbox... might be nice to see in the folder list something about the account its from... Agree, but that is what we have for the moment. -- Best regards, Miguel A.

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 1:39 AM on Sunday, May 02, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR View | Option | Folder Tabs option as you suggest, JR *all* my tabs disappear. No, only the all/unread/virtual folder tabs. [...] Also tabs created

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Sun, 2 May 2004 07:26:41 -0400 GMT (02/05/2004, 18:26 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR View | Option | Folder Tabs option as you suggest, JR *all* my tabs disappear. No, only the all/unread/virtual folder tabs. [...] JR Also tabs created by color group I didn't know

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 10:20 AM on Sunday, May 02, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in response to my comments Uread Message Tab: JR It simply comes down to a difference in people. OK, OK. But we both agree it's a minor issue, right? ;-) Given the state of the world we

Double addressing (was: Uread Message Tab)

2004-05-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:21:15 -0400 GMT (02/05/2004, 22:21 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: I would guess a stray reply template is the culprit. With one %TO= macro too many. JR Here's the appropriate portion of my reply template. I always thought JR the %REPLYTO applied to the

Re: Double addressing (was: Uread Message Tab)

2004-05-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 11:26 AM on Sunday, May 02, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in response to my comments on Double addressing (was: Uread Message Tab): JR %REPLYTO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] This one is redundant. The list server will override any Reply-To with the TBUDL

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:21:11 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 03:21 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: I disagree. It is easy for me to just click the unread tab. I was advised earlier that I create create a virutal foder that does the same. I choose the tab. JR IMO, not too much easier

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread MAU
Hello Dwight, Yes, I think it is very helpful. One has a list of all folders with unread messages, no matter how deeply buried in the account list tree, That's it. :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 2:15 AM on Saturday, May 01, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR Personally, I wish RIT would make it an option JR or excise it. It is indeed an option. Main menu: View / Folder Tabs. JR Indeed

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Sat, 1 May 2004 07:47:07 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 18:47 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: I cannot follow you. It is an ooption, yes it is. But you want to use it anyway. And say later on that the feature is redundant. But you don't want to use the option to turn it off. Hm? JR

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 2 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF Then just switch it off. That was my point. Then it won't take up TF space, it will be gone. Or is there something I'm not getting? Other TF tabs are uneffected by the setting for the unread tab. JR For you it's useful. That

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard, On Sat, 1 May 2004 19:40:52 +0100 GMT (02/05/2004, 01:40 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: TF It is. Opt out by going to View / Folder Tabs in the main menu and TF take the tickmark off. RW But the trouble is that it stops viewing of all virtual folder tabs too. RW There's only

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 2 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF But there are TF no tabs left, not even the all tab, when I switch it off. You're absolutely right! I must have wanted to have seen the ALL tab but they all go as you say. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.10.03

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU, Friday, April 30, 2004, 4:28:12 PM, MAU wrote: M Redundancy. What does it mean? ;-) see http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionaryva=Redundancyx=17y=21 -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 2:15 PM on Saturday, May 01, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR There is *only* one tab I am referring to in this thread it is the JR built in tab -- 'unread'. That is not an option. JR I like the tab feature

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Greg, On Sat, 1 May 2004 15:18:20 -0500 GMT (02/05/2004, 03:18 +0700 GMT), Greg Strong wrote: M Redundancy. What does it mean? ;-) GS see GS http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionaryva=Redundancyx=17y=21 I don't think he meant it as a question, as it's the same word in

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Sat, 1 May 2004 18:01:56 -0400 GMT (02/05/2004, 05:01 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: Then just switch it off. That was my point. Then it won't take up space, it will be gone. Or is there something I'm not getting? Other tabs are uneffected by the setting for the unread tab.

Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
It would seem to me that the unread msg tab is a misnomer because it shows all files including unread msgs. Unless I'm missing something, there don't seem to be any filter settings available for this view or..are there? Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V2.10.03/W2K_SP3

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jan, @30-Apr-2004, 13:49 -0400 (30-Apr 18:49 UK time) Jan Rifkinson [JR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JR It would seem to me that the unread msg tab is a misnomer because it JR shows all files including unread msgs. Unless I'm missing something, You are. To a degree. It's the folder

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:49:18 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 00:49 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR It would seem to me that the unread msg tab is a misnomer because it JR shows all files including unread msgs. Over here, it shows the folders that contain unread message. Works fine for me.

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Jan, on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:49:18 -0400GMT, you wrote: JR It would seem to me that the unread msg tab is a misnomer because it JR shows all files including unread msgs. Unless I'm missing something, JR there don't seem to be any filter settings available for this view JR or..are

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Marck, Thomas, Peter. Thanks for your response(s). At 1:55 PM on Friday, April 30, 2004 it seems Marck posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: JR It would seem to me that the unread msg tab is a misnomer because it JR shows all files including unread msgs

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jan, On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:19:51 -0400 GMT (01/05/2004, 01:19 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR In which case IMHO it's kinda silly, annoying useless, JR considering one can easily set up a folder to grabs all unread msgs JR from all folders that excludes all other msgs, making

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread MAU
Hello Jan, In which case IMHO it's kinda silly, annoying useless, considering one can easily set up a folder to grabs all unread msgs from all folders that excludes all other msgs, making it easier to read. Not that silly for someone like me, with 10 accounts and 496 folders :) --

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas Miguel, Thanks for your response(s). At 2:23 PM on Friday, April 30, 2004 it seems Thomas posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: I disagree. It is easy for me to just click the unread tab. I was advised earlier that I create create a virutal foder

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread MAU
Hello Jan, Sorry, I just don't get it. I wish I did. Try it. Create 10 account with a total of 496 folders. belongs in the department of redundancy department. Redundancy. What does it mean? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03

Re: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, April 30, 2004, 1:35:56 PM, MAU wrote: In which case IMHO it's kinda silly, annoying useless, considering one can easily set up a folder to grabs all unread msgs from all folders that excludes all other msgs, making it easier to read. M Not that silly for someone like

Re[2]: Uread Message Tab

2004-04-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Miguel. At 5:28 PM on Friday, April 30, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Uread Message Tab: It's like using word 'again' again. :-) As for the utility of the tab that indicates folders that have un-read msgs in them, well, like I said: I must