Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:44:06 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 10:44 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the
Hello Gary,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:06:22 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 12:06 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
T Under the Advanced tab, make sure the radio button Kill is selected
T (default).
Taking this a step further, under the advanced features.. it seems you can
call up a file for signal strings. I am
Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:41:25 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 13:41 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the lower
headers, even if you tick on anywhere.
This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
it should
Hi Jonathan!
In message mid:12151905962.20021026224406;certiflexdimension.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:44:06 PM, you wrote:
MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA friends that all use multipart/alternative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
it should allow you to search lower headers too... but when you
select the anywhere clause, I think it shouldn't actually hit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Scott McNay wrote...
MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA friends that all use multipart/alternative headers for including HTML
JA parts.
Hi Thomas!
In message mid:461061460.20021027105209;gmx.net
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:52:09 PM, you wrote:
TF The biggest part of the message may be the body; you can search for
TF signla strings in it. The lower headers are just a line or two. You
TF cannot search for signal string in
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net
instead of merely the domaing name.
Can this be done with the bat?
I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are infected
with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done, but it is a
Hello SCN,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 09:55 +0700 GMT),
SCN User wrote:
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
domaing name.
Can this be done with the bat?
Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office /
Do you know if Outlook Express 6.0 will do this as well?
Randal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello SCN,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 09:55 +0700 GMT),
SCN User wrote:
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270255.TAA14570;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:55:54 PM, you wrote:
SU I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are infected
SU with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done, but it is a real
SU nuisance. I downloaded the bat
Hi SCN,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:55 PM, you put forth, in part, about blocking IP
address vs domain name.:
S I want to block the following IP address
S 66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
S domaing name.
Blocking is best done through a firewall or DNS
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270321.UAA18081;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:21:46 PM, you wrote:
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
domaing name.
Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download.
Hello SCN,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:21:46 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 10:21 +0700 GMT),
SCN User wrote:
Do you know if Outlook Express 6.0 will do this as well?
I don't understand your question, as you top-posted on my long
article. I have no idea what you mean by do this. Do what? Spread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Scott McNay wrote...
SU I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are
SU infected with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done,
SU but it is a real nuisance. I downloaded the bat this evening and
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:08 PM, you put forth, in part, about blocking IP
address vs domain name.:
T Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download. Hit on New,
T creating a new filter. Fill in the above IP address into the signal
T Strings field. Use the radio
Hello Gary,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:31:23 AM, you wrote:
G Another way of handling it is to use the mail dispatcher feature. You can
G invoke this by Account / Dispatch mail on server, to manually start this
G process, or set it to do it automatically in Account / properties / mail
G
Hi Barry2,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 11:38 PM, you put forth, in part, about blocking IP
address vs domain name.:
G management / mail dispatcher. You will then see you mail before it is
G downloaded, and you can hand delete the offending files, while it is
G on your ISP's server, before
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:08 PM, you put forth, in part, about blocking IP
address vs domain name.:
T Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download. Hit on New,
T creating a new filter. Fill in the above IP address into the signal
T Strings field. Use the radio
20 matches
Mail list logo
