Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, on Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 3:01:07 AM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: >> Yes, it's in chinese characters on my display. So, please don't >> translate into Thai, as this would probably also result in Chinese >> characters PS> Yes, in the preview pane it's displayed in my preferred

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hello Peter Steiner, On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:01:07 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 2:01:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Peter Steiner wrote: Peter> Yes, in the preview pane it's displayed in my preferred codepage Peter> too; but when i hit reply, the new message

Re: re's and regexp's

On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:12:55 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: AVK >>> although I have no idea how this might be translated:-(> Thomas>>> That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone Thomas>>> help out here and translate this into English, German, Spanish, Thai, Thomas>

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi there! On 20 Dec 99, at 16:12, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re[4]: re's and regexp's": > AVK>>> AVK>>> although I have no idea how this might be translated:-(> > > Thomas>> That's a real pity as I value your comments and

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hi Alexander, on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> PS> But this works not for the Subject line, unless somebody can tell >> PS> how to nest quotes. The normal way to replace the subject of a >> PS> message is >> >> PS> %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, on Saturday, December 18, 1999, 7:38:23 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS> PS> That seems to work :-) PS> (See also my separate bug report post on this subject) Great! :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38e under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

Re[3]: re's and regexp's

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:49:28 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 12:49:28 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thomas> Hi Alexander, Thomas> on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >>> PS

Re[4]: re's and regexp's

Hi tracer, on Monday, December 20, 1999, 3:47:05 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: AVK>>> >> although I have no idea how this might be translated:-(> Thomas>> That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone Thomas>> help out here and translate this into English, German, Spanish,

Re: re's and regexp's

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:26:16 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote: > IMHO this example must be in the FAQ. Wait, wait... FAQ means frequently Answered Questions (though some people may prefer F. Asked Q.). Now this question has been answered only once and does therefore not qualify ;-)) > It is very useful

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:56:46 +0100, you wrote: PS> There are two reasons why this doesn't work: PS> 1. [ and ] have a special meaning inside regular expression (see in PS>the Help under Regular Expressions Syntax (Basic)). You have to PS>write \[ and \] OK, Time for me to read

Re: re's and regexp's

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:41:58 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote: > I use this (Antwort|Antw|Re|Aw|FW) for searching. But one Problem i > have. > Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an > example: > Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update SOT:

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi there! On 18 Dec 99, at 14:41, Dirk Heiser wrote about "Re: re's and regexp's": > Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an > example: > > Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update > >

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

hallo Dirk! on Saturday, December 18, 1999, 2:41:58 PM, you wrote: DH> Hi Peter, DH> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:38:23 +0100, you wrote: DH> [...] PS>> but the subject shows at the end a CRLF displayed as two additional PS>> black boxes. As i found out now how to put quotes into strings (i PS>> th

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:38:23 +0100, you wrote: [...] PS> but the subject shows at the end a CRLF displayed as two additional PS> black boxes. As i found out now how to put quotes into strings (i PS> thought i've tried that earlier...) i finally applied your PS> suggestion to not use a

Re: re's and regexp's

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 17:57:44 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > >%Subject=""%Subject=(%SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)"%REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ"Re: > %SUBPATT="3") > I don't know whether this should work, as the parameter for %Subject > has three lines, and I have just concatenated them.

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi there! On 16 Dec 99, at 14:35, Jast wrote about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's": > > It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see > > how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps > > currently don&

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi there! On 17 Dec 99, at 10:16, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's": > OK, let's see. Let's:-) > PS> %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" > PS> %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" > PS> Re: %SUBPA

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, on Friday, December 17, 1999, 4:02:13 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS>>> The normal way to replace the subject of a message is PS>>> %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This was the original subject)" >> Not quite. In Z notation, what you want is: PS> What's Z notation? It's a mathematic

Re: re's and regexp's

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:16:14 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS>> The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like: PS>> %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" PS>> %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" PS>> Re: %SUBPA

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Morning Alexander V. Kiselev, > It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see > how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps > currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-( From the new version announcement of 1.38: [+] %REPLYCOUNTER/%ORER

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

Hi Peter, OK, let's see. on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS> The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like: PS> %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" PS> %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" PS> Re: %SUBPATT="3" I will trust you on this, as I h

Re: re's and regexp's

On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:19:27 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the >> AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a >> Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros? > It's *very* easy indeed to co

Re: re's and regexp's

Hi there! On 16 Dec 99, at 3:19, I wrote about "Re: re's and regexp's": > ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast! > > ÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ > ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's": Whoops, seems that it's really time to go to bed for me:-) My

Re: re's and regexp's

ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast! ÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's": > Morning sirs, > > I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the > AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a > Re[x]

re's and regexp's

Morning sirs, I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros? A subject line with "AW: AW: AW: AW: AW:" or even "Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW:" in front of