Re: Quoting text after signature delimiter

Feli Wilcke: > Hello Luca, > On Wed, 13 May 2015 16:08:06 +0200GMT Luca wrote: > > L> With TB's text editor, it seems there is no way to paste quoted text > including > L> a signature delimiter into a reply or a new message. Either F4 or alt+ins > L> past

Re: Quoting text after signature delimiter

Hello Luca, On Wed, 13 May 2015 16:08:06 +0200GMT Luca wrote: L> With TB's text editor, it seems there is no way to paste quoted text including L> a signature delimiter into a reply or a new message. Either F4 or alt+ins L> paste all the text before the delimiter, while the

Re: Quoting text after signature delimiter

Hello Luca, Wednesday, May 13, 2015, 5:55:10 PM, among other things, you wrote: L> Now, if in 3) you use alt+ins instead of ctrl+v, to paste text as quotes, you L> get nothing. No text is pasted at all. That's the problem, can you confirm? Here, it pastes the text with quotes, but it does not pa

Re: Quoting text after signature delimiter

Roger Phillips: >> Hello Luca, >> >> Wednesday, May 13, 2015, 4:08:06 PM, among other things, you wrote: >> >> Is there a way to get a text portion including a signature delimiter quoted >> into a reply? > Yes, I copied and pasted the bottom part of

Re: Quoting text after signature delimiter

Hello Luca, Wednesday, May 13, 2015, 4:08:06 PM, among other things, you wrote: Is there a way to get a text portion including a signature delimiter quoted into a reply? Thanx. -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Yes, I copied and pasted the bottom part of your message into an

Quoting text after signature delimiter

With TB's text editor, it seems there is no way to paste quoted text including a signature delimiter into a reply or a new message. Either F4 or alt+ins paste all the text before the delimiter, while the part after the delimiter doesn't get pasted. Is there a way to get a text portion

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hello Stephane, On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:32:08 +0200 GMT (23/06/2005, 20:32 +0700 GMT), Stephane Bouvard [ML] wrote: SBM> All the links i have are in french, No prob. SBM> You can also have some informations here : SBM> http://www.belgium.be - search with "eid" Government PR. The following site

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hi, ,- - [ Le mercredi 15 juin 2005 vers 3:52 Thomas Fernandez écrivait: ] - - | SBM>> My problem is that i have an official national certificate : in SBM>> Belgium, we now have an electronic identity card, with an SBM>> included certificate (wich need the card, a card reader, a pin SBM>> code,...

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hello Stephane, On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:31:57 +0200 GMT (15/06/2005, 01:31 +0700 GMT), Stephane Bouvard [ML] wrote: SBM> My problem is that i have an official national certificate : in SBM> Belgium, we now have an electronic identity card, with an SBM> included certificate (wich need the card, a c

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hi, ,- - [ Le mardi 17 mai 2005 vers 16:37 Leif Gregory écrivait: ] - - | > However, (you knew that was coming didn't you! ), to address > your S/MIME issue. I'm not quite sure what the exact problem is, but > if you'd like you can get a free personal e-mail certificate from > www.thawte.com or at

Re[2]: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Leif wrote on Dienstag, 17. Mai 2005, 16:37: > However, (you knew that was coming didn't you! ), to address > your S/MIME issue. I'm not quite sure what the exact problem is, but > if you'd like you can get a free personal e-mail certificate from > www.thawte.com or at least you used to be able to

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hello Stephane, Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 7:02:53 AM, you wrote: S> I would like to sign my messages using S/MIME, but TB does not S> recognize my official/legal certificate :( But it will not change S> anything, the add is imposed by internal rules. We understand your plight. With regards to this r

Re: Signature delimiter (Was: TB 3.5 - Bug with view by thread)

Hi, ,- - [ Le lundi 16 mai 2005 vers 14:17 Roelof Otten écrivait: ] - - | > > Please keep your entire signature under your signature delimiter. TB does not recognise two signature delimiter, and there is already one added by the add, so it does'nt change anything... but if you w

Re[3]: signature delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Cyrille, Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 4:16:07 AM, Cyrille wrote: C> This means that there must be a ISP in the *outgoing* chain of my usual C> *SMTP* server who strips my end of line spaces away. There is a convention about _trailing_ spaces be

Re: signature delimiter

Marck D Pearlstone wrote in : > It's a recognised convention that has migrated from usenet to email > and is used by (est.) 90% of mail client software. It isn't in an > RFC as such (at least, a 20 minute Google didn't reveal it) The RFC writers are reluctant to say what sh

Re: signature delimiter

Dear Ludovic, @26-May-2004, 13:36 +0200 (26-May 12:36 UK time) Ludovic LE MOAL [LLM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Andre: LLM>>> There won't be any problem for people who haven't a signature. >> But for people with a signature. tb ignores all delimiters but the last >> one. LLM> Oh ok. On Us

Re: signature delimiter

Hi, On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 11:28:22 AM, Andre Wichartz wrote: LLM>> Just a suggestion about signature delimiter : why not adding it just LLM>> before LLM>> LLM>> Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using T

Re: signature delimiter

Hi Ludovic, On Wed, 26 May 2004, at 09:48:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:48 AM where I live) you wrote: LLM> Just a suggestion about signature delimiter : why not adding it LLM> just before LLM> There won't be any problem for people who haven't a signature. TB will ignore ever

Re: signature delimiter

Hi, On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 11:00:34 AM, Cyrille wrote: > Is this signature delimiter thing ("line break - dash - dash - space - > line break") a recognized Internet standard or just a TB convention ? On Usenet, it is. -- Ludovic LE MOAL (Quimper - France) http://www.

Re: signature delimiter

ng space after the two dashes. C> Is this signature delimiter thing ("line break - dash - dash - space - C> line break") a recognized Internet standard or just a TB C> convention ? It's a recognised convention that has migrated from usenet to email and is used by (est.) 90% o

Re: signature delimiter

was most of the time the missing space after the two dashes. C> Is this signature delimiter thing ("line break - dash - dash - space - C> line break") a recognized Internet standard or just a TB convention ? C> [No sig and no delimiter...] That's why I had to cut the li

Re: signature delimiter

Hello Ludovic, On 26 May 2004 at 09:48:40 +0200 GMT [09:48 CEST] you wrote: LLM> Just a suggestion about signature delimiter : why not adding it just LLM> before LLM> LLM> Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re[2]: signature delimiter

Hello Leif, Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 11:19:50 PM, you wrote: LG> Turn on the rich text viewer in: LG> Options, Preferences, Viewer/Editor, and set the "View plaintext LG> messages" to Rich Text/HTML viewer. That's interesting. Now I have the proof that all my messages you complaint about were sent

Re: signature delimiter

Hello, Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 10:58:09 PM, you wrote: C> During the last three days about 10% of the list traffic has been C> about wrong signature delimiters. (!!) C> The problem was most of the time the missing space after the two dashes. Is this signature delimiter thing ("lin

Re: signature delimiter

Hi, On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 10:58:09 PM, Cyrille wrote: > During the last three days about 10% of the list traffic has been > about wrong signature delimiters. (!!) > The problem was most of the time the missing space after the two dashes. Just a suggestion about signature delimi

Re: signature delimiter

not. If you do a set and forget like I do, then you'll not have to check. Place the signature delimiter in your templates for the list. The template will nicely preserve them. When you generate a new message or reply, just stay away from editing the signature with its delimiter. :) -- -=[

Re: signature delimiter

Hi Cyrille, On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 22:58:09 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:58 PM where I live) you wrote: C> In theory the mistake might be at 4 different places: C> 1) the end-user, Possible. C> 2) TB, Possible, but unlikely. C> 3) the Internet service provider Possible. C> 4) the moderator. Ve

Re: signature delimiter

ON Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 10:58:09 PM, you wrote: C> -2) To be honest, I do not know how to check whether I have the space C> after the two dashes. The praised "free caret" or "virtual space" C> method of MicroEd makes it impossible to know whether you have a space C> at the end of a line or not.

signature delimiter

Hello Mr Moderator, During the last three days about 10% of the list traffic has been about wrong signature delimiters. (!!) The problem was most of the time the missing space after the two dashes. In theory the mistake might be at 4 different places: 1) the end-user, 2) TB, 3) the Internet servi

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

Hello Tony, On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:09:38 GMT GMT (03/12/2003, 16:09 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: >> I'm just curious > Very dangerous, especially if your a cat. About half an hour ago, I was asked about my three favourite animals. Cats come up first. >> Again...just curious!! > Are you sure yo

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:21:44 -0800, Matt Thoene wrote : > Please don't take this the wrong way We won't. > I'm just curious Very dangerous, especially if your a cat. > Why are we having discussions about Pocomail's capabilities on The Bat! > mailing list? Because I've been on this list for yea

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 @ 2:06:32 PM [-0700], Simon Fincham wrote: > Pocomail Please don't take this the wrong way...I'm just curious. Why are we having discussions about Pocomail's capabilities on The Bat! mailing list? Simon/Tony/others...do you guys use TB AND Pocomail? Again...just curio

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:19:43 -0700, Leif Gregory wrote : > > Nope same problem. Marck is king. all hail the king! Er Marck. Mrck?... No sorry, never heard of him! Tony. Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silv

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

Hi Simon, @2-Dec-2003, 22:06 Simon Fincham said to tbudl: >> Would you like to shoot a message using Pocomail to one of the >> other TB lists as a test? > Sure. I have also tested sending to a friends E-Mail, they use ' > Thunderbird ' which seems to handle ' Pocomail ' output OK. > Let's see

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

Hello Simon, Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 3:06:32 PM, you wrote: SF> Let's see what happens? SF> -- SF> Regards, SF> Simon Fincham Nope same problem. Marck is king. all hail the king! -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.01.56 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

Hi Simon, on Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:06:32 GMTGMT (02.12.03, 23:06 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : >> Would you like to shoot a message using Pocomail to one of the >> other TB lists as a test? SF> Sure. I have also tested sending to a friends E-Mail, they use ' SF> Thunderbird

Signature delimiter - Test

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:56:12 -0700, Leif Gregory wrote: > I checked back through my archives to see if you'd posted to one of > the TB lists (other than TBOT) using Pocomail to see. I didn't find > any. > > Would you like to shoot a message using Pocomail to one of the > other TB lists as a test? S

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

On Sunday, November 2, 2003 at 10:19:06 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote in the message "Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dash-dash-space is defined in one of the RFCs. It is defined in RFC 2646: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Hello net5zero, On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 02:32:26 -0500 GMT (02/11/2003, 14:32 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> There are two different philosophies about the sig delimiter. One is to >> set it below your name, and this comes from the usenet: some clients >> have the option to not show what is b

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

On Sunday, November 2, 2003, 15:39:14, Douglas Hinds wrote: > Pegasus (and maybe Eudora) also uses the same signature delimiter, I > believe. Dash-dash-space is defined in one of the RFCs. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ http://deepthought.ena.si/

Mod: Cut mark (was: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter)

chael. Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a , i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without the signature and list footers since everything below and including the sig delimiter is excluded when

Re[3]: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Hello Michael & other TB! list members following this thread, On Saturday, November 1, 2003, Michael responded to Jonathan Angliss thusly: >> As a small note, your email appears to be missing a signature >> delimiter, or cut mark. This mark (shown just above my name) is >

Mod: OverQuoting (was: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter)

Net5zero, [N] wrote: N> Where do you set this option in v1.62? Ooops! Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out net5zero. Please trim replies to con

Re[2]: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Saturday, November 01, 2003, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Michael, > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:01:27 -0700 GMT (01/11/2003, 23:01 +0700 GMT), > Michael S. Greenbaum wrote: >> I've never heard of the signature delimiter you describe above. Is >> this a

Re: Re[2]: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

ing TB ;) > > As a small note, your email appears to be missing a signature > > delimiter, or cut mark. This mark (shown just above my name) is in the > > format of [dash][dash][space][enter] ("-- "). > > I've never heard of the signature delimiter you describe abo

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Hi Edgar, @1-Nov-2003, 17:42 +0100 (01-Nov 16:42 UK time) Edgar said to Thomas: >> some clients have the option to not show what is below it. TB can >> be set that way, too. > How can you do that? The Rich Text View mode allows you to configure the font / style / colour used to show the signatu

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, On Saturday, November 1, 2003, 5:24:04 PM, you wrote: > There are two different philosophies about the sig delimiter. One is to > set it below your name, and this comes from the usenet: some clients > have the option to not show what is

Re: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Hello Michael, On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:01:27 -0700 GMT (01/11/2003, 23:01 +0700 GMT), Michael S. Greenbaum wrote: > I've never heard of the signature delimiter you describe above. Is > this a custom or requirement for The Bat mailing list? It's an internet standard adopted by TB

Re[2]: Purchased v2 - how do i get it - Changed to Signature Delimiter

Jonathan: Thanks for your help. I did find the download, and this morning, I got my registration key. Guess I was just too anxious. On Saturday, November 01, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > As a small note, your email appears to be missing a signature > delimiter, or cut mark. Thi

Re[2]: Signature Delimiter

Hello Jonathan, Friday, July 12, 2002, 8:46:44 AM, you wrote: >> Until this list, I never knew the importance of the sig >> delimiter. I don't know if -- is TB standard or if it is >> USENET, etc. JA> The actual delimiter is --. I think it's a standard thing, JA> and listed somewhere, wouldn

Re: Signature Delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, July 12, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > Hello ListBuds, > Until this list, I never knew the importance of the sig > delimiter. I don't know if -- is TB standard or if it is > USENET, etc. The actual delimiter is --. I think it's a s

Signature Delimiter

Hello ListBuds, Until this list, I never knew the importance of the sig delimiter. I don't know if -- is TB standard or if it is USENET, etc. I wish that groups such as yahoo would adopt it though.. have you ever looked through their emails! just think of the wasted storage of those silly signatu

Re: signature delimiter

Hello role+the, 06. maj 2002, 20:41:20, you wrote: rtan> Typing in the TB! editor, I think trailing spaces are removed from rtan> lines too, and I only ever type just a "--", which seems to work in my rtan> experience so far. Is this "deprecated-but-supported" maybe? Trailing spaces seem to be

Re[2]: signature delimiter

Jernej, JS> No, it's standard (if you look at Agent or Gravity [which are JS> primarily newsreaders, but can be used for e-mail, too], they JS> always add signatures below "-- "). Actually the only mailer I JS> know that doesn't support -- is Outlook (Express) - it will remove JS> all trailing sp

Re: signature delimiter

signed document or mail. So, the only thing The Bat has to do ist do display the verified Mail instead of the originally received one. By doing so, the PGP-Header und Footer would not be displayed, and the signature delimiter will work. I used PMMail in my old OS/2-days, and when I remember corr

Re[2]: signature delimiter

El domingo 5 de mayo de 2002, 20.24, Melissa Reese decía: MR> Since PGP *does* use the dashes, it needs to recognize the five dashes MR> in its headers and footers in order to find "valid" PGP material. In MR> order to not get confused, during clear signing, it adds a dash/space MR> ("- ") in the

Re: signature delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 2:29:42 PM PST, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: > so, if it's standard, anyone knows why PGP destroys de delimiter when > you sign a message? I can only give you a partial answer to "why?"... I guess you'd have to ask Phil Zimme

Re[2]: signature delimiter

El domingo 5 de mayo de 2002, 17.15, Jernej Simončič decía: RMR>> Is TB the only program that uses the "-- " as a signature delimiter? JS> No, it's standard (if you look at Agent or Gravity [which are primarily JS> newsreaders, but can be used for e-mail, too], the

Re: signature delimiter

On Sun, 5 May 2002, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: > Is TB the only program that uses the "-- " as a signature delimiter? > No... Pine respects them too... And I think there is a standard for it somewhere... I vaugly remember reading something on it anyway. -- Jonathan Angliss (

Re: signature delimiter

Hello Ricardo, 05. maj 2002, 21:47:44, you wrote: RMR> Is TB the only program that uses the "-- " as a signature delimiter? No, it's standard (if you look at Agent or Gravity [which are primarily newsreaders, but can be used for e-mail, too], they always add signatures belo

signature delimiter

Is TB the only program that uses the "-- " as a signature delimiter? -- Ricardo M. Reyes (Mar del Plata - Argentina) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usando The Bat! 1.60c Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com U

Re: Signature delimiter

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 18:18:08 +, Simon wrote: > Hmmm. Ironic that you use that. :) >> This point used to be brought up before, quite often, but some >> subscribers took offense to the request and this may be why it hasn't >> been brought up for some time. Since I have noted

Re: Signature delimiter

Allie, dia duit! On Sunday 19/03/2000 you posted the following comments to TB!UDL @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > This point used to be brought up before, quite often, but some > subscribers took offense to the request and this may be why it hasn't > been brought up for some time. Since I hav

Signature delimiter

Hi, For the new subscribers, TB! supports a signature delimiter which is very useful for this list. It's a '' as shown in my signature. Of course the space, which is an absolute requirement as the dashes are for the signature delimiter to work, is not visible. An