Hi,
It's been a while since I've last used TB! seriously (lack of IMAP
spam filtering was too much of a hassle). Has this front improved at
all? If not, what do you IMAP users out there use?
--
Thanks,
Kevin
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using
Hallo Kevin,
On Thu, 18 May 2006 09:59:44 -0400GMT (18-5-2006, 15:59 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
KJM It's been a while since I've last used TB! seriously (lack of IMAP
KJM spam filtering was too much of a hassle). Has this front improved at
KJM all? If not, what do you IMAP users out
Roelof,
On 18-05-2006 16:20, you [RO] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RO Even though I'm using POP3, I'm using server side spam filtering. I
RO can't imagine any IMAP user using something else.
I have to. My host does not have server side.
Exception is SpamAssassin filtering which puts my spam
On 5/18/06, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though I'm using POP3, I'm using server side spam filtering. I
can't imagine any IMAP user using something else. Client side
filtering is rather contra productive when you're storing your message
base on the server side.
Unfortunately
Hi all
I've noticed that I'm now starting to get spams that ask for reading
confirmation and it occurred to me that some users may unknowingly have
their computers set to automatically reply to such requests, therefore
giving the spammers confirmation of a bone fide email address.
I have my
Hallo BJH,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:28:58 +GMT (17-1-2006, 11:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
B I have my system set up to prompt me before sending reading confirmations,
B but I wondered what the default TB action was and also if it was possible
B to set up a filter to ignore reading
Hi All
I finally gave up on using the bayes filtering in TB! and decided to
try K9.
It is working very well the only problem I have now is with one
newsletter I receive.
The newsletter has this header
X-Habeas-Report: Please report use of this mark in spam to...
This causes my filter to put
Hello Terry,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 at 11:21:48 -0700, (which is
16.09.2005 at 21:21:48 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
This causes my filter to put the newsletter in my spam folder since my
filter looks for the word spam in the headers.
You can try to look entire header line instead of only
Hello Zeynel,
Friday, September 16, 2005, 11:47:23 AM, you wrote:
You can try to look entire header line instead of only spam word
in headers.
Perfect...thanks for the help.
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 3.51.10
under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600
pgpGmjymnyWBL.pgp
Description: PGP
Hello Gene,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:53:29 AM, you wrote:
GB BayesIT had been working pretty well
is it the best spam plugin available?
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL'
On 5/21/04, at 1:01 AM, Gene Brown sent the following:
GB BayesIT had been working pretty well for me up until upgrading to the
GB current TB version with the built-in plug-in. I tried to bring it up to
GB speed by running through all my old junk mail as well as a collection of
GB good mail, but
Hello Jimmie,
On 21 May 2004 at 01:09:22 -0500 GMT [08:09 CEST] you wrote:
JT Go to check and see what version of BayesIT you have, I will guess that it is
JT something other than 0.4. That is what I found out, once I deleted out the
JT BayesIT that was installed with the program and put 0.4 in
On 5/21/04, at 5:25 AM, Andre Wichartz sent the following:
JT Go to check and see what version of BayesIT you have, I will guess that it is
JT something other than 0.4. That is what I found out, once I deleted out the
JT BayesIT that was installed with the program and put 0.4 in things seem to
On Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:00:44 AM, Andre wrote:
But 0.4 is pretty old and 0.5 works much better. From my experience you
have to retrain when you upgrade to 0.5, though.
When I upgraded to 0.5, I not only had to retrain, but I ended up
tanking all the files from any previous BayesIT
Hello Alex,
On 21 May 2004 at 09:12:17 -0400 GMT [15:12 CEST] you wrote:
AE When I upgraded to 0.5, I not only had to retrain, but I ended up
AE tanking all the files from any previous BayesIT installation. So, all
AE of my spambases went into the trash and then I reinstalled 0.5 and
AE then
Hello Jimmie,
On 21 May 2004 at 05:27:33 -0500 GMT [12:27 CEST] you wrote:
JT I didn't know there was an 0.5 but when I installed TB! there was a much older
JT version that it installed. Will go look for 0.5 was just there last night and
JT thought 0.4 was the latest.
The webpage isn't
On 21 May 2004 at 17:28:59 +0200 GMT [17:28 CEST] I wrote:
AW The webpage isn't up-to-date I think. Get 0.5.3 here:
AW http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar
AW There's also 0.5.4 but I think that only comes with tb! Don't ask me
AW about the differences, I'm still using 0.5.3.
So, what do those choices about Average, Maximal and Minimal
really mean? Average of what? Minimal of what?
--
Using The Bat! Version 2.10.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hello all,
Friday, May 21, 2004, Gene Brown wrote:
So, what do those choices about Average, Maximal and Minimal
really mean? Average of what? Minimal of what?
this setting is needed, if You use more antispam plugins.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using
A few days ago someone had a question about spam filtering problems
but it drifted off into a conversation about untrimmed replies, so I
thought I'd raise it again.
BayesIT had been working pretty well for me up until upgrading to the
current TB version with the built-in plug-in. I tried
Brien King wrote:
TBUDL,
I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
The Spam Filtering does not appear to be working on
TheBat!
It is not catching ANY SPAM at all.
Well, this isn't helpful, but FWIW I have the same problem. Even
setting the score to 5
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 9:07:05 AM, you wrote:
Brien King wrote:
TBUDL,
I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
The Spam Filtering does not appear to be working on
TheBat!
It is not catching ANY SPAM at all.
Well, this isn't
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 1:08:21 PM, Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LG Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
LG just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
LG instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Brien.
Getting an
Hello jwayne,
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 12:14:05 PM, you wrote:
jwayne Can they be sent to individuals rather than the whole list?
And it appears you've ignored every one dealing with the sigs.
See below:
jwayne jon
jwayne --
jwayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jwayne
TBUDL,
I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
The Spam Filtering does not appear to be working on
TheBat!
It is not catching ANY SPAM at all.
I have the Protection set at Average and to move junk
mail on a score of 60 or more.
I have marked
Hello Jan,
Select the text you want F4.
Nice... I have not seen this. Shift-F4 is nice too. You never stop
learning :).
Best regards,
Mitja Perko
Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe:
Hello James,
On Mon, 13 May 2002 22:08:52 -0400GMT (14-5-02, 4:08 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
JVH The Bat has so many things, but I feel more concentration on spam
JVH features is necessary.
I think it has lots of possibilities already.
JVH 1. The Bat needs a way to a import a large
system can work with an external
textfile containing strings.
Anyway
Sounds like you need a dedicated spam filtering system of which many
already exist. I used spam-killer for a while and it was quite
effective.
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60k | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public
JVH features is necessary.
JVH 1. The Bat needs a way to a import a large list of spam keywords and
JVH phrases.
The selective download filter system can work with an external
textfile containing strings.
Anyway
Sounds like you need a dedicated spam filtering system of which many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mitja,
@14 May 2002, 12:30:19 +0200 (11:30 UK time) Mitja Perko wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can also try free SpamWeasel. Very nice program.
moderator
Please trim your quotes to simply provide context for your
moderator
Please trim your quotes to simply provide context for your replies.
This message was a good example of over quoting.
Thank you.
/moderator
I apologize. I usually quote the message like you have seen so that
recipient can see what is it about and write at the top. In this case
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hail Mitja
On 14 May 2002 at 19:49:21 +0200 (which was 18:49 where I live) Mitja Perko
thoughtfully wrote the following
I apologize. I usually quote the message like you have seen so that
recipient can see what is it about and write at the top.
OK, guys, I need your help.
Currently, it takes a Ctrl-Shift-F plus 6 clicks to create a spam filter
for a given spam message.
Please tell me there is an easier way! Last year I received 50,000+
emails.
Thanks,
James
--
James Van Horn
President - Web Wonderland, Inc.
585-349-4722 x202
On Monday, May 13, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
The simplest and most effective spam filter is the Sherlock (process
of elimination) method as originally suggested by Steve Lamb and
explained by Allie Martin:
Process of elimination works very well... until you start getting spam
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
@13 May 2002, 14:49:26 -0400 (19:49 UK time) James Van Horn wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently, it takes a Ctrl-Shift-F plus 6 clicks to create a spam
filter for a given spam message.
Please tell me there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:
...
JA Process of elimination works very well... until you start getting
JA spam in mailing lists ;) I do fully agree with the idea though.
JA Filter all the good mail into your mail folder (like friends,
JA family,
On Monday, May 13, 2002, James Van Horn wrote...
Hi Jonathan,
I don't understand. How could I possibly filter all of the good
mail? I run a business and am contacted by new people all the time.
Most of the time, a nice quick and easy way to get rid of a lot of
mail, is check to
On Monday, May 13, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote...
That's an exceptional circumstance.
An exceptional circumstance that hits erm... about 9 of my mailing
lists ;) But they they're all high profile (see www.undernet.org).
At present my filter setup catches 99.99% of my spam messages
(~12/day)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@13 May 2002, 14:40:15 -0500 (20:40 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Process of elimination works very well... until you start getting
spam in mailing lists ;)
Best thing there is to put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Van Horn [JVH] wrote:
...
JVH I don't understand. How could I possibly filter all of the good
JVH mail? I run a business and am contacted by new people all the
JVH time.
A good penultimate filter would be one that filters messages directly
On Monday, May 13, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Hi Jonathan,
Best thing there is to put pressure on the ML admins to close the
list and restrict posting to subscribers only. More and more are
going that way all the time. We've always done that here.
Oh I understand that, but
Title: RE: Re[2]: Easier spam filtering
One easy way is to filer mail with your email address as the recipient. Another more advanced technique I am starting to make use of is to add my multiple email addresses to my entry in my address book. Since an address book entry can have multiple
Hi John,
On Monday, May 13, 2002 at 15:08:37 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
One easy way is to filer mail with your email address as the recipient.
[...]
Most spam does not have your actual email address in the To field.
That is one way to do it. You could also make use of the new $KNOWN$
folder
On 13-5-2002 at 22:10, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
filtering on keywords... making sure not to filter on words you're
likely to receive in new people's emails.
You can also make a filter for those keywords and then direct them to
your inbox.. Your own name, name of the
On 13-5-2002 at 22:44, Haico wrote:
filtering on keywords... making sure not to filter on words you're
likely to receive in new people's emails.
You can also make a filter for those keywords and then direct them to
your inbox.. Your own name, name of the company and other keywords
The Bat has so many things, but I feel more concentration on spam features
is necessary.
1. The Bat needs a way to a import a large list of spam keywords and
phrases.
2. Yahoo has a one click Block this sender feature. The Bat needs a
one click This is spam feature.
3. A point system could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Is there any way to write filtering rules to only allow mail addressed to
specific email addresses, and all others to be completely deleted - from
server as well?
I'm trying to figure out a good way to stop all the spam that arrives not
even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 24, 2001, at 2:15:56 PM, Melissa wrote:
I'm new to using The Bat!, so perhaps I just haven't been able to find
the filter that can do this.
Melissa, most will do it by using two separate filters. The very last
filter in your list should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 24, 2001, at 2:40:31 PM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Strings: e
NA Location: Anywhere
NA Presence: Yes
NA Move To: Trash
NA The second to last filter is where you filter anything that has your
NA address in
Hello,
Your instruction below is a bit unclear to me. The "regular
expressions syntax (basic)" in Bat Help does not tell me enough about
*implementation* within Bat. Can anybody help?
- - -
String: @ Location: Sender Presence: No Action: delete message.
- - - -
And I wonder, is this work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:34:55 -0400, David wrote these comments:
DRA Your instruction below is a bit unclear to me. The "regular
DRA expressions syntax (basic)" in Bat Help does not tell me enough about
DRA *implementation* within Bat. Can anybody
51 matches
Mail list logo
